Date |
Text |
2006-02-01 00:00:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| |
| SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| |
| FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| EXISTING BUILDING CODE |
| FBC*CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 |
| |
| 1.)A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE |
| FILED WITH THE CLERK OF COURTS BEFORE A |
| PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED |
| |
| 2.)SOME OF THE SHEETS ON A THIRD SET |
| OF ENGINEERING ARE NOT SEALED.ONLY TWO |
| SETS ARE REQUIRED FOR PERMITTING; EITHER |
| HAVE THE UNSEALED SHEETS SEALED OR |
| RETAIN THEM AND SUBMIT TWO SETS. |
| |
| 3.)THE SITE PLAN HAS TWO SEPARATE |
| PARCELS HIGHLIGHTED, BOTH 313 AND 309 |
| CLEMATIS AND PART OF301 CLEMATIS, |
| ENDING IN PARCEL ID NUMBERS 0170, 0180, |
| AND 0190 RESPECTIVELY.THE APPLICATION |
| IS FOR 309 CLEMATIS.CLARIFY.THE |
| IMPROVEMENT CANNOT CROSS OVER PROPERTY |
| LINES. |
| |
| 4.)THE EXISTING FLOOR PLAN PREPARED BY |
| THE ENGINEER SHOWS ONE TENANT SPACE. |
| THE ARCHITECT?S PLAN HAS A DASHED LINE |
| WHICH APPARENTLY SHOWS SCOPE OF WORK. |
| IS THIS CORRECT?OR IS THIS A WALL WITH |
| A TENANT SEPARATION?USUALLY THE DASHED |
| LINE AS SHOWN DEPICTS A 1 HOUR |
| SEPARATION.NO WALL LEGEND WAS |
| PROVIDED. |
| |
| 5.)AREA 100, OUTDOOR PATIO, IS TO |
| MATCH THE ELEVATION OF THE EXISTING |
| SIDEWALK.WHAT IS THE ELEVATION |
| DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE NEW OUTDOOR PATIO |
| AND THE FINISHED FLOOR OF THE INTERIOR |
| (ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE/EXIT)?SEE FBC11. |
| |
| 6.)WHERE IS THE EXISTING EXTERIOR WALL |
| AT THE ENTRY?IS THIS LOCATION |
| CHANGING?ARE THE FRENCH ENTRY DOORS |
| SHOWN NEW OR EXISTING?IF THEY ARE NEW, |
| PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVALS.NOTE THAT |
| IMPACT PROTECTION IS REQUIRED FBC EB |
| 507.3, FBC1609.1.4.USE OF REMOVABLE |
| SHUTTERS FOR COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS MUST |
| BE APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. |
| PLEASE CONTACT ME IF THIS IS YOUR |
| INTENT.RESUBMITTING WITH PLANS SHOWING |
| USE OF REMOVABLE SHUTTERS WITHOUT AN |
| APPROVED INSTALLATION PLAN WILL RESULT |
| IN A DELAY OF PERMIT ISSUANCE. |
| |
| 7.)NO DETAIL WAS PROVIDED FOR THE |
| WALLS/COLUMNS ON EITHER SIDE OF THE |
| ENTRY DOORS.IS THIS NEW OR EXISTING? |
| |
| 8.)DECLARE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOT AREA |
| FOR THE SPACE, OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION |
| FBC 3, OCCUPANT LOAD FBC1004, BUILDING |
| TYPE, SPRINKLED OR UNSPRINKLED. |
| |
| 9.)IF THE BUILDING IS REQUIRED TO BE |
| SPRINKLED BY CODE, SUPPLY FIRE SPRINKLER |
| PLANS. |
| |
| 10.)DECLARE GOVERNING CODE.IF |
| EXTERIOR ALTERATIONS ARE INCLUDED IN |
| THIS PROJECT, PROVIDE WIND DESIGN |
| INFORMATION FBC1603.1.4. |
| |
| 11.)WHY IS THERE A DIFFERENT WALL TYPE |
| DEPICTED BETWEEN COLUMN LINES D AND F, |
| WEST SIDE?IS THIS A WALL OR OPEN? |
| |
| 12.)SHOW ALL REQUIRED FIRE |
| SEPARATIONS, VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL, |
| AND NOTE HOW THIS RENOVATION WILL AFFECT |
| THE FIRE SEPARATIONS.SCOPE OF WORK IS |
| NOT CLEAR FROM THE PLAN. |
| |
| 13.)WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE NEW |
| COLUMNS AND BEAMS?SPECIFY DESIGN |
| LOADS.DECLARE OCCUPANCY OF THE SECOND |
| FLOOR, WHICH THIS BEAM IS NOW APPARENTLY |
| SUPPORTING. |
| |
| 14.)THE RAMP IS TO COMPLY WITH |
| FBC11-4.8.NO DETAIL OR SLOPE WAS |
| PROVIDED.IF HANDRAILS ARE REQUIRED, |
| THEY ARE TO COMPLY WITH FBC11-4.8.5. |
| PROVIDE SLOPE AND ELEVATION CHANGE.THE |
| RAMP APPEARS TO LEAD TO THE REAR AREA, |
| WHICH WOULD IMPLY THAT THE HEAVY DASHED |
| LINE IS NOT A WALL.PLEASE PROVIDE A |
| LEGEND FOR CLARIFICATION. |
| |
| 15.)PROVIDE INFORMATION IN REGARDS TO |
| THE STAGE CONSTRUCTION. |
| |
| 16.)HOW IS THE STAGE ACCESSIBLE?IT |
| IS NOT CLEAR IF THE DARK LINE IS A WALL |
| OR IF IT IS DELINEATING THE LINE BETWEEN |
| THE AREA OF WORK AND AREA NOT INCLUDED |
| IN THE REMODEL. |
| |
| 17.)SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC11-5.NO |
| DETAILS IN REGARDS TO ACCESSIBILITY WERE |
| SHOWN. |
| |