| Date |
Text |
| 2006-03-08 00:00:00 | ********** UNSAT 3RD REVIEW ************ |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE THAT THE PREVIOUS DEINED |
| | PLANS WERE NOT PICKED UP AND MADE INTO |
| | TWO COMPLETE SETS BEFORE RESUBMITTING |
| | PLANS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW, MUST PICK UP ALL OLD PLANS |
| | AND MAKE NEW SETS AND THEN RESUBMIT. |
| | THIS WILL HELP TO ALLEAVIATE ANY |
| | CONFUSION OF WHICH PLANS PASSED AND |
| | WHERE THOSE PLANS ARE/WERE. |
| | PLEASE SEE COMMENTS FROM OTHER REVIEW |
| | WHICH IS NOW FAILED AS ORIGINAL PLANS |
| | WERE NOT PICKED UP AND SUBMITTED BACK. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE NOTES BELOW AS MANY NOTES |
| | ARE THE SAME AS NOTES ON PREVIOUS REVIEW |
| | AND NEW NOTES AS RISER DIAGRAM HAS NOW |
| | CHANGED.PLEASE SEE NOTES BELOW ARE TAKEN |
| | DIRECTLY FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 1)NOTE: NOTE #1 NO, PLEASE SEE SHEETS |
| | WHICH STILL CONTAIN TITLE BLOCK,SIGNED |
| | AND DATED, HOWEVER THESE DO NOT CONTAIN |
| | THE REQUIRED RAISED SEAL. |
| | |
| | **PLEASE SEE ANY PLANS CONTAINING |
| | A TITLE BLOCK AND SIGNATURE OF AN |
| | ENGINEER SHALL BEAR THE RAISED SEAL, AND |
| | DATE BY THE SAID ENGINEER. FS471.025 |
| | |
| | 2)NOTE: NOTE #2 NO, PLEASE SEE SAME |
| | SPECS WHICH DO NOT INDICATE A MCB. |
| | |
| | **PLEASE SEE SPECS SUBMITTED DO |
| | NOT INDICATE THE USE OF AN ATS WITH A |
| | MCB . PLEASE SEE MAINS ARE NOT GROUPED |
| | PER 230.72,225.34 |
| | |
| | 3)NOTE: NOTE #3 NO, PLEAS SEE AN |
| | EQUIPMENT GRND IS BEING SHOWN FROM METER |
| | TO WHAT MAY BE THE FIRST MEANS OF |
| | DISCONNECT ?(IF ATS CONTAINS A MCB?? |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE 250.6,250.24 THE |
| | "EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTORS" ARE |
| | ONLY INSTALLED AFTER THE FIRST MEANS OF |
| | DISCONNECT. |
| | PLEASE SEE RISER SHOWS FROM METER ETC. |
| | 215.5 |
| | |
| | 4)NOTE: NOTE #4 NO, PLEASE SEE NEW SITE |
| | PLANS IS NOT CLEAR AND VISABLE FOR |
| | LOCATIONS OF EXISTING PANEL ETC. |
| | PLEASE SEE NOW RISER HAS BEEN REVISED |
| | REMOVING THE REQUIRED DISCONNECT?? |
| | ONCE AGAIN, PLEASE KNOW, A DISCONNECT |
| | WILL BE REQUIRED, GROUPED WITH OTHER |
| | MAINS,AT THE HOUSE. |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY RISER AS SHOWN. EXISTING |
| | PANEL DOES NOT INDICATE A MCB AND |
| | WHETHER OR NOT THS EXISTING PANEL(MCB?) |
| | IS GROUPED WITH NEW ATS? |
| | IT IS SUGGESTED TO CALL THIS OFFICE TO |
| | GO OVER PLANS AND SCENERIO AS SHOWN TO |
| | HELP ALLEAVIATE FURTHER REVIEWS. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE SITE PLANS DOES NOT |
| | INDICATE THE NEW GEN DISCONNECT. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE RISER SEEMS TO INDICATE |
| | THE MEANS OF DISCONNECT REQUIRED IN |
| | 225.31 AT GENERATOR? |
| | PLEASE SEE IF GEN CONTAINS A CB , THEN |
| | ONLY A DISCONNECTING MEANS IS REQUIRED |
| | AT MAIN HOUSE AND NOT OCP, ALTHOUGH OCP |
| | IS PERMITTED. |
| | |
| | 5)NOTE:NOTE #5, NO, PLEASE SEE NOTE |
| | ABOVE BEFORE REVIEW NOTES AS TO PICKING |
| | UP OF ANY OLD PLANS. |
| | |
| | **PLEASE SUBMIT TWO COMPLETE SETS |
| | OF PLANS AND SPECS FOR REVIEW AND |
| | STAMPING. |
| | PLEASE SEE ALL SHEETS WERE SUBMITTED |
| | LOOSELY AND NEED TO ATTACHED TOGETHER. |
| | |
| | 6)NOTE: NOTE #6 NO, COULD NOT LOCATE A |
| | NEW RECORDED NOC? PLEASE KNOW, THIS NEED |
| | ONLY BE SUBMITTED WHEN PICKING UP PERMIT |
| | ONCE IT IS ISSUED. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE THE NOTICE OF |
| | COMMENCMENT HAS SINCE EXPIRED PER FS |
| | 713.13(2). IF WORK HAS NOT COMMENCED |
| | WITHIN 90 DAYS OF RECORDING NOC, THE NOC |
| | SHALL BECOME VOID. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENT; |
| | |
| | 7)NOTE: PLEASE SEE FLORIDA STATUES |
| | 553.80(2))B) WITH RESPECT TO DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONALS AND REPEAT COMMENTS FOR |
| | PLANS REVIEW. PLEASE KNOW, IF PLANS COME |
| | BACK WITH ANY OF THE SAME CODE COMPLIANT |
| | COMMENTS STILL NOT ADDRESSED, THIS |
| | OFFICE SHALL ACCESSED A 4X FEE FOR THE |
| | PLAN REVIEW PORTION OF THE PERMIT FEE. |
| | SEEATTACHED COPY OF THIS FS. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION |
| | FOR REVIEW. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS |
| | PLEASE CALL. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
