Date |
Text |
2009-02-20 14:04:24 | ** DENIED REVIEW ** |
| |
| |
| |
| ** THE FOLLOWING REVIEW NOTES WERE POSTED AND ARE |
| PARTIALLY ON HOLD FOR THE ISSUES BELOW AND SITE |
| LIGHTING PERMITTING ISSUES. |
| SPOKE TO DESIGNER FROM KAMM CONSULTING AT LENGTH WITH |
| RESPECT TO PERMITTING OF SITE AND THE FACT SHEETS E.01 |
| AND 5.1 WHICH ARE IN THE SETS ARE NOT THE CORRECT |
| SHEETS. |
| THE SITE LIGHTING WAS ONLY APPLIED FOR PERMIT IN |
| FEBRUARY 2009. THIS IS TWO CODE CHANGES/REVISIONS PAST |
| ORIGINAL NOVEMBER 2005 PERMIT APPLICATION DATE. |
| THE PARKING STRUCTURE WAS APPLIED FOR PERMIT IN AUGUST |
| OF 2007. IF SITE LIGHTING IS ATTACHED TO THAT STRUCTURE |
| PERMIT, LIGHTING WOULD STILL NEED TO MEET PRESCRIPTIVE |
| REQUIREMENTS OF THE LIGHTING AT THAT TIME. |
| THE ONLY WAY TO USE THE BUILDING ALLOWANCES AS TRADE |
| OFFS FOR SITE LIGHTING WOULD BE TO REVISE THE BASE |
| BUILDING PERMIT TO INCLUDE ALL SITE LIGHTING. THE SITE |
| LIGHTING WOULD MOST LIKELY EXCEED THE PRESCRIPTIVE |
| REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE CURRENT CODE OR EVEN UNDER THE |
| PRESCRIPTIVE OF 2007. KEEP IN MIND METHOD *A* IS FOR |
| WHOLE BUILDING BY DEFINITION FOR ALL KNOWN COMPONENTS |
| NOT ONLY THE ONES CURRENTLY UNDER PERMIT WITHOUT FIRE |
| WALL SEPARATION. |
| IN DOING SO THIS WOULD NOT PERMIT THE BASE BUILDING TO |
| OBTAIN A C OF C OR C OF O. ALL SITE LIGHTING WOULD NEED |
| TO BE COMPLETE BEFORE THE FINALS COULD BE COMPLETED. |
| THIS WOULD EXTEND THE 05 PERMIT UNTIL ALL WORK IS |
| COMPLETED. |
| |
| |
| ** ORIGINAL COMMENTS ON REVISIONS: BRAMAN MOTORS |
| THESE WERE GONE OVER AT LENGTH WITH DESIGNER FROM KAMM. |
| |
| |
| 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE SHEET E0.1. THIS SHEET IS LABELED |
| FOR PHASE II SCOPE OF WORK. THIS SHEET HAS NOW BEEN |
| COMPLETELY REVISED REMOVING A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF |
| INFORMATION WHICH WAS ON PREVIOUS RECORD SET OF PLANS. |
| THERE IS NEW INFORMATION AND DETAILS. IF THIS SHEET IS |
| NOT SUPPOSE TO BE IN THIS SET WHY IS IT MARKED PHASE II |
| WHICH IS THIS PERMITTED SCOPE OF WORK? |
| WHERE IS THE ACTUAL REVISED E0.1 NEEDED? |
| THIS INFORMATION IS REQUIRED AND NEEDED ON THE PLANS IN |
| ORDER TO REVIEW FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. IT WAS THOUGHT |
| THAT PERHAPS THAT SOME OF THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION WAS |
| PLACED ON OTHER SHEETS HOWEVER THIS INFORMATION IS NOT |
| LOCATED ON ANY OF THE OTHER PLANS SUBMITTED. SEVERAL OF |
| THESE ITEMS WILL BE NOTED BELOW. |
| |
| A) THE CORRECT YEARS FOR THE CODES ARE NOW REMOVED. |
| NFPA-70, NFPA-101, NFPA-72 NOW DOES NOT HAVE ANY LISTED |
| ADOPTED EDITIONS LISTED WHICH WAS ON RECORD PLANS. |
| SHOULD BE: |
| 2002 NFPA-70 |
| 2003 NFPA-101 |
| 2002 NFPA-72 |
| |
| B) THE SHEET E0.1 IS NOW MISSING THE FIXTURE LEGEND |
| WHICH IS NEEDED TO REVIEW AND COORDINATE FIXTURES ON |
| PLANS FOR CHAPTER 13 COMPLIANCE WITH RESPECT TO ENERGY |
| CALCULATIONS. |
| THERE WERE PREVIOUS COMMENTS SPECIFIC TO THE PREVIOUSLY |
| REVISED E0.1 HOWEVER THIS SHEET NOW IN SETS DOES NOT |
| EVEN COORDINATE WITH THE RESPONSE FROM THE DESIGNER. |
| 13-415.2, 13-415.2.ABC.1.1,.1.2 AND .1.3. |
| |
| C) THE REVISED NEW SHEET E0.1 NOW HAS THE SYMBOL LEGEND |
| REMOVED. THIS IS PART OF THIS REVISED SHEET E0.1 WHICH |
| SHOULD OR SHOULD NOT BE IN THE SET. |
| |
| |
| 2) NOTE: THERE IS ALSO A REVISED/NEW SHEET E5.1 WHICH |
| IS NOT ACCURATE FOR THIS SCOPE OF WORK. IT IS LABELED |
| PHASE II WHICH IS WHAT IT IS SUPPOSED TO BE LABELED |
| HOWEVER THE SHEET DOES NOT CONTAIN THE CURRENT SCOPE OF |
| WORK. WHERE IS THE REVISED SHEET 5.1 WHICH WAS |
| ADDRESSING THE PREVIOUS COMMENTS? |
| |
| THE ACTUAL REVIEW OF SEVERAL ITEMS CAN NOT BE DONE |
| UNTIL THE REVISED PLANS ARE IN SETS FOR REVIEW. OTHER |
| SHEETS WHICH DO NOT HAVE COMMENTS AT THIS TIME SHOULD |
| BE SUBMITTED BACK WITH OTHER CORRECTED/REVISED SHEETS. |
| THESE ARE: |
| 2.1.1, 2.1.2, 3.1.1, 3.1.2, 6.1,6.2 AND 7.1. |
| |
| |
| |
| ** IMPORTANT ** |
| ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP |
| FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE |
| ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. |
| DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY |
| ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, |
| SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC. SHOULD BE PLACED |
| INTO TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. |
| PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS |
| SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. |
| THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID |
| ANY DELAYS. |
| |
| IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT |
| TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO |
| CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. |
| |
| DEWEY PALMER |
| ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II |
| CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| 561-805-6717 |
| [email protected] |
| |