Date |
Text |
2006-03-14 00:00:00 | BUILDING REVIEW CHECKLIST: |
| 1- ARCHITECT WAS ASKED TO REVIEW AND |
| APPROVE (TYPICALLLY THIS IS DONE BY |
| USING THE REVIEWED AND APPROVED STAMP), |
| NOT SIGN AND SEAL THE PRODUCT APPROVALS. |
| SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC |
| 2004. RE-SUBMIT CLEAN COPIES OF ALL THE |
| PRODUCT APPROVALS WITHOUT THE |
| ARCHITECT'S SEAL. INSTEAD ARCHITECT TO |
| USE THE STANDARD REVIEW STAMP. |
| ARCHITECT IS NOT ALLOWED TO SIGN AND |
| SEAL THE PRODUCT APPROVALS, SINCE HE'S |
| NOT THE DESIGNER. |
| |
| 2- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR 6'X8' |
| GARAGE DOOR THAT MEETS THE DESIGN |
| PRESSSURES CALCULATED BY THE ARCHITECT. |
| |
| 3- PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECS FOR ONE HOUR |
| FIRE RATED DOOR AT ATRIUM AS SPECIFIED |
| ON ARCHITECT'S PLANS. |
| |
| 4- NEED RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. |
| |
| 5- PROVIDE FLORIDA OR LOCAL PRODUCT |
| APPROVAL FOR ALL STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS |
| SPECIFIED ON PLANS AS REQUIRED BY RULE |
| 9B-72 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS. |
| SEE PLANS AND DETAILS TO FIND ALL |
| CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| |
| 6- PROVIDE TWO COPIES OF THE SAME DADE |
| COUNTY NOA SUBMITTED FOR 2" WINDOW |
| MULLION FOR FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| SEE WEBSITE WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG TO |
| DOWNLOAD SPECIFIC NOA SUBMITTED. |
| |
| 7- DRAWING A-2.0: A) UPDATE NOTE #11. |
| SEE 2004 RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| B) SPECIFY SIZE FOR ATTIC ACCESS BY |
| MASTER BEDROOM CLOSET. SEC. R807 2004 |
| RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| C) UPDATE CEILING NOTES. SEE R703.6 |
| 2004 RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| |
| 8- DRAWING A-5.0: A) CONNECTOR D |
| SPECIFIED ON ROOF FRAMING PLAN IS A WOOD |
| TO WOOD CONNECTOR. NEED WOOD TO MASONRY |
| CONNECTOR. SEE PLANS AND REVISE AS REQ'D |
| B) DETAIL 2: REVISE NUMBER OF MICROLAM |
| BEAMS. SEE ROOF FRAMING PLAN. |
| C) DETAIL 4 AND 5: SEE CATALOGUE FOR |
| CORRECT SIZE OF CONNECTOR AND SPECIFIC |
| SIZE AND TYPE OF ANCHOR TO BE USED. |
| REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| D) SPECIFY CALCULATED UPLIFT LOADS FOR |
| REAR PORCH BEAM ENDS USING CONNECTORS ON |
| DETAIL 4 AND 5. SEE PLANS. |
| E) SPECIFY CALCULATED UPLIFT LOADS FOR |
| GIRDER TRUSS THAT IS SUPPORTING GIRDER |
| TRUSSES AT ENTRY AREA. SEE PLANS. |
| F) SPECIFY CALCULATED UPLIFT LOADS FOR |
| GIRDER TRUSS BY KITCHEN DESK. SEE PLANS. |
| G) SPECIFY CALCULATED UPLIFT LOADS FOR |
| GIRDER TRUSS ABOVE BREAKFAST AREA AND |
| NEXT TO GIRDER TRUSS NAMED ON ITEM E) |
| ABOVE. SEE PLANS FOR COMMENTS. |
| H) ROOF FRAMING PLAN AT ENTRY AREA HAS |
| TWO DIFFERENT DETAILS 4/D1 AND 7/A-5. |
| PROVIDE ONLY THE DETAIL THAT APPLIES FOR |
| THE ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION. AND MAKE SURE |
| CORRECT TRUSS CONNECTOR IS SPECIFIED. |
| I) DETAIL 9/A-5 SHOWN ON ROOF FRAMING |
| PLAN BY THE ENTRY AREA DOESN'T APPLY TO |
| THIS JOB. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| |
| 9- DRAWING D-1: A) REVISE SECTION |
| SPECIFIED ON TYPICAL WALL SECTION FOR |
| TERMITE PROTECTION. SEE 2004 FLORIDA |
| RESIDENTIAL CODE FOR CORRECT SECTION. |
| B) DETAIL 5: HETA 20 CONNECTOR IS |
| SHOWN AS ATTACHED TO BEAM. SEE CATALOGUE |
| FOR PROPER HETA INSTALLATION AND REVISE |
| AS REQUIRED. |
| C) SPECIFY SPACING REQUIRED FOR HETA |
| 20 SPECIFIED ON DETAIL 5. |
| D) WOOD ARCH FRAMING DETAILS DON'T |
| MATCH DETAILS SHOWN FOR ENTRY. SEE ROOF |
| FRAMING PLAN. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| E) GLASS BLOCK DETAIL NOTE SAYS "GLASS |
| BLOCK SHALL CONFORM TO SBC 2704.10". |
| UPDATE NOTE AS REQUIRED. SEE 2004 |
| RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| F) ONE AND TWO FAMILY DWELLINGS DON'T |
| REQUIRE HANDICAPPED TOILET FIXTURES. |
| REVISE/CLARIFY NOTE AS REQUIRED. |
| |
| 10- DRAWINGS D-2 AND D-3 HAVE THE TITLE |
| BLOCK OF MCCARTHY AND ASSOCIATES INC. |
| CONSULTING ENGINEER'S. ENGINEER |
| RESPONSIBLE FOR THESE DRAWINGS TO |
| PROVIDE ALL HIS INFORMATION AND TO SIGN |
| AND SEAL DRAWINGS AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER |
| 471 FLORIDA STATUTES AND FLORIDA |
| ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. |
| |
| 11- DRAWINGS D-1 AND D-3 HAVE DIFFERENT |
| DETAILS FOR GARAGE DOOR STRUTURAL BUCK |
| ANDDOORS AND WINDOWS STRUCTURAL BUCKS. |
| PROVIDE ONLY THE ACTUAL DETAILS THAT |
| APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. |
| |
| 12- ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE DONE |
| FOR WORST CASE SCENARIO OR BE SPECIFIC |
| TO THE ACTUAL ORIENTATION OF THE HOUSE. |
| INFORMATION SUBMITTED IS NOT FOR WORST |
| CASE SCENARIO AND IT DOESN'T MATCH |
| ACTUAL ORIENTATION OF HOUSE. SEE SURVEY |
| AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| PROVIDE CORRECT CALCULATIONS. |
| |
| 13- ARCHITECT TO SPECIFY ROOF TILE |
| FASTENING AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.1.1.2 |
| CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| |
| 14- PLEASE RETURN REVIEWED SET AFTER |
| CORRECTIONS ARE DONE TO ORIGINAL |
| DRAWINGS TO EXPEDITE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| |
| JULIO GOMEZ |
| BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| (561)805-6712 |