| Date |
Text |
| 2006-08-23 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | PERMIT: 05110836 |
| | ADD: 1122 PALM BEACH LAKES |
| | CONT: POMEROY ELECTRIC, INC. |
| | TEL: (954)427-0705 |
| | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS |
| | |
| | 1ST REVIEW |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | 1) THE WIND LOAD CALCULATIONS INDICATE |
| | THE DESIGN CRITERIA AS ASCE 7-04. THE |
| | 2004 FBC BUILDING USES ASCE 7-02 SEE |
| | CHAPTER 35 FOR REFRENCED STANDARDS. |
| | |
| | 2) SHEET 2OF 7 S1 USES 8/3 WHICH SHOULD |
| | BE 9/3. |
| | |
| | 3) SHEET 3OF 7 PAGES 37' POLE, (POLE |
| | TYPE I) INDICATE SOME TYPE OF TAMPERING |
| | WITH THE PRINTED NUMBERS. THE PRINTED OR |
| | TAMPERED NUMBERS REPRESENT A 37' POLE |
| | INSAND WHERE AS THE DIAGRAM AT LEFT |
| | INDICATES A 34'-0" OVERALL LENGTH. |
| | EMBEDMENT IN SAND.106.1.2* |
| | |
| | 4) WHAT DOES EPA STAND FOR? WHY IS THE |
| | 120 & 150 MPH WIND ZONES ELIMINATED |
| | WHEREAS THE TYPE II POLE HASA ALL 3 |
| | CATAGORIES FILED IN? AGAIN TAMPERED |
| | WITH.106.1.2* |
| | |
| | 5) SHEET POLE TYPE II, 37' EMBEDMENT IN |
| | ROCKWHY IS THERE A DIFERENCE IN WEIGHT |
| | |
| | IF BOTH POLE TYPE 1 & POLE TYPE II BOTH |
| | ARE 37' LONG, A 280 LB DIFFERENCE? |
| | 106.1.2* |
| | |
| | 6) THE ES-1 SHEEET DOES NOT INDICATE IF |
| | THE POLES TO BE USED ARE A 37' TYPE I |
| | POLE OR A 37' TYPE II POLE? ADDITIONAL |
| | INFORMATION? 106.1.2* |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | JIM WITMER |
| | TEL: (561)805-6715 |
| | FAX: (561)659-8026 |
| | |
