Date |
Text |
2006-08-27 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| *******DENIED******* |
| ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6652 |
| E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| |
| FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 |
| FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND) |
| F.S.= FLORIDA (STATE) STATUTE |
| |
| FOR CONSISTENCY, THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS |
| ARE NUMBERED AS PER THE BUILDING PLAN |
| REVIEW OF 7/23/06: |
| |
| 6) PRODUCT APPROVALS.SUBMITTAL OF |
| PRODUCT APPROVALS IS NOTED. ONLY ONE |
| COPY OF EACH PRODUCT APPROVAL HAS BEEN |
| SUBMITTED AT THIS STAGE.THREE COPIES |
| WILL BE REQUIRED FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE. |
| EACH PRODUCT APPROVAL SHALL HAVE A |
| STATEWIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER SHEET. |
| ALTERNATIVELY, AN APPLICATION FOR LOCAL |
| PRODUCT APPROVAL WILL BE REQUIRED.THE |
| FOLLOWING COMMENTS APPLY TO THE |
| SUBMITTED PRODUCT APPROVALS: |
| (A)MODIFIED BITUMEN ROOFING SYSTEM. |
| SUBMITTAL OF THE ENHANCED FASTENER |
| DENSITY CALCULATIONS IS NOTED.THE |
| CONTENT IS OK BUT THE SIGNATURES ARE |
| PHOTOCOPIED AND EACH COPY MUST HAVE THE |
| AN ORIGINAL 'WET' SIGNATURE OF DONALD |
| FLOOD, P.E.ALSO, PER THE 8/25/06 |
| MEETING WITH ARTURO PENA, THREE COPIES |
| OF THE REFERENCED JOHNS MANVILLE PRODUCT |
| APPROVAL NOA# 04-0401.04 WILL BE |
| SUBMITTED.THE PRODUCT APPROVAL MUST BE |
| MARKED OR SEPARATED TO SHOW WHICH SYSTEM |
| IS PROPOSED (THE CALCULATIONS REFERENCE |
| THE SYSTEM ON PAGE 30). |
| (B)ROOF TILE:SUBMITTAL OF THE |
| ALTUSA 'S' PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA# |
| 05-0901.06 IS NOTED.ALSO, SUBMITTAL OF |
| THE TILE ATTACHMENT CALCULATIONS IS |
| NOTED.THE CONTENT OF THE CALCULATION |
| PACKAGE IS OK BUT THE SIGNATURES ARE |
| PHOTOCOPIED AND EACH COPY MUST HAVE THE |
| ORIGINAL 'WET' SIGNATURE OF DONALD |
| FLOOD, P.E. |
| (C)EXTERIOR DOORS. SEE COMMENT 6(J) |
| THRU 6(N). |
| (D)STOREFRONT.THE SUBMITTED ARCH |
| ALUMINUM SERIES L-300 IMPACT WALL |
| STOREFRONT PRODUCT NOA# 01-0619.01 |
| STATES A MAXIMUM UNIT HEIGHT OF 144". |
| THIS IS NOT SUFFICIENT TO COVER THE SIZE |
| OF STOREFRONT SPECIFIED ON SHEETS A-4.1 |
| AND A-4.2 OF THE PLANS.PER THE 8/25/06 |
| MEETING WITH GLASS ENGINEERING INC., |
| STRUCTURAL MULLIONS WILL BE INCORPORATED |
| AND SHEETS A-4.1 AND A-4.2 WILL BE |
| AMENDED TO REFLECT THIS AND CALL FOR |
| SHOP DRAWINGS 'BY OTHERS' TO BE |
| SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. |
| (E)SLIDING GLASS DOORS.THE |
| SUBMITTED MIAMI WALL SYSTEMS SERIES 100 |
| SLIDING GLASS DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA# |
| 01-0123.02 HAS A MAXIMUM DOOR HEIGHT OF |
| 102".DOOR SCHEDULE SHEET A-4.1 SHOWS A |
| PROPOSED SLIDING GLASS DOOR HEIGHT OF |
| 10'-0" WHICH EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM COVERED |
| BY THE PRODUCT APPROVAL.PER THE |
| 8/25/06 MEETING WITH GLASS ENGINEERING |
| INC., THEY WILL BE APPLYING FOR A ONE |
| TIME PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE 10'-0" |
| DOOR AND WILL PROVIDE THREE COPIES OF |
| THE APPLICATION FORM/LETTER SO THAT A |
| PROVISO MAY BE GIVEN. |
| (F)SINGLE HUNG WINDOW.THE |
| SUBMITTED MIAMI WALL SERIES 122 ALUMINUM |
| SINGLE HUNG WINDOW PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA# |
| 03-1008.03 HAS A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 72". |
| WINDOW SCHEDULE SHEET A-4.2 SHOWS SINGLE |
| HUNG WINDOW HEIGHTS UP TO 9'-4" WHICH |
| EXCEED THE MAXIMUM COVERED BY THE |
| PRODUCT APPROVAL.PER THE 8/25/06 |
| MEETING WITH GLASS ENGINEERING INC., |
| THEY WILL BE APPLYING FOR A ONE TIME |
| PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE 9'-4" HIGH |
| WINDOW AND WILL PROVIDE THREE COPIES OF |
| THE APPLICATION FORM/LETTER SO THAT A |
| PROVISO MAY BE GIVEN. |
| (G) FIXED WINDOW.IT IS NOTED THAT |
| FIXED WINDOW COVERED BY THE SUBMITTED |
| MIAMI WALL PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA# |
| 04-0322.09 WILL BE USED UNDER THE SINGLE |
| HUNG WINDOWS TO FORM THE 'SINGLE HUNG |
| WINDOW OVER FIXED WINDOW' CONFIGURATION. |
| AN APPROPRIATE MULLION PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| MUST BE SUBMITTED OR SHEET A-4.2 SHALL |
| BE AMENDED TO SHOW THAT A STRUCTURAL |
| MULLION IS TO BE INCORPORATED AND THAT |
| SHOP DRAWINGS WILL BE SUBMITTED 'BY |
| OTHERS' FOR REVIEW. |
| (H)MULLIONS. SEE COMMENTS (D) & (G). |
| (I)IF THERE IS A STATEWIDE PRODUCT |
| APPROVAL THAT COVERS ANY OF THE |
| SUBMITTED PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA'S, THE |
| STATEWIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER SHEET |
| MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE FRONT OF THE |
| NOA. |
| (J)STOREFRONT DOOR.PER THE 8/25/06 |
| MEETING WITH GLASS ENGINEERING INC. THE |
| 9'-0" STOREFRONT DOOR IS NOT AVAILABLE |
| SO SHEET A-4.1 MUST BE AMENDED TO REDUCE |
| THE HEIGHT OF THE STOREFRONT DOORS. |
| (K)LOUVER DOOR.BOTH THE COVER |
| SHEET AND PAGE 41 OF THE SUBMITTED |
| INTERTEK TESTING SERVICES REPORT# |
| 3080611 STATE THAT THE MAXIMUM DESIGN |
| PRESSURE FOR THE LOUVER DOOR IS +60 PSF |
| AND -60 PSF.THE MINIMUM REQUIRED |
| DESIGN PRESSURE REQUIRED FOR THIS |
| PROJECT IS +70 PSF AND - 70 PSF.SUBMIT |
| AN ALTERNATIVE PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| (L)SINGLE HOLLOW METAL DOOR.THE |
| SUBMITTED CURRIES PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA# |
| 01.1102.02 IS FOR A 7'-0" HIGH DOOR. |
| SHEET A-4.1 SHOWS DOOR TYPE 10 AS AN |
| 8'-0" HIGH DOOR.SUBMIT AN ALTERNATIVE |
| PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| (M)DOUBLE HOLLOW METAL DOOR.THE |
| SUBMITTED CURRIES PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA# |
| 02-0924.04 IS OK BUT TWO OF THE |
| AVAILABLE OPTIONS HAVE DESIGN PRESSURES |
| WHICH ARE LESS THAN THE MINIMUM +70 PSF |
| AND - 70 PSF REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT. |
| THOSE TWO OPTIONS MUST BE STRUCK FROM |
| ALL THREE COPIES OF THE PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| THAT ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMITTING. |
| (N)ROLL UP DOOR.THE SUBMITTED |
| CORNELL IRON WORKS INC. PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| NOA# 03-0925.07 IS HARDLY LEGIBLE (POOR |
| COPY) BUT APPEARS TO STATE A MAXIMUM |
| DESIGN PRESSURE OF +60 PSF AND -60 PSF. |
| THE MINIMUM REQUIRED DESIGN PRESSURE |
| REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT IS +70 PSF AND |
| - 70 PSF.SUBMIT AN ALTERNATIVE PRODUCT |
| APPROVAL. |
| |
| 16) FBC 411.2.3VEHICLE IMPACT |
| WALLS/GUARDRAILS. CONTRARY TO THE |
| COMMENT RESPONSE DATED 7/28/06, WALL |
| TYPE W-30, SHOWN AT THE NORTH WALL OF |
| THE PARKING GARAGE ON 2ND FLOOR FRAMING |
| PLAN SHEET S-1.01, SEPARATES AREAS OF |
| DIFFERENT FLOOR SLAB LEVEL.ON ONE SIDE |
| IS THE 2ND FLOOR PARKING AND ON THE |
| OTHER SIDE IS THE VOID ABOVE THE 1ST |
| FLOOR COMMMERCIAL SPACE TO THE NORTH. |
| IN FACT SHEET S-1.01 STATES "SLAB EDGE" |
| AT THIS LOCATION.WALL TYPE W-30 IS A |
| PARKING IMPACT WALL AND SHOULD BE SHOWN |
| AS SUCH ON THE SHEET S-4-4.1 WALL |
| SCHEDULE. |
| |
| 28) TO EXPEDITE REVIEW OF A RESUBMITTAL |
| WHICH REQUIRES NEW PLANS IN ORDER TO |
| ADDRESS THE ABOVE COMMENTS, THE OLD |
| SHEETS SHALL BE REMOVED AND THE NEW |
| SHEETS INSERTED.ONE COPY OF EACH OLD |
| SHEET SHOULD BE STAPLED/CLIPPED TO THE |
| REMAINING OLD SHEETS, TO FORM A SET OF |
| 'OLD/VOID SHEETS', FOR COMPARISON OF |
| REVISIONS WHEN REVIEWING THE RESUBMITTED |
| PLANS. |
| |
| |
| **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** |
| |
| END OF REVIEW COMMENTS |
| THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO |
| TELEPHONE: (561) 805 6652ROBERT BROWN |
| E-MAIL: [email protected] |