Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 05090351
Permit Number 05090351
Review Stop B
Sequence Number 3
Notes
Date Text
2006-07-19 00:00:00****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 561-805-6724 [email protected]
  
 FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001
 FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS
 TO THE FBC2001
  
 FROM PREVIOUS LIST:
  
 1.)A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE
 FILED WITH THE CLERK OF COURTS BEFORE A
 PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. (MUST BE FILED
 PRIOR TO PERMIT PICKUP; THIS COMMENT
 DOES NOT PREVENT THE PERMIT FROM BEING
 ISSUED.)
  
 2.)IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM
 BEACH COUNTY.THE PLANS MUST BE STAMPED
 AND THE RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE
 APPLICATION.561-233-5025
  
 3.)ADDITIONAL FEES WILL BE DUE
 (RADON). SEE FS553.721, REQUIRED ON
 ALTERATIONS.ARCHITECT'S OBJECTION IS
 NOTED; HAS HE READ THE FLORIDA STATUTE?
 ALSO NOTE THAT THE CONTRACTOR DID NOT
 PAY THE RESUB FEE.RESUB FEES ARE DUE
 AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL; FAILURE TO PAY
 THIS FEE COULD RESULT IN DEALYS IN PLAN
 REVIEW.
  
 4-6.)ADDRESSED.
  
 7.)PROVIDE A FIRE SPRINKLER PLAN,
 FBC104.3.1.1. (FIRST REVIEW)
  
 THIS WAS ADDRESSED WITH AN 8 1/2 X 11
 SHEETS WITH THE RESPONSE LETTER.EITHER
 INCORPORATE INTO THE PLAN OR REMOVE FROM
 THE RESPONSE LETTER AND ATTACH TO THE
 PLAN.
  
 THESE SHEETS ARE ALSO LACKING THE
 INFORMATION REQUIRED BY FAC61G1-16.003,
 004. (2ND REVIEW)
  
 3RD REVIEW - THIS ITEM HAS BEEN
 ADDRESSED.HOWEVER, ARCHITECT HAS ASKED
 FOR CLARIFICATION, STATES IN HIS
 RESPONSE LETTER "PLEASE CLARIFY
 FAC16G1-16.003 AS IT ADDRESSES TAXES."
 NOTE THAT THE ARCHITECT IS REFERRING TO
 SECTION FAC16G1, BUT MY COMMENT REFERS
 TO 61G1.I HOPE THAT THIS ADDRESSES ANY
 CONFUSION.
  
 8-15.)ADDRESSED.
  
 16.)SEE ATTACHED FS553.80(2)(B).A 4X
 PLAN REVIEW WILL BE CHARGED IF COMMENTS
 ARE NOT ADDRESSED A THIRD TIME.
  
 ARCHITECT'S RESPONSE LETTER - "I'M
 OFFENDED BY THIS COMMENT.WITH EVERY
 PROJECT I COOPERATE IN GOOD FAITH.ALL
 PREVIOUS COMMENTS WERE ADDRESSED."
 PLEASE NOTE THAT NO OFFENSE WAS
 INTENDED; THIS IS A STATUTORY
 REQUIREMENT AND IS NOT SUBJECT TO MY
 DISCRETION.I HAVE BEEN INSTRUCTED TO
 INCLUDE THIS COMMENT IN MY COMMENT LIST
 AFTER THE SECOND PLAN REVIEW.THE FEE
 IS A MANDATORY FEE TO BE IMPOSED IF THE
 SAME COMMENT IS MADE THREE
 TIMES,REGARDLESS OF INTENTION AND GOOD
 FAITH. THIS FEE IS TO BE CHARGED
 REGARDLESS OF WHETHER OR NOT THE
 DESIGNER IS ADVISED OF THE FLORIDA
 STATUTE.THIS COMMENT IS MADE AS A
 COURTESY (ADVISORY), AND IS NOT INTENDED
 TO BE OFFENSIVE.MY APOLOGIES IF YOU
 HAVE MISUNDERSTOOD MY INTENT.
  
 ALTHOUGH COMMENT #17 HAS BEEN MADE THREE
 TIMES, THE 4X FEE IS NOT CHARGED ON THIS
 REVIEW (MISSED DETAIL) BUT WILL BE
 CHARGED ON THE NEXT SUBMITTAL IF THE
 DETAIL IS NOT PROVIDED AS REQUESTED.
  
 17.)PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE
 ACCESSIBLE BREAKROOM SINK, FBC11-4.24.
 THE DOR IS TO PROVIDE DESIGN CRITERIA;
 SHOPS CAN BE PROVIDED DURING THE JOB BUT
 PLANS ARE TO SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE.
  
 AS REQUESTED, PROVIDE A DETAIL.THE
 WRITTEN SPECIFICATION IS NOTED BUT DOES
 NOT CLEARLY SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE AS
 THERE HAVE BEEN PROBLEMS IN THE FIELD ON
 THE PAST REGARDING DOORS (NOT PERMITTED)
 COVERING THE ACCESSIBLE SINKS.THE
 DETAIL HAS BEEN REQUESTED BY BOTH THE
 PLUMBING REVIEWER AND MYSELF TO AVOID
 PROBLEMS WHILE THE JOB IS IN PROGRESS.
  
 NEW COMMENT:
  
 18.)WHEN RESUBMITTING, REMOVE OLD
 SHEETS FROM THE PLAN.OLD SHEETS SHOULD
 BE SUBMITTED SEPARATELY AND MARKED
 "VOID".THIS IS TO PREVENT OLD SHEETS
 FROM BEING REVIEWED AND STAMPED IN
 ERROR.FOR INSTANCE, A-1 IS INCLUDED IN
 THE PACKAGE WITH BOTH REVISIONS 1 AND 2.
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT WILL BE ROUTED TO
 FIRE FOR FIRE PLAN REVIEW STAMP TO BE
 PLACED ON THE NEW SHEET.


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved