Date |
Text |
2005-10-14 00:00:00 | ********** UNSAT2ND REVIEW ********* |
| |
| PLEASE SEE MANY NOTES FROM PREVIOUS |
| REVIEWWHICH STILL NEED TO BE |
| ADDRESSED. |
| |
| 1)NOTE: NOTE #1, NO, PLEASE SEE BASED ON |
| SCALE PROVIDED ON PLANS, ONE GFI IS |
| STILL MISSING. SEE REDLINED PLANS. |
| |
| 2)NOTE: NOTE #2, NO, PLEASE SEE LOCATION |
| OF WASHER AND DRYER NOT SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS RISER DID NOT |
| INDICATE A PANEL "C" FOR AN APT? PLEASE |
| CLARIFY IF THIS PANEL IS EXISITNG OR |
| NEW. |
| PLEASE CALL IF NEW AS THERE MAY BE SOME |
| CODE COMMENTS. IF EXIST , ONLY IDENTIFY |
| AS EXIST. PLEASE HOWEVER SEE COMMENTS |
| FOR LOAD CALCULATIONS. |
| |
| 3)NOTE: NOTE#3 OK, AS PLANS MENTIONS ALL |
| A/C AS EXISTING AND NOT PROPOSED WORK TO |
| BE DONE. |
| |
| 4)NOTE: NOTE #4 OK, PLEASE KNOW, EVEN IF |
| SHLEVING IS NOT IN A CLOSET, THE CODE |
| TAKES INTO ACCOUNTAMIN SHELVING |
| DISTANCE FROM WALLS. |
| PLEASE SEE A FLOURESCENE FIXTURE ABOVE |
| DOOR IS OK PER 410.8 |
| |
| 5)NOTE: NOTE#5, NO, PLEASE SEE NOTE ON |
| PLANS DOES NOT INCLUDE QLL REQUIRED PER |
| 210.12. PLEASE ALSO SEE NOTE NOW SHOWN |
| FOR SD'S INDICATES BEING CONNECTED TO A |
| GFI CIRCUIT? |
| PLEASE SEE ARC FAULT AND GFI ARE TWO |
| DIFFERENT PROTECTION METHODS. |
| |
| 6)NOTE: NOTE #6 OK. |
| |
| 7)NOTE: NOTE #7 OK. |
| |
| 8)NOTE: NOTE #8 NO, |
| PLEASE SEE MIN AWG REQUIRED FOR OCP TO |
| BE BASED ON 240.4,310.16. |
| PLEASE SEE DRYER SHOWING 40A OCP ON #10 |
| AWG. |
| PLEASE KNOW, NOW LOAD FOR WATER IS HSOWN |
| AT 3.8 KW, HOWEVER 422.13 WHICH REQUIRES |
| MIN OCP TO BE 125% AND 422.11E REQUIURES |
| MAX OCP AT 150%. PLEASE KNOW AT 3.8 KW, |
| 40A OCP IS TOO HIGH. |
| |
| 9)NOTE: NOTE #9, NO, PLEASE SEE 424.3B |
| FOR MIN OCP FOR AHU. MIN 125% |
| |
| 10)NOTE: NOTE #10 NO, PLEASE SEE 220.16 |
| FOR MIN OF 5KW TO BE SHOWN FOR DRYER. |
| PLEASE SEE RESPONSEMENTIONS 5KW IS |
| SHOWN, HOWEVER PANEL SCHEDULE/LOAD CALCS |
| INDICATE 2.5KW. |
| |
| 11)NOTE: NOTE #11 NO, SEE PREVIOUS NOTE |
| #8 FOR WATER HEATER COMMENT. |
| |
| 12)NOTE: NOTE #12 NO, PLEASE SEE 220 FOR |
| MIN LOAD CALCULATIONS, |
| PLEASE SEE CONDENSING UNIT LOAD IS NOW |
| SHOWN AT 23 KVA/KW?? PLEASE VERIFY. "IF" |
| A/C CU IS 23KW, THEN THE COOLING LOAD IS |
| TO BE FIGURED ON LOAD CALCULATIONS AS |
| THIS LOAD IS LARGER THAN HEAT. THIS |
| APPEARS TO BE AMISPRINT OR INCORRECT |
| ?? |
| PLEASE SEE LOAD FROM PANEL "C" DOES NOT |
| INDICATE OF THERE IS ANY A/C LOADS? |
| PLEASE SEE NEC 220 FOR MIN KW RATING FOR |
| STOVE/RANGE/OVEN TO BE PER NAMEPLATE , |
| MIN 8KW. |
| PLEASE SEE LOAD SHOWN FOR PANEL "B" IS |
| BEING DE-RATED TWICE. |
| LOAD SHALL BE FIGURED AND DE-RATED FOR |
| LOAD ON PANEL "B", HOWEVER THE CONNECTED |
| LOAD MUST BE SHOWN AND FIGURED WHEN |
| CALCULATIONS FOR PANEL "A" ARE DONE. |
| |
| |
| 13)NOTE: NOTE #13 OK, AS PLANS NOW |
| INDICATE MAIN SERVICE AS EXISTING. |
| |
| 14)NOTE: NOTE #14 OK. ADDED. |
| |
| 15)NOTE: NOTE #15 NO, SEE PREVIOUS NOTE |
| WITH RESPECT TO CONNECTION OF SD'S. |
| |
| 16)NOTE: NOTE #16 OK, EXISTING. |
| |
| 17)NOTE: NOTE #17, NO, PLEASE SEE ONLY |
| THE PRINTED NAME IS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| FBC 104.2.1 |
| |
| 18)NOTE: NOTE #18, NO, PLEASE KNOW, |
| VALUE MUST BE BASED ON WHAT IS WOULD |
| COST AT FAIR MARKET VALUE IF A |
| CONTRACTOR WAS DOING THE WORK. |
| 104.6.5 |
| |
| 19)NOTE: PLEASE SEE FBC CHAPTER 34 WITH |
| RESPECT TO REMODEL WORK FOR ELECTRICAL |
| WIRING. |
| PLEASE KNOW, EXSITING OTHER AREAS MAY BE |
| REQUIRED TO BE BROUGHT UP TO MIN CODE, |
| IF NOT ALREADY. PLANS/NOTES MENTIONS |
| EXISTING AREAS HAVE ALREADY BEEN BROUGHT |
| UP TO CODE. |
| |
| PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR |
| REVIEW . IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, |
| PLEASE CALL. |
| |
| DEWEY PALMER |
| ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW |
| 561-805-6717 |
| [email protected] |
| |
| |
| 13)NOTE: |