Date |
Text |
2005-09-07 00:00:00 | BUILDING REVIEW THIRD CHECKLIST: |
| 1- STILL UNABLE TO PERFORM PLAN REVIEW |
| TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE OF PRODUCT USE IF |
| COMPLETE INSTALLATION INFORMATION IS NOT |
| PROVIDED. |
| CONTRACTOR WAS ASKED TO MARK ON DRAWINGS |
| SPECIFIC MOUNTING CONDITIONS AND ANCHOR |
| TYPE AND SPACING TO BE USED ACCORDING TO |
| THE DESIGN PRESSURES, EDGE DISTANCE, |
| PANEL SPAN, CONNECTION TYPE AND |
| STRUCTURE TO BE ATTACHED TO (CONCRETE, |
| CONCRETE BLOCK OR WOOD). SECTION |
| 104.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC |
| 2001 AND THE CITY IMPLEMENTATION |
| STANDARD FOR HURRICANE MISSILE IMPACT |
| PROTECTION. IN ADDITION ANCHOR NOTE #2 |
| ON PAGE 5 OF 5 OF THE ACCORDION DRAWINGS |
| CALLS FOR THE SAME INFORMATION I |
| REQUESTED ON THE FIRST CHECKLIST. |
| |
| BY PROVIDING THIS SIMPLE INFORMATION |
| PLAN REVIEWER CAN VERIFY THAT PROPER |
| ANCHOR TYPE AND SPACING IS USED. |
| |
| INSTALLATION SCHEDULE CALLS FOR TAPCON |
| AS THE ANCHOR TO BE USED. THE ANCHOR |
| SCHEDULE IN PAGE 5 OF 5 SHOWS THREE |
| DIFFERENT TYPES OF TAPCONS. SOME WORK |
| FOR THE SPACING SPECIFIED IN THE |
| INSTALLATION SCHEDULE AND SOME DON'T. |
| THAT'S WHY IS IMPORTANT TO BE SPECIFIC. |
| |
| IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL |
| JULIO GOMEZ AT (561)805-6712. |