Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 05070295
Permit Number 05070295
Review Stop B
Sequence Number 3
Notes
Date Text
2006-01-11 00:00:00BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
 PERMIT:05070295
 ADD: 1256 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD
 CONT: MASTER CONTRACTORS
 TEL: (561)712-8898
 FL BLD CODE= 2001 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE
 * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS
  
 3RD REVIEW
 ACTION: DENIED
 WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE
 THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY
 PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER
 LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUM-
 BER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION
 MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICA
 TION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND
 WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK
 YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
  
  
  
 1) COMMENET# 3 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW:
 705.7.1 JOINTS INSTALLED IN OR BE- TWEEN
 FIRE RESISTANT WALLS, FIRE RESIS- TANT
 FLOORS OR FLOOR/ CEILING ASSEMBLIES AND
 FIRE RESISTANT ROOFS OR ROOF/ CEIL- ING
 ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE PROTECTED BY AN
 APPROVED FIRE RESISTANT JOINT SYSTEM
 DESIGNED TO RESIST THE PASSAGE OF FIRE
 FOR A PERIOD NOT LESS THAN THE RE-
 QUIRED FIRE RESISTANCE RATING OF THE
 WALL, FLOOR OR FLOOR IN OR BETWEEN
 WHICH IT IS INSTALLED.
 THE AREA OF CONCERN IS BETWEEN THE
 RATED WALL AND THE ROOF ASSEMBLY.
 705.7.2. AND TABLE 705.7 WILL REQUIRE A
 SYSTEM THAT WILL COMPLY WITH 500 CYCLES
 OF EXPANSION AND CONTRACTION WITHOUT
 FAILURE.
 (UL OR EQUIVALENT) PROVIDE A FLEXIBLE
 JOINT FIRE AND SMOKE ASSEMBLY AT THE
 TENANT SEPERATION BETWEEN WALL A
 ROOF DECK.
  
 2) COMMENT# 4 FROM THE PREVIOUS
 REVIEW,DISCREPANCY BETWEEN A-2 & THE
 MEP-1, THE NEW OFFICE DOORS ARE IN
 DIFFERENT LOCATIONS OR MISSING , PLEASE
 CORRECT.
  
 3) COMMENT 6A) FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW,
 6A) PRODUCT APPROVALS, THE ARCH EXTERIOR
 DOORS(01-0226.05) AND STOREFRONT)
 SYSTEMS (00-1220.05)SUBMITTED WILL
 REQUIRE A HURRICANE PROTECTIVE SYSTEM.
 PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL REPORT
 FOR STORM SHUTTERS WITH A FL COVER
 SHEET.
 PROVIDE STORM PANEL INFORMATION WITH
 INSTALLATION SCHEDULE AND KEY PLAN WITH
 SPECIFIC ANCHORS AND MOUNTING TO BE USED
 FOR ALL NON-IMPACT GLAZING.
 FBC 1606.1.4.
 FL BLD CODE 2001 SECTION 103.6,
 1606.1.4, 1707.4 & 3401.7.2.4.
 PROCEDURES: 1(B) A COMPLETE INSTALLATION
 SCHEDULE SUMMARIZING & IDENTIFYING
 OPENING SIZES, STORY HEIGHTS, UNIT MARK
 NUMBERS, UNIT SPANS/WIDTHS, UNIT STORM
 BAR REINFORCING REQUIREMENTS, WALL PRES-
 SURE ZONES, SLAT TYPES, ETC., SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERMIT APPLICATION
 TO FACILITATE PLAN REVIEW AND PERMIT
 ISSUANCE.
 6B) YKK EXTERIOR DOOR, SUPPLY THE DADE
 COUNTY NOA MENTIONED IN THE FLORIDA
 REPORT:
 04-0227.02 LARGE MISSLE
 04-0227.03 SMALL MISSLE
 IF THE REPORT THAT WILL BE SUBMITTED IS
 FOR SMALL MISSLE IMPACT, PROVIDE THE
 INFORMATION THAT IS LISTED ABOVE FOR
 STORM SHUTTER REQUIREMENTS.
  
 4)COMMENT 6B) FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW,
 6B) FL BLD CODE 104.2.1.2
 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED,
 THE DOOR SCHEDULE INDICATES DOOR# 3 TO
 BE A HOLLOW CORE METAL CLAD DOOR, WHERE
 AS THE FLOOR PLAN & ELEVATIONS INDICATE
 GLASS DOORS WITH SIDE LIGHTS.
 6C) 2405.2.1 THE FOLLOWING SHALL BE
 CONSIDERED SPECIFIC HAZARDOUS LOCATIONS
 FOR THE PURPOSES OF GLAZING:
 3. GLAZING IN AN INDIVIDUAL FIXED OR
 OPERABLE PANEL ADJACENT TO A DOOR
 WHERE THE NEAREST VERTICAL EDGE
 IS WITHIN A 24-INCH (610 MM) RADIUS
 OF THE DOOR IN A CLOSED POSITION
 AND WHOSE BOTTOM EDGE IS LESS THAN
 60 INCHES (1524 MM) ABOVE THE
 FLOOR OR WALKING SURFACE.
  
 5) COMMENT# 7 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW
 THE INTERIOR DEMO PERMIT TO BE
 SATISFIED.COMMENT FROM FIELD INSPECTOR
 ABOUT FIRE DAMAGE, ENGINEERS LETTER
 REQUIRED FOR ROOF FRAMING MEMBERS AND
 DECK.PULLED THE PERMIT 05120051 AND
 FOUND NO REPORT, THIS WAS PART OF THE
 FIELD INSPECTORS REQUIREMENTS!!!!!!!!
  
 6) COMMENT# 8 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW,
 PLANS INDICATE EXISTING HANDICAPPED
 RAMP PROVIDE HEIGHT OF THE EXISTING
 RAMP AND CONFIGURATION. MAY REQUIRE
 UPGRADES, SEE 11-4.8 SLOPE, RISE,
 LANDINGS AND HANDRAILS.
 11-4.8.8 OUTDOOR CONDITIONS. OUTDOOR
 RAMPS AND THEIR APPROACHES SHALL
 BE DESIGNED SO THAT WATER WILL NOT
 ACCUMULATE ON WALKING SURFACES.
 6A)
 THE FRONT OF THE DOLLAR STORE INDICATES
 A RAMP WITH A FORWARD APPROACH ON SHEET
 A-2 WHERE AS SHEET A-3 INDICATES ANOTHER
 DETAIL SHOWING A COMMON LANDING AND 2
 RAMPS AT A 180 DEGREES FROM EACH OTHER.
 THESE 2 RAMPS APPEAR TO HAVE RUNS LONGER
 THAN 6'-0" REQUIRING A RAILING. NO LOWER
 LANDING IS PROVIDED. THIS SAME DETAIL
 INDICATES IN THE LEGEND SCALE 1/4" AND
 N. T. S. "NOT TO SCALE"WITH NO
 DIMENSION PROVIDED FOR THE RUN OF THE
 RAMP.
 6B)
 THE SAME PROBLEMS ARISE ON THE SIDE
 OF THE BUILDING WHERE RAMPS APPEAR NO
 INFORMATION PROVIDED.
 11-4.8.3. CLEAR WIDTH. THE MINIMUM
 CLEAR WIDTH OF A RAMP SHALL BE 36".
 EXCEPTION: RAMPS THAT ARE PART OF A
 REQUIRED MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL NOT BE
 LESS THAN 44 INCHES WIDE.
 11-4.8.4.(2) LANDINGS. ALL LANDINGS
 ON RAMPS SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 60"
 CLEAR, & THE BOTTOM OF EACH RAMP SHALL
 HAVE NOT LESS THAN 72" OF STRAIGHT &
 LEVEL CLEARENCE.
 11.4.8.5. HANDRAILS: IF A RAMP HAS
 A RISE GREATER THAN 6" OR A HORIZONTAL
 PROJECTION GREATER THAN 72", THEN IT
 SHALL HAVE HANDRAILS ON BOTH SIDES.
  
 6C)
 NOTE:
 11-4.1.6(2) DUTY TO PROVIDE AN
 ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL TO ALTERED
 AREAS SHALL BE DEEMED DISPROPORTIONATE
 TO THE OVERALL ALTERATION WHEN THE COST
 EXCEEDS 20 % OF THE COST OF THE ALTERA-
 TION TO THE PRIMARY FUNCTION AREA.
 (A)(I) AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE
 (II) AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE
  
 7) SEE THE ELECTRICAL REVIEWERS COMMENTS
 THAT DEAL WITH PHOTOCOPIED PLANS,
 ASSUMING WORK OF ONOTHER DESIGN
 PROFESSIONAL,AND AFFIXING ONES SEAL TO
 PLANS THAT WERE NOT PREPARED BY OR UNDER
 THIER SUPERVISING CONTROL. ONE SET OF
 PLANS HAS BEEN RETAINED FOR REVIEW BY
 THE FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURE.
 BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
 JIM WITMER
 TEL: (561)805-6715
 FAX: (561)659-8026
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved