Date |
Text |
2005-07-25 00:00:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| |
| SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| [email protected] |
| |
| 1.)CHANGES TO THE PLAN ARE TO BE |
| CLOUDED AND, IF DONE IN INK, TO BE |
| INITIALED BY THE ENGINEER. |
| |
| 2.)THE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA |
| FBC1606.1.7 IS TO BE A PART OF THE PLAN, |
| NOT AN UNSIGNED AND UNSEALED SHEET.IT |
| IS TO BE DONE BY THE ENGINEER. |
| |
| 3.)THE TRUSS ENGINEERING AND TRUSS |
| LAYOUT PREPARED BY HIRMET TUMAY, PE DO |
| NOT HAVE A TITLE BLOCK FAC61G15-23.002. |
| |
| 4.)THE TRUSS ENGINEERING HAS A STAMP |
| INSTEAD OF A SIGNATURE.EACH SHEET IS |
| TO BE SIGNED BY THE ENGINEER, NOT |
| STAMPED.PLEASE CONTACT FBPE IF YOU ARE |
| NOT IN AGREEMENT AND HAVE THEM EMAIL OR |
| CALL ME.IN PRIOR CONVERSATIONS WITH |
| FBPE THEY HAVE INSISTED ON A "WET |
| SIGNATURE". |
| |
| 5.)THE STANDARD GABLE END DETAIL, |
| STGBL77 IS NOT SIGNED AND SEALED. |
| INDICATE ON THAT SHEET THE WIND DESIGN |
| CRITERIA AND THAT FBC2313.4.1 HAS BEEN |
| MET.THIS IS BEING REQUESTED BECAUSE |
| THE DETAIL DOES NOT INCLUDE BLOCKING AND |
| ADDITIONAL BRACING SHOWN IN BCSI-B6 |
| PREPARED BY TPI AND WTCA.ALSO NOTE |
| THAT THE SAMPLE PROVIDED WAS FOR 100MPH |
| WIND ZONE, BUT HAD MORE BRACING. |
| |
| 6.)HAVE THE TRUSS LAYOUT AND |
| ENGINEERING REVIEWED BY ENGINEER OF |
| RECORD FAC61G15-30.003(2). |
| |
| 7.)SEE ATTACHED FS553.80(2)(B).A 4X |
| PLAN REVIEW WILL BE CHARGED IF THE |
| COMMENTS ARE NOT CORRECTLY ADDRESSED. |
| |
| 8.)NEW COMMENT - THE APPLICATION |
| STATES "WITH SCREEN".NO SCREEN IS |
| SHOWN ON THE PLAN.EITHER INCORPORATE |
| YOUR SCREEN STRUCTURAL DETAILS INTO YOUR |
| PLAN OR REMOVE FROM THE APPLICATION. |