Date |
Text |
2005-07-21 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| *******DENIED******* |
| ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6716 |
| E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| |
| FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 |
| FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND) |
| F.S.= FLORIDA (STATE) STATUTE |
| |
| FOR CONSISTENCY, THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS |
| ARE NUMBERED AS PER THE BUILDING PLAN |
| REVIEW OF 4/7/05: |
| |
| 2) FBC 3401.5.2HISTORIC BUILDINGS. |
| THIS COMMENT HAS NOT BEEN ADDRESSED. |
| THE TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE CODE, |
| PERTAINING TO 'REPAIRS AND ALTERATIONS |
| TO EXISTING BUILDINGS', WILL APPLY |
| UNLESS THE BUILDING CAN BE SHOWN TO BE A |
| QUALIFIED HISTORIC BUILDING.TO ACHEIVE |
| THIS, THE BUILDING MUST BE LISTED |
| INDIVIDUALLY OR AS A CONTRIBUTING |
| PROPERTY EITHER ON THE NATIONAL REGISTER |
| OR UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF A LOCAL |
| HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE.SUBMIT |
| DETAILS TO SHOW WHICH IS APPLICABLE AS |
| JUSTIFICATION FOR CONSIDERATION AS A |
| QUALIFIED HISTORIC BUILDING. |
| |
| 3) FBC 3401.5IF THE BUILDING IS SHOWN |
| TO BE A QUALIFIED HISTORIC BUILDING (PER |
| COMMENT #2), THE PROVISIONS OF THE |
| TECHNICAL CODE ARE NOT MANDATORY IF THE |
| FINISHED BUILDING IS JUDGED, BY THE |
| BUILDING OFFICIAL, TO BE SAFE AND IN THE |
| PUBLIC INTEREST OF HEALTH, SAFETY AND |
| WELFARE.ANY ALTERNATE MATERIALS AND |
| METHODS PROPOSED FOR ACHEIVING |
| EQUIVALENCY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE |
| CODE WILL BE CONSIDERED AND MAY BE USED |
| TO ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS. |
| |
| 5) 61G15-23.002(2)STRUCTURAL PLANS. |
| THE PRINTED NAME AND LICENSE NUMBER OF |
| RONALD HUNT P.E. SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE |
| TITLE BLOCK OF THE STRUCTURAL PLANS. |
| |
| 7) FBC 13-103.1.1.1SHEET 2 OF EACH |
| COPY OF THE ENERGY CODE COMPLIANCE FORM |
| SHALL BE SIGNED BY THE ARCHITECT OF |
| RECORD AND HIS LICENSE NUMBER ADDED ON |
| THE SPACE PROVIDED, TO CERTIFY |
| COMPLIANCE.THE OTHER PROFESSIONALS |
| HAVE ALREADY COMPLIED WITH THIS |
| REQUIREMENT. |
| |
| 8) FBC 11-4.1.6FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY |
| CODE DOES NOT APPLY TO BUILDINGS IN |
| EXISTENCE ON OCT 1, 1997 SO THE |
| FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE RECOMMENDATIONS |
| (ALSO CONSIDER PROVISIONS OF AMERICANS |
| WITH DISABILITIES ACT, 1990): |
| (A) ALREADY ADDRESSED |
| (B) FBC 11-4.24SHEETS A-9.05 AND |
| A-9.06, BREAKROOM/CONFERENCE ROOM SINKS. |
| THIS COMMENT HAS NOT BEEN PROPERLY |
| ADDRESSED.SECTION A-9.05/18 SHOWS |
| REQUIRED LEG/KNEE CLEARANCES THAT ARE |
| APPLICABLE TO LAVATORIES NOT SINKS. |
| AMEND THE PLANS TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE |
| SINKS IN THE BREAK ROOMS AND THE |
| CONFERENCE ROOM COMPLY WITH THE |
| FOLLOWING: |
| - MAX 34" ABOVE FLOOR (CONFERENCE |
| ROOM IS CURRENTLY 36"), |
| - MAX. 6-1/2" DEEP |
| - KNEE CLEARANCE THAT IS 30" WIDE X |
| 27" HIGH X 19" DEEP WITH PROTECTED HOT |
| WATER/DRAIN PIPES |
| - A MIN. CLEAR FLOOR SPACE OF 30" X |
| 48" SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN FRONT OF THE |
| SINK FOR FORWARD APPROACH. |
| (C) FBC 11-4.15SHEETS A-6.08 AND |
| A-6.09.THIS COMMENT HAS NOT BEEN |
| ADDRESSED.THE DRINKING FOUNTAINS |
| SHOULD HAVE A SPOUT HEIGHT, LEG/KNEE |
| CLEARANCES AND CLEAR FLOOR SPACE IN |
| COMPLIANCE WITH FIG. 27. |
| |
| 9) FBC* F102.2.4THIS COMMENT HAS NOT |
| BEEN ADDRESSED.ROOF COVERINGS, ON |
| BUILDINGS LOCATED IN THE FIRE DISTRICT, |
| SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF |
| CLASS A OR B ROOF COVERINGS, AS DEFINED |
| IN FBC 1505.ANNOTATE THE PLANS TO |
| DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. |
| |
| 10) FBC* F102.2.8SHEET A-3.01, |
| ELEVATIONS.THIS COMMENT HAS NOT BEEN |
| ADDRESSED.ITEM #8 ON THE LEGEND |
| REFERS TO FABRIC AWNINGS.PERMANENT |
| CANOPIES/ AWNINGS AND THEIR SUPPORTS, ON |
| BUILDINGS LOCATED IN THE FIRE DISTRICT, |
| SHALL BE OF NON-COMBUSTIBLE MATERIAL, |
| FIRE RETARDANT TREATED WOOD, WOOD OF |
| TYPE III SIZES OR OF 1-HOUR RESISTANT |
| CONSTRUCTION.ANNOTATE THE PLANS TO |
| DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE.ALSO, SHEET |
| A-8.01 HAS A NOTE REFERING TO THE WINDOW |
| SCHEDULE 'KEY NOTES' COLUMN FOR LOCATION |
| OF AWNINGS BUT NOTE# 11 IS NOT CALLED |
| UP.THERE ARE 'WINDOW GENERAL NOTES' |
| AND 'WINDOW KEY NOTES' ON THIS SHEET, |
| BOTH WITH NUMBERED NOTES 1,2,3.....IS |
| THE NUMBERING OF THE NOTES ON THE |
| SCHEDULE REFERING TO THE WINDOW GENERAL |
| NOTES (1-14) OR WINDOW KEY NOTES (1-4)? |
| |
| 11) THIS COMMENT HAS NOT BEEN ADDRESSED. |
| SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE NEW |
| BUILT-UP COAL TAR ROOFING SYSTEM, DOORS |
| AND WINDOWS. |
| NOTE: FL. ADMIN CODE RULE 9B-72 (IN |
| EFFECT SINCE OCTOBER 1, 2003) REQUIRES |
| THAT PRODUCTS HAVE STATEWIDE, LOCAL OR |
| SITE-SPECIFIC PRODUCT APPROVAL.THE |
| SUBMITTAL SHOULD INCLUDE THE STATEWIDE |
| PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER (FL###), |
| AVAILABLE FROM THE DEPT OF COMMUNITY |
| AFFAIRS PRODUCT APPROVAL WEBSITE |
| WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG/PR/PR_SRCH.ASP |
| (IF YOU FIND THAT THE QUOTED WEB PAGE IS |
| NO LONGER AVAILABLE, PLEASE INFORM THE |
| PLAN REVIEWER) |
| |
| 12) FBC 3502THIS COMMENT HAS NOT BEEN |
| ADDRESSED.SHEET S-1.00, GENERAL NOTE |
| #1 REFERS TO ACI 318-99.THE EDITION OF |
| THIS STANDARD REFERENCED IN THE CODE IS |
| ACI 318-02.AMEND THE NOTE. |
| |
| 14) FBC 1003.3.5SHEET A-0.12, THIRD |
| FLOOR LIFE SAFETY PLAN, CONVERGING |
| EXITS.THIS COMMENT HAS NOT BEEN |
| ADDRESSED.IT IS NOTED THAT THE WEST |
| EXIT STAIR DISCHARGES AT THIS LEVEL. |
| THE MEANS OF EGRESS CALCULATION SHOWS |
| THE THIS COMMENT HAS NOT BEEN ADDRESSED. |
| NORTH AND SOUTH EXIT STAIRS EACH |
| CARRYING A NUMBER OF OCCUPANTS EQUAL TO |
| THE TOTAL THIRD FLOOR OCCUPANCY (294 |
| OCCUPANTS) PLUS THE WEST STAIR OCCUPANT |
| LOAD (73 OCCUPANTS) SPLIT EQUALLY |
| BETWEEN THE NORTH AND SOUTH STAIRS. |
| THIS RESULTS IN AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 184 |
| OCCUPANTS FOR EACH OF THE TWO EXIT |
| STAIRS.DUE TO THE PLAN POSITION OF THE |
| STAIRS, IN A REAL EGRESS SITUATION THE |
| ENTIRE WEST STAIR OCCUPANTS WOULD GO TO |
| THE NORTH STAIR.THE OCCUPANT LOAD OF |
| THE NORTH EXIT STAIR WOULD BE 220 |
| OCCUPANTS, WHICH REQUIRES A STAIR WIDTH |
| OF 66".THIS EXCEEDS THE PROPOSED 60" |
| STAIR WIDTH.AMEND THE MEANS OF EGRESS |
| CALCULATION AND THE NORTH STAIR PLANS ON |
| SHEET A-5.02. |
| |
| 15) FBC 1012.4SHEET A-0.12THIRD |
| FLOOR LIFE SAFETY PLAN.THIS COMMENT |
| HAS NOT BEEN ADDRESSED.DURING THEIR |
| SWING, THE EXIT DOORS LEADING TO THE |
| NORTH AND SOUTH EXIT STAIRS OBSTRUCT |
| MORE THAN HALF OF THE REQUIRED LANDING. |
| SEE COMMENT #20 ALSO.AMEND THE PLAN. |
| |
| 18) FBC 1020.4SHEETS A-4.01 TO A-4.04. |
| THIS COMMENT HAS NOT BEEN ADDRESSED. |
| THE EDGE OF THE STAIRS SHALL BE |
| PROTECTED BY A GUARDRAIL WHICH IS MIN. |
| 42" HIGH WITH INTERMEDIATE RAIL SPACING |
| OR ORNAMENTAL PATTERN THAT WILL REJECT |
| THE PASSAGE OF A 4" SPHERE (REF: FBC |
| 1015.2 AND 1015.3) |
| |
| 19) FBC 1403SHEETS A-4.01 TO A-4.04, |
| WALL DETAILS.THIS COMMENT HAS NOT BEEN |
| ADDRESSED.SUBMIT DETAILS TO SHOW |
| MEANS OF RESTRAINT FOR THE FACE BRICK |
| VENEER AND LIMESTONE CORNICE, FRIEZE, |
| ARCHITRAVE, PEDIMENTS, PANELS, BELTS AND |
| BANDS. |
| |
| 20) FBC 1007.4SHEETS A-5.01 AND |
| A-5.02, STAIR LANDINGS.THIS COMMENT |
| HAS NOT BEEN ADDRESSED.THE WIDTH OF |
| THE LANDINGS SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN THE |
| WIDTH OF THE STAIRWAYS THEY SERVE. |
| AMEND THE PLANS. |
| |
| 21) FBC 1007.5.1SHEETS A-5.01 AND |
| A-5.02, STAIR DETAILS.THIS COMMENT HAS |
| NOT BEEN ADDRESSED.THE STAIR TREADS |
| SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 11".AMEND THE |
| PLANS |
| |
| 22) FBC 1015.2SHEET A-6.07, FOURTH |
| FLOOR BALCONY GUARDRAIL.IT IS NOTED |
| THAT A GUARDRAIL IS SHOWN ON DETAILS 7 |
| AND 8.THE HEIGHT IS SHOWN AS 34" WHICH |
| IS LESS THAN THE REQUIRED 42".AMEND |
| THE PLANS TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH |
| THE MINUMUM HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS. |
| |
| 23) FBC 1608.2.2THIS COMMENT HAS NOT |
| BEEN ADDRESSED.EACH GUARDRAIL SHALL |
| BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED FOR A |
| CONCENTRATED LOAD OF 200 LB APPLIED IN |
| ANY DIRECTION AT THE TOP OF THE |
| GUARDRAIL, A CONCENTRATED HORIZONTAL |
| LOAD OF 200 LB APPLIED ON A 1 SQ FT AREA |
| AT ANY POINT, AND A LINE LOAD OF 50 PLF |
| APPLIED HORIZONTALLY AT THE REQUIRED |
| GUARDRAIL HEIGHT WITH A SIMULTANEOUS |
| LINE LOAD OF 100 PLF APPLIED VERTICALLY |
| DOWNWARD ON THE TOP OF THE GUARDRAIL. |
| THESE LOADS SHALL NOT BE APPLIED |
| SIMULTANEOUSLY (UNLESS NOTED ABOVE) BUT |
| SHALL BE APPLIED INDIVIDUALLY TO PRODUCE |
| MAXIMUM STRESS IN EACH OF THE COMPONENTS |
| OR SUPPORTS.AMEND/ANNOTATE THE PLANS. |
| |
| 24) FBC 1608.2.1THIS COMMENT HAS NOT |
| BEEN ADDRESSED.EACH HANDRAIL SHALL BE |
| DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED FOR A |
| CONCENTRATED LOAD OF 200 LB AND A LINE |
| LOAD OF 50 PLF.THESE LOADS SHALL NOT |
| BE APPLIED SIMULTANEOUSLY BUT SHALL BE |
| APPLIED INDIVIDUALLY AT ANY POINT, AND |
| IN ANY DIRECTION, TO PRODUCE MAXIMUM |
| STRESS IN EACH OF THE COMPONENTS OR |
| SUPPORTS.AMEND/ANNOTATE THE PLANS. |
| |
| 25) FBC 3003.4THIS COMMENT HAS NOT |
| BEEN ADDRESSED.SHEET A-6.11.ELEVATOR |
| NUMBER 144 SHALL BE IDENTIFIED, BY |
| SIGNAGE, AS STRETCHER ACCESSIBLE. |
| ANNOTATE THE PLANS TO DEMONSTARE |
| COMPLIANCE |
| |
| 26) FBC 705.1.2SHEETA-7.01DOOR |
| SCHEDULE.THIS COMMENT HAS NOT BEEN |
| ADDRESSED.THE FOLLOWING DOORS ARE IN |
| WALLS REQURED TO BE 1-HOUR FIRE RATED, |
| PER THE LIFE SAFETY PLANS, AND SHOULD BE |
| 20-MINUTE FIRE-RATED DOORS: |
| 133-1, 125-1, 113-1, 221-1, 212-1, |
| 212-2, 211-1, 210-1, 207-1, 208-1, |
| 214-1, 215-1, 216-1, 217-1, 202.3, |
| 314-1, 308-1, 309-1, 311-1, 312-1, |
| 317-1, 322-1, 402-1, 403-1, 422-1, |
| 423-1 |
| THE FOLLOWING DOORS ARE IN 2-HOUR RATED |
| WALLS AND REQUIRED TO BE 90-MINUTE |
| FIRE-RATED DOORS: |
| 401-1 AND 401-2 |
| THE ABOVE LIST IS NOT EXHAUSTIVE.AMEND |
| THESE AS WELL AS ANY OTHER NON-RATED |
| DOORS WHICH ARE LOCATED IN FIRE-RATED |
| WALLS. |
| |
| 28) FBC* 105.13.1SPECIAL INSPECTOR. |
| THIS COMMENT HAS NOT BEEN ADDRESSED.A |
| STRUCTURAL INSPECTION PLAN MUST BE |
| SUBMITTED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE |
| BUILDING PERMIT.THREE COPIES OF THE |
| PLANS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS WILL BE |
| REQUIRED FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES |
| WHEN A THRESHOLD INSPECTOR IS SELECTED, |
| PLEASE ARRANGE WITH HAROLD PISKURA |
| (INSPECTION SERVICES MANAGER - TEL: |
| 561 805 6711), A MEETING INVOLVING THE |
| OWNER, THRESHOLD INSPECTOR, JOB |
| INSPECTOR, CONTRACTOR AND ENGINEER. |
| |
| 29) FBC 1908.6.1SHEET S-1.01. THE 'NEW |
| SLAB ON GRADE' DETAIL HAS BEEN AMENDED |
| TO SHOW CLAY BRICK MESH REINFORCEMENT |
| SUPPORTS.THE USE OF CLAY BRICK FOR |
| SUPPORT OF REINFORCEMENT IS NOT |
| RECOGNIZED PRACTICE.AMEND THE PLANS TO |
| SHOW AN ALTERNATIVE MATERIAL FOR THE |
| SUPPORTS OR SUBMIT DOCUMENTATION FROM |
| THE MESH REINFORCEMENT MANUFACTURER |
| STATING THAT THE USE OF CLAY BRICK |
| SUPPORTS IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR |
| SPECIFICATIONS. |
| |
| 30) TO EXPEDITE REVIEW OF A RESUBMITTAL |
| WHICH REQUIRES NEW PLANS IN ORDER TO |
| ADDRESS THE ABOVE COMMENTS, THE OLD |
| SHEETS SHALL BE REMOVED AND THE NEW |
| SHEETS INSERTED.ONE COPY OF EACH OLD |
| SHEET SHOULD BE STAPLED/CLIPPED TO THE |
| REMAINING OLD SHEETS, TO FORM A SET OF |
| 'OLD/VOID SHEETS', FOR COMPARISON OF |
| REVISIONS WHEN REVIEWING THE RESUBMITTED |
| PLANS. |
| |
| **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** |
| |
| END OF REVIEW COMMENTS |
| THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO |
| TELEPHONE: (561) 805 6716ROBERT BROWN |
| E-MAIL: [email protected] |