Date |
Text |
2004-12-02 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW: FAILED |
| |
| 1. SQ. FT. OF HOUSE HAS BEEN CORRECTED |
| TO INCLUDE THE UNCONDITIONED AREAS. |
| TOTAL SQ. FT. IS 6027 PER SHEET A-2 OF |
| THE ARCH. PLANS. |
| |
| 2. PLANS MUST BE TAKEN TO PBC AND IMPACT |
| FEES PAID.THE RECEIPT MUST BE |
| SUBMITTED BEFORE A PERMIT CAN BE |
| ISSUED. |
| |
| 3.SUBMIT THE FL PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE |
| STOREFRONT PANELS SHOWN AS "H" ON WINDOW |
| SCHEDULE. |
| |
| 4. SUBMIT THE MANUFACTURERS |
| SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE GAS FIREPLACE IN |
| THE LIVING ROOM. |
| |
| 5. THE SITE SPECIFIC DOCUMENTS FOR THE |
| BUTT GLASS ASSEMBLY IS MISSING THE ARCH |
| ALUMINUM PRODUCT APPROVAL. LINE 1 FOR |
| THE APPROVAL BY METHOD 1 OR 2 HAS NOT |
| BEEN FILLED IN.THE LETTER OF INTENT BY |
| THE ENGINEER DATED 6/29/2004 IS MISSING |
| THE LEGAL INFORMATION FOR LOT 37. |
| |
| 6. THE ENGINEER HAS SUBMITTED 8 1/2 X 11 |
| DETAILS FOR A SERIES OF WINDOWS 30" WIDE |
| X 107" HIGH. NO PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS |
| ATTACHED. HE REFERENCES ARCH ALUMINUM |
| SERIES 3000 WITH A NOA 01-0329.02 |
| EXPIRES 5/28/06. IF THIS IS THE SERIES |
| OF WINDOWS MARKED AS "H" ON THE PLANS |
| SUBMIT THE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS. PLANS |
| SHOW THEY ARE MULLED TOGETHER. IF THERE |
| IS NO FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL AVAILABLE |
| THEN A SITE SPECIFIC/LOCAL APPLICATION |
| WILL HAVE TO BE SUBMITTED WITH THE NOA. |
| |
| SITE SPECIFIC APPLICATION FOR ANOTHER |
| LOT WAS INCLUDED IN PERMIT PACKAGE |
| (L21) |
| |
| 7. DUPLICATE COPIES OF PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| WERE SUBMITTED.ONLY SUBMIT 2 COPIES |
| EVEN IF THE PRODUCT IS USED IN SEVERAL |
| AREAS OF THE HOUSE. |
| |
| 8. SUBMIT FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR |
| THE STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS. SEE SHEET A7 |
| USP & SIMPSON TRUSS STRAPS, ETC. |
| |
| 9. SEE OTHER PLAN REVIEWERS' NOTES |
| REGARDING THE ARCHITECT SEAL. |
| |
| 10. THE LETTER FROM MAURICE MENASCHE FOR |
| STRUCTURAL REVIEW REFERENCES L 30 AT |
| HAWKS LANDING INSTEAD OF L. 37. |
| |
| ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL: |
| LEA SMITH, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| 805-6713 |