Date |
Text |
2005-01-26 00:00:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| |
| SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| [email protected] |
| |
| COMMENTS APPLY TO 04060867, 04060868 |
| 04060856, 04060855, 04060842, 04060786, |
| 04060869, 04060871, 04060873 |
| |
| COMMENTS 1, 2, 4,5,7 AND 12 APPLY TO |
| 04060880, 04060882 |
| |
| COMMENTS 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 AND 12 APPLY TO |
| 04060876, 04060877 |
| |
| 1.)SUBCONTRACTORS HAVE SIGNED ONTO |
| THE |
| PERMIT SUBSEQUENT TO PERMIT INTAKE. |
| PLEASE COORDINATE ASSIGNING OF THE |
| SUBCONTRACTORS AND SUB PERMIT |
| NUMBERS WITH DEAN RUNNELS, 805-6681 TO |
| AVOID DELAYS AT TIME OF ISSUANCE.NOTE |
| THAT AT THIS TIME THE ROOF PERMIT |
| CANNOT BE ISSUED BECAUSE THE PRODUCT |
| APPROVALS SUBMITTED ARE NOT COMPLIANT |
| WITH THE PLAN (LIMITATION OF 33'. |
| |
| 2.)THE FOOTINGS AND PORCH CANNOT |
| ENCROACH THE PROPERTY LINE. |
| |
| 3.)THE EXISTING RETAINING WALL CANNOT |
| BE USED AS THE EXTERIOR BEARING WALL AS |
| PER BUILDING OFFICIAL. |
| |
| 4.)2-A6, THE STAIR RAIL SERVES AS A |
| GUARDRAIL AND IS REQUIRED TO BE A |
| MINIMUM OF 36" FBC1015. |
| |
| 5.)B-A7 HAS BEEN REPLACED BY AN 8 1/2 |
| X 14 DETAIL; PLEASE CROSS OFF THE |
| NONCOMPLIANT DETAIL WHICH IS STILL ON |
| THE PLAN. |
| |
| 6.)REGARDING THE ENGINEER'S LETTER |
| FOR |
| THE ROOF SHINGLES, PURSUANT TO FAC9B-72 |
| A FLORIDA STATE OR LOCAL PRODUCT |
| APPROVAL IS REQUIRED.SUBMIT AN |
| APPLICATION AS REQUESTED WITH |
| APPROPRIATE ENGINEERING.SUBJECT TO |
| APPROVAL BY ASSISTANT BUILDING |
| OFFICIAL.THE LETTER PREPARED BY DAVID |
| SHUMATE, PE DATED 12/16/04 STATING THE |
| DESIGN PRESSURE OF THE SHINGLES AND THE |
| DP OF THE JOB DOES NOT PROVIDE ENOUGH |
| DATA FOR ISSUANCE OF LOCAL PRODUCT |
| APPROVAL (CONFIRMED WITH BUILDING |
| OFFICIAL).ALSO NOTE THAT THE LETTER |
| REFERS TO A MEAN ROOF HEIGHT OF 34', |
| BUT |
| BUILDING 8 HAS A MEAN ROOF HEIGHT OF |
| 34'4"+. |
| |
| LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL CAN BE REVIEWED |
| AND ISSUED SEPARATELY FROM THE |
| RESUBMITTAL PROCESS. |
| |
| 7.)3-A4 (NEW DETAIL )REFERS TO |
| UBC1988 |
| WHICH IS NOT THE APPLICABLE BUILDING |
| CODE.PROVIDE EITHER AN APPROVED |
| ASSEMBLY LISTING OR CALCULATED FIRE |
| RESISTANCE, FBC CHAPTER 7. |
| |
| 8.)THE REVISION TO PERMIT #01091727 |
| (THE EXISTING RETAINING WALL) CONTAINS |
| A LETTER FROM JENKINS & CHARLAND DATED |
| 10/9/01 IN REGARDS TO THE REDESIGN OF |
| THE RETAINING WALL TO BE USED ALSO AS |
| THE EXTERIOR BEARING WALL OF THE |
| TOWNHOUSES.PROVIDE THE ORIGINAL |
| SEALED |
| CALCULATIONS REFERRED TO IN THAT |
| LETTER. |
| ALL DELEGATED ENGINEERING IS TO BE |
| REVIEWED BY EOR. |
| |
| 9.)WEEPHOLES WERE PLACED IN THE |
| EXISTING WALL AVOIDING THE TOWNHOUSE |
| LOCATIONS, BUT THE TOWNHOUSES WERE |
| REPLATTED, CHANGING THE TOWNHOUSE |
| LOCATIONS.ADDRESS. SEE RFI WALL 0060 |
| 11/9/01, RFI WALL-0001 7/27/2001 IN THE |
| REVISION. |
| |
| 10.) INCORPORATE THE ACTUAL EXISTING |
| WALL CONSTRUCTION DETAIL INTO THE PLAN. |
| THERE IS A REFERENCE TO THE FOUNDATION |
| PLAN 1-A%, WHICH REFERS TO SECTIONS 1 |
| AND 2 S2.4, WHICH STATE "EXISTING - SEE |
| PLAN." |
| |
| 11.)THE EXISTING WALL CONSTRUCTION |
| PLANS SHOW ELEVATION CHANGES.IT |
| APPEARS THAT THERE MAY BE ELEVATION |
| CHANGES IN THE MIDDLE OF THE PROPOSED |
| TOWNHOUSE WALLS.HOW DO THE CONTROL |
| JOINTS AND ELEVATION CHANGES OF THE |
| WALL AFFECT THE TOWNHOUSE STRUCTURE? |
| |
| 12.)A LETTER WAS SUBMITTED IN |
| RESPONSE |
| TO A PREVIOUS COMMENT IN REGARDS TO |
| SHOWING THE ABILITY OF THE HOLLOW CORE |
| TO CARRY THE LINE LOAD OF THE BLOCK |
| WALLS.PLEASE HAVE THE RESPONSE LETTER |
| DATED 12/20/04 PREPARED BY BRADLEY |
| CASH, PE (PCSI) SUBMITTED IN ORIGINAL |
| FORM, SIGNED AND SEALED FAC61G15-23.002 |
| INCLUDING PRINTED LICENSE NUMBER.ALSO |
| PLEASE ADDRESS THE WEIGHT OF BEAMS, ETC. |
| IN THE CALCS AS DISCUSSED WITH BRADLEY |
| CASH, PE OF PCSI. |
| |