| Date |
Text |
| 2003-11-18 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | *******DENIED******* |
| | ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6716 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 |
| | FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND) |
| | |
| | 1) THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT SHALL BE |
| | RECORDED AT PALM BEACH COUNTY COURTHOUSE |
| | AND A COPY SUBMITTED TO THIS OFFICE |
| | BEFORE A PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED.BLANK |
| | FORMS ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS OFFICE. |
| | |
| | 2) IMPACT FEES. THE PLANS SHALL BE TAKEN |
| | TO PALM BEACH COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMENT |
| | FOR IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT. THEY SHALL BE |
| | STAMPED AT THAT OFFICE AND A COPY OF THE |
| | PAID RECEIPT SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF |
| | WEST PALM BEACH DEPT OF CONSTRUCTION |
| | SERVICES BEFORE A PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. |
| | |
| | 3) 61G1-16.004(6) FACTHE TITLE BLOCK |
| | ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SHALL INCLUDE |
| | THE PRINTED NAME OF THE ARCHITECT |
| | SEALING THE DOCUMENT. |
| | |
| | 4) FBC* 104.2.4SITE SURVEY.A SIGNED |
| | AND SEALED SURVEY DRAWING PREPARED BY A |
| | QUALIFIED SURVEYOR IS REQUIRED (REF: |
| | 472.025(1) FL. STATUTES) |
| | |
| | 5) FBC 13-103.1.2THE SUBMITTED ENERGY |
| | CODE COMPLIANCE FORMS FOR THE |
| | RESIDENTIAL UNITS SHALL BE SIGNED BY THE |
| | BUILDING OWNER, THE OWNER'S ARCHITECT OR |
| | OTHER AUTHORIZED AGENT LEGALLY |
| | DESIGNATED BY THE OWNER. |
| | |
| | 6) FBC 13-101.1.6NO ENERGY CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE FORMS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED |
| | FOR THE FIRST FLOOR COMMERCIAL UNITS. |
| | THE WHOLE BUILDING (INCL. FUTURE TENANT |
| | SPACE) SHALL BE CONSIDERED.SHELL |
| | BUILDINGS SHALL BE SHOWN TO COMPLY WITH |
| | METHOD B (SEE SUB-CHAPTER 4).ALL |
| | ASSUMPTIONS MADE ABOUT SYSTEMS, NOT |
| | SHOWN ON THE CURRENT PLANS, SHALL BE |
| | LISTED AND APPENDED TO THE FORM 400B FOR |
| | SUBMITTAL.THIS WILL BE COMPARED TO THE |
| | ACTUAL SYSTEMS PROPOSED, AT A LATER, FOR |
| | INSTALLATION BY THE TENANT(S).THE |
| | ASSUMPTIONS LISTED ON THE APPENDIX SHEET |
| | SHALL BE AT LEAST THE MINIMUM STANDARD |
| | (LIGHTING, HVAC ETC) TO ALLOW THE WHOLE |
| | BUILDING TO BE OCCUPIED FOR IT'S |
| | INTENDED PURPOSE. |
| | |
| | 7) FBC* F102.2.4ROOF COVERING IN THE |
| | FIRE DISTRICT.ANNOTATE THE PLANS TO |
| | SPECIFY FIRE BARRIER BOARD AND AN |
| | APPROPRIATE UNDERLAYMENT TO ACHIEVE THE |
| | REQUIRED CLASS A OR B RATING. |
| | |
| | 8) FBC* F102.2.7ARCHITECTURAL TRIM ON |
| | BUILDINGS IN THE FIRE DISTRICT SHALL BE |
| | CONSTRUCTED OF APPROVED NON-COMBUSTIBLE |
| | MATERIALS OR FIRE RETARDANT TREATED |
| | WOOD.THE ELEVATIONS SHOW P.T. CEDAR |
| | WOOD SHAKE SIDING AND FASCIA, DECORATIVE |
| | WOOD TRELLIS MEMBERS AND OUTRIGGERS, AND |
| | WOOD BEAMS.AMEND THE PLANS TO |
| | DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | 9) FBC*F102.2.8THE CANVAS AWNING |
| | SUPPORTS SHALL BE OF NON-COMBUSTIBLE |
| | MATERIALS AND THE COVERING SHALL BE |
| | FLAME RESISTANT AS DETERMINED IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH FBC 3103.1.AMEND THE |
| | PLANS TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | 10) FBC 1604.1SHEET S0.2, |
| | PRE-ENGINEERED WOOD TRUSSES NOTE 4.THE |
| | TRUSSES SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR A BOTTOM |
| | CHORD LIVE LOAD NOT LESS THAN 10 PSF |
| | (RESIDENTIAL ATTICS WITHOUT STORAGE). |
| | ANNOTATE THE PLANS TO COMPLY. |
| | |
| | 11) FBC 1606.2.4SHEET S4.0, WOOD TRUSS |
| | CONNECTION MARK B AND C (DOUBLE ANCHORS) |
| | ARE STATED AS HAVING TWICE THE UPLIFT |
| | CAPACITY OF A SINGLE ANCHOR.THIS IS |
| | NOT CORRECT FOR EMBEDDED ANCHORS SUCH |
| | HETA & HHETA BECAUSE THE FAILURE MODE IS |
| | INFLUENCED BY OVERLAPPING OF THE |
| | CONCRETE 'PULL-OUT CONES' FOR THE TWO |
| | ANCHORS (SEE 2003 SIMPSON CATALOGUE). |
| | AMEND THE SCHEDULE. |
| | |
| | 12) FBC 1006.2.4SHEET A.7, NORTH |
| | ELEVATION AND EAST ELEVATION.THERE ARE |
| | WINDOWS WITHIN 10 FT VERTICALLY OF THE |
| | EXTERIOR EXIT STAIR.THESE WINDOWS |
| | SHALL BE 3/4 HOUR RATED ASSEMBLIES. |
| | AMEND THE PLANS |
| | |
| | 13) FBC 1005.4THE THIRD FLOOR BEDROOM |
| | IN RESIDENTIAL UNIT 67 IS SHOWN ON SHEET |
| | A.4 AS HAVING WINDOW TYPE H.AN |
| | EMERGENCY EGRESS WINDOW IS REQUIRED. |
| | THE WINDOW SCHEDULE ON SHEET A.20 STATES |
| | THAT TYPE H IS A SINGLE HUNG WINDOW BUT |
| | THE ELEVATION DOES NOT SHOW IT AS SINGLE |
| | HUNG.CLARIFY THE PROPOSED WINDOW TYPE |
| | TO ENSURE THE EGRESS WINDOW REQUIREMENTS |
| | ARE MET. |
| | |
| | 14) PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | THE PROPOSED PRODUCTS SHALL HAVE STATE- |
| | WIDE OR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 9B-72 FAC (FOR |
| | STATEWIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL SEE |
| | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG/PR/PR_SRCH.ASP): |
| | (A) THE SECOND FLOOR ENTRANCE DOORS TO |
| | THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS ARE SPECIFIED ON |
| | THE DOOR SCHEDULE AS HOLLOW METAL.THIS |
| | DOES NOT CORRELATE WITH THE SUBMITTED |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA# 02-0109.03 WHICH |
| | IS FOR FIBERGLASS DOORS.AMEND THE DOOR |
| | SCHEDULE OR SUBMIT A RELEVANT DOOR |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | (B) THE SUBMITTED ALUMINUM FRENCH DOOR |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA# 02-0701.12 DOES |
| | CORRELATE WITH A STATEWIDE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL (#FL253) BUT IT IS A POOR COPY |
| | AND IS ALSO MISSING DRAWING SHEET |
| | 2 OF 4.SUBMIT TWO LEGIBLE COPIES OF A |
| | COMPLETE PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | (C) THE SUBMITTED KAWNEER STOREFRONT |
| | DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA# 02-0523.05 |
| | DOES CORRELATE WITH A STATEWIDE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL (#FL629) BUT IT IS A POOR COPY. |
| | SUBMIT TWO LEGIBLE COPIES OF THE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL. |
| | (D) THE SUBMITTED KAWNEER WINDOW WALL |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA# 02-0220.01 DOES |
| | CORRELATE WITH A STATEWIDE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL (FL#627) BUT ONLY ONE COPY WAS |
| | SUBMITTED BETWEEN BUILDINGS G & H. |
| | SUBMIT NOT LESS THAN TWO COPIES PER |
| | BUILDING. |
| | (E) THE SUBMITTED PGT INDUSTRIES |
| | ALUMINUM SINGLE HUNG WINDOW |
| | NOA# 02-0419.13 DOES CORRELATE WITH A |
| | STATEWIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (#FL239) BUT |
| | ONLY ONE COPY WAS SUBMITTED BETWEEN |
| | BUILDINGS G & H.SUBMIT NOT LESS THAN |
| | TWO COPIES PER BUILDING. |
| | (F) THE SUBMITTED PGT INDUSTRIES |
| | ALUMINUM FIXED WINDOW NOA# 02-0806.04 |
| | DOES CORRELATE WITH A STATEWIDE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL (#FL243) BUT THIS PRODUCT HAS |
| | NO IMPACT RATING SO SHUTTERS WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED.ALSO ONLY ONE COPY WAS |
| | SUBMITTED BETWEEN BUILDINGS G & H. |
| | SUBMIT NOT LESS THAN TWO COPIES PER |
| | BUILDING AND SUBMIT A CORRESPONDING |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE PROPOSED |
| | SHUTTERS OR IMPACT RATED FIXED WINDOWS. |
| | (G) SUBMIT AT LEAST TWO COPIES OF A |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR IMPACT RATED |
| | MULLIONS TO SUIT THOSE WINDOW |
| | CONFIGURATIONS WHICH REQUIRE WINDOWS TO |
| | BE MULLED TOGETHER. |
| | (H) THE SUBMITTED MBCI 5V CRIMP PANEL |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA# 02-0628.02 DOES |
| | NOT CORRELATE WITH ANY STATEWIDE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL.SPECIFY A PRODUCT THAT HAS |
| | STATEWIDE OR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | (I) THE SUBMITTED ELK CORP. VERSASHIELD |
| | UNDERLAYMENT PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | NOA# 02-0327.03 DOES NOT CORRELATE WITH |
| | ANY STATEWIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL.SPECIFY |
| | A PRODUCT THAT HAS A STATEWIDE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 15) IF NEW PLAN SHEETS ARE REQUIRED, IN |
| | ORDER TO ADDRESS THE ABOVE COMMENTS, THE |
| | OLD SHEETS SHALL BE REMOVED AND THE NEW |
| | SHEETS INSERTED.ONE COPY OF EACH OLD |
| | SHEET SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE |
| | RESUBMITTAL FOR COMPARISON OF REVISIONS. |
| | |
| | **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** |
| | |
| | END OF REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO |
| | TELEPHONE: (561) 805 6716ROBERT BROWN |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
