Date |
Text |
2003-06-25 00:00:00 | SHEET EX-2 CALLS FOR THE REMOVAL OF A |
| PORTION OF A BEARING WALL IN TWO PLACES. |
| WHAT WILL BE SUBSTITUTED FOR IT?FBC |
| 104.2. |
| |
| PLEASE PROVIDE AN ENGINEERING ANALYSIS |
| OF THE SECOND FLOOR CERTIFYING IT IS |
| CAPABLE OF SUPPORTING 100 LB. LIVE |
| LOADS.SEE FBC T-1604 AND 106.1.2. |
| |
| THE MAIN ENTRY STAIR SHOWN ON SHEET A1, |
| SECTION 5/A4, AND ELSEWHERE IS REQUIRED |
| TOBE ENCLOSED IN TWO HOUR FIRE RATED |
| CONSTRUCTION.SEE FBC 1006.1.1, FBC |
| 1006.1.3 AND FBC 1010. THE OTHER TWO |
| STAIRS MUST ALSO BE TWO HOUR FIRE RATED. |
| |
| THE AREA OF THE MEZZANINES SHOULD BE |
| MEASURED AS GROSS AREA NOT NET.PLEASE |
| REVISE AS NECESSARY.SEE FBCTABLE |
| 1003.1, NOTE #3 AND FBC 202 AREA, GROSS |
| AND AREA, NET. |
| |
| THE FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM |
| INFORMATION,SPRINKLERS, IS REQUIRED BY |
| FBC 104.3.1.1TO BE ON THE PERMIT PLANS. |
| NOTE THAT ENTIRE BUILDING MUST HAVE |
| FIRE SPRINKLER PROTECTION AS PROVIDED |
| FOR IN FBC 903.7.2.4. |
| |
| SHEET A5, THE DOOR IN ROOM 205, MARTINI |
| BAR, MUST SWING IN THE DIRECTION OF EXIT |
| TRAVEL.FBC 1012.1.2. |
| |
| SHEET A7, DOORS SHOWN AS (E) REQUIRE |
| PANIC HARDWARE AND CANNOT HAVE FLUSH |
| LOCKING BOLTS AS NOTED IN THE SCHEDULE. |
| SEE FBC1012.1.8 AND 1019.7.2. |
| |
| SHEET S1.THE DECLARED LIVE LOAD OF 60 |
| PSF FOR STORAGE IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE |
| WITH FBC T-1604 (125 PSF FOR LIGHT |
| STORAGE)ALSO, SHOW THE DESIGN LOAD FOR |
| THE GUARD RAIL/WALL OF THE DJ BOOTHS. |
| FBC 1608.2.2. |
| |
| SHEET S3, WHAT ARE THE DIMENSIONS OF |
| FOOTING F1 FOR THE LIFT? |
| |
| SHEET S5. DETAIL C1, IS THIS AN EXISTING |
| OR PROPOSED CONDITION?IF NEW, |
| PROVIDE DESIGN INFORMATION SUCH AS |
| CONNECTIONS AND BEARING AREAS.SECTION |
| CC, AND DD, WHERE IS THE REINFORCING TO |
| BE ACCOMPLISHED SHOWN?SEE FBC 104.2. |
| |
| SHEET S6, PLEASE PROVIDE A BETTER |
| SPECIFICATION FOR THE "I BEAMS" IN THE |
| NOMENCLATURE OF THE AISC.SEE FBC |
| 2203.1 |
| |
| SHEET S6, PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR |
| THE ATTACHMENT/SUPPORT OF THE 6" |
| CONCRETE SLAB TO THE EXISTING WALL AND |
| A DETAIL FOR THE WOOD FLOOR JOISTS TO |
| THE "I BEAM"FBC 104.2. |
| |
| SHEET S7 STUCTURAL PLAN 2ND FLOOR |
| MEZZANINE, HAS VERY LITTLE STRUCTURAL |
| INFORMATION FOR THE MEZZANINES.WHERE |
| IS THE "EXISTING COLUMN" LOCATED THAT |
| IS SHOWN IN THE DETAIL?WHAT SUPPORTS |
| THE AREA THAT IS SHOWN AS "2X8 CEILING |
| BELOW"? |
| |
| SHEET S8 STRUCTURAL PLAN - ROOF FRAMING. |
| WHAT IS INTENDED TO BE SHOWN HERE? |
| |
| SHEET S9, SECTION A/S4.IS THAT |
| SECTION 4/A4?WHAT WILL THE A/C |
| SUPPORTS ATTACH TO AND HOW?FBC 104.2. |
| |
| SHEET S10.WHAT IS THE INTENDED DEPTH |
| OF EMBEDMENT FOR THE VARIOUS ANCHORS |
| SHOWN AND WHERE SPECIFICALLY DO THESE |
| DETAILS APPLY?ARE THE EXISTING WALLS |
| CONCRETE? PLEASE CLARIFY THE DESIGN. |
| |
| SHEET S11.IN THE TRANSVERSE SECTION |
| WHICH SHOWS THE AUDIO-STORAGE HAVING |
| NEW 2X8 CEILING JOISTS IN A DIFFERENT |
| PLANE THEN THE EXISTING CEILING JOISTS. |
| WILL THE TRUSS CHORD BE INTERRUPTED? |
| WHAT DO THE NEW CEILING JOISTS BEAR ON? |
| |
| WHAT WILL SUPPORT THE NEW 2X12 FLOOR |
| JOISTS?THE STAIRS AND LANDING? |
| |
| ARCH SECTION 4/A4 CALLS OUT NEW FLOOR |
| TRUSSES AND THIS SECTION 2X12'S. |
| PLEASE CLARIFY. |
| |
| SHEET S11.THE LONGITUDINAL SECTION |
| MAKES REFERENCE TO RELOCATED TENSION |
| CABLE STAYS.HOW IS THAT TO BE |
| ACCOMPLISHED?IS THERE AN ENGINEERED |
| CONNECTIONMETHOD? A PRESCRIBED TENSION? |
| A SPECIFIC LOCATION FOR THE CABLE? |
| PLEASE PROVIDE THE NECESSARY DETAILS. |
| |
| PLEASE PROVIDE STRUCTURAL DETAILS FOR |
| THE DJ BOOTHS WHICH ARE SHOWN AS |
| SUSPENDEDFROM ABOVE ON THE |
| ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. |
| |
| S11.WHY ARE THE 2X6 CHANNELS ATTACHED |
| TO THE BOTTOM CHORD OF THE TRUSS AT GRID |
| LINE 2? |
| |
| THE ADDED AREA OF THE NEW MEZZANINES IS |
| SUBJECT TO IMPACT FEES COLLECTED BY THE |
| COUNTY.THE PERMIT PLANS MUST BE |
| STAMPED BY THAT OFFICE AND A COPY OF |
| THE PAID RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT |
| APPLICATION.CALL 561-233-5025 FOR |
| MORE INFORMATION. |
| |
| THE DECLARED PERMIT VALUATION OF |
| $130,000.00 APPEARS TOO LOW FOR THIS |
| SCOPE OF WORK.PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY |
| OF THE SIGNED CONTRACT AND A DETAILED |
| ESTIMATE TAKEOFF, INCLUDING EXTENSIONS, |
| TO JUSTIFY THE PRICE. |