Date |
Text |
2003-05-01 00:00:00 | |
| |
| BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| PERMIT: 03040127 |
| ADD: 8198 SPYGLASS |
| CONT: WESTBROOKE |
| TEL: (786)367-7362 |
| FL BLD CODE= 2001 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| |
| ACTION : DENIED |
| |
| 1) PROVIDE NOC RECORDED WITH THE CLERK |
| OF COURT BEFORE A PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. |
| |
| 2) FL BLD CODE 1804.2.2 QUESTIONABLE |
| SOILS, WHERE THE BEARING CAPACITY IS |
| NOT DEFINETLY KNOWN OR IS IN QUESTION |
| THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY REQUIRE |
| EXPLORATIONS, TESTS OR OTHER ADEQUATE |
| PROOF AS TO THE PERMISSIBLE SAFE BEARING |
| CAPACITY. REQUIRED TESTS AND RECOMMENDAT |
| IONS SUBMITTED TO VERIFY BEARING CAPAC- |
| ITY SHALL BE CERTIFIED BY BY A GEO TECH- |
| NICAL REPORT FROM A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL |
| PROPERLY LICENSED IN THE STATE OF |
| FLORIDA. |
| |
| 3) *********NOTE ************ |
| ONLY FOR CONSIDERATION , FUTURE POOL |
| 1803.1.3 EXCAVATION FOR ANY PURPOSE |
| SHALL NOT EXTEND WITHIN 1 FT OF THE |
| ANGLE OF REPOSE OR NARURAL SLOPE OF THE |
| SOIL UNDER ANY FOOTING OR FOUNDATION, |
| UNLESS SUCH FOOTING OR FOUNDATION IS |
| FIRST PROPERLY UNDERPINNED OR PROTECTED |
| AGAINST SETTLEMENT. |
| |
| 4) NOTE: SHEET A-1 DETAIL 38 INDICATES |
| A FOUNDATION WITH LESS THAN 12" BELOW |
| GRADE, 1804.1.3 INDICATES THIS IS A MINI |
| MUM, SINCE THE ARCHITECT HAS DESIGNED & |
| SEALED THIS PLAN, THE ARCHITECT RESUMES |
| FULL RESPONSIBLIITY FOR THE DESIGN. |
| |
| 5)FL BLD CODE 104.2.1.2 |
| ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED, |
| A-1,A-3, A-6 DETAIL(6): |
| OPENING 8, 8A SLIDING GLASS DOOR AT THE |
| FAMILY ROOM, THE PLAN INDICATES THE USE |
| OF (TS-1) TUBE STEEL AND TO SEE DETAIL |
| 12 OF SHEET 6, THIS DETIAL, DETAIL 11 |
| WOULD BE ACCURATE BUT WHAT IS THE TUBE |
| STEEL USED FOR? |
| |
| 6) SHEET A-5 TRUSS CONNECTOR SCHEDULE:RE |
| FERS TO USP 2001 CATALOG.SEE 2003 CATA- |
| LOG "VALUES REPRESENT LOADS WHICH DO NOT |
| INCLUDE STRESS INCRESS ON STEEL". |
| FLORIDA SPECIFIC CODE: |
| 1609.4.3 LOAD REDUCTION. |
| WHEN STRUCTURAL EFFECTS DUE TO TWO OR |
| MORE LOADS IN COMBINATION WITH DEAD LOAD |
| ARE INVESTIGATED IN LOAD COMBINATIONS OF |
| 1609.4.1 OR 1609.4.2, THE COMBINED |
| EFFECTS DUE TO THE TWO OR LOADS MULTI- |
| PLIED BY 0.75 PLUS EFFECTS DUE TO DEAD |
| LOADS SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN THE EFFECTS |
| FROM THE LOAD COMBINATION OF THE DEAD |
| LOAD PLUS THE LOAD PRODUCING THE LARGEST |
| EFFECTS. INCREAS IN ALLOWABLE STRESS SPE |
| CIFIED IN THE MATERIALS SECTIONS OF THIS |
| CODE OR A REFRENCED STANDARD SHALL NOT |
| BE USED WITH THESE LOAD COMBINATIONS |
| EXCEPT THAT A DURATION OF LOAD INCREASE |
| SHALL BE PERMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| CHAPTER 23. |
| |
| RE-EVALUATE TRUSS TABLES WITH NEW LOAD |
| REDUCTIONS! |
| |
| 7)1606.1.4(1) IN WIND BORNE DEBRIS |
| REGIONS, EXTERIOR GLAZING THAT RECEIVES |
| POSITIVE PRESSURE IN BUILDINGS SHALL BE |
| ASSUMED TO BE OPENINGS UNLESS SUCH |
| GLAZING IS IMPACT RESISTANT OR PROTECTED |
| WITH AN IMPACT RESISTANT COVERING MEET- |
| ING THE REQUIREMENTS OF SSTD 12, ASTM |
| E 1886 AND ASTM E 1996 OR MIAMI-DADE. |
| |
| 1) GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED WITHIN 30 FT |
| OF GRADE SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF |
| LARGE MISSLE TEST. |
| |
| 8) FL BLD CODE 1606.1.5: COMPONENTS & |
| CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 COPIES(3 IF THRESH- |
| OLD OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR) OF PRODUCT |
| TESTING REPORT, SBCCI OR DADE COUNTY |
| REPORT ARE ACCEPTED. MISSING REPORTS: |
| A) WINDOWS SINGLE HUNG / FIXED |
| B) MULLIONS |
| C) EXTERIOR DOORS/ GLAZED OPENINGS |
| D) EXTERIOR DOORS/ SOLID |
| E) OVERHEAD GARAGE DOORS |
| F) ROOF ASSEMBLIES |
| G) STORM SHUTTERS |
| |
| 9)1707.4.5.1 MULLIONS OCCURRING |
| BETWEEN INDIVIDUAL WINDOW AND GLASS |
| DOOR ASSEMBLIES. TESTING REPORTS ARE |
| REQUIRED BY AN APPROVED TESTING |
| LABORATORY OR BE ENGINEERED. |
| |
| 10) 1707.4.5.2 MULLIONS SHALL BE DESIGN- |
| ED TO TRANSFER THE DESIGN PRESSURE LOADS |
| APPLIED BY THE WINDOW OR DOOR ASSEMBLIES |
| TO THE ROUGH OPENING SUBTRATE. |
| |
| 11)PROVIDE STORM PANEL INFORMATION WITH |
| INSTALLATION SCHEDULE AND KEY PLAN WITH |
| SPECIFIC ANCHORS AND MOUNTING TO BE USED |
| FOR ALL NON-IMPACT GLAZING. |
| FBC 1606.1.4. |
| |
| 12)FL BLD CODE 2001 SECTION 103.6, |
| 1606.1.4, 1707.4 & 3401.7.2.4. |
| PROCEDURES: 1(B) A COMPLETE INSTALLATION |
| SCHEDULE SUMMARIZING & IDENTIFYING |
| OPENING SIZES, STORY HEIGHTS, UNIT MARK |
| NUMBERS, UNIT SPANS/WIDTHS, UNIT STORM |
| BAR REINFORCING REQUIREMENTS, WALL PRES- |
| SURE ZONES, SLAT TYPES, ETC., SHALL BE |
| SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERMIT APPLICATION |
| TO FACILITATE PLAN REVIEW AND PERMIT |
| ISSUANCE. |
| |
| 13)1707.4.3 EACH EXTERIOR DOOR |
| ASSEMBLY NOT COVERED BY 1707.4.2 |
| (GLAZED DOORS) SHALL BE LISTED AND TEST- |
| ED FOR A PERIOD EQUAL TO THE QUANITY |
| 3600/ V WHERE THE TIME PERIOD IS IN |
| SECTIONS AND V IS IN MILES PER HR TAKEN |
| FROM FIGURE 1606. THE TIME PERIOD SHALL |
| ALSO INCLUDE A 10 SECOND PERIOD AT A |
| LOAD EQUAL TO 1.5 TIMES THE DESIGN |
| PRESSURE. DADE COUNTY & SBCCI REPORTS |
| ARE ACCEPTED. |
| |
| 14) NOTE : ARCHITECT RESUME FULL RESPONS |
| IBILITY FOR WINDOW / DOOR ATTACHMENT IF |
| ATTACHMENT IS LESS RESTRICTIVE THAN SPEC |
| IFIED BY TESTING REPORTS: |
| 1707.4.4.1 ANCHOR REQUIREMENTS: |
| WINDOW & DOOR ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE ANCHOR |
| ED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PUBLISHED |
| MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS TO |
| ACHIEVE THEDESIGN PRESSURE SPECIFIED. |
| SUBSTITUTE ANCHORING SYSTEM USED FOR |
| THE SUBSTRATE NOT SPECIFIED BY THE |
| FENESTRATION MANUFACTURER SHALL PROVIDE |
| EQUAL OR GREATER ANCHORING AS DEMONSTRA- |
| TED BY ACCEPTED ENGINEERING PRACTICES. |
| |
| 15) 1503.4.4 PROTECTION AGAINST DECAY & |
| TERMITES. CONDENSATE LINES & ROOF DOWN |
| SPOUTS SHALL DISCHARGE AT LEAST 1 FT. |
| AWAY FROM THE STRUCTURE SIDEWALL, |
| WHETHER BY UNDERGROUND PIPING, TAIL EX- |
| TENSIONS, OR SPLASH BLOCKS. |
| |
| 16)BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY |
| BE ISSUED, IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO |
| PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL PERMIT |
| SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT |
| OFFICE, AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT |
| ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT APPLICATION. |
| PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE |
| INFORMATION. |
| |
| LOOK FOR COMMENTS BY THE OTHER PLAN |
| REVIEW DISCIPLINES THAT MAY BE WRITTEN |
| ON THE APPLICATION, PLANS, OR ATTACHED |
| SEPARATELY. WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS |
| PLEASE CLEARLY INDICATE THE REVISION AND |
| REMOVE AND REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESS- |
| ARY. SUBMIT (1) SET OF OLD DRAWINGS WITH |
| THE PLANS WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS. A |
| TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL |
| REVIEW NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE |
| REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR |
| SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN |
| BE FOUND, WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR |
| PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED |
| COOPERATION. |
| JIM WITMER |
| BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| TEL: (561)659-8096 X 8412 |
| FAX: (561)659-8026 |