Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 03031778
Permit Number 03031778
Review Stop E
Sequence Number 2
Notes
Date Text
2003-09-04 00:00:00*************** UNSAT **************
  
 PLEASE SEE THAT SOME NOTES FROM FIRST
 REVIEW STILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED.
  
 1)NOTE: PLEASE SHOW POINT OF ATTACHED
 FOR TRANSFORMERS. IT IS NOTED ON X-FORM-
 -ER SCHEDULE FOR THE SIZE BUT NOT
 LOCATION. 250.30 (NOTE#6 FIRST REVIEW)
  
 2)NOTE: (NOTE# 1 FIRST REVIEW), RESPONSE
 LETTER MENTIONS THAT A NOTE WOULD BE
 ADDED TO RISER DIAGRAM. PLEASE CLARFIY/
 SHOW WHERE THIS NOTE IS FOR TEMPORARY
 CONDUITS FOR POWER??
  
 3)NOTE: PLEASE SEE RISER DIAGRAM, SHOWS
 WHAT APPEARS TO BE ONE BUS-DUCT COMING
 FROM FPL FEEDINGMAINS 1 AND 2?
 PLEASE SEE RISER NOTES: MENTIONS BUS
 DUCT TO BE 3000A'S AND LOAD ON BOTH OF
 THESE MAINS EXCEED RATING OF 3000A DUCT?
 PLEASE CLARIFY IF THESE ARE TO BE
 SEPARATE? 215.5
  
 4)NOTE: PLEASE SEE E6.1, SHOWS TWO
 MC-"B"'S, APPEARS TO BE A MISPRINT?
  
 5)NOTE: PLEASE SEE RISER DIAGRAM NOTES,
 MENTIONS 1 1/2" CONDUIT FOR 3-3/0'S AND
 1-#6. PLEASE SEE CONDUIT FILL TABLES IN
 NEC. CHPT 9
  
 6)NOTE: PLEASE CORRELATE ALL PAGES,
 MAINLY E2.7 AND 3.1, FOR FUEL ALARMS,
 ONE MENTION 80% AND 90% AND OTHERS
 MENTION 85 AND 95%.
  
 7)NOTE: PLEASE SEE NOTE FROM FIRST
 REVIEW FOR GFI PROTECTION REQ'D FOR
 HDP. RESPONSE LETTER MENTIONS THAT
 INDICVATION WOULD BE MADE LARGER?
 PLEASE CLARIFY WHERE THIS IS. PANEL
 SCHEDULE DOES NOT MENTION AND RISER
 IS NOT CLEAR. PLEASE INDICATE AT BOTH
 LOCATIONS,RISER AND PANEL.
 230.95/215.10 ETC.
  
 8)NOTE: PLEASE SEE DISCONNECT SHOWN ON
 RISER DIAGRAM FOR X-FORMER TP, THERE IS
 NO INFORMATION GIVEN FOR SIZE,OCP ETC,
 PANEL SCHEDULE FOR HDP MENTIONS TO
 FEED X-FORMER TP W/ 200A OCP, YET
 X-FORMER SCHEDULE MENTIONS 100A OCP?
 PLEASE CLARIFY AND PROVIDE MORE INFOR.
 215.5
  
 9)NOTE: PLANS INDICATE ON 1.2 TO SEE
 3.1 FOR ENLARGED ELECTRICAL RM LAYOUT
 FOR REQ'D ELECTRICAL. PLEASE CLARIFY
 WHERE LIGHTING/POWER IS SHOWN? MINLTS
 ALSO PER 700.16, PLEASE ALSO SEE FIRE
 REVIEW NOTES FOR POSSIBLE REQ'D SD IN
 ELECTRICAL RM.
  
 11)NOTE: PLEASE SEE 110.26C FOR ENTRANCE
 INTO AND OUT OF ELECTRICAL RM.
 PLEASE SEE THE EXCEPT.'S
 PER SCALE, IT DOES NOT SEEM TO MEET
 TWICE THE DISTANCE ACCROSS FOR CLEARENCE
 ? PLEASE CLARIFY AND/OR ADJUST.
  
 12)NOTE: PLEASE SEE 210.52 FOR RECEPTS
 SPACING. THERE ARE MANY UNITS MISSING
 RECEPTS FOR 2' OF WALL ETC.
 ON SET OF PLANS HAVE SOME OF THESE AREAS
 REDLINED. F.R>
  
 13)NOTE: PLEASE ALSO SEE 210.52C-1 FOR
 RECEPTS REQ'D FOR COUNTERSPACE, THERE
 ARE ONLY A COUPLE MISSING, SEE UNIT D36.
 F.R.
 14)NOTE: PLEASE SEE NOTE#22 FROM FIRST
 REVIEW. RESPONSE LETTER MENTIONS, UNIT
 IS 800 SQ FT AND WILL COMPLY? PLEASE SEE
 D36, PANEL SCHEDULE SHOWS UNIT AT 1059SQ
 FT?? PLEASE SEE OTHER UNITS THAT ARE
 LARGER AND NO CHANGE WAS MADE>
 PLEASE ALSO SEE SQFT FOR ALL OTHER UNITS
 SOME DO NOT SEEM TO CORRELATE W/SCALE?
  
 15)NOTE: PLEASE SEE NOTE 26 FROM FIRST
 REVIEW, RESPONSE MENTIONS, WILL COMPLY.
 PLANS DO NOT SEEM TO HAVE AHD SD'S
 MOVED OR NOTE ADDED FOR INSTALLATION OF
 SD'S? NFPA-72
  
 16)NOTE: PLEASE SEE NOTE#36 FR> RESPONSE
 MENTIONS; WILL COMPLY, HOWEVER PANELS
 STILL DO NOT INDICATE SPECS ON PANELS,
 SIZE? THEY ARE NOTED WITH SIZE OF FEEDER
 -S. 215.5
  
 17)NOTE: PLEASE SEE NOTE#27 , PLEASE
 SEE SOME UNITS MOVED RECEPTS TO COMPLY,
 HOWEVER PLEASE SEE SOME UNIT(S), THERE
 ARE MANY UNITS STILL NEED TO MEET
 210.52D, TO BE W/IN 3' OF LAV/SINKS.
  
 18)NOTE: PLEASE SEE NOTE#39 ,PLEASE
 CLARIFY WHERE NOTE IS FOR COLOR CODING
 OF CONDUCTOR PER LOCAL AMENDMENTS?
 215. 277/480V BROWN/PURPLE/YELLOW
  
 PLEASE SEE FIRE REVIEW COMMENTS AND
 COMMENTS FROM OTHER REVIEWERS THAT MAY
 HAVE AN AFFECT ON ELECTRICAL PLANS.
  
 PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR
 REVIEW.IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS,
 PLEASE CALL.
  
 DEWEY PALMER
 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW
 561-805-6717
 [email protected]
2003-09-03 00:00:00NOTES TO FOLLOW,


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved