| Date |
Text |
| 2002-12-30 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | *******DENIED******* |
| | ROBERT BROWN(561) 659 8096 EXT 8499 |
| | |
| | ***NOTE***: |
| | CHAPTER 553.80(2)(B) FLORIDA STATUTES |
| | STATES THAT A LOCAL GOVERNMENT SHALL |
| | IMPOSE A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE FEE FOR |
| | PLAN REVIEW, IF PLANS ARE REJECTED THREE |
| | OR MORE TIMES FOR REPEATED FAILURE TO |
| | CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION. |
| | |
| | FOR CONSISTENCY, THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS |
| | ARE NUMBERED AS PER THE BUILDING PLAN |
| | REVIEW OF 12/23/02: |
| | |
| | 2) FBC* 104.2.2SOME OF THE |
| | ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS ARE STILL NOT |
| | PROPERLY SEALED, FLORIDA STATUTES |
| | 61G1-16.001 THRU 16.003.SEE NOTE ABOVE |
| | |
| | 3) SHEET A-05.THE AMENDMENT TO THE |
| | INTERMEDIATE TRUSS ANCHOR FOR GIRDER |
| | TRUSS SG2 IS NOTED, BUT THE ANCHORS AT |
| | THE ENDS OF THIS TRUSS HAVE STILL NOT |
| | BEEN AMENDED.WHEN THE TRUSS WAS MOVED |
| | TOWARD THE REAR OF THE BUILDING, THE |
| | RELEVANT TRUSS ANCHOR ANNOTATION WAS NOT |
| | AMENDED TO SUIT.AS A RESULT OF THIS, |
| | THE PLANS CURRENTLY SHOW A TRUSS ANCHOR |
| | MARK A (UPLIFT CAPACITY 860 LBS) AT EACH |
| | END OF THIS TRUSS.IS THIS INTENTIONAL/ |
| | SUFFICIENT?.THE PREVIOUS TRUSS END |
| | ANCHOR ANNOTATION FOR THIS TRUSS IS |
| | STILL SHOWN ON THE PLAN BUT NOT POINTING |
| | TO ANY TRUSS UNDER THE REVISED LAYOUT. |
| | ALSO, THE 'REQUIRED UPLIFT' AND TRUSS |
| | ANCHOR REFERENCES ON THE LEFT EDGE OF |
| | SHEET A-05 HAVE NOT PRINTED (TRUNCATED |
| | BY LEFT MARGIN).FINALLY, DUE TO |
| | RELOCATION OF GIRDER TRUSS SG2, THE |
| | AMENDED INTERMEDIATE TRUSS ANCHOR |
| | 'MARK J' IS NOT ALIGNED WITH A CMU |
| | COLUMN AND NO TIE BEAM IS SPECIFIED, ON |
| | SHEET A-05, AT THE HEAD OF THE COVERED |
| | PATIO SIDE WALL.SHOW THE MEANS FOR |
| | TRANSFERRING THE LOADS FROM THE TRUSS |
| | ANCHOR TO THE CMU WALL. |
