Date |
Text |
2005-01-06 00:00:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| |
| SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| [email protected] |
| CALCS FOR HOUSEKEEPING PAD AND 6TH |
| STORY |
| STEEL DECK |
| |
| 1.)THE ACI REFERENCE USED MUST BE IN |
| ACCORDANCE WITH FBC CHAPTER 35, WHICH |
| REFERENCES ACI 318-02.THE INFORMATION |
| SUBMITTED WAS FROM ACI 318-93. |
| |
| 2.)THE CALCS STILL SHOW 4.22% |
| OVERSTRESS (WAS 2% PREVIOUSLY), WITH |
| THE |
| WATER AS A DEAD LOAD.THE CALCS |
| SUBMITTED MUST BE COMPLIANT WITH |
| FBC1601.2.1.IF THE CONCRETE WAS |
| STRONGER THAN DESIGN SPECIFIED, AND |
| THIS |
| IS YOUR JUSTIFICATION, PLEASE INCLUDE |
| IT |
| IN THE CALCS TO SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE. |
| |
| 3.)WHY WILL THE HOT WATER TANK NOT BE |
| FULL 99% OF THE TIME?DOES THIS TANK |
| WORK DIFFERENTLY FROM OTHER TANKS, |
| WHICH |
| REFILL AS HOT WATER LEAVES THE TANK, SO |
| ARE ALWAYS FULL?IF THE WATER LEVEL |
| CHANGES WITHIN THE TANK, HOW DOES THE |
| TANK ADDRESS THE VACUUM CREATED? |
| PLEASE |
| SUBMIT PRODUCT DATA FOR CLARIFICATION. |
| THE CALCS WERE RUN AT 90% FULL; PROVIDE |
| SOME DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS ASSUMPTION. |
| |
| 4.)PLEASE NOTE THAT THE ORIGINAL CALCS |
| SUBMITTED (WITH A MATH ERROR, AND TANK |
| AS A DEAD LOAD) WHEN RUN WITHOUT THE |
| MATH ERROR AND THE TANK AS A LIVE LOAD |
| APPEARS TO SHOW A 28% OVERSTRESS. |
| |
| 5.)IN ADDRESSING THE COMMENT |
| REGARDING |
| THE STEEL DECK, I BELIEVE YOU ARE |
| STATING THAT THE DENSGLASS CAN ACT WITH |
| THE STEEL DECK AS THE MWFRS.THE CALCS |
| CANNOT SHOW AN OVERSTRESS, FBC1601.2.1. |
| ALSO YOUR NOTE STATES THAT THE |
| DENSGLASS |
| AT 3.5PSF WILL ACCOUNT FOR THE 2% |
| INADEQUACY, BUT ISN'T THE STEEL DECK |
| 3.5% OVERSTRESSED?PLEASE RERUN THE |
| CALCULATIONS INCLUDING THE DENSGLASS IF |
| THAT IS HOW YOU ARE SHOWING CODE |
| COMPLIANCE. |
| |
| |
| |
| SENT VIA FAX TO PAUL KING, PE AND TO |
| WHITING TURNER |