| Date |
Text |
| 2002-06-10 00:00:00 | |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | PERMIT: 02041957 |
| | ADD: LOT#48 SEC#5 RENAISSANCE |
| | CONT: HOME DYNAMICS CONSTRUCTION |
| | TEL: (954)275-8569 |
| | FL BLD CODE= 2001 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| | |
| | 1)FL BLDG 1909.3 (EXEPTION# 2) |
| | CONCRETE SLABS ON GRADE CONTAINING 6X6/ |
| | W1.4XW1.4 WELDED WIRE REINFORCEMENT |
| | FABRIC LOCATED IN THE MIDDLE TO THE |
| | UPPER 1/3RD OF THE SLAB SHALL BE SUP- |
| | PORTED BY APPROVED MATERIALS OR SUPPORTS |
| | AT SPACING NOT TO EXCEED 3 FT OR IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPEC. |
| | |
| | 2)1804.1.3 THE BOTTOM OF THE FOUNDA- |
| | TION SHALL EXTEND NO LESS THAN 12" |
| | BELOW FINISH GRADE. SHEET A-4, TYPICAL |
| | WALL SEC NOTE 1821.1.1 IS FOR "HIGH WIND |
| | AREAS". |
| | |
| | 3) FL BLD CODE 1804.2.2 QUESTIONABLE |
| | SOILS, WHERE THE BEARING CAPACITY IS |
| | NOT DEFINETLY KNOWN OR IS IN QUESTION. |
| | THE REPORT SUBMITTED INDICATES ON PAGE |
| | #9"THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS |
| | REPORT IS NOT SUFFICIENT FOR A FINAL |
| | DESIGN OF THE FOUNDATION" |
| | |
| | SHEET A-1 BOTTOM RIGHT OF CENTER, |
| | DISSCREPANCY, PLANS CONFORM TO 2001FBC |
| | /ASCE 5-95, SHOULD READ 7-98. |
| | |
| | 5) PLANS INDICATE CHANGES IN BLACK INK, |
| | QUESTIONABLE AS TO WHOS CHANGES THESE |
| | ARE? PRESSURE ZONES , ARE ALSO ADDED |
| | WITHOUT THE ARCHETECTS INTITIALS OR |
| | ACCOMPANYING SIGNED / SEALED LETTER. |
| | |
| | 6) ACOPY OF THE ASSOCIATIONS COVENANT, |
| | THE ROOF IS OVER THE ZERO-SIDE PROPERTY |
| | LINE. |
| | |
| | 7) FL BLD CODE 1606.1.5: COMPONENTS & |
| | CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 COPIES(3 IF THRESH- |
| | OLD OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR) OF PRODUCT |
| | TESTING REPORT, SBCCI OR DADE COUNTY |
| | REPORT ARE ACCEPTED. |
| | A) ROOFING REPORT, PROVIDE A CURRENT |
| | ROOFING ASSEMBLY REPORT. |
| | B) GARAGE DOOR,OVERHEAD DOOR, HIGHLIGHT |
| | THE MODEL TO BE USED. |
| | C) FRONT ENTRY DOOR, 2 COPIES |
| | D) GLASS BLOCK, TO BE 1 HOUR RATED!!! |
| | THE GLASS BLOCK ARE LOCATED ON A 1HR. |
| | RATED WALL, NO OPENINGS ALLOWED NO |
| | DERATING FOR OPENINGS. |
| | E) STORM SHUTTERS PROVIDE A KEY PLAN |
| | W/ TESTING REPORT. |
| | F) 1707.4.5.1 MULLIONS OCCURRING |
| | BETWEEN INDIVIDUAL WINDOW AND GLASS |
| | DOOR ASSEMBLIES. TESTING REPORTS ARE |
| | REQUIRED BY AN APPROVED TESTING |
| | LABORATORY OR BE ENGINEERED. |
| | |
| | 8)1707.4.5.2 MULLIONS SHALL BE DESIGN- |
| | ED TO TRANSFER THE DESIGN PRESSURE LOADS |
| | APPLIED BY THE WINDOW OR DOOR ASSEMBLIES |
| | TO THE ROUGH OPENING SUBTRATE. |
| | |
| | 9)1707.4.4.1 ANCHOR REQUIREMENTS: |
| | WINDOW & DOOR ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE ANCHOR |
| | ED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PUBLISHED |
| | MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS TO |
| | ACHIEVE THEDESIGN PRESSURE SPECIFIED. |
| | SUBSTITUTE ANCHORING SYSTEM USED FOR |
| | THE SUBSTRATE NOT SPECIFIED BY THE |
| | FENESTRATION MANUFACTURER SHALL PROVIDE |
| | EQUAL OR GREATER ANCHORING AS DEMONSTRA- |
| | TED BY ACCEPTED ENGINEERING PRACTICES. |
| | SHEET A-4 DETAILS INDICATE A DIFFERENT |
| | METHOD OF ATTACHMENT THAN SPECIFIED BY |
| | THE PRODUCT APPROVAL,CHECK ALL REPORTS |
| | VS DETAILS! |
| | |
| | 10)FL BLD CODE CHAP 13 ENERGY EFFICENCY |
| | PROVIDE ENERGY CALS/ W MANUAL "J" |
| | 11) |
| | SHEET A-2 ROOF FRAMING PLAN, DOES NOT |
| | PROVIDE THE MAGNITUDE OF FORCES THAT |
| | ARE TO BE RESISTED, VERTICAL, HORIZONTAL |
| | OR GRAVITY. |
| | |
| | 12) TRUSS ANCHOR SCHEDULE NOT INCLUDED, |
| | INDICATE MANUFACTURER, AND MODEL, DELETE |
| | ALL NOTES FOR SEMCO AND HUGHES, THESE |
| | MANUFACTURERS ARE NO LONGER IN BUSINESS. |
| | |
| | 13) SHEET A-4 NO IDENTIFICATION AS TO |
| | WHAT TYPE OF LATH IS TO BE USED FOR THE |
| | STUCO SOFFIT, FL BLDG CODE 2504.2.2. |
| | 2504.2.2 INSTALLATION OF EXTERIOR |
| | LATHING AND FRAMING SHALL COMPLY WITH |
| | ASTM C-1063. |
| | |
| | 14) SHEET A-4 SECTION 1 TYPICAL 2-STORY |
| | TABLE 600 FOOTNOTE "I" THE FIRE RESIS- |
| | TANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR EXTERIOR WALLS |
| | WITH 5' OR LESS IN HORIZONTAL SEPERATION |
| | SHALL BE BASED UPON BOTH INTERIOR AND |
| | EXTERIOR FIRE EXPOSURES. |
| | 709.6.2.2 THE FIRE RESISTANCE RATING OF |
| | A WOOD FRAMED ASSEMBLY IS EQUAL TO THE |
| | SUM OF THE TIME ASSIGNED TO THE MEMBRANE |
| | ON THE FIRE EXPOSED SIDE, THE TIME |
| | ASSIGNED TO THE FRAMING MEMBERS AND THE |
| | TIME ASIGNED FOR ADDITIONAL CONTRIBUTION |
| | BY OTHER PROTECTIVE MEASURES SUCH AS |
| | INSULATION. THE MEMBRANE ON THE |
| | UNEXPOSED SIDE SHALL NOT BE INCLUDED IN |
| | DETERMINING THE FIRE RESISTANCE OF THE |
| | ASSEMBLY. |
| | |
| | 15) THIS SECOND FLOOR DETAIL NEEDS CLARI |
| | FICATIONA CONTINIOUS LOAD PATH OF RESIS- |
| | TANCE NEEDS TO BE ACHEIVED, USE A CURREN |
| | T MANUFACTURER OFTHE HURRICANE RESIS- |
| | TANT STRAP,DELETE THE NOTE" STRAP |
| | EMBEDED 6" INTO CONCRETE, WHERE A WOOD |
| | TO WOOD CONECTION IS REQUIRED! |
| | THIS SAME DETAIL INDICATES NO RIM |
| | JOIST, BAND BOARD, WHAT WILL THE STRAP |
| | BE FASTENED TO? CONTINIOUS PATH! |
| | ALSO 2X4 BLOCKING , IF THE STUD STRAPP- |
| | ING IS TO FASTEN TO THE BLOCKING, HOW |
| | WILL CONTINIOUS PATH OCCUR? |
| | |
| | 15) SHEET A-2 NOTE#3 THE ARCHETECT OF |
| | RECORD NOTES THAT " THE TRUSS BRACING ON |
| | THIS PLAN SUPERCEDES THE BRACING SHOWN |
| | ON THE TRUSS ENGINEER'S SHOP DRAWINGS. |
| | DOES THIS MEAN IF THERE IS A FAILURE DO |
| | TO BRACING THE ARCHETECT SHALL RESUME |
| | RESPONSIBILITY? |
| | |
| | 16) THE SIDE ENTRY GATE & WALL DEPICTS |
| | A 5'-0" SECTION, TO BE INCLUDED UNDER |
| | THIS PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 17)ACOPY OF THE CALCULATED FEES ARE |
| | ATTACHED. |
| | |
| | 18)BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT CAN BE |
| | ISSUED, IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM |
| | BEACH CO.,THE PERMIT PLANS STAMPED BY |
| | THEM AND THE RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE |
| | PERMIT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | 19)A RECORDED COPY OF THE NOTICE OF |
| | COMMENCEMENT MUST BE SUBMITTED BEFORE A |
| | PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. |
| | |
| | ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL, |
| | JIM WITMER |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | DEPARTMENT OF CONSTRUCTION SERVICES |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | (561) 659-8096 EXT. 8412 |
