Date |
Text |
2002-06-07 00:00:00 | 1) PLAN REVIEW COMMENT RESPONSE 27 |
| LOCATED ON PAGE 7 OF PERMIT REVIEW |
| COMMENTS, 2ND REVIEW SUBMITTAL, APRIL |
| 22,2002 IS CONFUSING. THE PORTION |
| THAT INDICATES "NETS WILL BE ADDED" |
| IS NOT VERY CLEAR. |
| |
| 2) EXIT SIGN INFORMATION THAT WAS |
| PROVIDED IS ACCEPTABLE. THANK YOU. |
| |
| 3) PLANS STILL INDICATE IMPROPER |
| OCCUPANT LOAD FOR ANCILLARY SPACE |
| ON PAGE LS-103. |
| |
| 4) THE OCCUPANT LOAD FOR THE MEZZANINE |
| IS STILL INCORRECT. |
| |
| 5) DOOR M-17 SHOULD BE SHIFTED IN |
| CORRIDOR M-16. |
| |
| 6) PARKING SPACE # 55 AND THE BIKE AREA |
| NOTED ON LEVEL 2, PARKING APPEARS TO |
| POSE A PROBLEM. PLEASE SCALE THIS AREA |
| TO DETERMINE IF THE MINIMUM WIDTH |
| REQUIREMENTS ARE MET ESPECIALLY AT THE |
| NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE PARKING SPACE. |
| |
| 7) ALL SHAFTS THAT PERSONS CAN FALL INTO |
| MUST BE MARKED "SHAFTWAY IN RED LETTERS |
| AT LEAST 6 INCHES HIGH ON A WHITE |
| BACKGROUND. |
| |
| 8) PLEASE PROVIDE TACTILE SIGNAGE AT |
| ALL EXIT DOORS. |
| |
| 9) EXIT SIGNS STILL SHOWN DIRECTING |
| AND IMMEDIATELY IN FRONT OF VALET |
| RAMP ON LS-102. |
| |
| 10) WITH REGARDS TO THE MAG LOCKS |
| PLANNED FOR USE IT WAS INDICATED THAT |
| THESE DEVICES WILL BE TIED INTO THE |
| FIRE ALARM SYSTEM. PLEASE BE ADVISED |
| THAT THERE ARE OTHER CODE REQUIREMENTS |
| FOR THESE DEVICES UNDER DELAYED EGRESS |
| OR ACCESS CONTROLLED EGRESS. |
| |
| 11) STILL CONFUSED ABOUT "USING THE |
| ESCUTHEON ONLY AND CONCEALING THE EYE |
| WITH THE COVER NOTES". |
| |
| 12) STRIPING NOTED OUTSIDE OF EXIT DOORS |
| ARE NOT NECESSARY UNLESS THE OWNER |
| MANDATES THEM, SEE PAGE LS-105. |
| |
| 13) PLEASE SHADE EXIT ACCESS AREAS ON |
| THE PLAN FOR EXITS THAT ARE OPPOSITE OF |
| PARKING SPACES. THIS APPEARS TO BE A |
| PROBLEM ON MORE THAN ONE LOCALE. PLEASE |
| SEE LS-101 AND LS-102. |
| |
| MIKE CARSILLO, ASSISTANT FIRE MARSHAL |
| 659-8096,EXT.8497 |
| 835-2910 |