Date |
Text |
2002-05-28 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| *******DENIED******* |
| ROBERT BROWN(561) 659 8096 EXT 8499 |
| |
| FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 |
| FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND) |
| |
| FOR CONSISTENCY, THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS |
| ARE NUMBERED AS PER THE BUILDING PLAN |
| REVIEW OF 4/12/02: |
| |
| 1) RESPONSE LETTER OF 4/22/02 IS NOTED. |
| A RECORDED COPY OF THE NOTICE OF |
| COMMENCEMENT MUST BE SUBMITTED BEFORE A |
| PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. |
| |
| 2) RESPONSE LETTER OF 4/22/02 IS NOTED. |
| IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH |
| COUNTY, THE PLANS STAMPED BY THEM AND A |
| COPY OF THE RECEIPT SUBMITTED TO CITY OF |
| WEST PALM BEACH BUILDING DEPARTMENT, |
| BEFORE A BUILDING PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. |
| |
| 3) FBC* 104.2.4SITE SURVEY.CONTRARY |
| TO THE LETTER OF RESPONSE DATED 4/22/02, |
| THE SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY DRAWING WAS |
| NOT SUBMITTED. |
| |
| 4) RESPONSE LETTER OF 4/22/02 IS NOTED. |
| FBC* 104.2.1.1ROOF COVERING PRODUCT |
| APPROVAL SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR THE ROOF |
| COVERING SYSTEM TO BE USED (FBC 1504.3) |
| |
| 5) FBC* 1804.2.2THE GEOTECHNICAL |
| REPORT WAS SUBMITTED AS REQUIRED, BUT |
| THE FOUNDATION/STRUCTURAL PLANS WERE NOT |
| RESUBMITTED FOR CORRELATION CHECKS TO BE |
| CARRIED OUT.RESUBMIT ALL DOCUMENTS. |
| |
| 7) RESPONSE LETTER OF 4/22/02 IS NOTED. |
| FBC 1606.1.4WINDOW AND DOOR PRODUCT |
| APPROVALS.SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR |
| THE EXTERIOR DOOR AND WINDOW SYSTEMS TO |
| BE USED. |
| |
| 9) FBC 13-103THREE COPIES OF THE HVAC |
| LOAD ANALYSIS WERE RECEIVED BUT |
| COMPLIANCE MUST BE DEMONSTRATED BY |
| SUBMITTAL OF APPROPRIATE ENERGY CODE |
| COMPLIANCE FORMS. |
| |
| 11) FBC 1019.1.1 EXIT FROM ASSEMBLY RMS |
| SHEET LS-105, SECOND FLOOR.THE LETTER |
| OF RESPONSE DATED 4/22/02 IS NOTED.ADD |
| PAINTED STRIPES WITH WARNING: FIRE |
| EGRESS KEEP CLEAR, BETWEEN DOOR G22 AND |
| THE STEPS/RAMP, ON SHEETS LS-103 & A-103 |
| |
| 16) FBC 1003.1 OCCUPANCY OF 'UNASSIGNED' |
| ROOM, SHEET LS-106.IF THE EGRESS |
| CAPACITY HAS BEEN CALCULATED BASED ON |
| OFFICE USE AS STATED, THEN CHANGE THE |
| ROOM NAME FROM 'UNASSIGNED' TO 'OFFICE'. |
| |
| 17) FROM THE LETTER OF RESPONSE, IT IS |
| NOTED THAT STAIR #3 IS NOT AN EXIT. WITH |
| REFERENCE TO SHEET LS-106, THE COMMON |
| PATH OF TRAVEL (FBC 202 & 1020.6) FROM |
| COMMUNITY CONFERENCE ROOM (3-003) AND |
| THE RECEPTION (3-002) MAY EXCEED 100 FT. |
| SHOW THE PROPOSED FURNITURE IN THESE |
| ROOMS ON THE LIFE SAFETY PLAN AND SHOW |
| THAT THE COMMON PATH OF TRAVEL TO THE |
| NORTH SECTION OF CORRIDOR 3-010 DOES NOT |
| EXCEED 100 FT.ALTERNATIVELY, AMEND THE |
| EGRESS SIGNS AND DOOR LOCKS TO PROVIDE A |
| SECOND EGRESS PATH VIA CORRIDOR 3-024. |
| |
| 21) FBC 104.2.1EXTERIOR ALUMINUM |
| CLADDING PANELS.THIS COMMENT HAS NOT |
| BEEN PROPERLY ADDRESSED.THE REVISION |
| TO DETAIL 8/A-705 DOES NOT SHOW THE |
| MEANS OF ATTACHING THE ALUMINUM-FACED |
| PLYWOOD PANELS TO THE BUILDING FACADE. |
| |
| 23) |
2002-05-22 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| ******PROVISO******* |
| ROBERT BROWN(561) 659 8096 EXT 8499 |
| |
| PARADISE BAY-MASTER MODEL A |
| |
| --PROVISO-- |
| HURRICANE MISSILE IMPACT PROTECTION |
| SHUTTERS.THE ROBICO SHUTTERS INC. |
| DRAWINGS SUBMITTED DO NOT FORM PART OF A |
| PRODUCT APPROVAL.SUBMIT A PRODUCT |
| APPROVAL NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE WITH |
| ASSOCIATED DRAWINGS FOR THE PROPOSED |
| SHUTTERS. |