Date |
Text |
2001-06-06 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| PERMIT # 01050883 |
| 1329 10TH STREET |
| O/B TAYLOR, MARLA/ |
| GREEN, SCOTTY |
| 820-0145 |
| ARTHER PATERSON |
| 842- 1944 |
| 1)- SBC SSTD 10-97 FOR RESIDENTIAL |
| BUILDINGS THAT ARE NOT DESIGNED BY A |
| DESIGN PROFESSIONAL (ARCHITECT OR ENGINE |
| ER) THE EQUIREMENTS ARE DEEMED TO SATIS- |
| FY THE WIND LOAD PROVISIONS OF 1606 IN |
| THE 1997 SBC SUBJECT TO THE LIMITATIONS |
| IN GENERIC BUILDING GEOMETRY, SITING |
| LOCATIONS, MATERIALS AND WIND CLIMATE |
| SET FORTH WITHIN. |
| |
| 2)- SSTD 10-97 303.1 MONOLITHIC SLAB |
| CONFIGURATION, 20" TALL X 12" WIDE. |
| |
| 3)- SSTD 10-97 TABLE 205 C IS GIVEN FOR |
| THE SPACING OFVERTICAL STEEL AND THE |
| BOND BEAM REQUIREMENTS. |
| |
| 4)- SSTD 10-97: 205.8 GIVES THE O/B |
| 3 OPTIONS FOR TYPE OF BEAM.THE THREE |
| CHOICES ARE OUTLINED ON PAGES 36/41 |
| THE MOST COMMONLY USED IN THIS AREA IS |
| THE BEAM / LINTAL ASSEMBLY. PAGE 41 |
| INDICATES A 16" BEAM ALL CELLS ARE GROUT |
| ED ABOVE THE LINTEL & THE AMOUNT OF |
| STEEL REQUIRED FOR THE PLACEMENT IN THE |
| LINTEL. |
| |
| 5)- SBC 1606.2.6.2 COMPONENTS & CLADDING |
| THERE IS NO DETAIL FOR THE ATTACHMENT OF |
| WINDOW BUCKS TO THE BLOCK. |
| |
| 6)- DISCREPANCIES: THE TRUSS PLAN SHOWS |
| A DIFFERENT TRUSSED ROOF THAN THE ELEVAT |
| IONS, THERE IS ALSO A 3'-0" INDINTATION |
| IN THE EXTERIOR WALL WHICH THE TRUSS |
| PLAN DOESN'T SHOW CREATING A 5'-0" OVER- |
| HANG + VERY HIGH UPLIFT VALUES WHICH |
| WILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED. |
| |
| 7)- THE PLAN DOESN'T INDICATE IF THE |
| GABLE END IS TO BE WOOD FRAME OR BLOCK, |
| IF THERE IS TO BE A DROPPED GABLE TO |
| ALLOW FOR THE 2'-0" OVERHANG? |
| |
| 8)- SBC 1606.4.1/1707.4.1 GLAZED OPENING |
| WILL REQUIRE STORM SHUTTERS THAT MEET |
| THE LARGE MISSLE IMPACT RESISTANCE TEST- |
| ING, SBCCI REPORT OR DADE COUNTY ARE |
| ACCEPTABLE. |
| |
| BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| JIM WITMER |
| (561) 659-8096 EX 8412 |