Plan Review Details - Permit 99121967
Plan Review Stops For Permit 99121967
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2001-02-07 Cont ID  
Sent By dpalmer Date 2001-02-07 Time 17:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By dpalmer Date 2001-02-07 Time 17:55 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2000-05-15 Cont ID  
Sent By dpalmer Date 2000-05-15 Time 13:19 Rev Time 0.00
Received By dpalmer Date 2000-05-15 Time 13:19 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2000-02-05 Cont ID  
Sent By dpalmer Date 2000-02-05 Time 11:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By dpalmer Date 2000-02-05 Time 11:26 Sent To  
Notes
2001-01-08 00:00:00***************************************
  
 NOTES ON PLANS FOR CWP IF REQ`D BY
 METAL COLD WATER PIPE BEING INSTALLED.
 AS PER 250-80-81
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2000-05-03 Cont ID  
Sent By cthirben Date 2000-05-03 Time 14:11 Rev Time 1.00
Received By cthirben Date 2000-05-03 Time 14:10 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2000-03-23 Cont ID  
Sent By jleech Date 2000-03-01 Time 15:05 Rev Time 0.35
Received By jleech Date 2000-03-01 Time 15:05 Sent To  
Notes
2001-01-08 00:00:00DENIED;
 1. A/C PLAN TO BE SAME AS BUILDING
 FLOOR PLAN.
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2000-02-03 Cont ID  
Sent By jleech Date 2000-02-03 Time 14:36 Rev Time 0.50
Received By jleech Date 2000-02-03 Time 14:36 Sent To  
Notes
2001-01-08 00:00:00DENIED;
 1.A/C PLAN TO BE SAME AS BUILDING
 FLOOR PLAN.
 2.CFM CALCULATIONS SHOULD BE LESS THAN
 A/H'S CAPACITY OR LARGER EQUIPMENT
 SHOULD BE USED.
 3.MISSING CFM'S IN UNIT 1527 1-R NOOK.
 4. SHOW R/A LOCATION.
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2000-05-17 Cont ID  
Sent By tlarge Date 2000-05-17 Time 06:21 Rev Time 0.50
Received By tlarge Date 2000-05-17 Time 06:21 Sent To  
Notes
2001-01-08 00:00:00SAME COMMENTS AS PREVIOUS REVIEW.
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2000-05-04 Cont ID  
Sent By tlarge Date 2000-05-04 Time 09:07 Rev Time 1.00
Received By tlarge Date 2000-05-04 Time 09:07 Sent To  
Notes
2001-01-08 00:00:00SHT.1-MAX.HEIGHT TO BOTTOM OF WOOD
 BLOCKING FOR SIDE OF TOILET SHALL BE 32"
 (PLANS SHOW 32"MIN)PER FHA REQ.6,FIG.#3.
  
 SUPPLY WOOD BLOCKING DETAILS FOR SHOWER.
 COMPLY W/FHA REQ.#6,FIG.#5.
  
 CLEARLY INDICATE ON THE PLANS WHICH
 DESIGN SPECIFICATION (A OR B )OF THE
 FAIR HOUSING ACT IS BEING UTILIZED.
  
 BATHROOM #2,UNIT MDL-1409,LENGTH OF THE
 BATHROOM DOESN'T HAVE THE DIMENSION
 REQUIRED FOR TYPE "A" BATH WHEN
 APPROACHED FROM THE BEDROOM.
  
 THE LOCATION OF THE PLUMBING FIXTURES ON
 THE SANITARY RISER DOESN'T MATCH THE
 ARCH.FLOOR PLAN..COUNTYWIDE AMENDMENTS
 TO SPC SEC.104.2.1.
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2000-01-27 Cont ID  
Sent By tlarge Date 2000-01-27 Time 07:43 Rev Time 0.75
Received By tlarge Date 2000-01-27 Time 07:43 Sent To  
Notes
2001-01-08 00:00:00A 30"X 48"CLEAR FLOOR SPACE SHALL BE
 PROVIDED PARALLEL TO THE SHOWER PER
 FEDERAL FAIRHOUSING ACT 24 CFR 100.205
 REQ.#7,PARAGRAPH (2)(A).THE WATER CLOSET
 CANNOT BE LOCATED IN THIS SPACE PER
 SPECIFICATION "A" OF THE ACT.
  
 SHOW MAX.HEIGHT TO BOTTOM WOOD BLOCKING
 FOR GRAB BARS.COMPLY W/FHA REQ.#6.
  
 THE LOCATION OF THE FIXTURES ON THE
 SANITARY RISER DOESN'T CORRELATE W/THE
 ARCH.FLOOR PLAN.COUNTYWIDE AMENDMENTS TO
 SPC SEC.104.2.1.
Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2000-05-11 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2000-05-11 Time 21:37 Rev Time 2.00
Received By jgomez Date 2000-05-11 Time 21:36 Sent To  
Notes
2001-01-08 00:00:00APPROVED WITH PROVISO:
 1-FLOOD ZONE "A0". PROVIDE ELEVATION
 CERTIFICATE AFTER SLAB IS POURED.
 2-PRODUCT APPROVALS:
 -PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR TWO HOUR
 FIRE RATED CONCRETE BLOCK, EXTERIOR
 FRENCH DOOR WITH SIDELITES ASSEMBLY,
 EXTERIOR DOUBLE FRENCH DOOR AND
 WINDOW MULLIONS.
 -DRAWINGS IN PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE
 SLIDING GLASS DOORS ARE NOT LEGIBLE.
 3-PROVIDE BUCK DETAIL FOR SLIDING GLASS
 DOORS. SEC. 104.2.2 CITY AMENDMENTS.
 4-PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR SINGLE HUNG
 WINDOW REQUIRES A 2X BUCK. REVISE
 WINDOW BUCK DETAIL AS REQUIRED.
 5-STORM PANELS:
 -INSTALLATION SCHEDULE AND KEY PLAN
 DON'T MATCH ARCHITECT'S PLANS. SEE
 SIZES OF OPENINGS. ALSO, INCLUDE THE
 OPTIONS.
 -CLEARLY INDICATE ON DRAWINGS MOUNTING
 CONDITIONS AND ANCHOR TYPE AND SPACING
 TO BE USED.
 NOTE: TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION TABLES
 ON SHEET 4 OF 4 OF DRAWING 97-404P AND
 BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. THE MEAN ROOF
 HEIGHT FOR THIS BUILDING IS PLUS OR
 MINUS AT 16'-0" AND THE BUILDING
 CONSTRUCTION IS MASONRY, NOT CONCRETE.
 6-REVISE ENERGY CALCULATIONS:
 -OWNER INFORMATION IS INCORRECT.
 -LOCATION IS INCORRECT.
 -DON'T FORGET OWNER SIGNATURE AND DATE.
 7-PROVIDE COMPLETE CALCULATIONS FOR
 ATTIC CROSS VENTILATION AT EACH UNIT
 AND CLEARLY INDICATE ON ROOF PLAN THE
 VENT SIZES AND LOCATION.SEC 2309.7 SBC
 8-PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAIL/SPECS FOR
 CEILING CONSTRUCTION AT ENTRY AND BACK
 PORCH. INCLUDE FASTENER TYPE AND
 SPACING. SEC 2504 SBC 1997.
 9-WALK-IN-CLOSET IN UNITS 1527 TO HAVE
 THE SHELF ONLY ON EITHER SIDE IN ORDER
 TO COMPLY WITH THE CLEARANCES ON THE
 FAIR HOUSING ACT, CHAPTER THREE.
  
 NOTE:
 -IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE FEEL
 FREE TO CALL JULIO GOMEZ AT 659-8096
 EXT. 8232.
Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2000-03-28 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2000-03-28 Time 11:55 Rev Time 3.00
Received By jgomez Date 2000-03-28 Time 11:55 Sent To  
Notes
2001-01-08 00:00:00CHECKLIST:
 1-REVISE LOCATION OF KITCHEN RANGE TO
 COMPLY WITH THE CLEAR SPACE REQUIRED
 FRONT OF IT. SEC 7A FAIR HOUSING ACT.
 2-BATHRM #2, UNIT MDL 1409, SEC 7B F.H.A
 A)DOOR FROM BEDROOM #2 TO BE 32" CLEAR.
 B)LENGTH OF BATHROOM DOESN'T HAVE THE
 DIMENSION REQUIRED FOR A TYPE A BATH
 WHEN APPROACHED FROM THE BEDROOM.
 3-SHOWER AT MASTER BATH TO COMPLY WITH
 THE CLEAR FLOOR SPACE REQUIRED. 7B FHA
 4-OPTIONAL SLIDING GLASS DOORS AT MASTER
 BEDROOM TO HAVE 32" MIN. CLEAR OPENING
 5-ENTRY DOOR SPACE TO COMPLY W/ANSI 4.13
 6-ROOF FRAMING PLANS AND TRUSS DRAWINGS:
 -CLARIFY CONSTRUCTION AT RIGHT AND LEFT
 END OF BUILDING. TRUSS DRAWINGS SHOW
 BEARING WALLS, BUT, ARCHITECTURAL DWGS
 DON'T. SEE PLANS FOR COMMENTS.
 -CLARIFY WHO REVIEW THE TRUSS DRAWINGS.
 STAMP SAYS "OUR OFFICE HAS REVIEW..."
 WHAT OFFICE IS THIS?.
 -CLARIFY WHY THE TRUSSES RUNNING FROM
 FRONT TO BACK ARE DESIGNED WITHOUT
 THE RIDGE. WHY IS THIS AREA TO BE DONE
 BY BUILDER?.
 -UPDATE ALL GENERAL TRUSS DETAILS TO
 ASCE 7-95 AND SIGN, SEAL AND DATE THEM
 -ENGINEERED TRUSSES TO BE DESIGNED PER
 ASCE 7-95 FOR 145 MPH WIND, NOT AS PER
 ASCE 7-93 FOR 140 MPH WIND, ALSO, ALL
 TRUSSES TO BE DESIGNED AT THE SAME
 MEAN ROOF HEIGHT.
 -REVISE TRUSS ANCHOR SCHEDULE TO RESIST
 THE UPLIFT AND LATERAL LOADS SHOWN ON
 THE ENGINEERED TRUSSES.
 7-PRODUCT APPROVALS:
 -PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR 2 HOUR
 CONCRETE BLOCK.
 -SLIDING GLASS DOORS AND WINDOW PRODUCT
 APPROVALS TO BE SIGNED, SEALED & DATED
 BY THE PROFESSIONAL DESIGNER OF RECORD
 AND FILL IN THE SPECIFIC JOB LOCATION.
 8-STORM PANELS:
 -PROVIDE A COMPLETE INSTALLATION SCHED.
 (AS PER CITY SAMPLE) AND KEY PLAN.
 ALSO, HIGHLIGHT THE SPECIFIC MOUNTING
 CONDITIONS AND ANCHOR SPACING.
 9-ENERGY CALCULATIONS TO BE SIGNED AND
 DATED BY THE OWNER/AGENT. ALSO, REVISE
 THE OWNER INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM.
 -NUMBER OF BEDROOMS ON UNIT 1527 IS 3,
 NOT 2. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
 10-PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR ATTIC CROSS
 VENTILATION AT EACH UNIT.SBC/97 2309.7
 NOTE: TAKE INTO ACCOUNT FIREPROOF DET.
 ON WALL SECTION 1 OF SHEET NAMED DT.
 11-PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAIL AND SPECS FOR
 CEILING CONSTRUCTION AT ENTRY AND BACK
 PORCHES OF EACH UNIT. INCLUDE FASTENER
 TYPE AND SECTION. SEC. 2504.2 SBC/97.
 12-DRAWING #4: CLARIFY HOW DOES THE 2 HR
 "PARTY WALL" GOES TO THE BOTTOM OF
 ROOF SHEATHING IF THE BEAM HEIGHT IS
 12'-11". SEE SECTIONS AND ELEVATIONS.
 13-DETAIL SC-2: HOW DOES THIS DESIGN
 MAINTAINS THE STRUCTURAL STABILITY AND
 FIRE RESISTANCE IF THE MAIN GIRDER
 FAILS. SEC. 704.4.2(3) SBC 1997.
 14-NEED TO HAVE A PERMIT APPLICATION FOR
 EACH TOWNHOUSE.
 15-PAY $750 TO THE CITY OF WEST PALM BCH
 FOR WESTERN EXPANSION FEES FOR EACH
 TOWNHOUSE.
 16-CONSTRUCTION VALUE DECLARED IN THE
 PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO LOW. THE
 RECALCULATED VALUE FOR EACH TOWNHOUSE
 IS AS FOLLOWS:
 $104,640 FOR MODEL 1357
 $107,877 FOR MODEL 1409 AND
 $115,660 FOR MODEL 1527.
 THEREFORE, PERMIT FEES TO BE ADJUSTED
 FOR EACH PERMIT APPLICATION.
 17-PROVIDE SAFETY GLASS WHERE REQUIRED.
 SEE PLANS FOR COMMENTS. SEC 2405.2 SBC
 18-SEE PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AND
 PLEASE RETURN REVIEWED SET AFTER THE
 CORRECTIONS ARE DONE IN ORDER TO
 FACILITATE AND EXPEDITE THE RE-REVIEW
 PROCESS.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2000-02-28 Cont ID  
Sent By gjoyce Date 2000-02-28 Time 10:43 Rev Time 0.25
Received By gjoyce Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved