Plan Review Details - Permit 22010534
Plan Review Stops For Permit 22010534
Review Stop AD ADDRESSING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2022-01-27 Cont ID  
Sent By cpuell Date 2022-01-27 Time 16:49 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cpuell Date 2022-01-27 Time 16:49 Sent To  
Notes
2022-01-27 16:50:01ADDRESS APPROPRIATE FOR PROJECT.

Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2022-04-07 Cont ID  
Sent By cthroop Date 2022-04-07 Time 13:29 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cthroop Date 2022-04-07 Time 05:23 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2022-03-23 Cont ID  
Sent By cthroop Date 2022-03-23 Time 07:30 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cthroop Date 2022-03-17 Time 06:53 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2022-04-07 Cont ID  
Sent By cthroop Date 2022-04-07 Time 13:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cthroop Date 2022-04-07 Time 12:03 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2022-02-16 Cont ID  
Sent By jleahy Date 2022-02-16 Time 11:18 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jleahy Date 2022-02-15 Time 11:31 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop E-LOWVOLT ELECTRICAL LOW VOLTAGE
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2022-04-07 Cont ID  
Sent By cthroop Date 2022-04-07 Time 13:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cthroop Date 2022-04-07 Time 13:24 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2022-04-13 Cont ID  
Sent By aoliver Date 2022-04-13 Time 08:00 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aoliver Date 2022-04-10 Time 08:59 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2022-04-07 Cont ID  
Sent By lmarchan Date 2022-04-07 Time 14:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmarchan Date 2022-04-05 Time 07:46 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2022-03-23 Cont ID  
Sent By lmarchan Date 2022-03-23 Time 13:52 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmarchan Date 2022-01-27 Time 09:15 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop IMPACT COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2022-04-20 Cont ID  
Sent By lmarchan Date 2022-04-20 Time 12:56 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmarchan Date 2022-04-07 Time 14:38 Sent To  
Notes
2022-04-20 11:59:21RECEIPT MU-2022-07396 - $2291.74 PAID
2022-04-07 14:38:354/7/22 EMAILED IMPACT OFFICE TO REVIEW. LEM

Review Stop IMPACT COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2022-03-23 Cont ID  
Sent By lmarchan Date 2022-03-23 Time 13:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmarchan Date 2022-03-23 Time 13:53 Sent To  
Notes
2022-03-23 13:53:26 
 IMPACT FEES
 PLANS NEED TO BE REVIEWED BY PALM BEACH COUNTY FOR
 IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT.
 PLANS WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE PBC IMPACT FEE OFFICE
 DIGITALLY VIA PROJECTDOX UPON NOTIFICATION BY THIS
 OFFICE. NOTIFICATION MAY OCCUR WHEN PLANS ARE NEAREST
 FINAL FORM. YOU MAY COORDINATE WITH THE IMPACT FEE
 OFFICE AT (561) 233-5025 OR SIMPLY UPLOAD THE MUNICIPAL
 IMPACT FEE QUESTIONNAIRE FORM TO YOUR PROJECT AND NAME
 THE FILE MUNICIPAL IMPACT FEE QUESTIONNAIRE. THE FORM
 CAN BE FOUND AT: HTTP://DISCOVER.PBCGOV.ORG/PZB/ADMINIS
 TRATION/PDF/IMPACTFEES/FORMS/QUESTIONNAIRE.PDF UPON
 APPROVAL AND FEE PAYMENT (IF ANY), PLEASE UPLOAD THE
 RECEIPT TO YOUR PROJECT OR EMAIL IT TO
 [email protected] .
  

Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2022-04-07 Cont ID  
Sent By cthroop Date 2022-04-07 Time 13:29 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cthroop Date 2022-04-07 Time 12:03 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2022-02-09 Cont ID  
Sent By medwards Date 2022-02-09 Time 11:11 Rev Time 0.00
Received By medwards Date 2022-02-09 Time 10:36 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2022-04-06 Cont ID  
Sent By lcrespo Date 2022-04-06 Time 12:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lcrespo Date 2022-04-06 Time 12:47 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2022-02-08 Cont ID  
Sent By lcrespo Date 2022-02-08 Time 13:40 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lcrespo Date 2022-02-08 Time 13:40 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2022-01-31 Cont ID  
Sent By lcrespo Date 2022-01-31 Time 13:27 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lcrespo Date 2022-01-31 Time 13:27 Sent To  
Notes
2022-01-31 13:47:2001/31/22 1ST PLUMBING REVIEW**DENIED** WITH COMMENTS
  
 NOTE - A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW COULD NOT BE DONE AT THIS
 TIME, AND ADDITIONAL PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS MAY BE
 GENERATED UPON THE RE-REVIEW OF SUBMITTED CORRECTIONS.
  
 1. ON THE COVER SHEET IT SAYS THERE IS A P-1 WITH
 PLUMBING SANITARY PLAN; WATER PIPING AND FIXTURE
 SCHEDULE AND NON-PROVIDED. WOULD YOU PLEASE PROVIDE PER
 THE WPB AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC SEC.107.2.1 INFORMATION
 ON CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT?
 WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS, PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION &
 REMOVE ANY VOIDED SHEETS & REPLACE ANY NECESSARY PAGES.
 A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW
 COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION,
 MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE
 THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND, WILL HELP EXPEDITE YOUR
 PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 HTTPS://CODES.ICCSAFE.ORG/CODES/FLORIDA
  
 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS 2017 FBC CHAPTER; UPON
 REQUEST.
  
 LUIS A. CRESPO
 PLUMBING PLAN EXAMINER / INSPECTOR
 EMAIL: [email protected] OFFICE: 561 805-6720
  

Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2022-03-23 Cont ID  
Sent By cthroop Date 2022-03-23 Time 07:30 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cthroop Date 2022-03-17 Time 06:53 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2022-04-13 Cont ID  
Sent By pvalenti Date 2022-04-13 Time 07:13 Rev Time 0.00
Received By pvalenti Date 2022-04-13 Time 06:37 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2022-04-07 Cont ID  
Sent By cthroop Date 2022-04-07 Time 13:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cthroop Date 2022-04-07 Time 05:23 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2022-03-23 Cont ID  
Sent By cthroop Date 2022-03-23 Time 07:30 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cthroop Date 2022-03-17 Time 06:53 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2022-04-11 Cont ID  
Sent By kdefranc Date 2022-04-11 Time 09:58 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kdefranc Date 2022-04-11 Time 09:57 Sent To  
Notes
2022-04-11 09:58:264/11/22 ? PASSED
  
 PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS TO BE ADDRESSED:
 REVIEW COMMENTS TO BE ADDRESSED:
 1.PLEASE UPDATE THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE SITE
 DATA TABLE AS FOLLOWS:
 A. "LESSER OF 20', 20% LOT DEPTH, OR 'CONTEXTUAL'" IS
 NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE APPLICABLE REQUIRED/ALLOWABLE
 MINIMUM FRONT SETBACK. THEREFORE, SIMPLY STATE "IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-223(C)(3)(B)" FOR
 THE REQUIRED/ALLOWABLE MINIMUM FRONT SETBACK.
 [SATISFIED]
 B. "CONTEXTUAL; SEE SITE PLAN" IS NOT ACCEPTABLE FOR
 THE PROVIDED MINIMUM FRONT SETBACK INFORMATION.
 THEREFORE, IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROVIDED FRONT SETBACK
 DEMONSTRATED IN THE SITE PLAN. [SATISFIED]
  
 ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENTS (THAT REQUIRE SEPARATE
 PERMITS) TO BE ADDRESSED:
 1. PLEASE SUBMIT A LANDSCAPE PERMIT APPLICATION OR A
 LANDSCAPE CONDITIONAL APPROVAL PERMIT FORM. [SATISFIED]
 2. THE SEGMENT OF THE PROPOSED FENCE ALONG WINDSOR
 AVENUE IS, NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION
 94-222(H)(2), EXCEEDING THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 48 INCHES
 (4 FEET). THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE SITE PLAN
 DEMONSTRATING THIS SEGMENT OF THE PROPOSED FENCE
 MEETING THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED HEIGHT. [SATISFIED]
 3. THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY IS, NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH
 ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-312(2)(A), ENCROACHING WITHIN THE
 MINIMUM CORNER CLEARANCE DISTANCE OF 50 FEET. IT ALSO
 APPEARS THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY IS ENCROACHING WITHIN THE
 MINIMUM ACCESS POINTS SEPARATION DISTANCE OF 125 FEET.
 HOWEVER, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-312(3),
 AN ALTERNATIVE DESIGN MAY BE APPROVED. [SATISFIED]
  
 NEW REVIEW COMMENTS TO BE ADDRESSED:
 1. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE SIDE
 SETBACK DIMENSION FOR THE PROPOSED HVAC UNIT ON THE
 SITE PLAN, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION
 94-305(B)(4). [SATISFIED]
 2. FOR BOTH THE SUBJECT MASTER BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION AND THE SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT
 APPLICATION, PLEASE PROVIDE A REVISED LANDSCAPE PLAN
 DEMONSTRATING CONSISTENT INFORMATION (PERTAINING TO THE
 PROPOSED BUILDING, SIDE UNCOVERED STAIR, SHED, HVAC
 UNIT, DRIVEWAY, WALKWAY, AND FENCE) LIKE THE OTHER
 REVISED PLANS AND DRAWINGS DEMONSTRATE. [NOT SATISFIED]
  
  
 KEVIE DEFRANC
 PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION
 [email protected]
 561-822-1449
  

Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2022-04-07 Cont ID  
Sent By kdefranc Date 2022-04-07 Time 14:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kdefranc Date 2022-04-07 Time 14:46 Sent To  
Notes
2022-04-07 14:46:554/7/22 - FAILED
  
 PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS TO BE ADDRESSED:
 REVIEW COMMENTS TO BE ADDRESSED:
 1.PLEASE UPDATE THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE SITE
 DATA TABLE AS FOLLOWS:
 A. "LESSER OF 20', 20% LOT DEPTH, OR 'CONTEXTUAL'" IS
 NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE APPLICABLE REQUIRED/ALLOWABLE
 MINIMUM FRONT SETBACK. THEREFORE, SIMPLY STATE "IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-223(C)(3)(B)" FOR
 THE REQUIRED/ALLOWABLE MINIMUM FRONT SETBACK. [NOT
 SATISFIED]
 B. "CONTEXTUAL; SEE SITE PLAN" IS NOT ACCEPTABLE FOR
 THE PROVIDED MINIMUM FRONT SETBACK INFORMATION.
 THEREFORE, IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROVIDED FRONT SETBACK
 DEMONSTRATED IN THE SITE PLAN. [SATISFIED]
  
 ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENTS (THAT REQUIRE SEPARATE
 PERMITS) TO BE ADDRESSED:
 1. PLEASE SUBMIT A LANDSCAPE PERMIT APPLICATION OR A
 LANDSCAPE CONDITIONAL APPROVAL PERMIT FORM. [SATISFIED]
 2. THE SEGMENT OF THE PROPOSED FENCE ALONG WINDSOR
 AVENUE IS, NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION
 94-222(H)(2), EXCEEDING THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 48 INCHES
 (4 FEET). THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE SITE PLAN
 DEMONSTRATING THIS SEGMENT OF THE PROPOSED FENCE
 MEETING THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED HEIGHT. [SATISFIED]
 3. THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY IS, NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH
 ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-312(2)(A), ENCROACHING WITHIN THE
 MINIMUM CORNER CLEARANCE DISTANCE OF 50 FEET. IT ALSO
 APPEARS THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY IS ENCROACHING WITHIN THE
 MINIMUM ACCESS POINTS SEPARATION DISTANCE OF 125 FEET.
 HOWEVER, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-312(3),
 AN ALTERNATIVE DESIGN MAY BE APPROVED. [SATISFIED]
  
 NEW REVIEW COMMENTS TO BE ADDRESSED:
 1. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE SIDE
 SETBACK DIMENSION FOR THE PROPOSED HVAC UNIT ON THE
 SITE PLAN, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION
 94-305(B)(4).
 2. FOR BOTH THE SUBJECT MASTER BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION AND THE SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT
 APPLICATION, PLEASE PROVIDE A REVISED LANDSCAPE PLAN
 DEMONSTRATING CONSISTENT INFORMATION (PERTAINING TO THE
 PROPOSED BUILDING, SIDE UNCOVERED STAIR, SHED, HVAC
 UNIT, DRIVEWAY, WALKWAY, AND FENCE) LIKE THE OTHER
 REVISED PLANS AND DRAWINGS DEMONSTRATE.
  
  
 KEVIE DEFRANC
 PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION
 [email protected]
 561-822-1449
  

Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2022-02-07 Cont ID  
Sent By kdefranc Date 2022-02-07 Time 15:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kdefranc Date 2022-02-07 Time 15:53 Sent To  
Notes
2022-02-07 15:55:012/7/22 - FAILED
  
 REVIEW COMMENTS TO BE ADDRESSED:
 1.PLEASE UPDATE THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE SITE
 DATA TABLE AS FOLLOWS:
 A. "LESSER OF 20', 20% LOT DEPTH, OR 'CONTEXTUAL'" IS
 NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE APPLICABLE REQUIRED/ALLOWABLE
 MINIMUM FRONT SETBACK. THEREFORE, SIMPLY STATE "IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-223(C)(3)(B)" FOR
 THE REQUIRED/ALLOWABLE MINIMUM FRONT SETBACK.
 B. "CONTEXTUAL; SEE SITE PLAN" IS NOT ACCEPTABLE FOR
 THE PROVIDED MINIMUM FRONT SETBACK INFORMATION.
 THEREFORE, IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROVIDED FRONT SETBACK
 DEMONSTRATED IN THE SITE PLAN.
  
 ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENTS (THAT REQUIRE SEPARATE
 PERMITS) TO BE ADDRESSED:
 1. PLEASE SUBMIT A LANDSCAPE PERMIT APPLICATION OR A
 LANDSCAPE CONDITIONAL APPROVAL PERMIT FORM.
 2. THE SEGMENT OF THE PROPOSED FENCE ALONG WINDSOR
 AVENUE IS, NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION
 94-222(H)(2), EXCEEDING THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 48 INCHES
 (4 FEET). THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE SITE PLAN
 DEMONSTRATING THIS SEGMENT OF THE PROPOSED FENCE
 MEETING THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED HEIGHT.
 3. THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY IS, NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH
 ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-312(2)(A), ENCROACHING WITHIN THE
 MINIMUM CORNER CLEARANCE DISTANCE OF 50 FEET. IT ALSO
 APPEARS THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY IS ENCROACHING WITHIN THE
 MINIMUM ACCESS POINTS SEPARATION DISTANCE OF 125 FEET.
 HOWEVER, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SUBSECTION 94-312(3),
 AN ALTERNATIVE DESIGN MAY BE APPROVED.
  
  
 KEVIE DEFRANC
 PLANNER
 EMAIL: [email protected]
 TELEPHONE #: 561-822-1200
  
  
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved