Plan Review Details - Permit 21120302
Plan Review Stops For Permit 21120302
Review Stop AD ADDRESSING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2021-12-07 Cont ID  
Sent By cpuell Date 2021-12-07 Time 15:56 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cpuell Date 2021-12-07 Time 15:56 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2022-11-30 Cont ID  
Sent By sberglun Date 2022-11-30 Time 08:40 Rev Time 0.00
Received By sberglun Date 2022-11-30 Time 08:40 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2022-09-08 Cont ID  
Sent By sberglun Date 2022-09-08 Time 09:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By sberglun Date 2022-09-08 Time 09:05 Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-08 09:17:301) SHEET B-1 SURVEY INCORRECTLY IDENTIFIES A SANITARY
 SEWER MANHOLE AND SHOWS AN UNDERGROUND SANITARY SEWER
 LINE GOING NORTH. THIS IS A AIR RELEASE VALVE FOR A 30"
 FORCE MAIN THAT RUNS NORTH AND SOUTH OF THIS STRUCTURE.
 IF THIS SURVEY IS ONLY ABOVE GROUND IMPROVEMENTS,
 PLEASE DO NOT INCORRECTLY SHOW UNDERGROUND
 IMPROVEMENTS. IF THE SURVEY SHOWS UNDERGROUND
 IMPROVEMENTS, ALL UNDERGOUND IMPROVEMENTS MUST BE SHOWN
 CORRECTLY.
  
 2) PLEASE SHOW OFFSETS OF A 5' MINIMUM DISTANCE FROM
 THE OUTER EDGE OF THE POLE AND FOUNDATION TO THE OUTER
 EDGE OF THE CITY'S 24" WATERMAIN. THIS DISTANCE MUST BE
 MAINTAINED AS THIS IS A MAJOR WATER TRANSMISSION MAIN
 SERVING THE NORTH END OF THE CITY. SOFT DIGS MUST BE
 DONE PRIOR TO SETTING THE POLE TO VERIFY THE EXACT
 LOCATION OF THE CITY'S 24" WATERMAIN.
  
 3) PLEASE USE EXTREME CAUTION WHEN BORING IN THIS AREA
 AND MINIMUM DISTANCES TO CITY UTILITIES MUST BE
 MAINTAINED.
  
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2022-06-23 Cont ID  
Sent By gpatrie Date 2022-06-23 Time 14:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By sberglun Date 2022-06-23 Time 16:23 Sent To  
Notes
2022-06-23 16:24:051) CITY UTILITIES ARE SHOWN INCORRECTLY ON PLANS.
 INCLUDE CITY UNDERGROUND UTILITIY PIPE SIZE, PIPE
 MATERIAL, AND DESCRIPTION ON THE SITE PLAN. CONTACT
 JANICE TARBILL, [email protected] FOR AS-BUILT
 INFORMATION. INCLUDE AS-BUILT INFORMATION IN YOUR
 RESUBMITTAL.
 2) PROVIDE PROFILE FOR PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC
 SHOWING ALL CROSSING DATA FOR OTHER UTILITIES.
 3) ALL ROADWAY, SIDEWALK, AND SWALE RESTORATIONS ARE
 REQUIRED PER CITY STANDARD.
  
 SUZANNE BERGLUND
 [email protected]
 561-494-1075
  
2022-05-23 14:47:31CELL TOWER LOCATION APPROVED.
 ADDRESS ERIC SCHNEIDER COMMENTS.
  
 CONTACT [email protected]
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2022-12-01 Cont ID  
Sent By lmarchan Date 2022-12-01 Time 08:58 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmarchan Date 2022-10-06 Time 08:06 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2022-09-21 Cont ID  
Sent By aoliver Date 2022-09-21 Time 12:31 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aoliver Date 2022-08-18 Time 06:59 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2022-08-02 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2022-08-02 Time 10:50 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2022-06-23 Time 15:02 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2022-05-24 Cont ID  
Sent By lmarchan Date 2022-05-24 Time 09:13 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmarchan Date 2021-12-07 Time 13:49 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2022-09-21 Cont ID  
Sent By aoliver Date 2022-09-21 Time 12:31 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aoliver Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2022-08-02 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2022-08-02 Time 10:45 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2022-08-02 Time 11:18 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-02 10:50:411) THE DIGITAL SIGNATURE OF ALEXANDER ABERNATHY, PE IS
 SELF-CERTIFIED. THE FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL
 ENGINEERS REQUIRES ENGINEERS TO USE AN APPROVED THIRD
 PARTY AGENCY TO CERTIFY THEIR SIGNATURES. FS 471 & FAC
 61G15
  
 2) THE SHEETS THAT WERE SUBMITTED FROM JACOB GORALSKI,
 PE ARE COPIES OF SIGNED AND SEALED PAPER DOCUMENTS.
 ELECTRONICALLY SUBMITTED DRAWINGS ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE
 THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S DIGITAL SIGNATURE ON THEM.
 YOU ALSO HAVE THE OPTION TO SUBMIT THE SIGNED AND
 SEALED PAPER VERSION OF DRAWINGS. AFTER THE ELECTRONIC
 PLANS HAVE BEEN APPROVED, YOU CAN SUBMIT THE
 CORRESPONDING PAPER DRAWINGS AT THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT
 TO BE VERIFIED. THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S ORIGINAL
 HANDWRITTEN SIGNATURE AND SEAL IS REQUIRED TO BE ON THE
 DRAWINGS. NO PHOTOCOPY OR OTHER FACSIMILES OF THE
 SIGNATURE ARE ACCEPTABLE. FS 481 & FAC 61G1 OR FS 471 &
 FAC 61G15
  
 3) SEE PREVIOUS SIGNATURE REVIEW COMMENTS.
  
  
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2021-12-17 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2021-12-17 Time 15:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2021-12-17 Time 15:47 Sent To  
Notes
2021-12-17 15:47:48SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 COMMUNICATIONS APPLICATIONS - NEW PROCESS EFFECTIVE
 12/6/2021
  
 1. FOR ALL FUTURE SUBMITTALS, PRIOR TO SUBMISSION,
 CONTACT [email protected] TO OBTAIN THE CORRECT ADDRESS
 FOR YOUR APPLICATION. SHE WILL ASSIGN AN ADDRESS VIA
 EMAIL. WHEN YOU SUBMIT THE APPLICATION, INCLUDE THE
 EMAIL AS AN ATTACHMENT.
  
 2. FOR ALL FUTURE SUBMITTALS, TO SUBMIT THE
 COMMUNICATIONS APPLICATION, EMAIL THE COMPLETED
 APPLICATION TO [email protected]. THEY WILL
 GENERATE YOUR APPLICATION AND SEND YOU INSTRUCTIONS TO
 UPLOAD YOUR PLANS.
  
 3. FS471/FS481 DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ARCHITECT OR
 ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE
 SIGNED, SEALED, DATED ORIGINALS. IT APPEARS THAT THE
 DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED PAPER TO THE BUILDING DIVISION WERE
 DIGITALLY SIGNED PLANS THAT WERE PRINTED.
  
 IF THIS APPLICATION FAILS REVIEW - WHEN RESUBMITTING,
 UPLOAD INDIVIDUALLY SIGNED AND SEALED DRAWINGS IF
 POSSIBLE. IF YOU CANNOT OBTAIN PLANS IN THAT FORMAT,
 UPLOAD THE SINGLE MULTIPAGE DIGITALY SIGNED PDF TO THE
 SIGNATURE FOLDER.
  
 IF THIS APPLICATION PASSES REVIEW - UPLOAD THE
 DIGITALLY SIGNED DOCUMENTS (SHOULD BE IDENTICAL TO THE
 DOCUMENTS REVIEWED) TO THE SIGNATURE FOLDER.
  
 IF THE ENGINEER DOES NOT HAVE A DIGITAL SIGNATURE,
 PLEASE CONTACT ME DIRECTLY TO DISCUSS OPTIONS.
  
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 5 Status P Date 2022-12-14 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2022-12-14 Time 16:58 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2022-11-29 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2022-11-29 Time 16:32 Rev Time 0.50
Received By eschneid Date 2022-11-29 Time 13:03 Sent To  
Notes
2022-11-29 16:33:14THE POLE STYLE AND HEIGHT MEET CITY REQUIREMENTS.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2022-09-21 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2022-09-21 Time 11:28 Rev Time 0.25
Received By eschneid Date 2022-09-20 Time 17:05 Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-21 11:28:59INSUFFICIENT
  
 1) THE LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE COORDINATES FOR THE FINAL
 POLE LOCATION HAVE NOT BEEN UPDATED ON THE SITE PLAN
 AND SURVEY. PLEASE PROVIDE THE CORRECT COORDINATES.
  
 2) THE NEW SURVEY THAT CORRECTLY CALLS OUT THE
 28-FOOT-TALL POLE WAS NOT UPLOADED.
  
 3) THE RELOCATED HANDHOLE BY THE POWER DRAW POLE ON
 SHEET P-1 CORRECTLY ADDRESSES THE LAST SET OF COMMENTS
 (NOTE: SIDEWALK NEEDS TO BE RESTORED TO CITY STANDARDS
 AT THIS LOCATION). THE UPLOAD FOR THIS SHEET LOCATION
 INCLUDED THE ENTIRE JOB PACKAGE. PLEASE ONLY UPLOAD
 SHEET P-1 UNDER THE P-1 TAB. ADDITIONALLY, IT APPEARS
 THAT EVERY SHEET IN THE PACKAGE HAS A NEW "LATEST
 REVISION DATE" AND A NEW ENGINEER OF RECORD SIGNING.
 PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE MOST RECENT VERSION OF EACH
 SHEET IS UPLOADED. THIS DID NOT OCCUR IN ALL INSTANCES.
  
 4) THE POLE STYLE AND HEIGHT MEET CITY REQUIREMENTS.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2022-08-01 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2022-08-01 Time 13:30 Rev Time 0.25
Received By eschneid Date 2022-08-01 Time 11:15 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-01 13:31:10INSUFFICIENT
  
 1) REPEAT COMMENT: THE LOCATION OF THE HANDHOLE AND THE
 INSTALL EXCAVATION SHOWN ADJACENT TO THE POLE SUPPLYING
 POWER WILL DAMAGE THE ROOT SYSTEM OF THE EXISTING LARGE
 STREET TREE IF INSTALLED IN THE LOCATION SHOWN ON SHEET
 P-1. THE HANDHOLE MAY NOT BE INSTALLED AT THIS
 LOCATION. *** THE EXCAVATION PIT CONTINUES TO BE SHOWN
 LESS THEN 5 FEET FROM THE TREE, WHICH IS TOO CLOSE. IT
 NEEDS TO BE AT LEAST 10 FEET AWAY, ESPECIALLY GIVEN THE
 SIZE OF THE TREE. STAFF SUGGESTS THAT THE HANDHOLE BE
 INSTALLED UNDER THE SIDEWALK SO THAT IT, AND THE
 EXCAVATION, ARE FURTHER AWAY FROM THE TREE AND IN AN
 AREA THAT TYPICALLY SEES LESS ROOT ZONE EXPANSION.
  
 2) THE POLE STYLE AND HEIGHT MEET CITY REQUIREMENTS.
 THE POLE COLOR AT THIS LOCATION SHALL BE RAL/RAYCAP
 7042 TRAFFIC GREY A.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2022-03-30 Cont ID  
Sent By eshneide Date 2022-03-30 Time 15:47 Rev Time 0.50
Received By eschneid Date 2022-03-30 Time 15:47 Sent To  
Notes
2022-03-30 15:48:15INSUFFICIENT
  
 1) THE SURVEY AND ENGINEERING PLANS FAIL TO SHOW TWO
 PALM TREES THAT ARE LOCATED WITHIN THE BULB OUT WHERE
 THE POLE IS PROPOSED. PLEASE SHOW THE TREES IN THEIR
 ACCURATE LOCATIONS SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THERE
 IS NO CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED POLE.
  
 2) THE CITY CODE REQUIRES THAT POLES SHALL BE LOCATED
 SO AS TO ALIGN WITH EXISTING POLES IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY
 AND HAVE EQUAL SETBACK DISTANCES WITH EXISTING POLES
 FROM THE CURBLINE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE PROPOSED
 POLE IS NOT SHOWN IN LINE WITH THE EXISTING LIGHT POLES
 ALONG TAMARIND AVENUE IN THIS LOCATION. THE EXISTING
 LIGHT POLES ARE LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE SIDEWALK (A
 GOOGLE STREETVIEW SCREENSHOT HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO
 CHRISTINA WARR). PLEASE ADJUST THE PROPOSED POLE
 LOCATION ACCORDINGLY.
  
 3) THE ADJACENT LOT IS IN THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR A
 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING. IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH THE CITY
 CODE REQUIREMENT THAT DOES NOT PERMIT WIRELESS
 FACILITIES TO BE PLACED IN FRONT OF A RESIDENTIAL
 STRUCTURE, THE PROPOSED POLE NEEDS TO BE MOVED SOUTH
 WITHIN THE BULB OUT. STAFF HAS PROVIDED CHRISTINA WARR
 WITH THE SITE PLAN SHOWING THE SETBACK OF THE RESIDENCE
 FROM THE BACK OF THE STATE STREET SIDEWALK SO THAT THE
 POLE LOCATION CAN BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY.
 4) THE BORE PIT AND HANDHOLE NOTES ON SHEET P-1 STATE
 THAT THE SIDEWALK WILL BE RESTORED; HOWEVER, THESE ARE
 LOCATED ONLY WITHIN THE PARKWAY WHICH WILL NEED
 RESTORATION. PLEASE UPDATE THE NOTATIONS ACCORDINGLY.
  
 5) THE LOCATION OF THE HANDHOLE AND THE INSTALL
 EXCAVATION SHOWN ADJACENT TO THE POLE SUPPLYING POWER
 WILL DAMAGE THE ROOT SYSTEM OF THE EXISTING LARGE
 STREET TREE IF INSTALLED IN THE LOCATION SHOWN ON SHEET
 P-1. THE HANDHOLE MAY NOT BE INSTALLED AT THIS
 LOCATION.
  
 6) THE POLE HEIGHT SHOWN ON SHEET C-3 LISTS THE HEIGHT
 TO THE TOP OF THE ANTENNA AS 28 FEET ABOVE GRADE;
 HOWEVER, THE SITE PLAN AND SURVEY CALL OUT A POLE 38
 FEET ABOVE GRADE LEVEL. ALL SHEETS MUST SHOW
 CONSISTENT, ACCURATE INFORMATION. NOTE: THE 38-FOOT
 HEIGHT IS CONSISTENT WITH ONE OF THE NEARBY POWER
 POLES.
  
 7) PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION OF THE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC
 WHICH VERIFIES THAT THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS WITH
 EXISTING UTILITIES AND TREE ROOTS.
  
 8) THE PLANS SHOW THE COM LINES WITHIN 2-FEET OF THE
 BORE PIT(S). IN ORDER TO VERIFY THAT THE INSTALLATION
 WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH THE EXISTING FACILITIES,
 PROVIDE A PUBLIC UTILITY LETTER OF NO OBJECTION FROM
 THE COM PROVIDER(S), MOST LIKELY AT&T OR COMCAST.
  
 9) THE POLE STYLE MEETS CITY REQUIREMENTS. THE POLE
 COLOR AT THIS LOCATION SHALL BE RAL/RAYCAP 7042 TRAFFIC
 GREY A.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved