| Plan Review Stops For Permit 21120280 |
| Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2021-12-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cpuell |
Date |
2021-12-07 |
Time |
16:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cpuell |
Date |
2021-12-07 |
Time |
16:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2023-06-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
sberglun |
Date |
2023-06-06 |
Time |
13:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
sberglun |
Date |
2023-06-06 |
Time |
13:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2023-03-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
sberglun |
Date |
2023-03-27 |
Time |
12:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
sberglun |
Date |
2023-03-27 |
Time |
12:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-12-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
sberglun |
Date |
2022-12-30 |
Time |
10:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
sberglun |
Date |
2022-12-30 |
Time |
10:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-12-30 10:45:21 | 1) MILL AND RESURFACE ON 50' EACH SIDE OF TRENCH | | | REQUIRED INCLUDING RESTRIPING CITY DETAIL GC-9, | | | INCLUDING ALLEYWAYS. | | | 2) GENERAL COMMENT, SIDEWALK RESTORATION REQUIRED PER | | | CITY STANDARD GC-1. ENTIRE FLAG OF SIDEWALK MUST BE | | | REPLACED. | | | 3) HANDHOLE CAN NOT BE PLACED ON TOP OF CITY'S EXISTING | | | 4" WATERMAIN. THIS BORE AND UTILITY MUST BE 5' MIN | | | DISTANCE FROM THE CITY WATER MAIN. | | | 4) POLE LOCATION APPEARS TO BE ON TOP OF AN EXISTING | | | GAS MAIN. LETTER FROM FPU REQUIRED OR THE POLE MUST BE | | | RELOCATED. | | | SUZANNE BERGLUND | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-10-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
sberglun |
Date |
2022-10-25 |
Time |
08:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
sberglun |
Date |
2022-10-25 |
Time |
08:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-10-25 08:08:01 | 1) 2' MINIMUM DISTANCE FROM FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF | | | POLE. | | | 2) PLEASE ADDRESS ALL ZONING COMMENTS.WILL RE-REVIEW | | | AFTER RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | SUZANNE BERGLUND | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-06-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
sberglun |
Date |
2022-06-24 |
Time |
08:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
sberglun |
Date |
2022-06-24 |
Time |
08:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-06-24 08:55:12 | 1) CITY UTILITIES ARE SHOWN INCORRECTLY ON PLANS. | | | INCLUDE CITY UNDERGROUND UTILITIY PIPE SIZE, PIPE | | | MATERIAL, AND DESCRIPTION ON THE SITE PLAN. CONTACT | | | JANICE TARBILL, [email protected] FOR AS-BUILT | | | INFORMATION. INCLUDE AS-BUILT INFORMATION IN YOUR | | | RESUBMITTAL. | | | 2) PROFILE PROVIDED DOES NOT ACCURATELY SHOW CITY | | | UTILITIES. INCLUDE UTILITY TYPE, PIPE SIZE, PIPE | | | MATERIAL AND CROSSIND DATA FOR ALL UTILITIES. | | | 3) ALL ROADWAY, SIDEWALK, AND SWALE RESTORATIONS ARE | | | REQUIRED PER CITY STANDARD. | | | | | | SUZANNE BERGLUND | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1075 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2023-06-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2023-06-07 |
Time |
10:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2023-04-21 |
Time |
09:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2023-04-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aoliver |
Date |
2023-04-19 |
Time |
07:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aoliver |
Date |
2023-02-27 |
Time |
08:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2023-01-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aoliver |
Date |
2023-01-27 |
Time |
09:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aoliver |
Date |
2022-12-09 |
Time |
08:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2022-10-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-10-26 |
Time |
09:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-09-08 |
Time |
08:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2022-06-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2022-06-27 |
Time |
08:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2021-12-07 |
Time |
11:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2023-04-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aoliver |
Date |
2023-04-19 |
Time |
07:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aoliver |
Date |
2023-04-19 |
Time |
07:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-10-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-10-26 |
Time |
09:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-10-26 |
Time |
09:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-10-26 09:04:42 | SIGNATURE REVIEW | | | | | | CORRECTIONS NEEDED - | | | | | | 1) DRAWING B-1 DOES NOT SHOW AS DIGITALLY SIGNED IN | | | ADOBE READER - | | | | | | SIGNED AND SEALED DRAWINGS IN PROJECTDOX NEED TO BE | | | DIGITALLY/ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED TO BE USED IN | | | ELECTRONIC PLAN REVIEW. (A CERTIFICATE-BASED DIGITAL | | | SIGNATURE (OFTEN JUST CALLED A DIGITAL SIGNATURE) IS A | | | SPECIFIC TYPE OF E-SIGNATURE). | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-12-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2021-12-17 |
Time |
17:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2021-12-17 |
Time |
17:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-12-17 17:30:23 | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | COMMUNICATIONS APPLICATIONS - NEW PROCESS EFFECTIVE | | | 12/6/2021 | | | | | | 1. FOR ALL FUTURE SUBMITTALS, PRIOR TO SUBMISSION, | | | CONTACT [email protected] TO OBTAIN THE CORRECT ADDRESS | | | FOR YOUR APPLICATION. SHE WILL ASSIGN AN ADDRESS VIA | | | EMAIL. WHEN YOU SUBMIT THE APPLICATION, INCLUDE THE | | | EMAIL AS AN ATTACHMENT. | | | | | | 2. FOR ALL FUTURE SUBMITTALS, TO SUBMIT THE | | | COMMUNICATIONS APPLICATION, EMAIL THE COMPLETED | | | APPLICATION TO [email protected]. THEY WILL | | | GENERATE YOUR APPLICATION AND SEND YOU INSTRUCTIONS TO | | | UPLOAD YOUR PLANS. | | | | | | 3. FS471/FS481 DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ARCHITECT OR | | | ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE | | | SIGNED, SEALED, DATED ORIGINALS. IT APPEARS THAT THE | | | DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED PAPER TO THE BUILDING DIVISION WERE | | | DIGITALLY SIGNED PLANS THAT WERE PRINTED. | | | | | | IF THIS APPLICATION FAILS REVIEW - WHEN RESUBMITTING, | | | UPLOAD INDIVIDUALLY SIGNED AND SEALED DRAWINGS IF | | | POSSIBLE. IF YOU CANNOT OBTAIN PLANS IN THAT FORMAT, | | | UPLOAD THE SINGLE MULTIPAGE DIGITALY SIGNED PDF TO THE | | | SIGNATURE FOLDER. | | | | | | IF THIS APPLICATION PASSES REVIEW - UPLOAD THE | | | DIGITALLY SIGNED DOCUMENTS (SHOULD BE IDENTICAL TO THE | | | DOCUMENTS REVIEWED) TO THE SIGNATURE FOLDER. | | | | | | IF THE ENGINEER DOES NOT HAVE A DIGITAL SIGNATURE, | | | PLEASE CONTACT ME DIRECTLY TO DISCUSS OPTIONS. | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2023-06-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ckimmerl |
Date |
2023-06-06 |
Time |
15:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ckimmerl |
Date |
2023-06-06 |
Time |
12:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2023-04-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
sberglun |
Date |
2023-04-18 |
Time |
10:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
sberglun |
Date |
2023-04-18 |
Time |
10:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2023-04-18 10:40:16 | PENDING LETTER FROM FPU. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2023-01-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ckimmerl |
Date |
2023-01-26 |
Time |
10:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ckimmerl |
Date |
2023-01-26 |
Time |
10:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2023-01-26 10:26:40 | 1. PROPOSED WCF POLE LOCATION, STEALTH DESIGN, COLOR, | | | AND DETAILS MEET CITY ZONING STANDARDS. | | | | | | 2. PLEASE ADDRESS ENGINEERING CONCERNS WITH LOCATION OF | | | PROPOSED POLE/HANDHOLES AND UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC IN | | | RELATION TO GASLINE AND WATERMAIN. | | | | | | | | | ***FAIL IS DUE TO PENDING ENGINEERING REVIEW & | | | APPROVAL. UPON ENGINEERING REVIEW & APPROVAL, ZONING | | | STAFF MAY APPROVE AND ISSUE LETTER.*** | | | | | | CHRIS KIMMERLY, AICP | | | URBAN DESIGN PLANNER | | | (561)822-1426 [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-09-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ckimmerl |
Date |
2022-09-26 |
Time |
14:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ckimmerl |
Date |
2022-09-26 |
Time |
14:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-09-26 14:03:27 | 1. PROPOSED POLE LOCATION SHOWN TO POTENTIALLY CONFLICT | | | WITH EXISTING PRIVATE UTILITY GAS LINE, PLEASE PROVIDE | | | THE NECESSARY UTILITY LETTERS GRANTING APPROVAL/NO | | | OBJECTION OF THIS POLE LOCATION AND BORE DEPTH, IF NO | | | RESPONSE CAN BE OBTAINED FROM UTILITY PROVIDER, PLEASE | | | PROVIDE PROOF OF COMMUNICATION AND A LETTER OF NO | | | RESPONSE. | | | | | | 2. PLEASE PROVIDE SURVEY FOR ENTIRE SCOPE OF PROJECT, | | | INCLUDING THE POWER ROUTE. APPEARS POWER IS BEING | | | PULLED FROM A POLE WITHIN ALLEY RIGHT-OF-WAY, STAFF | | | WOULD LIKE TO VERIFY THIS VIA SURVEY. IF THE POLE THAT | | | THE POWER IS BEING DRAWN FROM IS WITHIN PRIVATE | | | PROPERTY, PLEASE PROVIDE PROOF OF UTILITY/ACCESS | | | EASEMENT ON THE SURVEY OR PROVIDE OWNER???S CONSENT. | | | | | | 3. THE POLE STEALTH DESIGN AND COLOR MEETS CITY | | | STANDARDS, PROPOSED RELOCATION GENERALLY SATISFIES | | | STAFF???S PREVIOUS CONCERNS WITH CLEMATIS ST. AND | | | SPECIAL EVENTS APPROVAL. | | | | | | CHRIS KIMMERLY, AICP | | | URBAN DESIGN PLANNER | | | (561)822-1426 [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-01-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ckimmerl |
Date |
2022-01-05 |
Time |
14:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ckimmerl |
Date |
2022-01-05 |
Time |
14:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-01-05 14:24:56 | PROPOSED POLE LOCATION IS SUBJECT TO SPECIAL EVENTS | | | REVIEW. ALL COMMENTS BELOW ARE PENDING THE LOCATION | | | APPROVAL FROM SPECIAL EVENTS. | | | | | | 1. PROPOSED POWER ROUTE, BORE PIT, AND UNDERGROUND | | | ELECTRICAL CONNECTION IS SHOWN TO POTENTIALLY CONFLICT | | | WITH EXISTING GAS LINE, SEWER, AND WATER, PLEASE | | | PROVIDE THE NECESSARY UTILITY LETTERS GRANTING APPROVAL | | | OF THIS ELECTRICAL CONNECTION LOCATION AND DEPTH. | | | | | | 2. PROPOSED BORE PITS AND HANDHOLE ARE TOO CLOSE TO | | | EXISTING PALM TREES, PLEASE ADJUST TO PROVIDE THE | | | NECESSARY SPACING TO PROTECT ROOT/TREE VIABILITY. | | | RECOMMENDED AT LEAST 8 FT. CLEARANCE FROM PALMS TO | | | SAFELY PROVIDE A BUFFER TO THE ROOT SYSTEM. | | | | | | 3. PLEASE PROVIDE A TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION SHOWING THE | | | DEPTH OF THE UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS. | | | | | | 4. PROPOSED LOCATION IS SUBJECT TO SPECIAL EVENTS | | | APPROVAL. | | | | | | 5. THE POLE STEALTH DESIGN MEETS CITY STANDARDS. | | | | | | CHRIS KIMMERLY @ (561)822-1426 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
