Plan Review Details - Permit 21120234
Plan Review Stops For Permit 21120234
Review Stop AD ADDRESSING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2021-12-07 Cont ID  
Sent By cpuell Date 2021-12-07 Time 16:45 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cpuell Date 2021-12-07 Time 16:45 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2023-05-17 Cont ID  
Sent By cseifer Date 2023-05-17 Time 08:18 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cseifer Date 2023-05-17 Time 08:18 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2023-02-17 Cont ID  
Sent By sberglun Date 2023-02-17 Time 13:31 Rev Time 0.00
Received By sberglun Date 2023-02-17 Time 13:31 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2022-06-23 Cont ID  
Sent By sberglun Date 2022-06-23 Time 16:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By sberglun Date 2022-06-23 Time 16:06 Sent To  
Notes
2022-06-23 16:06:391) CITY UTILITIES ARE SHOWN INCORRECTLY ON PLANS.
 INCLUDE CITY UNDERGROUND UTILITIY PIPE SIZE, PIPE
 MATERIAL, AND DESCRIPTION ON THE SITE PLAN. CONTACT
 JANICE TARBILL, [email protected] FOR AS-BUILT
 INFORMATION. INCLUDE AS-BUILT INFORMATION IN YOUR
 RESUBMITTAL.
 2) PROVIDE PROFILE FOR PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC
 SHOWING ALL CROSSING DATA FOR OTHER UTILITIES.
 3) ALL ROADWAY, SIDEWALK, AND SWALE RESTORATIONS ARE
 REQUIRED PER CITY STANDARD.
  
 SUZANNE BERGLUND
 [email protected]
 561-494-1075
  
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2023-06-16 Cont ID  
Sent By avolcy Date 2023-06-16 Time 11:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By avolcy Date 2023-02-23 Time 09:37 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2023-02-17 Cont ID  
Sent By aoliver Date 2023-02-17 Time 14:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aoliver Date 2023-01-11 Time 06:52 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2022-06-24 Cont ID  
Sent By aoliver Date 2022-06-24 Time 07:34 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aoliver Date 2021-12-06 Time 13:58 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2021-12-07 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2021-12-07 Time 06:39 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2021-12-07 Time 06:39 Sent To  
Notes
2021-12-07 06:39:57SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 COMMUNICATIONS APPLICATIONS - NEW PROCESS EFFECTIVE
 12/6/2021
  
 1. FOR ALL FUTURE SUBMITTALS, PRIOR TO SUBMISSION,
 CONTACT [email protected] TO OBTAIN THE CORRECT ADDRESS
 FOR YOUR APPLICATION. SHE WILL ASSIGN AN ADDRESS VIA
 EMAIL. WHEN YOU SUBMIT THE APPLICATION, INCLUDE THE
 EMAIL AS AN ATTACHMENT.
  
 2. FOR ALL FUTURE SUBMITTALS, TO SUBMIT THE
 COMMUNICATIONS APPLICATION, EMAIL THE COMPLETED
 APPLICATION TO [email protected]. THEY WILL
 GENERATE YOUR APPLICATION AND SEND YOU INSTRUCTIONS TO
 UPLOAD YOUR PLANS.
  
 3. FS471/FS481 DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ARCHITECT OR
 ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE
 SIGNED, SEALED, DATED ORIGINALS. IT APPEARS THAT THE
 DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED PAPER TO THE BUILDING DIVISION WERE
 DIGITALLY SIGNED PLANS THAT WERE PRINTED.
  
 IF THIS APPLICATION FAILS REVIEW - WHEN RESUBMITTING,
 UPLOAD INDIVIDUALLY SIGNED AND SEALED DRAWINGS IF
 POSSIBLE. IF YOU CANNOT OBTAIN PLANS IN THAT FORMAT,
 UPLOAD THE SINGLE MULTIPAGE DIGITALY SIGNED PDF TO THE
 SIGNATURE FOLDER.
  
 IF THIS APPLICATION PASSES REVIEW - UPLOAD THE
 DIGITALLY SIGNED DOCUMENTS (SHOULD BE IDENTICAL TO THE
 DOCUMENTS REVIEWED) TO THE SIGNATURE FOLDER.
  
 IF THE ENGINEER DOES NOT HAVE A DIGITAL SIGNATURE,
 PLEASE CONTACT ME DIRECTLY TO DISCUSS OPTIONS.
  
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2023-06-16 Cont ID  
Sent By avolcy Date 2023-06-16 Time 11:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By avolcy Date 2023-06-16 Time 11:55 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2023-02-02 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2023-02-02 Time 15:16 Rev Time 0.00
Received By sberglun Date 2023-02-17 Time 13:30 Sent To  
Notes
2023-02-02 15:17:01INSUFFICIENT
  
 1) REPEAT COMMENT: THIS LOCATION IS WITHIN A HISTORIC
 DISTRICT. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF THE STATE HISTORIC
 PRESERVATION OFFICE APPROVAL OF THIS LOCATION.
  
 2) REPEAT UPDATED COMMENT: THE SURVEY ONLY PROVIDES THE
 HEIGHT OF A CAMERA POLE AT 10 FEET IN HEIGHT IN THE
 VICINITY OF THE PROPOSED WIRELESS FACILITY POLE. THE
 ENGINEERING SITE PLAN CALLS OUT A LIGHT POLE THAT IS 14
 FEET IN HEIGHT. PER CITY CODE, NEITHER WILL PERMIT THE
 PROPOSED 24-FOOT-TALL WIRELESS FACILITY POLE SHOWN ON
 THE SITE PLAN AND THE RAYCAP POLE SPECIFICATION PAGES,
 NOR THE 28-FOOT TALL POLE SHOWN ON SHEETS C-3, E-2 AND
 E-3.
  
 A. THERE APPEAR TO BE NEARBY POLES THAT ARE TALLER THAN
 THE LABELED POLES. PROVIDE THIS HEIGHT DIMENSION SO
 THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THE PROPOSED WIRELESS FACILITY
 POLE DOES NOT EXCEED THE HEIGHT ALLOWANCE.
 B. ALL SHEETS NEED TO SHOW CONSISTENT, CODE COMPLIANT
 POLE HEIGHTS.
  
 3) REPEAT UPDATED COMMENT: THE SURVEY SHOWS THE
 PROPOSED POLE AT 16.7 FEET FROM THE SPRUCE AVENUE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY. STAFF LOCATED A SURVEY FOR THE HOUSE ON
 THE SOUTH SIDE OF 28TH STREET, WHICH SHOWS A 15.6-FOOT
 SETBACK FROM SPRUCE AVENUE. IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH THE
 REQUIREMENT OF SECTION 78-411(B)(2) OF THE CITY CODE
 WHICH REQUIRES THAT THE POLE BE NOT DIRECTLY IN FRONT
 OF A RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE, THE WESTERN EDGE OF THE
 POLE MUST BE SHOWN NO FURTHER THAN 15.6 FEET FROM THE
 SPRUCE AVENUE RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE POLE NEEDS TO BE
 SHIFTED APPROXIMATELY TWO AND A HALF FEET TO THE EAST.
  
 4) THE PLANS SHOW THE HANDHOLE EXCAVATION AND THE BORE
 PIT EXCAVATION ADJACENT TO A COM LINE AND AN
 UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE, RESPECTIVELY. IN ORDER TO
 VERIFY THAT THE INSTALLATION WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH
 THE EXISTING FACILITIES, PROVIDE A PUBLIC UTILITY
 LETTER OF NO OBJECTION FROM THE COM PROVIDER(S), MOST
 LIKELY AT&T OR COMCAST AND FPL.
  
 5) THE POLE STYLE MEETS CITY REQUIREMENTS. THE POLE
 COLOR AT THIS LOCATION SHALL BE RAL/RAYCAP 7042 TRAFFIC
 GREY A.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ 561-822-1446
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2022-03-01 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2022-03-01 Time 09:22 Rev Time 0.25
Received By eschneid Date 2022-02-28 Time 10:17 Sent To  
Notes
2022-02-28 14:23:43INSUFFICIENT
  
 1) THIS LOCATION IS WITHIN A HISTORIC DISTRICT. PLEASE
 PROVIDE A COPY OF THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION
 OFFICE APPROVAL OF THIS LOCATION.
  
 2) THE SURVEY ONLY PROVIDES THE HEIGHT OF A CAMERA POLE
 AT 10 FEET IN HEIGHT IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROPOSED
 WIRELESS FACILITY POLE. THE ENGINEERING PLAN CALLS OUT
 A LIGHT POLE THAT IS 14 FEET IN HEIGHT. PER CITY CODE,
 NEITHER WILL PERMIT THE PROPOSED 24-FOOT-TALL WIRELESS
 FACILITY POLE. THERE APPEAR TO BE NEARBY POLES THAT ARE
 TALLER THAN THE LABELED POLES. PROVIDE THIS HEIGHT
 DIMENSION SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THE PROPOSED
 WIRELESS FACILITY POLE DOES NOT EXCEED THE HEIGHT
 ALLOWANCE.
  
 3) THE ENGINEERING PLAN THAT IS OVERLAID ON THE AERIAL
 NEEDS TO SHOW THE HOUSE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 28TH
 STREET SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THE POLE IS NOT
 DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF THE HOUSE. STAFF HAS TRIED TO LINE
 UP THE POLE THE PROPOSED 16.7-FOOT DIMENSION FROM THE
 INTERSECTION THAT IS PROVIDE ON THE SURVEY, AND IT
 APPEARS THAT THE WIRELESS FACILITY POLE IS DIRECTLY IN
 FRONT OF THE HOUSE. THE WIRELESS FACILITY POLE MAY NEED
 TO BE SHIFTED A FEW FEET TO THE EAST TO COMPLY WITH
 THIS CODE REQUIREMENT.
  
 4) THE HANDHOLE AND BORE PIT NOTES ON SHEET P-1 STATE
 THAT THE SIDEWALK WILL BE RESTORED; HOWEVER, THE IS
 BOTH PARKWAY AND SIDEWALKS THAT WILL NEED RESTORATION.
 PLEASE UPDATE THE NOTATIONS ACCORDINGLY.
  
 5) PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION OF THE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC
 WHICH VERIFIES THAT THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS WITH
 EXISTING UTILITIES.
  
 6) THE POLE STYLE MEETS CITY REQUIREMENTS. THE POLE
 COLOR AT THIS LOCATION SHALL BE RAL/RAYCAP 7042 TRAFFIC
 GREY A.
  
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved