Plan Review Stops For Permit 21110846 |
Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2022-03-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
cpuell |
Date |
2022-03-31 |
Time |
14:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
cpuell |
Date |
2022-03-31 |
Time |
14:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2022-03-31 14:44:11 | PARCEL MERGED INTO A NEW PARCEL 74434328060200010 WITH | | THE NEW ADDRESS OF 475 CLAREMORE DR, UPDATED PERMIT |
|
|
Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-02-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
cpuell |
Date |
2022-02-28 |
Time |
14:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
cpuell |
Date |
2022-02-28 |
Time |
14:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2022-02-28 14:58:07 | PER THE PLANS SUBMITTED, THE AREA OF WORK TO BE DONE | | ENCOMPASSES THE FOLLOWING PARCELS; 74434328060200012, | | 74434328060200011, 74434328060200040 AND | | 74434328060200050. EITHER A REPLAT OR A UNIT OF TITLE | | NEEDS TO BE APPLIED FOR. YOU WILL NEED TO CONTACT VINCE | | NOEL [email protected] OR CALL 561-494-1040 TO START THE | | UNITY OF TITLE PROCEDURE, A SINGLE PCN MUST BE ISSUED | | BY THE COUNTY. WHEN YOU CONTACT THE PROPERTY APPRAISERS | | YOU NEED TO REQUEST PRELIMINARY LETTER OF THE UNIFIED | | PCN. ONCE YOU HAVE RECEIVED THE PRELIMINARY LETTER | | PLEASE CONTACT [email protected] OR CALL 561-805-6659 TO | | BE ISSUED AN ADDRESS. |
|
|
Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-12-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
cpuell |
Date |
2021-12-23 |
Time |
11:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
cpuell |
Date |
2021-12-23 |
Time |
11:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2021-12-23 11:35:14 | PER THE PLANS SUBMITTED, THE AREA OF WORK TO BE DONE | | ENCOMPASSES THE FOLLOWING PARCELS; 74434328060200012, | | 74434328060200011, 74434328060200040 AND | | 74434328060200050. EITHER A REPLAT OR A UNIT OF TITLE | | NEEDS TO BE APPLIED FOR. YOU WILL NEED TO CONTACT VINCE | | NOEL [email protected] OR CALL 561-494-1040 TO START THE | | UNITY OF TITLE PROCEDURE, A SINGLE PCN MUST BE ISSUED | | BY THE COUNTY. WHEN YOU CONTACT THE PROPERTY APPRAISERS | | YOU NEED TO REQUEST PRELIMINARY LETTER OF THE UNIFIED | | PCN. ONCE YOU HAVE RECEIVED THE PRELIMINARY LETTER | | PLEASE CONTACT [email protected] OR CALL 561-805-6659 TO | | BE ISSUED AN ADDRESS. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2022-04-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-04-18 |
Time |
11:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-04-18 |
Time |
11:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2022-04-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-04-04 |
Time |
10:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-04-04 |
Time |
10:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2022-03-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-03-02 |
Time |
11:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-03-02 |
Time |
11:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-12-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2021-12-14 |
Time |
14:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2021-12-14 |
Time |
14:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2021-12-14 14:25:08 | LIGHT POLES | | REVIEWED BY ROGER MCPHERSON | | 561-805-6716 | | [email protected] | | CODE USED FOR REVIEW - 2020 FBC WITH WPB CHAPTER 1 | | AMENDMENT | | | | CORRECTIONS NEEDED - | | | | 1) LIGHT POLE DRAWINGS - SHOULD SHOW POLE HEIGHT, | | BURIAL DEPTH, POLE MODEL/DESIGNATION NUMBER, ETC. |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2022-04-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mpeterso |
Date |
2022-04-20 |
Time |
15:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mpeterso |
Date |
2022-04-20 |
Time |
15:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-04-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mpeterso |
Date |
2022-04-01 |
Time |
14:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mpeterso |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2022-04-01 15:55:52 | ELECTRIC REVIEW FAILED | | 1) METER IS INCORRECTLY DESCRIBE AS A 120/208 VOLT | | METER CAN. PLEASE DETAIL IT CORRECTLY. FBC 107.2 | | 2) RISER DIAGRAM DETAILS (2) SETS OF 500MCM RHU AS | | FEEDERS TO THE EXISTING 1000-AMP MDP. THESE CONDUCTORS | | ARE INADEQUATELY SIZED AS PER NEC 240.4(C). OVERCURRENT | | DEVICE OVER 800-AMPERES, THE AMPACITY OF CONDUCTORS IT | | PROTECTS SHALL BE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THE RATING OF THE | | OVERCURRENT DEVICE. PLEASE CORRECT WITH APPROPRIATELY | | SIZED CONDUCTORS. | | 2) THE RISER DIAGRAM DOES NOT DETAIL GROUND FAULT | | PROTECTION AS REQUIRED PER NEC 215.10 FOR DISCONNECTS | | OF 480 VOLT,1000AMP SYSTEMS. PLEASE DETAIL THAT THIS | | GROUND FAULT PROTECTION EXISTS OR WILL BE INSTALLED. | | 3) PLEASE PROVIDE AVAILABLE SHORT CIRCUIT CALCULATION | | AND ENSURE EQUIPMENT RATING IS SUFFICIENT AS PER NEC | | 110.9. PLEASE INCLUDE A NOTE TO ENSURE LABLEING TO IS | | TO BE APPLIED ON EQUIPMENT AS PER NEC 110.24 | | | | PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED | | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. WHEN | | RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE | | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY | | RESUBMITTAL FORM. | | | | CODES IN EFFECT: | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2020 7TH EDITION | | WPB FBC = WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA | | BUILDING CODE 2020 7TH ED. | | FBC EB = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE EXISTING BUILDING 2020 | | 7TH EDITION | | FBC EC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION 2020 | | 7TH EDITION | | FBC RE = FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE 2020 7TH EDITION | | NEC = NFPA 70 2017 EDITION, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE | | FS = FLORIDA STATUTES | | | | V/R, | | | | MICHAEL PETERSON | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | [email protected] | | 561-805-6746 | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-03-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mpeterso |
Date |
2022-03-08 |
Time |
13:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mpeterso |
Date |
2022-03-08 |
Time |
13:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2022-03-08 13:57:03 | ELECTRIC REVIEW FAILED | | 1) PLEASE PROVIDE DETAIL AS TO EXISTING 1000-AMP MDP TO | | ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH NEC 110,26 AND OTHER APPLICABLE | | CODES | | 2) NO RECORD EXISTS FOR EXISTING 1000-AMP SERVICE AT | | THIS ADDRESS. PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION REGADING | | THIS SERVICE. FBC 107.2 | | | | PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED | | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. WHEN | | RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE | | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY | | RESUBMITTAL FORM. | | | | CODES IN EFFECT: | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2020 7TH EDITION | | WPB FBC = WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA | | BUILDING CODE 2020 7TH ED. | | FBC EB = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE EXISTING BUILDING 2020 | | 7TH EDITION | | FBC EC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION 2020 | | 7TH EDITION | | FBC RE = FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE 2020 7TH EDITION | | NEC = NFPA 70 2017 EDITION, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE | | FS = FLORIDA STATUTES | | | | V/R, | | | | MICHAEL PETERSON | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | [email protected] | | 561-805-6746 | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-12-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mpeterso |
Date |
2021-12-13 |
Time |
10:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mpeterso |
Date |
2021-12-13 |
Time |
10:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2021-12-13 10:22:52 | PLEASE CORRECT | | 1) SERVICE POINT DETAILS INDICATE #2 RHW CU FEEDER | | CONDUCTORS FROM SERVICE POINT ?A? TO SERVICE POINT ?B? | | WITH 125-AMP OVERCURRENT PROTECTION. NEC TABLE 310.15 | | (B)(16) STATES AMPACITY OF THIS CONDUCTOR AT 115-AMPS | | 2) PLAN ALSO STATES THERE ARE NO EXISTING LOADS AT | | EXISTING SERVICE POINT ?A?. IS THERE MORE THAN ONE | | SERVICE AT THE EXISTING STORAGE BUILDING? PLEASE DETAIL | | LOCATIONS OF EXISTING SERVICES AT THE EXISTING | | BUILDINGS AND WHAT ELECTRICAL LOADS THESE SERVICES | | SUPPLY. F.B.C.107.3.5.1.2 | | 3) NEC210.20 (A) OVERCURRENT PROTECTION OF 20-AMPS IS | | NOT ADEQUATE TO SUPPLY TENNIS COURT LIGHT CIRCUITS WITH | | A CONTINUOUS LOAD OF 17.3-AMPS | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2022-04-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2022-04-21 |
Time |
15:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2022-04-14 |
Time |
09:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2022-04-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2022-04-11 |
Time |
15:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2022-03-31 |
Time |
09:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
|
Date |
2022-03-09 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
aoliver |
Date |
2022-02-28 |
Time |
07:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2021-12-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
aoliver |
Date |
2021-12-27 |
Time |
17:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
aoliver |
Date |
2021-11-20 |
Time |
09:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2022-04-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dbattles |
Date |
2022-04-20 |
Time |
16:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dbattles |
Date |
2022-04-20 |
Time |
16:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2022-04-20 16:17:06 | MULTI PAGE UPLOADED INTO SIGNATURE FOLDER. | | IF ANOTHER ROUND OF REVIEWS OCCURS ANY NEW SHEETS WILL | | NEED TO BE REVIEWED FOR SIGNATURE. |
|
|
Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-04-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-04-18 |
Time |
11:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-04-18 |
Time |
11:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2022-04-18 11:04:24 | SIGNATURE REVIEW | | | | CORRECTIONS NEEDED | | | | 1) DRAWINGS - SHEETS 01,02,03,04,05,06,07 DO NOT SHOW | | AS DIGITALLY SIGNED IN ADOBE READER - | | | | SIGNED AND SEALED DRAWINGS IN PROJECTDOX NEED TO BE | | DIGITALLY/ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED BY THE ENGINEER OR | | ARCHITECT TO BE USED IN ELECTRONIC PLAN REVIEW. (A | | CERTIFICATE-BASED DIGITAL SIGNATURE (OFTEN JUST CALLED | | A DIGITAL SIGNATURE) IS A SPECIFIC TYPE OF | | E-SIGNATURE).- OR - IF YOUR ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER DOES | | NOT HAVE AN ELECTRONIC OR DIGITAL SIGNATURE - YOU CAN | | DROP OFF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED AND SEALED | | DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS TO THE FRONT DESK IN THE BUILDING | | DIVISION AT THE CITY HALL. | | | | REVIEWED BY ROGER MCPHERSON | | 561-805-6716 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-04-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-04-04 |
Time |
10:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-04-04 |
Time |
10:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2022-04-04 10:10:57 | SIGNATURE REVIEW | | | | CORRECTIONS NEEDED | | | | 1) DRAWINGS LABELED "LOCATION OF POLES 3&4" AND | | "LOCATION OF POLES 4&5" DO NOT SHOW AS DIGITALLY SIGNED | | IN ADOBE READER - | | | | SIGNED AND SEALED DRAWINGS IN PROJECTDOX NEED TO BE | | DIGITALLY/ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED BY THE ENGINEER OR | | ARCHITECT TO BE USED IN ELECTRONIC PLAN REVIEW. (A | | CERTIFICATE-BASED DIGITAL SIGNATURE (OFTEN JUST CALLED | | A DIGITAL SIGNATURE) IS A SPECIFIC TYPE OF | | E-SIGNATURE).- OR - IF YOUR ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER DOES | | NOT HAVE AN ELECTRONIC OR DIGITAL SIGNATURE - YOU CAN | | DROP OFF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED AND SEALED | | DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS TO THE FRONT DESK IN THE BUILDING | | DIVISION AT THE CITY HALL. | | | | REVIEWED BY ROGER MCPHERSON | | 561-805-6716 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-03-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-03-02 |
Time |
11:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-03-02 |
Time |
11:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2022-03-02 11:14:15 | SIGNATURE REVIEW | | | | CORRECTIONS NEEDED | | | | 1) ALL OF THE DRAWINGS DO NOT SHOW AS DIGITALLY SIGNED | | IN ADOBE READER - | | | | SIGNED AND SEALED DRAWINGS IN PROJECTDOX NEED TO BE | | DIGITALLY/ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED BY THE ENGINEER OR | | ARCHITECT TO BE USED IN ELECTRONIC PLAN REVIEW. (A | | CERTIFICATE-BASED DIGITAL SIGNATURE (OFTEN JUST CALLED | | A DIGITAL SIGNATURE) IS A SPECIFIC TYPE OF | | E-SIGNATURE).- OR - IF YOUR ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER DOES | | NOT HAVE AN ELECTRONIC OR DIGITAL SIGNATURE - YOU CAN | | DROP OFF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED AND SEALED | | DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS TO THE FRONT DESK IN THE BUILDING | | DIVISION AT THE CITY HALL. | | | | REVIEWED BY ROGER MCPHERSON | | 561-805-6716 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-12-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2021-12-14 |
Time |
14:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2021-12-14 |
Time |
14:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2021-12-14 14:33:11 | SIGNATURE REVIEW | | | | DRAWINGS NEED TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE DESIGNER | | FBC 107.2.1 | | | | ALL OF THE DRAWINGS DO NOT SHOW AS DIGITALLY SIGNED IN | | ADOBE READER - | | | | SIGNED AND SEALED DRAWINGS IN PROJECTDOX NEED TO BE | | DIGITALLY/ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED BY THE ENGINEER OR | | ARCHITECT TO BE USED IN ELECTRONIC PLAN REVIEW. (A | | CERTIFICATE-BASED DIGITAL SIGNATURE (OFTEN JUST CALLED | | A DIGITAL SIGNATURE) IS A SPECIFIC TYPE OF | | E-SIGNATURE).- OR - IF YOUR ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER DOES | | NOT HAVE AN ELECTRONIC OR DIGITAL SIGNATURE - YOU CAN | | DROP OFF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED AND SEALED | | DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS TO THE FRONT DESK IN THE BUILDING | | DIVISION AT THE CITY HALL. | | | | REVIEWED BY ROGER MCPHERSON | | 561-805-6716 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2022-04-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
2022-04-21 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
llouie |
Date |
2022-04-21 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2022-04-21 15:04:15 | SCOPE OF PERMIT IS FOR LIGHTING/LIGHT POLE FIXTURES | | ONLY. ALL OTHER STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS/SITE IMPROVEMENTS | | (I.E. LANDSCAPING, PARKING LOT, FENCE/WALL, ETC.) | | REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMITS. |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-04-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
2022-04-11 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
llouie |
Date |
2022-04-11 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2022-04-11 13:52:25 | ** FAILED ** | | | | PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS. RESPOND TO THE | | COMMENTS IN WRITING AND/OR ON THE PLANS WHERE | | APPLICABLE: | | | | 1.) SITE PLAN (6 COURTS) IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE | | PLANS THAT ARE BEING APPROVED FOR THE TENNIS COURT | | PROJECT (SCOPE OF WORK HAS BEEN CHANGED FROM 6 COURTS | | TO 4 COURTS). ALL PLANS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT | | MUST MATCH FOR CONSISTENCY. | | | | 2.) MAKE SURE THAT WHEN SUBMITTING THE CORRECT/MATCHING | | SITE PLAN THAT SETBACK DISTANCES FROM THE POLE FIXTURES | | TO THE PROPERTY LINE(S) ARE PROVIDED. A MINIMUM POLE | | SETBACK OF 5 FT. FROM THE PROPERTY LINE IS REQUIRED. | | | | 3.) A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN MATCHING THE APPROVED PLANS FOR | | THE TENNIS COURTS (4 COURTS) MUST BE PROVIDED WITH THE | | SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | | | NOTES: | | | | * ANY REVISIONS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE | | QUESTIONS. | | | | * ZONE: GC (TENNIS COURTS). | | | | * LANDSCAPE PERMIT #22020765 (ISSUED - 4 COURTS SHOWN). | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-03-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
2022-03-09 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
llouie |
Date |
2022-03-09 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2022-03-09 14:53:12 | ** FAILED ** | | | | PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS. RESPOND TO THE | | COMMENTS IN WRITING AND/OR ON THE PLANS WHERE | | APPLICABLE: | | | | 1.) SIGNED AND SEALED UPDATED SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY IS | | REQUIRED. A SURVEY WAS NOT PROVIDED WITH THE PERMIT | | APPLICATION. | | | | [12/27/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: NOT ADDRESSED. NO SURVEY | | PROVIDED WITH THE RESUBMITTAL AND THE SURVEY MUST | | REFLECT THE PARCEL(S) OF THE SCOPE OF WORK ONLY.] | | | | | | 2.) PLANS SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE APPLICATION FOR | | THE PROPOSED CREATION OF THE GREENE SCHOOL COMMERCIAL | | PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CPD) TO WHICH THE PARCELS IS | | PROPOSED TO BE A PART OF. | | | | [12/27/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: TO DATE, STAFF IS STILL | | WAITING ON THE RESUBMITTAL FOR THE PROPOSED GREENE | | SCHOOL CPD APPLICATION. STAFF MUST BE ABLE TO REVIEW | | FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE PERMIT APPLICATION AND THE | | PROPOSED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.] | | | | | | 3.) THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN MUST SHOW PHOTOMETRIC SPILL | | OVER BEYOND THE PROPERTY LINES. PER THE ZONING AND LAND | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS), ANY SOURCE OF | | ILLUMINATION SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE FOOT CANDLE AT OR | | BEYOND THE PROPERTY LINES. [ZLDR S.94-207(D)] | | | | [12/27/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE | | PHOTOMETRIC PLAN; HOWEVER, THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN IS NOT | | CONSISTENT WITH THE STANDARDS OF THE ZLDRS.] | | | | | | NOTES: | | | | * ANY REVISIONS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE | | QUESTIONS. | | | | * ZONE: GC/PROPOSED GREENE SCHOOL CPD | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-12-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
2021-12-27 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
llouie |
Date |
2021-12-27 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2021-12-27 13:14:37 | ** FAILED ** | | | | PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS. RESPOND TO THE | | COMMENTS IN WRITING AND/OR ON THE PLANS WHERE | | APPLICABLE: | | | | 1.) SIGNED AND SEALED UPDATED SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY IS | | REQUIRED. A SURVEY WAS NOT PROVIDED WITH THE PERMIT | | APPLICATION. | | | | 2.) A UNIT OF TITLE IS REQUIRED TO JOIN THE ADJACENT | | PARCEL, WHICH SEEMS TO BE A PART OF THE PROJECT AREA. | | | | 3.) PLANS SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE APPLICATION FOR | | THE PROPOSED CREATION OF THE GREENE SCHOOL COMMERCIAL | | PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CPD) TO WHICH THE PARCELS IS | | PROPOSED TO BE A PART OF. | | | | 4.) A 5 FT WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS REQUIRED ALONG THE | | BISCAYNE DRIVE PROPERTY LINE. [ZLDR S.94-443] | | | | 5.) SHOW SETBACK DISTANCE OF THE LIGHT POLE FIXTURES TO | | THE PROPERTY LINE(S). A MINIMUM 5 FT. IS REQUIRED FROM | | THE PROPERTY LINES. | | | | 6.) HOW TALL ARE THE POLE FIXTURES? FIXTURE DETAILS | | REQUIRED. | | | | 7.) THE FOLLOWING NOTE SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE PLANS | | FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | REGULATIONS (ZLDRS): ALL OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL BE | | SHIELDED TO REDUCE GLARE AND SHALL BE ARRANGED TO | | REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE AWAY FROM ALL ADJACENT | | RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, ADJACENT RESIDENCES, OR PUBLIC | | THROUGHFARES. [ZLDR S.94-309.A.] | | | | 8.) A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN IS REQUIRED. | | | | | | NOTES: | | | | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE | | QUESTIONS. | | | | * ZONE: GC/PROPOSED GREENE SCHOOL CPD | | |
|
|