Plan Review Details - Permit 21091039
Plan Review Stops For Permit 21091039
Review Stop AD ADDRESSING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2022-03-23 Cont ID  
Sent By cpuell Date 2022-03-23 Time 08:43 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cpuell Date 2022-03-23 Time 08:43 Sent To  
Notes
2022-03-23 08:44:32LOCATION OF POLE CHANGED FROM 1110 @ JAMES ST TO 1100 @
 OKEECHOBEE RD
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2022-12-30 Cont ID  
Sent By sberglun Date 2022-12-30 Time 10:19 Rev Time 0.00
Received By sberglun Date 2022-12-30 Time 10:19 Sent To  
Notes
2022-12-30 10:20:521) REPEAT COMMENT: RELOCATE THE BORE AWAY FROM THE
 CITY'S 30" PCCP WATERMAIN.
 2) ADDRESS ALL ZONING COMMENTS.
 SUZANNE BERGLUND
 [email protected]
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2022-10-20 Cont ID  
Sent By sberglun Date 2022-10-20 Time 15:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By sberglun Date 2022-10-20 Time 15:15 Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-20 15:17:061) SAME COMMENT AS BEFORE. PROPOSED BORE PATH AND BORE
 PIT LOCATION APPEAR TO BE ON THE CITY'S 30" PCCP WM.
 RELOCATE THE BORE TO THE NORTH SIDE OF JAMES ST. AWAY
 FROMT HE CITY'S 30" PCCP WM.
 SUZANNE BERGLUND
 [email protected]
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2022-08-17 Cont ID  
Sent By sberglun Date 2022-08-17 Time 11:04 Rev Time 0.00
Received By sberglun Date 2022-08-18 Time 07:38 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-18 07:38:321) PLEASE RELOCATE THE BORE TO THE NORTH SIDE OF JAMES
 ST. AWAY FROM THE CITY'S 30" PCCP WM. PROPOSED BORE
 THAN NEEDS TO BE BELOW THE CITY'S PCCP WM AT ALL
 CROSSINGS.
 SUZANNE BERGLUND
 [email protected]
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2022-06-27 Cont ID  
Sent By sberglun Date 2022-06-27 Time 14:13 Rev Time 0.00
Received By sberglun Date 2022-06-27 Time 14:13 Sent To  
Notes
2022-06-27 14:13:491) CITY UTILITIES ARE SHOWN INCORRECTLY ON PLANS.
 PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL, [email protected] FOR
 AS-BUILT INFORMATION. PLEASE INCLUDE AS-BUILT
 INFORMATION IN YOUR RESUBMITTAL.
 2) PLEASE PROVIDE ROUTE FOR UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC
 SERVING THE POLE. PLEASE PROVIDE PROFILE FOR PROPOSED
 UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SHOWING ALL CROSSING DATA FOR
 OTHER UTILITIES.
 3) ALL ROADWAY, SIDEWALK, AND SWALE RESTORATIONS ARE
 REQUIRED PER CITY STANDARD.
  
 SUZANNE BERGLUND
 [email protected]
 561-494-1075
  
Review Stop ENG - APP2 ENGINEERING APP. REVIEW TELCOM
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2021-10-21 Cont ID  
Sent By gpatrie Date 2021-09-27 Time 13:08 Rev Time 0.00
Received By gpatrie Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-10-21 07:05:44DRAWING REVISED 10-21-2021 TO SHOW ADDITIONAL
 UTILITIES.
  
 CONTACT: [email protected]
2021-09-27 13:07:56PAGE 4 OF 16 NOT ALL UTILITIES SHOWN. CONTACT: JANICE
 TARBILL AT [email protected].
  
 CONTACT: [email protected]
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 5 Status N Date 2022-12-30 Cont ID  
Sent By aoliver Date 2022-12-30 Time 12:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aoliver Date 2022-11-03 Time 07:13 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2022-10-20 Cont ID  
Sent By lmarchan Date 2022-10-20 Time 16:54 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmarchan Date 2022-09-23 Time 07:34 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2022-08-29 Cont ID  
Sent By lmarchan Date 2022-08-29 Time 15:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmarchan Date 2022-08-12 Time 09:20 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2022-06-27 Cont ID  
Sent By lmarchan Date 2022-06-27 Time 15:57 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmarchan Date 2022-03-25 Time 08:04 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2021-11-29 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2021-11-29 Time 17:32 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date 2021-09-22 Time 10:38 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 5 Status F Date 2022-12-27 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2022-12-27 Time 15:13 Rev Time 0.25
Received By eschneid Date 2022-12-27 Time 13:59 Sent To  
Notes
2022-12-27 15:13:33***** WCF PERMIT WILL REMAIN IN FAILED STATUS UNTIL
 PASSED BY ENGINEERING. IT COMPLIES WITH PLANNING *****
  
  
  
  
 THE POLE STYLE AND HEIGHT MEET CITY REQUIREMENTS. THE
 POLE COLOR AT THIS LOCATION SHALL BE RAL/RAYCAP 7042
 TRAFFIC GREY A, OR EQUIVALENT.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2022-10-19 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2022-10-19 Time 16:08 Rev Time 0.25
Received By eschneid Date 2022-10-19 Time 16:08 Sent To  
Notes
2022-10-19 16:08:59INSUFFICIENT
  
 1) THE CITY CODE REQUIRES THAT POLES SHALL BE LOCATED
 SO AS TO ALIGN WITH EXISTING POLES IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY
 AND HAVE EQUAL SETBACK DISTANCES WITH EXISTING POLES
 FROM THE CURBLINE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE PROPOSED
 POLE IS NOT SHOWN IN LINE WITH THE EXISTING POWER POLES
 ALONG OKEECHOBEE ROAD. THE EXISTING POLES ARE LOCATED
 ADJACENT TO THE SIDEWALK. PLEASE ADJUST THE PROPOSED
 POLE LOCATION ACCORDINGLY. *** STAFF HAS EMAILED A
 STREET VIEW SHOWING THE EXISTING POLE LOCATIONS TO
 BETTZY BRAVO FOR REVERENCE FOR WHERE THE PROPOSED POLE
 SHALL BE LOCATED IN LINE.
  
 2) THE POLE STYLE AND HEIGHT MEET CITY REQUIREMENTS.
 THE POLE COLOR AT THIS LOCATION SHALL BE RAL/RAYCAP
 7042 TRAFFIC GREY A, OR EQUIVALENT.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446.
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2022-08-29 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2022-08-29 Time 14:17 Rev Time 0.25
Received By eschneid Date 2022-08-29 Time 14:17 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-29 14:17:52INSUFFICIENT
  
 1) THE CITY CODE REQUIRES THAT POLES SHALL BE LOCATED
 SO AS TO ALIGN WITH EXISTING POLES IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY
 AND HAVE EQUAL SETBACK DISTANCES WITH EXISTING POLES
 FROM THE CURBLINE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE PROPOSED
 POLE IS NOT SHOWN IN LINE WITH THE EXISTING POWER POLES
 ALONG OKEECHOBEE ROAD. THE EXISTING POLES ARE LOCATED
 ADJACENT TO THE SIDEWALK. PLEASE ADJUST THE PROPOSED
 POLE LOCATION ACCORDINGLY.
  
 2) THE SURVEY SHOWS A 36-FOOT TALL UTILITY POLE ACROSS
 THE STREET FROM THE PROPOSED LOCATION TO SET THE
 FACILITY HEIGHT. THE 33-FOOT HEIGHT OF THE WIRELESS
 FACILITY SHOWN ON SHEET 8 MEETS THE CITY HEIGHT
 ALLOWANCE. THERE ARE OTHER SHEETS THAT CALL OUT A
 25-FOOT HEIGHT. ALL SHEETS NEED TO REFLECT THAT THE
 WIRELESS FACILITY IS 33 FEET IN HEIGHT.
  
 3) THE PALM BEACH COUNTY ENGINEERING DETAILS NEED TO BE
 CHANGED TO THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ENGINEERING
 DETAILS.
  
 4) THE POLE STYLE AND HEIGHT (AT 33 FEET) MEET CITY
 REQUIREMENTS. THE POLE COLOR AT THIS LOCATION SHALL BE
 RAL/RAYCAP 7042 TRAFFIC GREY A, OR EQUIVALENT.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446.
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2022-04-26 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2022-04-26 Time 14:12 Rev Time 0.25
Received By eschneid Date 2022-04-26 Time 14:12 Sent To  
Notes
2022-04-26 14:12:55INSUFFICIENT
  
 1) THE UNDERGROUND POWER CONDUIT RUN MUST BE INCLUDED
 WITH THIS WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY PLACEMENT
 PERMIT - RIGHT-OF-WAY SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THE
 UNDERGROUND POWER IS LOCATED WITHIN A RIGHT-OF-WAY AND
 DOES NOT INTERFERE WITH ANY RIGHT-OF-WAY LANDSCAPE OR
 EXISTING UTILITIES. ALL HANDHOLES AND BORE PITS MUST BE
 SHOWN.
  
 2) THE SURVEY SHOWS A 36-FOOT TALL UTILITY POLE ACROSS
 THE STREET FROM THE PROPOSED LOCATION TO SET THE
 FACILITY HEIGHT. SHEET 06 SHOWS A 40.5-FOOT-TALL
 FACILITY, WHICH EXCEEDS THE CODE PERMITTED HEIGHT
 ALLOWANCE.
  
 3) THE POLE STYLE MEETS CITY REQUIREMENTS. THE POLE
 COLOR AT THIS LOCATION SHALL BE RAL/RAYCAP 7042 TRAFFIC
 GREY A.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446.
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2021-11-29 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2021-11-29 Time 17:20 Rev Time 0.25
Received By eschneid Date 2021-11-29 Time 17:20 Sent To  
Notes
2021-11-29 17:32:14FAILED
  
 1)THE SIDEWALK IS SHOW AS 5 FEET IN WIDTH ON THE
 ENGINEERING PLAN. THE POLE BASE IS SHOWN AS 1.5 FEET IN
 WIDTH (NOTE THERE IS A BASE PLATE THAT IS NOT
 DIMENSIONED, BUT WIDER THAN THE POLE BASE). THE SURVEY
 SHOWS THE OFFSET FROM THE PROPERTY LINE AT 0.5 FEET.
 THE MATH DOES NOT WORK TO RESULT IN 4 FEET BETWEEN THE
 POLE AND THE EDGE OF THE SIDEWALK SHOWN ON THE
 ENGINEERING PLAN. 5 FEET MINUS 1.5 FEET MINUS 0.5 FEET
 EQUALS 3 FEET BETWEEN THE POLE AND THE EDGE OF
 PAVEMENT. SURVEY AND PLAN NEED TO SHOW THE SAME
 CONDITIONS.
  
 2) THE SECTION DRAWING IMPLIES THAT THE BASE OF THE
 POLE WILL BE ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, WHICH WOULD
 STILL LEAVE ONLY 3.5 FEET BETWEEN THE POLE BASE AND THE
 EDGE OF THE SIDEWALK. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE BASE PLATE
 MAY NOT BE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY, SO THERE IS AN OFF-SET
 FROM THE POLE BASE REQUIRED IF THE BASE PLATE IS ON THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE. PROVIDE THE BASE PLATE DIMENSION SO
 STAFF CAN VERIFY.
  
 3) THE POLE COMPLIES WITH THE CITY'S CONCEALMENT
 REQUIREMENTS.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446.
 [email protected]


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved