Plan Review Details - Permit 21090470
Plan Review Stops For Permit 21090470
Review Stop AD ADDRESSING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2021-09-16 Cont ID  
Sent By cpuell Date 2021-09-16 Time 15:04 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cpuell Date 2021-09-16 Time 15:04 Sent To  
Notes
2021-09-16 15:05:092995 @ 45TH ST OK ADDRESS
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2022-07-11 Cont ID  
Sent By fgiaquin Date 2022-07-11 Time 23:33 Rev Time 0.00
Received By fgiaquin Date 2022-07-11 Time 23:31 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2022-05-27 Cont ID  
Sent By fgiaquin Date 2022-05-27 Time 21:45 Rev Time 0.00
Received By fgiaquin Date 2022-05-27 Time 20:22 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2021-10-12 Cont ID  
Sent By fgiaquin Date 2021-10-12 Time 22:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By fgiaquin Date 2021-10-12 Time 20:58 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2022-01-20 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2022-01-20 Time 16:18 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2021-10-26 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2021-10-26 Time 13:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2021-10-26 Time 13:35 Sent To  
Notes
2021-10-26 13:36:08SEE ZONING
  
 CONTACT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND APPLY FOR A RIGHT OF
 WAY PERMIT IF REQUIRED.
  
  
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 6 Status N Date 2022-07-11 Cont ID  
Sent By fgiaquin Date 2022-07-11 Time 23:34 Rev Time 0.00
Received By fgiaquin Date 2022-06-29 Time 07:40 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 5 Status N Date 2022-06-17 Cont ID  
Sent By mpeterso Date 2022-06-17 Time 15:24 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mpeterso Date 2022-05-13 Time 15:42 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2022-04-26 Cont ID  
Sent By lmarchan Date 2022-04-26 Time 15:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmarchan Date 2022-04-01 Time 10:32 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2022-03-17 Cont ID  
Sent By mpeterso Date 2022-03-17 Time 11:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mpeterso Date 2022-01-27 Time 07:56 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2022-01-20 Cont ID  
Sent By lmarchan Date 2022-01-20 Time 16:20 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmarchan Date 2021-11-30 Time 07:43 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2021-10-26 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2021-10-26 Time 13:36 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2021-09-15 Time 12:46 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 5 Status P Date 2022-07-11 Cont ID  
Sent By fgiaquin Date 2022-07-11 Time 23:34 Rev Time 0.00
Received By fgiaquin Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2022-06-17 Cont ID  
Sent By mpeterso Date 2022-06-17 Time 15:24 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mpeterso Date 2022-06-17 Time 15:24 Sent To  
Notes
2022-06-17 16:59:19SIGNATURE REVIEW FAILED
 1) IT APPEARS ALL DRAWINGS EXCEPT SURVEY DO NOT HAVE A
 VERIFIABLE DIGITAL SIGNATURE. PLEASE FOLLOW DIRECTIONS
 BELOW TO CORRECT THIS ISSUE
  
 FS471/FS481 DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ARCHITECT OR
 ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE
 SIGNED, SEALED, DATED ORIGINALS OR DIGITALLY SEALED AND
 SIGNED.
  
 UPLOAD A DIGITALLY OR ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED PLAN TO THE
 SIGNATURE FOLDER WITH YOUR RESUBMITTAL (IF APPLICABLE)
 AND COMPLETE THE UPLOAD TASK IN PROJECTDOX..
  
 PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED
 MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. WHEN
 RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE
 LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY
 RESUBMITTAL FORM.
  
 SIGNATURE DOCUMENTS ARE TYPICALLY REVIEWED WITHIN TWO
 BUSINESS DAYS AFTER SUBMITTAL; DIGITALLY SIGNED
 DOCUMENTS ARE PREFERRED.
  
 PLEASE EMAIL [email protected] AND CC TO
 [email protected] WITH ANY QUESTIONS
  
 MICHAEL PETERSON
 ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6746
  
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2022-04-19 Cont ID  
Sent By jleahy Date 2022-04-19 Time 11:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jleahy Date 2022-04-19 Time 11:48 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2022-03-17 Cont ID  
Sent By mpeterso Date 2022-03-17 Time 11:25 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mpeterso Date 2022-03-17 Time 11:25 Sent To  
Notes
2022-03-17 11:26:47IT APPEARS ALL DRAWINGS ARE COPIES/SCANS OF ENGINEERED,
 DIGITALLY SIGNED AND SEALED DRAWINGS, COPIES OR SCANS
 OF DOCUMENTS WITH ENGINEERS DIGITAL SIGNATURES CANNOT
 BE CERTIFIED USING SIGNATURE, CERTIFYING, SOFTWARE.
 PLANS SUBMITTED ELECTRONICALLY MUST BE DIGITALLY SIGNED
 AND SEALED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. PLEASE FOLLOW THE
 DIRECTIONS OUTLINED BELOW TO CORRECT THIS ISSUE.
  
 FS471/FS481 DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ARCHITECT OR
 ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE
 SIGNED, SEALED, DATED ORIGINALS OR DIGITALLY SEALED AND
 SIGNED.
  
 EITHER UPLOAD A DIGITALLY OR ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED PLAN
 TO THE SIGNATURE FOLDER WITH YOUR RESUBMITTAL (IF
 APPLICABLE) AND COMPLETE THE UPLOAD TASK IN PROJECTDOX,
 OR YOU CAN SUBMIT ONE ORIGINAL SIGNED AND SEALED PAPER
 ORIGINAL WITH A WET SIGNATURE TO THE BUILDING
 DEPARTMENT.
 PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED
 MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. WHEN
 RESUBMITTING,
  
 IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING
 EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY RESUBMITTAL FORM.
  
 SIGNATURE DOCUMENTS ARE TYPICALLY REVIEWED WITHIN TWO
 BUSINESS DAYS AFTER SUBMITTAL; DIGITALLY SIGNED
 DOCUMENTS ARE PREFERRED.
 PLEASE EMAIL [email protected] AND CC TO
 [email protected] WITH ANY QUESTIONS
  
 MICHAEL PETERSON
 ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6746
  
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2021-10-12 Cont ID  
Sent By fgiaquin Date 2021-10-12 Time 22:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By fgiaquin Date 2021-10-12 Time 22:10 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 5 Status P Date 2022-06-15 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2022-06-15 Time 13:37 Rev Time 0.50
Received By eschneid Date 2022-06-15 Time 13:37 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2022-04-26 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2022-04-26 Time 15:31 Rev Time 0.25
Received By eschneid Date 2022-04-26 Time 14:49 Sent To  
Notes
2022-04-26 15:32:09FAILED
  
 1) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE THE CROSS SECTION OF THE
 UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC (BORING PROFILE) SO THAT STAFF CAN
 VERIFY THAT THE BORE IS DEEP ENOUGH TO AVOID DAMAGING
 THE ROOT SYSTEMS OF THE TREES OVER THE ELECTRIC PATH.
 BORE PITS/HANDHOLES NEED TO BE SHOWN AT LEAST 10 FEET
 FROM THE EXISTING TREES. THESE TREES ARE REQUIRED
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER TREES TO IT NEEDS TO BE SHOWN THAT
 THIS INSTALLATION PROVIDES ENOUGH SEPARATION TO NOT
 DAMAGE THE ROOT SYSTEMS OF THE TREES.
  
 2) THE POLE STYLE AND HEIGHT MEET CITY REQUIREMENTS.
 THE POLE COLOR AT THIS LOCATION SHALL BE RAL/RAYCAP
 7042 TRAFFIC GREY A.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2022-03-16 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2022-03-16 Time 17:34 Rev Time 0.50
Received By eschneid Date 2022-03-16 Time 14:57 Sent To  
Notes
2022-03-16 17:27:50FAILED
  
 1) THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE SURVEY. THE LOCATION OF
 THE PROPOSED POLE DIFFERS ON THE SURVEY THAT WHERE IT
 IS SHOWN ON THE POWER ROUTING PLAN. THE SURVEY SHOWS
 THE POLE AT THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK, WHILE THE POWER
 ROUTING PLAN SHOWS THE POLE FURTHER NORTH AT THE EDGE
 OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE. THE SURVEY AND PLANS MUST
 SHOW THE SAME CONDITIONS. PROVIDE A SURVEY, PREPARED BY
 A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR, WHICH SHOWS THE POLE
 LOCATION AND THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE SO THAT STAFF CAN
 VERIFY THAT THE WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY IS
 WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND NOT ON PRIVATE PROPERTY.
 NOTE: THE LAT/LON COORDINATES ARE THE SAME ON BOTH
 PLANS, SO ONE IS INCORRECTLY DEPICTED.
  
 PROVIDE THE CROSS SECTION OF THE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC
 SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THE BORE IS DEEP ENOUGH
 TO AVOID DAMAGING THE ROOT SYSTEMS OF THE TREES OVER
 THE ELECTRIC PATH.
  
 SHEET E201 SHOWS A PROPOSED WIRELESS FACILITY (POLE)
 THAT DOES NOT MEET THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 CONCEALMENT (STEALTH) STYLE REQUIREMENTS LISTED IN
 SECTIONS 78-411(E) AND 78-411(F) OF THE CITY CODE. THE
 OTHER SHEETS DO SHOW A COMPLIANT POLE. ALL SHEETS NEED
 TO SHOW ACCURATE, COMPLIANT INFORMATION.
  
 THE SURVEY SHOWS THAT THE SETBACK FROM THE RIGHT-OF-WAY
 LINE TO THE CENTER OF THE FACILITY IS ONE FOOT. THE
 POLE FOUNDATION IS SHOWN ON SHEET A201 WITH A TWO-FOOT
 SIX-INCH DIAMETER. PLEASE PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS FOR
 THE POLE OR THE MOUNTING PAD. THE ONE-FOOT SETBACK TO
 THE CENTERLINE OF THE FOUNDATION RESULTS IN THREE
 INCHES OF THE FOUNDATION, AND POSSIBLY THE POLE AND/OR
 MOUNTING PAD LOCATED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY OUTSIDE OF THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY, WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED. THE PLANS MUST
 CLEARLY SHOW THAT NO PART OF THE FACILITY IS LOCATED ON
 PRIVATE PROPERTY.
  
 NO EXCAVATION MAY OCCUR OUTSIDE OF THE RIGHT-A-WAY ON
 THE PRIVATE PROPERTY. ALL WIRELESS FACILITY COMPONENTS
 AND CONSTRUCTION MUST OCCUR IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 THE WIRELESS FACILITY COMPLIES WITH CITY HEIGHT
 REQUIREMENTS. STAFF HAS NOT YET DETERMINED WHAT THE
 APPROPRIATE POLE COLOR AT THIS LOCATION SHALL BE.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2022-01-20 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2022-01-20 Time 16:15 Rev Time 0.25
Received By eschneid Date 2022-01-20 Time 15:56 Sent To  
Notes
2022-01-20 16:17:30FAILED
  
 1) THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE SURVEY. THE LOCATION OF
 THE PROPOSED POLE DIFFERS ON THE SURVEY THAT WHERE IT
 IS SHOWN ON THE POWER ROUTING PLAN. THE SURVEY SHOWS
 THE POLE AT THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK, WHILE THE POWER
 ROUTING PLAN SHOWS THE POLE FURTHER NORTH AT THE EDGE
 OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE. THE SURVEY AND PLANS MUST
 SHOW THE SAME CONDITIONS. PROVIDE A SURVEY, PREPARED BY
 A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR, WHICH SHOWS THE POLE
 LOCATION AND THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE SO THAT STAFF CAN
 VERIFY THAT THE WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY IS
 WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND NOT ON PRIVATE PROPERTY.
 NOTE: THE LAT/LON COORDINATES ARE THE SAME ON BOTH
 PLANS, SO ONE IS INCORRECTLY DEPICTED.
  
 2) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PROPOSED WIRELESS FACILITY
 (POLE) DOES NOT MEET THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 CONCEALMENT (STEALTH), STYLE OR HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS
 LISTED IN SECTIONS 78-411(E), 78-411(F) AND 78-411(G)
 OF THE CITY CODE. PROVIDE A POLE THAT MEETS THE CITY
 CODE REQUIREMENTS. NOTE: VERIZON HAS SHOWN POLES ON
 OTHER APPLICATIONS THAT MEET THE CITY CODE
 REQUIREMENTS.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2021-09-27 Cont ID  
Sent By eshneide Date 2021-09-27 Time 08:53 Rev Time 0.25
Received By eschneid Date 2021-09-27 Time 08:53 Sent To  
Notes
2021-09-27 09:13:14FAILED
  
 1) PROVIDE A SURVEY, PREPARED BY A FLORIDA LICENSED
 SURVEYOR, WHICH SHOWS THE POLE LOCATION AND THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THE
 WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY IS WITHIN THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY AND NOT ON PRIVATE PROPERTY.
  
 2) PROVIDE A COPY OF THE PALM BEACH COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAY
 APPROVAL IF THE SURVEY SHOWS THE PROPOSED WIRELESS
 COMMUNICATION FACILITY IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. NOTE: THE
 ROW PERMIT APPROVAL NUMBER IS LISTED ON THE ENGINEERING
 SITE PLAN.
  
 3) THE PROPOSED WIRELESS FACILITY (POLE) DOES NOT MEET
 THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CONCEALMENT (STEALTH),
 STYLE OR HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS LISTED IN SECTIONS
 78-411(E), 78-411(F) AND 78-411(G) OF THE CITY CODE.
 PROVIDE A POLE THAT MEETS THE CITY CODE REQUIREMENTS.
 NOTE: VERIZON HAS SHOWN POLES ON OTHER APPLICATIONS
 THAT MEET THE CITY CODE REQUIREMENTS.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  
  
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved