2021-09-03 18:53:21 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS |
| CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| PERMIT #21080635 |
| |
| NOTE: SEC. 702.6 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. ALL NEW WORK |
| SHALL COMPLY WITH THE MATERIALS AND METHODS |
| REQUIREMENTS IN THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. |
| |
| 1- SHUTTER SPAN FOR OPENING #1 EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM SPAN |
| ALLOWED BY TABLE 3 ON PAGE 1 OF 14 OF SHUTTERS PRODUCT |
| APPROVAL SUBMITTED. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| 2- SPACING OF ANCHOR AT THE BOTTOM OF OPENING #2 NEEDS |
| TO BE REVISED. SEE PAGE 11 OF 14 OF SHUTTERS PRODUCT |
| APPROVAL SUBMITTED. |
| SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| 3- CLEARLY SPECIFY HOW THE EMERGENCY EGRESS IS ACHIEVED |
| IF ALL OPENINGS WILL HAVE SHUTTERS? SEC. R310.4 |
| FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| |
| |
| 4- BASED ON THE OPENING HEIGHT AND THE EDGE DISTANCE |
| SPECIFIED ON THE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE, IT LOOKS LIKE |
| THE SPECIFIED SHUTTER SPAN IS INCORRECT. REVISE AS |
| REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| NOTE: |
| CLEARLY SPECIFY IF THE EDGE DISTANCE SHOWN INCLUDES THE |
| STUCCO THICKNESS OR NOT. THIS IS IMPORTANT BECAUSE IN |
| THE FIELD THE ACTUAL EDGE DISTANCE NEED TO BE LARGER |
| THAN THE ONE SHOWN ON THE SCHEDULE (TYPICALLY 1/2 MORE |
| TO INCLUDE THE STUCCO THICKNESS). |
| |
| THE EDGE DISTANCE IS THE ONE THAT WILL BE VERIFIED IN |
| THE FIELD. IF THE EDGE DISTANCE IS LESS THAN THE |
| SPECIFIED ONE, THEN A REVISION WILL BE REQUIRED. |
| |
| WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF |
| THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR |
| SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL |
| HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR |
| ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| |
| PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| JULIO GOMEZ |
| COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| BUILDING DIVISION |
| (561)805-6712 |
| [email protected] |