Plan Review Stops For Permit 21071518 |
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2022-04-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2022-04-10 |
Time |
15:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2022-04-10 |
Time |
15:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-01-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2022-01-19 |
Time |
07:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2022-01-19 |
Time |
07:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2022-01-19 07:02:47 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | [email protected] | | 561-805-6724 | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 7TH EDITION (2020) | | FBC B = FBC BUILDING | | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING | | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY | | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION | | FBC R = FBC RESIDENTIAL | | | | FYI THE MAJORITY OF FILES IN THIS SUBMITTAL HAVE BEEN | | LOCKED AS THEY DO NOT MEET DESIGN PRESSURE | | REQUIREMENTS. | | | | 1. FBC B 1609, FROM PREVIOUS LISTS: | | | | MARK PRODUCT APPROVALS TO SHOW OPTION SELECTED, BUT | | OPTIONS MUST MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES SPECIFIED BY THE | | ENGINEER. NOTE IF THE OPTION IS FOR ZONE 4 OR ZONE 5 AS | | IT APPEARS THAT THERE ARE OPENINGS FOR FIXED, SINGLE | | HUNG, AND SGD IN BOTH ZONES. | | | | 2. SEE SGD FL251-R33, IT IS NOT CLEAR WHAT DESIGN | | PRESSURE OPTION IS PROPOSED AND NONE MEET THE | | REQUIREMENT FOR ZONE 5. PRESSURES REQUIRED PER | | ENGINEER: | | | | ZONE 4 +59.79/-62.18 | | ZONE 5 +56.01/-93.54 | | | | OPTIONS ON PAGES 6 AND 7 HAVE DP LIMITATION OF +-60, | | OPTIONS ON PAGE 8 HAVE DP LIMITATION OF +-90, SEE ALSO | | TABLE 1A, 2A, 3A. | | | | 2. SEE FIXED WINDOW FL26095, SHEET 4 OF 5 HAS +55/-59.3 | | HIGHLIGHTED. THIS DOES NOT MEET PRESSURES REQUIRED BY | | THE ENGINEER: | | | | ZONE 4 +62.01/-66.97 | | ZONE 5 +66.97/-122.79 | | | | 3. SINGLE HUNG FL9064 APPEARS OK. | | | | 4. IT APPEARS THAT MULLIONS ARE REQUIRED, BUT HAVE NOT | | BEEN SUBMITTED. | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-11-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2021-11-01 |
Time |
14:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2021-11-01 |
Time |
14:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2021-11-01 15:00:58 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | [email protected] | | 561-805-6724 | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 7TH EDITION (2020) | | FBC B = FBC BUILDING | | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING | | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY | | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION | | FBC R = FBC RESIDENTIAL | | | | 1. FBC B 1609, FROM PREVIOUS LIST: | | | | MARK PRODUCT APPROVALS TO SHOW OPTION SELECTED, BUT | | OPTIONS MUST MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES SPECIFIED BY THE | | ENGINEER. NOTE IF THE OPTION IS FOR ZONE 4 OR ZONE 5 AS | | IT APPEARS THAT THERE ARE OPENINGS FOR FIXED, SINGLE | | HUNG, AND SGD IN BOTH ZONES. | | | | 2ND REVIEW - THE SGD PRODUCT APPROVAL IS NOT MARKED. A | | NEW PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS UPLOADED NOTHING IS MARKED. | | | | FIXED WINDOW OPTION OK FOR THE MOST CURRENT DOCUMENT | | UPLOADED ON 10/21 BUT THE PRODUCT APPROVAL UPLOADED | | (NAMED NOA.PDF) IS INCOMPLETE; IT IS MISSING THE FIRST | | PAGE. THERE ARE TWO OTHER DOCUMENTS FOR A FIXED WINDOW | | NAMED "NOA FIXED.PDF" AND "PRODUCT APPROVAL - WINDOWS | | FIXED FL26095-R3.PDF" AND "PRODUCT APPROVAL.PDF". IT IS | | NOT CLEAR WHICH OF THE THREE IS PROPOSED; PLEASE ADVISE | | WHICH THREE SHOULD BE DELETED. IT APPEARS THAT | | "NOA.PDF" IS THE MOST CURRENT DOCUMENT AND THE OTHER | | THREE SHOULD BE DELETED, PLEASE CONFIRM. | | | | IT DOES NOT APPEAR A NEW PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR SINGLE | | HUNG WINDOW WAS NOT SUBMITTED. | | | | 2. SEE SHEET A1.0, ALUMINUM WINDOWS AND SGD ARE | | PROPOSED, BUT VINYL PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED. | | REVISE. THE SCHEDULE DOES NOT APPEAR TO CORRELATE WITH | | THE PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED, PLEASE ADVISE WHICH | | PRODUCT APPROVALS SHOULD BE DELETED. THERE SHOULD BE | | THREE PRODUCT APPROVALS (SGD, FIXED, S/H) BUT 8 WERE | | UPLOADED. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-09-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2021-09-15 |
Time |
17:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2021-09-15 |
Time |
17:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2021-09-15 17:20:26 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | [email protected] | | 561-805-6724 | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 7TH EDITION (2020) | | FBC B = FBC BUILDING | | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING | | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY | | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION | | FBC R = FBC RESIDENTIAL | | | | PLAN REVIEW IN PROGRESS | | | | 1. FBC B 1609, ENGINEER'S CALCULATIONS ARE VERY LENGTHY | | AND COMPLIANCE IS NOT CLEAR, DESIGN PRESSURES ON A1 DO | | NOT ALWAYS CORRELATE WITH THE ENGINEER'S CALCULATIONS. | | SEE PAGE 7-8 OF CALCULATIONS. A1.0 SHOWS ZONE 4 AS | | +66.97/-66.97, ENGINEER'S CALCS SHOW +62.01/-66.97. | | | | THE PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE NOT MARKED AS TO OPTIONS | | PROPOSED. | | | | THE FIXED PRODUCT APPROVAL FL 26095 OPTION ON DRAWING | | SHEET 4 OF 5 FOR OPTION MEETING DESIGN PRESSURE OF | | +55/-59.3, BUT DESIGN PRESSURES FOR ZONE 4 ARE HIGHER | | THAN THAT PER ENGINEERING. | | | | TO RESOLVE: | | | | CONFIRM THAT ALL DESIGN PRESSURES IN THE CALCULATIONS | | EXACTLY CORRELATE WITH THOSE SHOWN ON A1.0 | | MARK PRODUCT APPROVALS TO SHOW OPTION SELECTED, BUT | | OPTIONS MUST MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES SPECIFIED BY THE | | ENGINEER. NOTE IF THE OPTION IS FOR ZONE 4 OR ZONE 5 AS | | IT APPEARS THAT THERE ARE OPENINGS FOR FIXED, SINGLE | | HUNG, AND SGD IN BOTH ZONES. | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2022-04-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2022-04-10 |
Time |
15:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2022-03-15 |
Time |
07:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2022-01-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2022-01-19 |
Time |
07:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2021-12-09 |
Time |
07:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2021-11-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2021-11-01 |
Time |
15:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2021-10-22 |
Time |
09:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2021-09-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2021-09-15 |
Time |
18:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2021-09-13 |
Time |
14:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2022-04-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2022-04-10 |
Time |
15:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2022-04-10 |
Time |
15:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2022-01-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2022-01-19 |
Time |
07:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2022-01-19 |
Time |
07:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2021-11-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2021-11-01 |
Time |
15:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2021-11-01 |
Time |
15:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-09-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2021-09-15 |
Time |
18:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2021-09-15 |
Time |
18:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2021-09-15 18:17:06 | SAMANTHA HILL | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | [email protected] | | 561-805-6724 | | | | CALCULATIONS OK (DIGITALLY SIGNED BY ENGINEER) | | DRAWING PAGE 1.0 PREPARED BY MANUEL SIQUES, PE HAS A | | SCAN OF THE ENGINEER'S SIGNATURE AND SEAL. | | DEMO PLAN WILL NOT BE ISSUED; PREPARED BY ENGINEER BUT | | SHOWS WORK NOT IN THIS SCOPE. DEMO PLAN NOT NEEDED FOR | | A WINDOW PERMIT. | | | | FS471/FS481 DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ARCHITECT OR | | ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE | | SIGNED, SEALED, DATED ORIGINALS. A SCAN OF A SIGNED | | PLAN IS NOT CONSIDERED AN ORIGINAL. | | | | EITHER UPLOAD A DIGITALLY OR ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED PLAN | | TO THE SIGNATURE FOLDER WITH YOUR RESUBMITTAL (IF | | APPLICABLE) AND COMPLETE THE UPLOAD TASK IN PROJECTDOX, | | OR YOU CAN SUBMIT ONE ORIGINAL SIGNED AND SEALED PAPER | | ORIGINAL WITH A WET SIGNATURE TO THE BUILDING DIVISION. | | SIGNATURE DOCUMENTS ARE TYPICALLY REVIEWED WITHIN TWO | | BUSINESS DAYS AFTER SUBMITTAL; DIGITALLY SIGNED | | DOCUMENTS ARE PREFERRED. | | | | |
|
|