Plan Review Stops For Permit 21071160 |
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2022-01-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
cthroop |
Date |
2022-01-21 |
Time |
14:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
cthroop |
Date |
2022-01-21 |
Time |
13:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-11-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
cthroop |
Date |
2021-11-05 |
Time |
16:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
cthroop |
Date |
2021-11-05 |
Time |
16:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2021-11-05 17:00:15 | PLAN REVIEW BUILDING | | | | CHRISTOPHER S. THROOP, C.B.O., CFM | | PLANS EXAMINER II PX3169/SFP306 | | INSPECTOR BN4338 | | BUILDING OFFICIAL BU1635 | | ASFPM CERTIFIED FLOODPLAIN MANAGER US-21-11935 | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | (561) 805-6726 | | [email protected] | | | | CODES IN EFFECT: | | 2020 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 7TH EDITION W/2017 WEST | | PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, | | CHAPTER 1 ADMINISTRATION | | 2017 NEC | | | | 5TH REVIEW | | | | COMMENTS FROM 4TH REVIEW HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | RESULTS: DENIED | | ADDRESS THE ATTACHED COMMENTS AND RE-SUBMIT | | | | NOTICE: RE: SUPPORTING DOC'S FOLDER. I HAVE LOCKED ALL | | DOCUMENTS THAT ARE DUPLICATE OR NOT RELEVANT TO THIS | | SUBMITTAL. | | | | 1. PROVIDE A SITE PLAN, FLOOR PLAN OR BUILDING SKETCH. | | IDENTIFY LOCATION OF PROPOSED DOOR. | | 107.2 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS | | SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTIONS107.2.1 THROUGH | | 107.2.5. | | | | 2. REF. PRODUCT APPROVAL FL 15012-R8 FOR THE FOLLOOWING | | COMMENTS: | | | | THE DESIGN PRESSURES (32.0/-36.2) OF AN 8 FOOT WIDE | | OVERHEAD DOOR (OHD) ARE INSUFFICIENT FOR THE SITE | | CONDITIONS. PROVIDE DESIGN PRESSURE CALCULATIONS FOR AN | | 8 FOOT WIDE OHD THAT MEET OR EXCEED THE DESIGN | | PRESSURES OF THE SITE. SEE FBC R301. | | R301.2.1 WIND DESIGN CRITERIA. | | BUILDINGS AND PORTIONS THEREOF SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH THE WIND PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE USING | | THE BASIC WIND SPEED IN TABLE R301.2(1) AS DETERMINED | | FROM FIGURE R301.2(4) WITH ADJUSTMENTS PER COEFFECIENTS | | PER R301.2(3). | | | | | | COMMENTS FROM 1ST REVIEW BY S HILL. | | | | 1. SEE FBC R TABLE 301.2(4), A 9' DOOR MODIFIED BY | | TABLE R301.2(3) HAS A DESIGN PRESSURE REQUIREMENT OF | | +33.39/-37.75. THE DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED HAS | | A DESIGN PRESSURE LIMITATION OF +32/-36.2 FOR AN 8' | | DOOR. SINCE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR AN 8' OPENING WIDE | | GARAGE DOOR IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE FBC, PROVIDE | | CALCULATIONS TO SHOW DP FOR AN 8' DOOR. A 8' DOOR WILL | | REQUIRE HIGHER DESIGN PRESSURES THAN A 9' DOOR BUT THE | | DP REQUIREMENT WILL LIKELY BE VERY CLOSE TO THE SAME AS | | A 9' WIDE DOOR. | | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED | | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-09-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
cthroop |
Date |
2021-09-24 |
Time |
16:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
cthroop |
Date |
2021-09-24 |
Time |
15:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2021-09-24 17:15:46 | PLAN REVIEW BUILDING | | | | CHRISTOPHER S. THROOP, C.B.O., CFM | | PLANS EXAMINER II PX3169/SFP306 | | INSPECTOR BN4338 | | BUILDING OFFICIAL BU1635 | | ASFPM CERTIFIED FLOODPLAIN MANAGER US-21-11935 | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | (561) 805-6726 | | [email protected] | | | | CODES IN EFFECT: | | 2020 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 7TH EDITION W/2017 WEST | | PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, | | CHAPTER 1 ADMINISTRATION | | 2017 NEC | | | | 4TH REVIEW | | | | RESULTS: DENIED | | ADDRESS THE ATTACHED COMMENTS AND RE-SUBMIT | | | | NOTICE: RE: SUPPORTING DOC'S FOLDER. I HAVE LOCKED ALL | | DOCUMENTS THAT ARE DUPLICATE OR NOT RELEVANT TO THIS | | SUBMITTAL. | | | | 1. PROVIDE A SITE PLAN, FLOOR PLAN OR BUILDING SKETCH. | | IDENTIFY LOCATION OF PROPOSED DOOR. | | 107.2 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS | | SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTIONS107.2.1 THROUGH | | 107.2.5. | | | | 2. REF. PRODUCT APPROVAL FL 15012-R8 FOR THE FOLLOOWING | | COMMENTS: | | | | THE DESIGN PRESSURES (32.0/-36.2) OF AN 8 FOOT WIDE | | OVERHEAD DOOR (OHD) ARE INSUFFICIENT FOR THE SITE | | CONDITIONS. PROVIDE DESIGN PRESSURE CALCULATIONS FOR AN | | 8 FOOT WIDE OHD THAT MEET OR EXCEED THE DESIGN | | PRESSURES OF THE SITE. SEE FBC R301. | | R301.2.1 WIND DESIGN CRITERIA. | | BUILDINGS AND PORTIONS THEREOF SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH THE WIND PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE USING | | THE BASIC WIND SPEED IN TABLE R301.2(1) AS DETERMINED | | FROM FIGURE R301.2(4) WITH ADJUSTMENTS PER COEFFECIENTS | | PER R301.2(3). | | | | | | COMMENTS FROM 1ST REVIEW BY S HILL. | | | | 1. SEE FBC R TABLE 301.2(4), A 9' DOOR MODIFIED BY | | TABLE R301.2(3) HAS A DESIGN PRESSURE REQUIREMENT OF | | +33.39/-37.75. THE DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED HAS | | A DESIGN PRESSURE LIMITATION OF +32/-36.2 FOR AN 8' | | DOOR. SINCE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR AN 8' OPENING WIDE | | GARAGE DOOR IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE FBC, PROVIDE | | CALCULATIONS TO SHOW DP FOR AN 8' DOOR. A 8' DOOR WILL | | REQUIRE HIGHER DESIGN PRESSURES THAN A 9' DOOR BUT THE | | DP REQUIREMENT WILL LIKELY BE VERY CLOSE TO THE SAME AS | | A 9' WIDE DOOR. | | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED | | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-09-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2021-09-13 |
Time |
07:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2021-09-13 |
Time |
07:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2021-09-13 07:36:40 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | [email protected] | | 561-805-6724 | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 7TH EDITION (2020) | | FBC B = FBC BUILDING | | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING | | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY | | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION | | FBC R = FBC RESIDENTIAL | | | | 1. FBC 107, SCOPE NOT CLEAR. APPLICATION IS FOR ONE 8' | | DOOR. PRODUCT APPROVAL DOCUMENTS WERE UPLOADED FOR A 9' | | DOOR AND AN 8' DOOR. DOCUMENTS HAVE NOT BEEN REVIEWED | | AS SCOPE OF WORK IS NOT CLEAR. | | | | VALUE APPEARS TO BE FOR ONE DOOR ONLY. WHY WERE TWO | | SETS OF PRODUCT APPROVAL DOCUMENTS UPLOADED? | | | | PLEASE COORDINATE WITH THE PERMIT LIBRARIANS AND HAVE | | ALL UNNECESSARY DOCUMENTS REMOVED FROM THIS SUBMITTAL. | | | | IF THIS IS FOR ONE DOOR, THERE SHOULD BE THREE | | DOCUMENTS UPLOADED IN PROJECTDOX: | | | | PERMIT APPLICATION WHICH DESCRIBES SCOPE OF WORK | | INCLUDING DOOR SIZE (CURRENTLY STATES "REPLACE 8X6'9" | | GARAGE DOOR SIZE FOR SIZE") | | A COMPLETE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE ONE DOOR (FL STATE | | PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER SHEET, EVALUATION REPORT, | | INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS). | | A PLAN SHOWING LOCATION OF DOOR TO BE REPLACED | | | | IF THIS IS FOR TWO DOORS, THERE SHOULD BE THREE OR FOUR | | DOCUMENTS UPLOADED IN PROJECTDOX: | | PERMIT APPLICATION WHICH DESCRIBES SCOPE OF WORK | | INCLUDING NUMBER OF DOORS, DOOR SIZES, VALUE WHICH | | INCLUDES ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, OVERHEAD, PROFIT | | A COMPETE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE DOORS - IF ONE | | PRODUCT APPROVAL COVERS BOTH DOORS, ONLY ONE IS | | NECESSARY, MARK PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR CLARIFICATION. IF | | THE PRODUCT APPROVAL DOES NOT INCLUDE BOTH SIZES, ONE | | FOR EACH IS REQUIRED | | A PLAN SHOWING LOCATION OF DOORS TO BE REPLACED | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-08-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2021-08-21 |
Time |
06:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2021-08-21 |
Time |
06:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2021-08-21 06:43:58 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | [email protected] | | 561-805-6724 | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 7TH EDITION (2020) | | FBC B = FBC BUILDING | | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING | | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY | | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION | | FBC R = FBC RESIDENTIAL | | | | 1. A FLORIDA STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS UPLOADED BUT | | THE EVALUATION REPORT AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS | | WERE NOT PROVIDED. TO ENSURE THAT WE REVIEW THE DOOR | | THAT THE CONTRACTOR IS PROPOSING, PLEASE PROVIDE. | | | | I WENT TO THE SITE FLORIDABUILDING.ORG TO ATTEMPT TO | | GET THE DOCUMENTS FOR YOU. IT APPEARS THAT MULTIPLE | | PRODUCTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE PRODUCT APPROVAL 15012.3 | | (THE ONE HIGHLIGHTED ON THE COVER SHEET) AND NOT ALL | | COMPLY. PLEASE PROVIDE THE EVALUATION REPORT WITH THE | | DESIGN PRESSURE LIMITATION HIGHLIGHTED FOR THE DOOR | | PROPOSED. | | | | | | THE DOCUMENTS PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED ARE STILL IN THE | | SUBMITTAL. PLEAE EMAIL [email protected] AND | | REQUEST THAT THE DOCUMENTS NO LONGER APPLICABLE TO THIS | | JOB BE LOCKED. | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-07-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2021-07-24 |
Time |
10:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2021-07-24 |
Time |
10:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2021-07-24 10:55:58 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | [email protected] | | 561-805-6724 | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 7TH EDITION (2020) | | FBC B = FBC BUILDING | | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING | | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY | | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION | | FBC R = FBC RESIDENTIAL | | | | 1. SEE FBC R TABLE 301.2(4), A 9' DOOR MODIFIED BY | | TABLE R301.2(3) HAS A DESIGN PRESSURE REQUIREMENT OF | | +33.39/-37.75. THE DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED HAS | | A DESIGN PRESSURE LIMITATION OF +32/-36.2 FOR AN 8' | | DOOR. SINCE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR AN 8' OPENING WIDE | | GARAGE DOOR IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE FBC, PROVIDE | | CALCULATIONS TO SHOW DP FOR AN 8' DOOR. A 8' DOOR WILL | | REQUIRE HIGHER DESIGN PRESSURES THAN A 9' DOOR BUT THE | | DP REQUIREMENT WILL LIKELY BE VERY CLOSE TO THE SAME AS | | A 9' WIDE DOOR. | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2022-01-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
cthroop |
Date |
2022-01-21 |
Time |
14:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
cthroop |
Date |
2021-12-13 |
Time |
16:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2021-11-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
cthroop |
Date |
2021-11-05 |
Time |
17:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
cthroop |
Date |
2021-09-28 |
Time |
07:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2021-09-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
cthroop |
Date |
2021-09-24 |
Time |
17:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
cthroop |
Date |
2021-09-15 |
Time |
06:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2021-09-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2021-09-13 |
Time |
07:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2021-09-10 |
Time |
12:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2021-08-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2021-08-21 |
Time |
06:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2021-08-09 |
Time |
16:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2021-07-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2021-07-24 |
Time |
10:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2021-07-22 |
Time |
14:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|