Plan Review Stops For Permit 21061632 |
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2021-08-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2021-08-12 |
Time |
16:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2021-08-12 |
Time |
16:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-07-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2021-07-21 |
Time |
09:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2021-07-21 |
Time |
09:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2021-07-21 09:30:53 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | [email protected] | | 561-805-6724 | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 7TH EDITION (2020) | | FBC B = FBC BUILDING | | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING | | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY | | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION | | FBC R = FBC RESIDENTIAL | | | | 1. NEW TILE FLOORING IS PROPOSED. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING | | TEST REPORTS FOR THE UNDERLAYMENT: | | | | A. FBC 1207.2, FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLIES SEPARATING | | DWELLING UNITS FROM EACH OTHER OR FROM PUBLIC OR | | SERVICE AREAS SHALL HAVE A SOUND TRANSMISSION CLASS | | (STC) OF NOT LESS THAN 50 (45 IF FIELD TESTED) FOR AIR | | BORNE NOISE WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 90. | | THE TEST REPORT CANNOT INCLUDE A DROPPED GYPSUM | | CEILING. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE TEST REPORT. | | | | B. FBC 1207.3, FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLIES BETWEEN | | DWELLING UNITS OR BETWEEN A DWELLING UNIT AND A PUBLIC | | OR SERVICE AREA WITHIN THE STRUCTURE SHALL HAVE AN | | IMPACT INSULATION CLASS (IIC) RATING OF NOT LESS THAN | | 50 (45 IF FIELD TESTED) WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | ASTM E 492. THE TEST REPORT CANNOT INCLUDE A DROPPED | | GYPSUM CEILING. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE TEST REPORT. | | | | C. FBC 603.1, ALLOWABLE MATERIALS IN NON COMBUSTIBLE | | BUILDINGS, SEE ITEM 2, EXCEPTION 2, ACOUSTICAL | | INSULATION INSTALLED BETWEEN A FINISHED FLOOR AND SOLID | | DECKING WITHOUT INTERVENING AIRSPACE SHALL BE ALLOWED | | TO HAVE A FLAME SPREAD INDEX OF NOT MORE THAN 200. SEE | | 803.1.1, PROVIDE TEST DATA IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 84 | | OR UL 723. | | | | 2. FBC 107, THE PAPER PLAN SUBMITTED WAS BLURRY. | | PROVIDE LEGIBLE DOCUMENTS. IT IS BEST IF YOU UPLOAD A | | PDF PRODUCED FROM THE ENGINEER'S CAD DRAWING. YOU CAN | | SUBMIT PAPER, BUT THE QUALITY MUST BE LEGIBLE. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2021-08-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jleahy |
Date |
2021-08-09 |
Time |
15:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jleahy |
Date |
2021-08-09 |
Time |
15:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2021-07-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jleahy |
Date |
2021-07-06 |
Time |
12:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jleahy |
Date |
2021-07-06 |
Time |
12:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2021-08-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2021-08-04 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2021-08-04 |
Time |
15:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-07-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2021-07-22 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2021-07-22 |
Time |
13:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2021-07-22 13:06:26 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE | | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | 1) THERE ARE INDICATIONS OF NEW TILE, HOWEVER, NO | | SPECIFICATIONS SHEETS FOR THE FLOOR UNDERLAYMENT NOR | | PROPSED TILE THAT INDICATE MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS PER | | NFPA | | | | PER NFPA 101, CH 30 | | | | 30.3.3.3 INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH. | | 30.3.3.3.1 INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH SHALL COMPLY WITH | | SECTION 10.2. | | | | 30.3.3.3.3 INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH SHALL COMPLY WITH | | 10.2.7.1 OR | | 10.2.7.2, AS APPLICABLE | | | | 10.2.1.1 CLASSIFICATION OF INTERIOR FINISH MATERIALS | | SHALL BE IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH TESTS MADE UNDER CONDITIONS SIMULATING | | ACTUAL | | INSTALLATIONS, PROVIDED THAT THE AUTHORITY HAVING | | JURISDICTION IS | | PERMITTED TO ESTABLISH THE CLASSIFICATION OF ANY | | MATERIAL FOR WHICH | | CLASSIFICATION BY A STANDARD TEST IS NOT AVAILABLE, | | UNLESS OTHERWISE | | PROVIDED IN 10.2.1.2 OR 10.2.1.4. | | 10.2.1.2 THE PROVISIONS OF 10.2.1.1 SHALL NOT APPLY TO | | MATERIALS HAVING | | A TOTAL THICKNESS OF LESS THAN 1?28 IN. (0.9 MM) THAT | | ARE APPLIED DIRECTLY | | TO THE SURFACE OF WALLS AND CEILINGS WHERE BOTH OF THE | | FOLLOWING | | CONDITIONS ARE MET: | | (1) THE WALL OR CEILING SURFACE IS A NONCOMBUSTIBLE OR | | LIMITED COMBUSTIBLE | | MATERIAL. | | (2) THE MATERIALS APPLIED MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF | | CLASS A INTERIOR | | WALL OR CEILING FINISH WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | 10.2.3, | | USING FIBER CEMENT BOARD AS THE SUBSTRATE MATERIAL. | | | | 10.2.7* INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH TESTING AND | | CLASSIFICATION. | | 10.2.7.1* CARPET AND CARPET LIKE INTERIOR FLOOR | | FINISHES SHALL | | COMPLY WITH ASTM D 2859, STANDARD TEST METHOD FOR | | IGNITION | | CHARACTERISTICS OF FINISHED TEXTILE FLOOR COVERING | | MATERIALS. | | 10.2.7.2* FLOOR COVERINGS, OTHER THAN CARPET FOR WHICH | | 10.2.2.2 | | ESTABLISHES REQUIREMENTS FOR FIRE PERFORMANCE, SHALL | | HAVE A | | MINIMUM CRITICAL RADIANT FLUX OF 0.1 W/CM2. | | | | 10.2.7.4 INTERIOR FLOOR FINISHES SHALL BE GROUPED IN | | THE CLASSES SPECIFIED | | IN 10.2.7.4.1 AND 10.2.7.4.2 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | CRITICAL RADIANT FLUX | | REQUIREMENTS. | | 10.2.7.4.1 CLASS I INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH. CLASS I | | INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH | | SHALL HAVE A CRITICAL RADIANT FLUX OF NOT LESS THAN | | 0.45 W/CM2, AS DETERMINED | | BY THE TEST DESCRIBED IN 10.2.7.3. | | 10.2.7.4.2 CLASS II INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH. CLASS II | | INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH | | SHALL HAVE A CRITICAL RADIANT FLUX OF NOT LESS THAN | | 0.22 W/CM2, BUT LESS | | THAN 0.45 W/CM2, AS DETERMINED BY THE TEST DESCRIBED IN | | 10.2.7.3. | | | | PLEASE REVIEW AND PROVIDE SPEC SHEETS. | | | | | | 2) THERE IS AN INDICATION OF NON-BEARING WALL BUT NONE | | FOR THE RATED TENANT SEPARATION WALL BY THE PROPOSED | | SHOWER. | | | | THE PROPOSED WORK APPEARS TO INVOLVE THE EXISTING WALL | | BOARD AND THUS THE REQUIRED FIRE RATING. | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A NOTE OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND ENSURE | | COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | 3) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET | | REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE | | ABOVE. | | | | | | 4) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE | | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | FIRE MARSHAL | | 561-804-4709 | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
|
Date |
2021-09-07 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
aoliver |
Date |
2021-09-03 |
Time |
16:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2021-08-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2021-08-27 |
Time |
16:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2021-08-27 |
Time |
11:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2021-08-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2021-08-12 |
Time |
16:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2021-07-30 |
Time |
08:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2021-07-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2021-07-22 |
Time |
13:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2021-06-30 |
Time |
15:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2021-07-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
medwards |
Date |
2021-07-06 |
Time |
10:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
medwards |
Date |
2021-07-06 |
Time |
10:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2021-07-06 10:05:52 | NO MECHANICAL WORK SHOWN ON DRAWINGS.ME |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2021-08-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
lcrespo |
Date |
2021-08-03 |
Time |
19:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
lcrespo |
Date |
2021-08-03 |
Time |
19:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2021-08-03 19:49:44 | 08/03/21 REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE (PLUMBING/POOL) | | | | BY REVIEWING THE PLANS / SPECIFICATIONS FOR CODE | | COMPLIANCE DOES NOT RELIEVE THE OWNER, DESIGN | | PROFESSIONAL, CONTRACTORS, OR THEIR REPRESENTATIVES | | FROM THE RESPONSIBILITY TO COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL, | | STATE, AND NATIONAL CODES AND STANDARDS IN EFFECT AT | | THE TIME OF PERMIT ISSUANCE. OUR REVIEW IS NOT A CHECK | | OF EVERY ITEM AND DOES NOT PREVENT THIS DEPARTMENT FROM | | REQUIRING CORRECTIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION. ANY CHANGES | | / ALTERATIONS TO APPROVED PLANS SHALL BE APPROVED TO | | AVOID VOIDING OF THE PERMIT. | | | | LUIS A. CRESPO | | PLUMBING PLAN EXAMINER / INSPECTOR | | EMAIL: [email protected] OFFICE: 561 805-6720 | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2021-07-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
lcrespo |
Date |
2021-07-08 |
Time |
13:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
lcrespo |
Date |
2021-07-08 |
Time |
13:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2021-07-08 13:09:57 | 07/08/21 REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE (PLUMBING) | | | | BY REVIEWING THE PLANS / SPECIFICATIONS FOR CODE | | COMPLIANCE DOES NOT RELIEVE THE OWNER, DESIGN | | PROFESSIONAL, CONTRACTORS, OR THEIR REPRESENTATIVES | | FROM THE RESPONSIBILITY TO COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL, | | STATE, AND NATIONAL CODES AND STANDARDS IN EFFECT AT | | THE TIME OF PERMIT ISSUANCE. OUR REVIEW IS NOT A CHECK | | OF EVERY ITEM AND DOES NOT PREVENT THIS DEPARTMENT FROM | | REQUIRING CORRECTIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION. ANY CHANGES | | / ALTERATIONS TO APPROVED PLANS SHALL BE APPROVED TO | | AVOID VOIDING OF THE PERMIT. | | | | LUIS A. CRESPO | | PLUMBING PLAN EXAMINER / INSPECTOR | | EMAIL: [email protected] OFFICE: 561 805-6720 | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2021-09-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
ccole |
Date |
2021-09-07 |
Time |
11:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
ccole |
Date |
2021-09-07 |
Time |
11:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-08-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2021-08-27 |
Time |
16:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2021-08-27 |
Time |
16:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2021-08-27 16:47:21 | THE ENGINEER'S SIGNATURE ON THE BEAM SECTION DRAWING IS | | A PHOTO COPY. THE ENGINEER'S ORIGINAL HANDWRITTEN | | SIGNATURE IS REQUIRED. ELECTRONICALLY SUBMITTED | | DRAWINGS ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE THE ARCHITECT OR | | ENGINEER'S DIGITAL SIGNATURE ON THEM. YOU ALSO HAVE THE | | OPTION TO SUBMIT THE SIGNED AND SEALED PAPER VERSION OF | | DRAWINGS. AFTER THE ELECTRONIC PLANS HAVE BEEN | | APPROVED, YOU CAN SUBMIT THE CORRESPONDING PAPER | | DRAWINGS AT THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT TO BE VERIFIED. THE | | ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S ORIGINAL HANDWRITTEN SIGNATURE | | AND SEAL IS REQUIRED TO BE ON THE DRAWINGS. NO | | PHOTOCOPY OR OTHER FACSIMILES OF THE SIGNATURE ARE | | ACCEPTABLE. FS 487 & 61G1 OR FS 471 & 61G15 |
|
|
Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-08-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2021-08-12 |
Time |
16:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2021-08-12 |
Time |
16:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2021-08-12 16:34:52 | SAMANTHA HILL | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | [email protected] | | 561-805-6724 | | | | FS471/FS481 DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ARCHITECT OR | | ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE | | SIGNED, SEALED, DATED ORIGINALS. THE DOCUMENT UPLOADED | | APPEARS TO HAVE A DIGITAL SIGNATURE BUT WHEN OPENED IN | | ADOBE THE BLUE BAR AT THE TOP DOES NOT APPEAR, THERE IS | | NO CERTIFICATE FOR THE DIGITAL SIGNATURE. | | | | IF YOU SPLIT A TWO PAGE PDF THAT WAS DIGITALLY SIGNED | | INTO TWO DIFFERENT PDFS, PLEASE UPLOAD THE ORIGINAL | | DIGITALLY SIGNED PDF INTO THE SIGNATURE FOLDER. THE | | DIGITAL SIGNATURE MAY HAVE BEEN REMOVED IF THE DOCUMENT | | WAS SPLIT. | | | | EITHER UPLOAD A DIGITALLY OR ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED PLAN | | TO THE SIGNATURE FOLDER AND COMPLETE THE UPLOAD TASK IN | | PROJECTDOX, OR YOU CAN SUBMIT ONE ORIGINAL SIGNED AND | | SEALED PAPER ORIGINAL WITH A WET SIGNATURE TO THE | | BUILDING DIVISION. SIGNATURE DOCUMENTS ARE TYPICALLY | | REVIEWED WITHIN TWO BUSINESS DAYS AFTER SUBMITTAL; | | DIGITALLY SIGNED DOCUMENTS ARE PREFERRED. | | | | IF THE ENGINEER NEEDS ASSISTANCE WITH THE DIGITAL | | SIGNATURE, HAVE HIM CALL ME. | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-07-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
medwards |
Date |
2021-07-01 |
Time |
15:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
medwards |
Date |
2021-07-01 |
Time |
15:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2021-07-01 15:13:14 | ENGINEER NEEDS TO SIGN HIS PAPER DRAWINGS. | | | | MICHAEL EDWARDS | | MECHANICAL EXAMINER | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET | | WEST PALM BEACH FL. 33401 | | 561-805-6728 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|