Plan Review Stops For Permit 21060143 |
Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2022-05-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
cpuell |
Date |
2022-05-10 |
Time |
12:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
cpuell |
Date |
2022-05-10 |
Time |
12:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2022-05-10 12:21:42 | WORK IS TO BE DONE ON 74434328060110012 WITH THE | | ADDRESS OF 492 FLAMINGO DR |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2022-02-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-02-16 |
Time |
10:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-02-16 |
Time |
10:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-07-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2021-07-15 |
Time |
13:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2021-07-15 |
Time |
13:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2021-07-15 13:04:07 | MASONRY FENCE | | REVIEWED BY ROGER MCPHERSON | | 561-805-6716 | | [email protected]. | | CODE USED FOR REVIEW - 2020 FBC WITH WPB CHAPTER 1 | | AMENDMENT | | | | CORRECTIONS NEEDED - FBC WPB AMENDMENTS 107 | | 1) JOB COST APPEARS TO BE LOW - PLEASE PROVIDE A COST | | BREAK DOWN TO SHOW JOB COST FBC WPB 109.3 BUILDING | | PERMIT VALUATIONS. IF, IN THE OPINION OF THE BUILDING | | OFFICIAL, THE CLAIMED VALUATION | | OF BUILDING, ALTERATION, STRUCTURE, ELECTRICAL, GAS, | | MECHANICAL OR PLUMBING SYSTEMS APPEARS TO BE | | UNDERESTIMATED ON THE APPLICATION, THE PERMIT SHALL BE | | DENIED, UNLESS THE APPLICANT CAN SHOW | | DETAILED, QUANTITY ESTIMATES, AND/OR BONA FIDE SIGNED | | CONTRACTS (EXCLUDING LAND VALUE) TO MEET THE | | APPROVAL OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. FOR PERMITTING | | PURPOSES, VALUATION OF BUILDINGS AND SYSTEMS SHALL | | BE TOTAL REPLACEMENT VALUE TO INCLUDE STRUCTURAL, | | ELECTRIC, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, INTERIOR FINISH, | | RELATIVE SITE WORK, ARCHITECTURAL AND DESIGN FEES, | | MARKETING COSTS, OVERHEAD AND PROFIT; EXCLUDING | | ONLY LAND VALUE. VALUATION REFERENCES MAY INCLUDE THE | | LATEST PUBLISHED DATA OF NATIONAL | | CONSTRUCTION COST ANALYSIS SERVICES (MARSHALL-SWIFT, | | MEANS, ETC.), AS PUBLISHED BY INTERNATIONAL | | CODE CONGRESS. FINAL BUILDING PERMIT VALUATION SHALL BE | | SET BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2022-05-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
aoliver |
Date |
2022-05-26 |
Time |
12:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
aoliver |
Date |
2022-05-25 |
Time |
08:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2022-05-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mpeterso |
Date |
2022-05-06 |
Time |
13:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mpeterso |
Date |
2022-04-26 |
Time |
14:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2022-04-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2022-04-22 |
Time |
18:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2022-04-18 |
Time |
15:43 |
Sent To |
I |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2022-02-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2022-02-24 |
Time |
13:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2022-02-11 |
Time |
14:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2021-07-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2021-07-15 |
Time |
13:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2021-06-15 |
Time |
11:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2022-05-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mpeterso |
Date |
2022-05-06 |
Time |
13:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mpeterso |
Date |
2022-05-06 |
Time |
13:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2022-04-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2022-04-22 |
Time |
18:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2022-04-22 |
Time |
18:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2022-02-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-02-16 |
Time |
10:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2022-02-16 |
Time |
10:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2021-07-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2021-07-15 |
Time |
13:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2021-07-15 |
Time |
13:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2022-05-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
2022-05-26 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
llouie |
Date |
2022-05-26 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2022-05-26 10:36:13 | ZONING APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING PROVISO(S): | | | | 1.) WALL HEIGHT SHALL NOT EXCEED 4 FT. IN HEIGHT WITHIN | | THE AREA OF THE FIRST 5 FT. OF THE PROPERTY LINES AT | | BISCAYNE DRIVE AND FLAMINGO DRIVE (FRONT PROPERTY | | LINES) - AS NOTED IN THE PLAN. | | | | | | NOTES: | | | | * SIGNED EASEMENT CONSENT PROVIDED FROM ALL UTILITY | | PROVIDERS. |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-05-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
2022-05-05 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
llouie |
Date |
2022-05-05 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2022-05-05 10:43:30 | ** FAILED ** | | | | PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS. RESPOND TO THE | | COMMENTS IN WRITING AND/OR ON THE PLANS WHERE | | APPLICABLE: | | | | 1.) FENCE HEIGHT SHALL NOT EXCEED 4 FT. IN HEIGHT | | WITHIN THE AREA OF THE FIRST 5 FT. OF THE PROPERTY LINE | | AT FLAMINGO DRIVE AND BISCAYNE DRIVE (FRONT SETBACKS). | | PLEASE PROVIDE SETBACK DIMENSIONS IN THE PLANS TO | | DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZONING AND LAND | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS). [ZLDR S.94-302(C.)(1)] | | | | [4/21/22 REPEAT COMMENT: NOT ADDRESSED. PROPOSED HEIGHT | | WITHIN THE REQUIRED FRONT SETBACK IN THE REVISED PLAN | | IS STILL NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE WALL/FENCE | | REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZLDRS. THE FENCE HEIGHT SHALL NOT | | EXCEED 4 FT. IN HEIGHT WITHIN THE AREA OF THE FIRST 5 | | FT. OF THE PROPERTY LINE AT FLAMINGO DRIVE AND BISCAYNE | | DRIVE (FRONT SETBACKS) AND MUST BE SHOWN IN THE PLANS | | (I.E. DIMENSION OUT THE SETBACK(S) IN THE SITE PLAN).] | | | | | | 2.) THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TIED TO THE ADDRESS AT | | 454 FLAMINGO DRIVE; HOWEVER, THE WALL LOCATION HAS BEEN | | MOVED TO THE 15 FT. WIDE PARCEL ADJACENT TO 454 | | FLAMINGO DRIVE. THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED WORK MUST | | MATCH THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE PERMIT | | APPLICATION. THE APPLICANT MUST RESOLVE THE ISSUE BY | | UNIFYING THE PARCELS IF THE ADDRESS AT 454 FLAMINGO | | DRIVE IS TO BE UTILIZED. PLEASE ADDRESS. | | | | | | 3.) ACCORDING TO THE SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY FOR THE | | 15 FT. WIDE STRIP BETWEEN THE FEC AND 454 FLAMINGO | | DRIVE THERE IS A 2.5 FT. WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT LOCATED | | WITHIN THE STRIP THAT WILL IMPACT THE PROPOSED WALL | | LOCATION. EASEMENT CONSENT FROM THE FOLLOWING UTILITY | | PROVIDERS IS REQUIRED: CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, FPL, | | FPU, COMCAST AND AT&T. | | | | | | | | NOTES: | | | | * ANY REVISIONS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE | | QUESTIONS. | | | | * ZONE: GC | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-04-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
2022-04-21 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
llouie |
Date |
2022-04-21 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2022-04-21 16:08:47 | ** FAILED ** | | | | PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS. RESPOND TO THE | | COMMENTS IN WRITING AND/OR ON THE PLANS WHERE | | APPLICABLE: | | | | 1.) FENCE HEIGHT SHALL NOT EXCEED 4 FT. IN HEIGHT | | WITHIN THE AREA OF THE FIRST 5 FT. OF THE PROPERTY LINE | | AT FLAMINGO DRIVE AND BISCAYNE DRIVE (FRONT SETBACKS). | | PLEASE PROVIDE SETBACK DIMENSIONS IN THE PLANS TO | | DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZONING AND LANND | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS). [ZLDR S.94-302(C.)(1)] | | | | 2.) PLEASE CLARIFY IF THE PROPOSED WALL LOCATION IS | | LOCATED ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY LINE OF THE PARCEL AT | | 454 FLAMINGO DRIVE, OR IS IT SUPPOSED TO BE ON THE 15 | | FT. WIDE PARCEL ADJACENT TO 454 FLAMINGO DRIVE AND THE | | RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE PLAN/SURVEY PROVIDED FOR THE | | PERMIT AND SHOWING THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE WALL IS | | FOR THE PROPERTY AT 454 FLAMINGO DRIVE. PLEASE NOTE | | THAT THE PARCEL AT 454 FLAMINGO DRIVE IS NOT LOCATED | | ADJACENT TO THE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND THEREFORE, | | THE HEIGHT OF THE PROPOSED WALL IS LIMITED TO 8 FT. IN | | HEIGHT (12 FT. IS NOT PERMITTED). [ZLDR S.94-302(C)(1)] | | | | | | NOTES: | | | | * ANY REVISIONS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE | | QUESTIONS. | | | | * ZONE: GC | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2022-02-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
2022-02-24 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
llouie |
Date |
2022-02-24 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2022-02-24 13:28:20 | ** FAILED ** | | | | PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS. RESPOND TO THE | | COMMENTS IN WRITING AND/OR ON THE PLANS WHERE | | APPLICABLE: | | | | 1.) THIS PROPERTY IS PART OF A PROPOSED REZONING FOR A | | COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CPD), CURRENTLY IN | | REVIEW BY STAFF, AND REQUIRES CITY COMMISSION APPROVAL. | | THE PROPOSED WALL IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE CURRENT SITE | | DESIGN FOR THE CPD AND CONFLICTS WITH THE REQUIRED 5 | | FT. WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY LINE | | FOR THE PROPOSED CPD. (REFERENCE: PLANNING BOARD CASE | | NO. 1878). | | | | [6/29/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: TO DATE, STAFF HAS NOT | | RECEIVED THE RESUBMITTAL FOR THE CPD APPLICATION. ALL | | PLANS MUST MATCH FOR CONSISTENCY AND MUST ALSO | | DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE | | ZLDRS (I.E. PLACEMENT AND SETBACK DISTANCE). ZONING | | SIGN-OFF FOR THIS PERMIT WILL NOT BE GRANTED UNTIL | | PLANS MATCH THE PROPOSED CPD APPLICATION FOR | | CONSISTENCY. PERMIT TO PROCEED AT THE APPLICANT?S OWN | | RISK.] | | | | | | 2.) ILLUSTRATE THE EXACT LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED WALL | | IN PLANS AS IT RELATES TO THE SCOPE OF THIS PERMIT AND | | SHOW SETBACK DIMENSION(S) FROM THE PROPERTY LINES. | | PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PROPOSED WALL MUST MEET THE | | MINIMUM SETBACK DISTANCE OF 5 FT. FROM THE FRONT | | PROPERTY LINES. THERE IS ALSO AN INCONSISTENCY IN THE | | PLANS PROVIDED IN THE PERMIT: ONE PLAN STATES THAT THE | | WALL WILL BE ON THE PROPERTY LINE AND ANOTHER PLAN | | SHOWS THE PROPOSED WALL INSIDE OF THE PROPERTY LINE. | | THE PLANS CANNOT BE IN CONFLICT; ADDRESS FOR | | CONSISTENCY [ZLDR S.94-145] | | | | | | 3.) SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY IS OUTDATED AND IS NOT | | SIGNED AND SEALED BY A FLORIDA REGISTERED LAND | | SURVEYOR. PLEASE PROVIDE A SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY. | | | | [6/29/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: NOT ADDRESSED. SURVEY STILL | | OUTDATED AND NOT SIGNED AND SEALED.] | | | | | | 4.) IF THE PROPOSED WALL IS TO BE INCLUDED IN THE | | PROPOSED CPD: A) SITE PLAN MUST BE UPDATED TO REFLECT | | AS SUCH. B) PLAN MUST CLEARLY SHOW THE SETBACK DISTANCE | | FROM THE PROPERTY LINE(S). SETBACK DISTANCE AND WALL | | HEIGHT SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE REQUIREMENTS IN | | SEC. 94-302(C) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | REGULATIONS (ZLDRS). THERE ARE INCONSISTENCIES DETECTED | | WITH THE PROPOSED LOCATION AND HEIGHT OF THE WALL WITH | | THE ZLDRS. | | | | [6/29/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: STAFF IS STILL WAITING ON | | THE RESUBMITTAL FOR THE PROPOSED CPD. PLANS MUST MATCH | | FOR CONSISTENCY.] | | | | | | | | NOTES: | | | | * ANY REVISIONS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE | | QUESTIONS. | | | | * ZONE: GC | | | | * REFERENCE PB CASE NO. 1878 (GREENE SCHOOL CPD - IN | | REVIEW). | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-06-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
2021-06-29 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
Received By |
llouie |
Date |
2021-06-29 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2021-06-29 15:58:49 | ** FAILED ** | | | | PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS. RESPOND TO THE | | COMMENTS IN WRITING AND/OR ON THE PLANS WHERE | | APPLICABLE: | | | | 1.) THIS PROPERTY IS PART OF A PROPOSED REZONING FOR A | | COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CPD), CURRENTLY IN | | REVIEW BY STAFF, AND REQUIRES CITY COMMISSION APPROVAL. | | THE PROPOSED WALL IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE CURRENT SITE | | DESIGN FOR THE CPD AND CONFLICTS WITH THE REQUIRED 5 | | FT. WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY LINE | | FOR THE PROPOSED CPD. (REFERENCE: PLANNING BOARD CASE | | NO. 1878) | | | | 2.) SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY IS OUTDATED AND IS NOT | | SIGNED AND SEALED BY A FLORIDA REGISTERED LAND | | SURVEYOR. PLEASE PROVIDE A SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY. | | | | 3.) IF THE PROPOSED WALL IS TO BE INCLUDED IN THE | | PROPOSED CPD: A) SITE PLAN MUST BE UPDATED TO REFLECT | | AS SUCH. B) PLAN MUST CLEARLY SHOW THE SETBACK DISTANCE | | FROM THE PROPERTY LINE(S). SETBACK DISTANCE AND WALL | | HEIGHT SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE REQUIREMENTS IN | | SEC. 94-302(C) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | REGULATIONS (ZLDRS). THERE ARE INCONSISTENCIES DETECTED | | WITH THE PROPOSED LOCATION AND HEIGHT OF THE WALL WITH | | THE ZLDRS. | | | | | | | | NOTES: | | | | * ANY REVISIONS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE | | QUESTIONS. | | | | * ZONE: GC | | | | * REFERENCE PB CASE NO. 1878 (GREENE SCHOOL CPD ? IN | | REVIEW). | | |
|
|