City of West Palm Beach eGovPlus

Plan Review Details - Permit 20121077

Plan Review Stops For Permit 20121077

Review Stop	AD			ADDRESSING
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	2021-01-20			Cont ID
Sent By	cpuell			Date	2021-01-20	Time	12:21	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cpuell			Date	2021-01-20	Time	12:21	Sent To

Notes

2021-01-20 12:22:18	BACK UNIT HAS A LEGAL ADDRESS OF 839 4TH ST. UPDATED
	PERMIT ADDRESS.

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	7	Status	F	Date	2023-07-21			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2023-07-21	Time	18:12	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2023-07-21	Time	17:02	Sent To

Notes

2023-07-21 18:12:25	NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE(R3) SEVEN BUILDING REVIEW
	COMMENTS
	CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS.
	PERMIT #20121077
	839 4TH ST

	****NOTE:
	ACCORDING TO THE DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL
	REGULATION, THE CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE IS SUSPENDED.
	CONTRACTOR TO UPDATE LICENSE STATUS WITH DBPR PRIOR TO
	OBTAINING THE PERMIT OR PROVIDE CHANGE OF CONTRACTOR
	FORM AND A NEW PERMIT APPLICATION.

	PROVISO NOTE:
	BUILDING REVIEW MAY BE APPROVED WITH PROVISO. PROVISO
	MEANS CONTRACTOR WILL SUBMIT REQUIRED INFORMATION AFTER
	THE PERMIT IS ISSUED BUT BEFORE INSPECTIONS TO AVOID
	CONFLICTS/DELAYS. REVISION FEES MAY APPLY (EXCEPT FOR
	PRODUCT APPROVALS DEFERRED SUBMITTAL).

	***IMPORTANT
	****CONTRACTOR TO ADVICE IF PROVISO OPTION IS PREFERRED
	AT THIS TIME OR IF RE-SUBMITTING REQUIRED INFORMATION
	BEFORE PERMIT ISSUANCE.


	11- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC
	61G20-3.001 FOR:
	A)OK. ROOF SHINGLES FL31588-R2.

	PREVIOUS COMMENT:
	D)HARDIE BOARD SIDING.
	FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER UPLOADED TO PROJECTDOX
	DOESN'T MATCH FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER NAMED IN
	PROJECTDOX SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS. ONE OF THEM IS
	FL13223-R7 AND THE OTHER ONE IS FL13192.2. REVISE AS
	REQUIRED TO MATCH.
	NOTE: WHEN RESUBMITTING PLEASE UPLOAD THE FLORIDA
	PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE AND INSTALLATION
	INSTRUCTION ON THE SAME FILE. DON'T SPLIT THEM INTO TWO
	SEPARATE FILES.

	RESPONSE:
	REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED.

	WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE
	ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF
	THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR
	SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL
	HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR
	ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.

	PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
	QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
	JULIO GOMEZ
	COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	BUILDING DIVISION
	(561)805-6712
	[email protected]

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	6	Status	F	Date	2023-03-03			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2023-03-03	Time	14:06	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2023-03-03	Time	12:57	Sent To

Notes

2023-03-03 14:09:16	NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE(R3)SIXTH BUILDING REVIEW
	COMMENTS
	CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS.
	PERMIT #20121077
	839 4TH ST

	****NOTE:
	ACCORDING TO THE DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL
	REGULATION, THE CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE IS SUSPENDED.
	CONTRACTOR TO UPDATE LICENSE STATUS WITH DBPR PRIOR TO
	OBTAINING THE PERMIT.


	NOTE:
	ENGINEER OF RECORD TO PAY $4728.72 FEE OF FOUR TIMES
	THE AMOUNT OF THE PROPORTION OF THE PERMIT FEE
	ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS REVIEW (LAST REVIEW AND THIS ONE).
	FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B

	NOTE:
	ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS
	FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B):
	ARCHITECTS WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN
	PROFESSIONALS DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT
	NECESSARY, IN ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT
	DESIGN DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE
	TIMES FOR FAILURE TO CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION
	SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY NOTED IN EACH REJECTION,
	INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION,
	STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING,
	VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS
	SYSTEMS, OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF
	THE FLORIDA BUILDING COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
	CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH
	TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED
	FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT
	OF THE PROPORTION OF THE PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS
	REVIEW

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	3-SPECIFY ATTIC ACCESS SIZE AND LOCATION SHOWING
	COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R807 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	PREVIOUS COMMENT:
	3-ATTIC ACCESS WAS RELOCATED, BUT BASED ON THE ROOF
	FRAMING PLAN, THE LOCATION OF THE ATTIC ACCESS DOESN'T
	SEEM TO PROVIDE THE HEADROOM CLEARANCE REQUIRED BY SEC.
	R807 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. ATTIC ACCESS IS LOCATED BETWEEN
	TWO GABLE END ROOFS. ALSO, BASED ON SECTION 2 ON SHEET
	S-3, THERE IS A MASONRY WALL BETWEEN THE FRONT PART OF
	THE HOUSE AND THE REAR PART OF THE HOUSE. THEREFORE,
	THERE IS NOT ACCESS TO OTHER ROOF AREAS. EACH ROOF AREA
	NEEDS AN ATTIC ACCESS. REVISE AS REQUIRED.

	PREVIOUS COMMENT:
	3- ATTIC ACCESS WAS NOT REVISED ON THE ROOF FRAMING
	PLAN TO MATCH LOCATIONS SHOWN ON SHEET A-1.
	SEC. R807 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	RESPONSE:
	A)ROOF FRAMING PLAN ON SHEET S2 SHOWS ATTIC ACCESS BY
	THE KITCHEN AREA BEING BLOCKED BY THE TRUSS GIRDER
	ABOVE. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY
	AMENDMENTS.

	B)BEDROOM #3 ATTIC ACCESS LOCATION SHOWN ON SHEET A1
	DOESN'T MATCH LOCATION AND ORIENTATION SHOWN ON THE
	ROOF FRAMING PLAN ON SHEET S2. REVISE TO MATCH. SEC.
	107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.

	6-SECTION 2 ON SHEET S-3 SHOWS A MASONRY WALL BETWEEN
	THE FRONT PART OF THE HOUSE AND THE REAR PART OF THE
	HOUSE. ROOF FRAMING PLAN ON SHEET S-2 DOESN'T SPECIFY
	THE BEAM SUPPORTING THE MASONRY WALL.
	ROOF FRAMING PLAN DOESN'T SHOW HOW THE TWO REAR GABLE
	END ROOFS ARE SUPPORTED AT THE INTERSECTION OF BOTH
	ROOFS.
	FRONT PORCH WOOD BEAM SIZE AND ROOF RAFTERS SIZE
	SPECIFIED ON THE ROOF FRAMING PLAN AND WOOD BEAM
	SPECIFIED ON SECTION 2 ON SHEET S-3 DON'T MATCH.
	SECTION 2 ON SHEET S-3 SHOWS OUT LOOKERS IN THE MIDDLE
	MASONRY WALL. THE OUT LOOKERS ARE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF
	THE SECTION BY THE GABLE END AREA. REVISE/CLARIFY WALL
	SECTION AS REQUIRED.
	SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	PREVIOUS COMMENT:
	D)NEW C1 COLUMN IS NOT SHOWN ON THE FLOOR PLAN ON SHEET
	A-1.

	RESPONSE:
	PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN ON SHEET A1 SHOWS NEW COLUMN C1
	BLOCKING THE HALLWAY LEADING TO BEDROOM #2 AND BEDROOM
	#3. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.

	PREVIOUS COMMENT:
	E)BEAM SUPPORTING THE TWO GABLE END TRUSSES IS NOT
	SPECIFIED ON THE
	BEAM SCHEDULE.

	RESPONSE:
	REPEAT COMMENT. ROOF FRAMING PLAN DOESN'T SPECIFY THIS
	BEAM. SEE SECTION-1 ON SHEET S3. THE BEAM IN QUESTION
	IS THE CENTER BEAM SUPPORTING THE TWO GABLE END
	TRUSSES. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.

	11- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC
	61G20-3.001 FOR:
	A)OK. ROOF SHINGLES FL31588-R2.

	PREVIOUS COMMENT:
	D)HARDIE BOARD SIDING.
	FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER UPLOADED TO PROJECTDOX
	DOESN'T MATCH FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER NAMED IN
	PROJECTDOX SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS. ONE OF THEM IS
	FL13223-R7 AND THE OTHER ONE IS FL13192.2. REVISE AS
	REQUIRED TO MATCH.
	NOTE: WHEN RESUBMITTING PLEASE UPLOAD THE FLORIDA
	PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE AND INSTALLATION
	INSTRUCTION ON THE SAME FILE. DON'T SPLIT THEM INTO TWO
	SEPARATE FILES.

	RESPONSE:
	REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED.

	NEW COMMENT:
	12- ENGINEER'S SELF CERTIFIED DIGITAL SIGNATURE
	1- REVISED DRAWINGS A1, S1, S2, S3 AND S5 HAVE
	ENGINEER'S SELF-CERTIFIED SIGNATURE. BOARD OF
	ENGINEER'S DON'T ALLOW SELF-CERTIFICATION. A THIRD
	PARTY CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED.
	FAC 61G15-23.004.

	WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE
	ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF
	THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR
	SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL
	HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR
	ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.

	PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
	QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
	JULIO GOMEZ
	COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	BUILDING DIVISION
	(561)805-6712
	[email protected]

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	5	Status	F	Date	2022-12-22			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2022-12-22	Time	17:05	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2022-12-21	Time	16:10	Sent To

Notes

2022-12-27 16:46:34	NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) FIFTH BUILDING REVIEW
	COMMENTS
	CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS.
	PERMIT #20121077
	839 4TH ST

	NOTE:
	ENGINEER OF RECORD TO PAY $4728.72 FEE OF FOUR TIMES
	THE AMOUNT OF THE PROPORTION OF THE PERMIT FEE
	ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS REVIEW (LAST REVIEW AND THIS ONE).
	FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B

	NOTE:
	ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS
	FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B):
	ARCHITECTS WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN
	PROFESSIONALS DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT
	NECESSARY, IN ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT
	DESIGN DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE
	TIMES FOR FAILURE TO CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION
	SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY NOTED IN EACH REJECTION,
	INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION,
	STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING,
	VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS
	SYSTEMS, OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF
	THE FLORIDA BUILDING COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
	CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH
	TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED
	FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT
	OF THE PROPORTION OF THE PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS
	REVIEW


	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	3-SPECIFY ATTIC ACCESS SIZE AND LOCATION SHOWING
	COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R807 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	PREVIOUS COMMENT:
	3-ATTIC ACCESS WAS RELOCATED, BUT BASED ON THE ROOF
	FRAMING PLAN, THE LOCATION OF THE ATTIC ACCESS DOESN'T
	SEEM TO PROVIDE THE HEADROOM CLEARANCE REQUIRED BY SEC.
	R807 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. ATTIC ACCESS IS LOCATED BETWEEN
	TWO GABLE END ROOFS. ALSO, BASED ON SECTION 2 ON SHEET
	S-3, THERE IS A MASONRY WALL BETWEEN THE FRONT PART OF
	THE HOUSE AND THE REAR PART OF THE HOUSE. THEREFORE,
	THERE IS NOT ACCESS TO OTHER ROOF AREAS. EACH ROOF AREA
	NEEDS AN ATTIC ACCESS. REVISE AS REQUIRED.

	RESPONSE:
	ATTIC ACCESS WAS NOT REVISED ON THE ROOF FRAMING PLAN
	TO MATCH LOCATIONS SHOWN ON SHEET A-1.
	SEC. R807 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	6- BEAM SCHEDULE ON SHEET S-2 ONLY SPECIFIES B-1 BEAM.
	IT DOESN'T SPECIFY THE RAKE BEAM SHOWN ON SHEET S-4.
	REVISE AS REQUIRED TO CLARIFY. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY
	AMENDMENTS.

	PREVIOUS COMMENT:
	SECTION 2 ON SHEET S-3 SHOWS A MASONRY WALL BETWEEN THE
	FRONT PART OF THE HOUSE AND THE REAR PART OF THE HOUSE.
	ROOF FRAMING PLAN ON SHEET S-2 DOESN'T SPECIFY THE BEAM
	SUPPORTING THE MASONRY WALL.
	ROOF FRAMING PLAN DOESN'T SHOW HOW THE TWO REAR GABLE
	END ROOFS ARE SUPPORTED AT THE INTERSECTION OF BOTH
	ROOFS.
	FRONT PORCH WOOD BEAM SIZE AND ROOF RAFTERS SIZE
	SPECIFIED ON THE ROOF FRAMING PLAN AND WOOD BEAM
	SPECIFIED ON SECTION 2 ON SHEET S-3 DON'T MATCH.
	SECTION 2 ON SHEET S-3 SHOWS OUT LOOKERS IN THE MIDDLE
	MASONRY WALL. THE OUT LOOKERS ARE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF
	THE SECTION BY THE GABLE END AREA. REVISE/CLARIFY WALL
	SECTION AS REQUIRED.
	SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	RESPONSE:
	A)ROOF FRAMING PLAN ON SHEET S2 SHOWS B-1 BEAM
	SUPPORTING THE MASONRY WALL AND RAKE BEAM RB-1.
	FOUNDATION PLAN WAS REVISED SHOWING COLUMN C1 AND
	FOOTING CF-16 IN THE MIDDLE OF THE FLOOR SLAB. ENGINEER
	TO CLARIFY WHY SPECIFYING A CONTINUOUS SPREAD FOOTING
	INSTEAD OF A CONCRETE PAD IF THE LOAD IS THE ECCENTRIC
	LOAD FROM THE COLUMN?. SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	B)FOUNDATION PLANS WAS ALSO REVISED SHOWING NEW C1
	COLUMNS ON THE PERIMETER WALL BUT THERE IS NOT COLUMN
	SUPPORTING BEAM B-1 ON THE LEFT HAND SIDE.

	C) SIZE OF BEAM B-1 SPECIFIED ON SECTION 2 OF SHEET S-3
	DOESN'T MATCH SIZE SPECIFIED ON THE BEAM SCHEDULE.

	D)NEW C1 COLUMN IS NOT SHOWN ON THE FLOOR PLAN ON SHEET
	A-1.

	E)BEAM SUPPORTING THE TWO GABLE END TRUSSES IS NOT
	SPECIFIED ON THE
	BEAM SCHEDULE.

	F)PORCH WOOD JOIST SIZE SPECIFIED ON SECTION 2 OF SHEET
	S-3 DOESN'T MATCH ROOF FRAMING PLAN.


	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	7- PLANS DON'T PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE ROOF
	SHEATHING. SPECIFY TYPE, THICKNESS AND ROOF SHEATHING
	FASTENING AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R803.2.3.1
	FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	PREVIOUS COMMENT:
	INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE TYPICAL WALL SECTION ON SHEET
	A-1 DOESN'T MATCH INFORMATION SHOWN ON OTHER PLANS AND
	SECTIONS. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH TO AVOID MORE
	CONFLICTS/DELAYS. ROOF SHEATHING SPECIFICATIONS DON'T
	MATCH SPECIFICATIONS SHOWN ON SHEET S-5. FOOTING SIZE
	DOESN'T MATCH FOUNDATION PLAN. ATTIC INSULATION DOESN'T
	MATCH. ETC.
	NOTE: ENGINEER TO COORDINATE ALL PLANS, SECTIONS AND
	SPECIFICATIONS TO AVOID MORE CONFLICTS AND DELAYS.

	RESPONSE:
	ROOF SHEATHING SPECIFICATIONS DON'T MATCH SECTION
	R803.2.3.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL AND FIGURE R803.2.3.1
	FBC-RESIDENTIAL. NEED TO SPECIFY NAILS AT 4" O.C. ON
	ROOF ZONE #3 AND NEED TO SPECIFY RING SHANK NAILS. (OR
	PROVIDE CALCULATIONS SHOWING THAT 10D NAIL MATCHES OR
	EXCEEDS 8D RING SHANK NAILS AS REQUIRED BY SEC.
	R803.2.3.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL).

	ALSO, ROOF SHEATHING SPECIFICATIONS DON'T COMPLY WITH
	GABLE ROOF NAILING REQUIREMENTS OF FIGURE R803.2.3.1
	FBC-RESIDENTIAL. ROOF ZONE 3 IS 5 FEET NOT 48".

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	8- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
	STEEL COLUMNS SHOWN ON THE FRONT PORCH. SPECIFY TOP AND
	BOTTOM CONNECTORS AND FURRING DETAILS.
	SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	PREVIOUS COMMENT:
	SECTION 2 ON SHEET S-3 SHOWS STEEL COLUMNS BELOW GRADE.
	THIS INFORMATION DOESN'T MATCH INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE
	FOUNDATION PLAN. FOUNDATION PLAN SHOWS A KNEE WALL.
	ALSO, THERE ARE NO DETAIL/SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING HOW
	THE STEEL COLUMNS AND CONNECTIONS ARE PROTECTED AGAINST
	RUST/DETERIORATION.

	RESPONSE:
	SECTION 2 ON SHEET S3 STILL DOESN'T MATCH FOUNDATION
	PLAN. IT DOESN'T SHOW THE KNEE WALL AND IT IS NOT CLEAR
	WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE CONCRETE PEDESTAL. THE
	CONCRETE PEDESTAL IS COVERING THE STEEL COLUMN. WHY?.
	WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF COVERING THE STEEL COLUMN WITH A
	PEDESTAL. ALSO NO SPECS FOR STEEL COLUMN, PLATE AND
	BOLTS PROTECTION FOR RUST.

	9-OK.

	11- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC
	61G20-3.001 FOR:

	A)OK. ROOF SHINGLES FL31588-R2.

	PREVIOUS COMMENT:
	D)HARDIE BOARD SIDING.
	FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER UPLOADED TO PROJECTDOX
	DOESN'T MATCH FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER NAMED IN
	PROJECTDOX SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS. ONE OF THEM IS
	FL13223-R7 AND THE OTHER ONE IS FL13192.2. REVISE AS
	REQUIRED TO MATCH.
	NOTE: WHEN RESUBMITTING PLEASE UPLOAD THE FLORIDA
	PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE AND INSTALLATION
	INSTRUCTION ON THE SAME FILE. DON'T SPLIT THEM INTO TWO
	SEPARATE FILES.

	RESPONSE:
	REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED.

	WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE
	ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF
	THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR
	SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL
	HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR
	ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.

	PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
	QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
	JULIO GOMEZ
	COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	BUILDING DIVISION
	(561)805-6712
	[email protected]

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	4	Status	F	Date	2022-07-12			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2022-07-12	Time	16:50	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2022-07-11	Time	17:46	Sent To

Notes

2022-07-12 16:52:59	NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) FOURTH BUILDING REVIEW
	COMMENTS
	CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS.
	PERMIT #20121077


	NOTE:
	ENGINEER OF RECORD TO PAY $2364.36 FEE OF FOUR TIMES
	THE AMOUNT OF THE PROPORTION OF THE PERMIT FEE
	ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS REVIEW.
	FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B



	NOTE:
	ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS
	FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B):
	ARCHITECTS WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN
	PROFESSIONALS DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT
	NECESSARY, IN ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT
	DESIGN DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE
	TIMES FOR FAILURE TO CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION
	SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY NOTED IN EACH REJECTION,
	INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION,
	STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING,
	VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS
	SYSTEMS, OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF
	THE FLORIDA BUILDING COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
	CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH
	TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED
	FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT
	OF THE PROPORTION OF THE PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS
	REVIEW



	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	2-PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE
	FOLLOWING:
	R401.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SEC. 107.2.5 CITY AMENDMENTS.
	SEC. 110.9 CITY AMENDMENTS.

	RESPONSE:
	A)DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWS A 6 INCH SWALE IMMEDIATELY
	ADJACENT TO THE EXISTING RESIDENCE #837. THE PROPOSED
	SWALE AFFECTS THE FOUNDATION. ENGINEER OF RECORD TO
	PROVIDE DETAILS SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING HOW PROTECTING
	THE FOOTING AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R401.3 BC-RESIDENTIAL.

	B)DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWS A PERMANENT TRENCH AND SILT FENCE
	TO CONTAIN THE SURFACE DRAINAGE. NEED TO APPLY FOR A
	SEPARATE FENCE PERMIT FOR ZONING APPROVAL. SEC. 105.1
	CITY AMENDMENTS.

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	3-SPECIFY ATTIC ACCESS SIZE AND LOCATION SHOWING
	COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R807 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	RESPONSE:
	ATTIC ACCESS WAS RELOCATED, BUT BASED ON THE ROOF
	FRAMING PLAN, THE LOCATION OF THE ATTIC ACCESS DOESN'T
	SEEM TO PROVIDE PROVIDE THE HEADROOM CLEARANCE REQUIRED
	BY SEC. R807 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. ATTIC ACCESS IS LOCATED
	BETWEEN TWO GABLE END ROOFS. ALSO, BASED ON SECTION 2
	ON SHEET S-3, THERE IS A MASONRY WALL BETWEEN THE FRONT
	PART OF THE HOUSE AND THE REAR PART OF THE HOUSE.
	THEREFORE, THERE IS NOT ACCESS TO OTHER ROOF AREAS.
	EACH ROOF AREA NEEDS AN ATTIC ACCESS. REVISE AS
	REQUIRED.

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	6- BEAM SCHEDULE ON SHEET S-2 ONLY SPECIFIES B-1 BEAM.
	IT DOESN'T SPECIFY THE RAKE BEAM SHOWN ON SHEET S-4.
	REVISE AS REQUIRED TO CLARIFY. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY
	AMENDMENTS.

	RESPONSE:
	SECTION 2 ON SHEET S-3 SHOWS A MASONRY WALL BETWEEN THE
	FRONT PART OF THE HOUSE AND THE REAR PART OF THE HOUSE.
	ROOF FRAMING PLAN ON SHEET S-2 DOESN'T SPECIFY THE BEAM
	SUPPORTING THE MASONRY WALL.
	ROOF FRAMING PLAN DOESN'T SHOW HOW THE TWO REAR GABLE
	END ROOFS ARE SUPPORTED AT THE INTERSECTION OF BOTH
	ROOFS.
	FRONT PORCH WOOD BEAM SIZE AND ROOF RAFTERS SIZE
	SPECIFIED ON THE ROOF FRAMING PLAN AND WOOD BEAM
	SPECIFIED ON SECTION 2 ON SHEET S-3 DON'T MATCH.
	SECTION 2 ON SHEET S-3 SHOWS OUTLOOKERS IN THE MIDDLE
	MASONRY WALL. THE OUTLOOKERS ARE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF
	THE SECTION BY THE GABLE END AREA. REVISE/CLARIFY WALL
	SECTION AS REQUIRED.
	SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	7- PLANS DON'T PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE ROOF
	SHEATHING. SPECIFY TYPE, THICKNESS AND ROOF SHEATHING
	FASTENING AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R803.2.3.1
	FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	RESPONSE:
	INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE TYPICAL WALL SECTION ON SHEET
	A-1 DOESN'T MATCH INFORMATION SHOWN ON OTHER PLANS AND
	SECTIONS. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH TO AVOID MORE
	CONFLICTS/DELAYS. ROOF SHEATHING SPECIFICATIONS DON'T
	MATCH SPECIFICATIONS SHOWN ON SHEET S-5. FOOTING SIZE
	DOESN'T MATCH FOUNDATION PLAN. ATTIC INSULATION DOESN'T
	MATCH. ETC.
	NOTE: ENGINEER TO COORDINATE ALL PLANS, SECTIONS AND
	SPECIFICATIONS TO AVOID MORE CONFLICTS AND DELAYS.

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	8- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
	STEEL COLUMNS SHOWN ON THE FRONT PORCH. SPECIFY TOP AND
	BOTTOM CONNECTORS AND FURRING DETAILS.
	SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	RESPONSE:
	SECTION 2 ON SHEET S-3 SHOWS STEEL COLUMNS BELOW GRADE.
	THIS INFORMATION DOESN'T MATCH INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE
	FOUNDATION PLAN. FOUNDATION PLAN SHOWS A KNEE WALL.
	ALSO, THERE ARE NO DETAIL/SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING HOW
	THE STEEL COLUMNS AND CONNECTIONS ARE PROTECTED AGAINST
	RUST/DETERIORATION.

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	9- PROVIDE DOORS AND WINDOWS STRUCTURAL BUCK DETAIL.
	NOTE: STRUCTURAL BUCK NEEDS TO PROVIDE FULL SUPPORT TO
	THE DOOR FRAME AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R609.7.2.1
	FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	RESPONSE:
	BUCK DETAIL ON SHEET A1 DOESN'T PROVIDE THE STRUCTURAL
	BUCK SPECIFICATIONS AS REQUESTED AND DOESN'T SEEM TO
	APPLY TO THIS JOB.

	11- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC
	61G20-3.001 FOR
	A)OK. ROOF SHINGLES FL31588-R2.

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	D)HARDIEBOARD SIDING. INFORMATION SUBMITTED IS NOT A
	PRODUCT APPROVAL. NEED MIAMI DADE NOA OR COMPLETE
	FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL.

	RESPONSE:
	FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER UPLOADED TO PROJECTDOX
	DOESN'T MATCH FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER NAMED IN
	PROJECTDOX SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS. ONE OF THEM IS
	FL13223-R7 AND THE OTHER ONE IS FL13192.2. REVISE AS
	REQUIRED TO MATCH.
	NOTE: WHEN RESUBMITTING PLEASE UPLOAD THE FLORIDA
	PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE AND INSTALLATION
	INSTRUCTION ON THE SAME FILE. DON'T SPLIT THEM INTO TWO
	SEPARATE FILES.

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	E) SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. NEW COMMENT BASED ON REVISED
	PLANS. PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR SINGLE HUNG WINDOW
	SIZE SPECIFIED ON PLANS FO WINDOW A. NEW 72"W X 52"H
	SINGLE HUNG WINDOW.

	RESPONSE:
	REPEAT COMMENT. NOA SUBMITTED DOESN'T COVER 72" WIDE
	WINDOW. NEED TO PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL THAT COVERS
	THIS WINDOW SIZE AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS.

	F) PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR SHINGLES UNDERLAYMENT
	SPECIFIED ON TYPICAL WALL SECTION ON SHEET A-1.

	12- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING
	(NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ABOVE PRODUCT APPROVALS AS
	REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	14- PROVIDE COMPLETE WALL SECTION FROM FOUNDATION
	THROUGH ROOF AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.5.3 CITY
	AMENDMENTS.

	RESPONSE:
	REVISE NEW TYPICAL WALL SECTION ON SHEET A1:
	A) FOOTING SIZE DOESN'T MATCH SIZE SPECIFIED ON THE
	FOUNDATION PLAN. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.

	RESPONSE:
	REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED.

	C)ROOF SHEATHING NAILING SPECIFICATIONS ARE NOT CLEAR.
	NOTE: SEE SECTION R803.2.3.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL AND FIGURE
	R803.2.3.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	RESPONSE:
	ROOD SHEATHING SPECIFICATIONS ON TYPICAL WALL SECTION
	AND SPECIFICATIONS ON SHEET S-5 DON'T MATCH. REVISE AS
	REQUIRED TO MATCH. NOTE: SEE SECTION R803.2.3.1
	FBC-RESIDENTIAL AND FIGURE R803.2.3.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	D) ROOF INSULATION ON TYPICAL WALL SECTION AND
	SPECIFICATIONS ON SHEET S-3 DON'T MATCH. REVISE AS
	REQUIRED TO MATCH.


	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	17- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
	CONSTRUCTION OF THE FRONT AND BACK GUARDRAILS SHOWING
	COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R312.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	RESPONSE:
	REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. DESIGN INFORMATION NEEDS
	TO BE SHOWN ON PLANS BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. PRODUCT
	APPROVALS OR SHOP DRAWINGS ARE DEFERRED SUBMITTALS JUST
	TO CONFIRM THE DESIGN INTENT OF THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL
	OF RECORD.

	WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE
	ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF
	THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR
	SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL
	HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR
	ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.

	PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
	QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
	JULIO GOMEZ
	COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	BUILDING DIVISION
	(561)805-6712
	[email protected]

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	2021-10-21			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2021-10-21	Time	15:16	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2021-10-21	Time	09:29	Sent To

Notes

2021-10-21 15:18:16	NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) THIRD BUILDING REVIEW
	COMMENTS
	CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS.
	PERMIT #20121077

	NOTE:
	ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS
	FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B):
	ARCHITECTS WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN
	PROFESSIONALS DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT
	NECESSARY, IN ORDER TO ENFORRCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT
	DESIGN DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE
	TIMES FOR FAILURE TO CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION
	SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY NOTED IN EACH REJECTION,
	INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION,
	STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING,
	VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS
	SYSTEMS, OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF
	THE FLORIDA BUILDING COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
	CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH
	TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED
	FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT
	OF THE PROPORTION OF THE PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS
	REVIEW

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	2-PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE
	FOLLOWING:
	R401.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
	SEC. 107.2.5 CITY AMENDMENTS.
	SEC. 110.9 CITY AMENDMENTS.

	RESPONSE:
	A) PROVIDE DIMENSIONS ON TYPICAL WET SWALE CROSS
	SECTION. SPECIFY DEPTH OF SWALE, DISTANCE FROM
	BUILDING, ETC. SEC. 1072.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
	B) PROVIDE TRENCH WITH GRAVEL DETAIL #1 AS SHOWN ON
	DRAINAGE PLAN ALONG PERIMETER OF LOT. DETAIL WAS NOT
	GIVEN. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.


	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	3-SPECIFY ATTIC ACCESS SIZE AND LOCATION SHOWING
	COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R807 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	RESPONSE:
	BASED ON THE ROOF FRAMING PLAN, THE LOCATION OF THE
	ATTIC ACCESS DOESN'T PROVIDE THE CLEARANCE REQUIRED BY
	SEC. R807 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. REVISE AS REQUIRED.

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	6- BEAM SCHEDULE ON SHEET S-2 ONLY SPECIFIES B-1 BEAM.
	IT DOESN'T SPECIFY THE RAKE BEAM SHOWN ON SHEET S-4.
	REVISE AS REQUIRED TO CLARIFY. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY
	AMENDMENTS.

	RESPONSE:
	REVISED ROOF FRAMING PLAN IS INCOMPLETE. IT IS MISSING
	THE ROOF AT THE ENTRY PORCH. THERE IS NOT CORRELATION
	BETWEEN THE WOOD BEAM SCHEDULES AND THE ROOF FRAMING
	PLAN. THERE IS NOT TRUSS CONNECTOR SCHEDULE. THERE IS
	NOT INFORMATION ABOUT THE GABLE END BEAMS. ARE THESE
	CONCRETE RAKED BEAMS?. THERE IS NOT INFORMATION FOR
	PORCH BEAMS, COLUMNS, ALL STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS OF ALL
	STRUCTURAL MEMBERS (ROOF TRUSSES, BEAMS AND COLUMNS).
	NEW ROOF FRAMING PLAN SHOWS TWO GABLE END ROOFS
	INTERSECTING ON THE REAR OF THE HOUSE. SEE REAR
	ELEVATION ON SHEET A-2. NEED TO PROVIDE DETAILS AND
	SPECIFICATIONS FOR CRICKET CONSTRUCTION IN THIS AREA.
	NEED TO PROVIDE COMPLETE ROOF FRAMING PLAN WITH ALL THE
	INFORMATION. SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	7- PLANS DON'T PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE ROOF
	SHEATHING. SPECIFY TYPE, THICKNESS AND ROOF SHEATHING
	FASTENING AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R803.2.3.1
	FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	RESPONSE:
	ENGINEER'S RESPONSE SAID SEE REVISED SHEET S-3.
	SECTIONS 1 AND 2 ON SHEET S-3 DON'T MATCH REVISED ROOF
	FRAMING PLAN. SEE NEW ROOF PROFILE. THERE ARE NO
	SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE ROOF SHEATHING. PORCH
	CONSTRUCTION DOESN'T MATCH PORCH SHOWN ON THE EXTERIOR
	ELEVATIONS AND NEEDS MORE INFORMATION. FRAMING AT GABLE
	ENDS IS NOT CLEAR. HOW THE GABLE END IS GOING TO BE
	BUILT. SPECIFY ALL GABLE FRAMING MEMBERS AND
	CONNECTORS. NEED COLUMNS CONNECTOR AT TOP AND BOTTOM,
	WOOD BEAM SHOWN DON'T REFLECT (2)2X12 WOOD BEAM. DETAIL
	SHOWS FOUR 2X12'S. SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
	NOTE: ENGINEER OF RECORD TO COORDINATE ALL PLANS,
	DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS TO AVOID MORE CONFLICTS AND
	DELAYS.

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	8- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
	STEEL COLUMNS SHOWN ON THE FRONT PORCH. SPECIFY TOP AND
	BOTTOM CONNECTORS AND FURRING DETAILS.
	SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	RESPONSE:
	REPEAT COMMENT. SEE RESPONSE TO ITEM #6 ABOVE.

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	9- PROVIDE DOORS AND WINDOWS STRUCTURAL BUCK DETAIL.
	NOTE: STRUCTURAL BUCK NEEDS TO PROVIDE FULL SUPPORT TO
	THE DOOR FRAME AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R609.7.2.1
	FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	RESPONSE:
	REPEAT COMMENT.

	11- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC
	61G20-3.001 FOR

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	A)ROOF MATERIAL FOR PITCHED ROOF AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS.

	RESPONSE:
	NOA 19-0617.05 SUBMITTED NOW IS NOT FOR SHINGLES. WRONG
	NOA AGAIN.

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	D)HARDIEBOARD SIDING. INFORMATION SUBMITTED IS NOT A
	PRODUCT APPROVAL. NEED MIAMI DADE NOA OR COMPLETE
	FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL.

	RESPONSE:
	NOA 20-0730.05 SUBMITTED IS FOR INSTALLATION TO WOOD
	FRAMED BUILDINGS. THIS HOUSE IS CONCRETE BLOCK. NEED
	PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR INSTALLATION ON CONCRETE BLOCK
	CONSTRUCTION.

	E) SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. NEW COMMENT BASED ON REVISED
	PLANS. PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR SINGLE HUNG WINDOW
	SIZE SPECIFIED ON PLANS FO WINDOW A. NEW 72"W X 52"H
	SINGLE HUNG WINDOW.

	12- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING
	(NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ABOVE PRODUCT APPROVALS
	(INCLUDING THE HARDIEBOARD SIDING) AS REQUIRED BY SEC.
	107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	14- PROVIDE COMPLETE WALL SECTION FROM FOUNDATION
	THROUGH ROOF AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.5.3 CITY
	AMENDMENTS.

	RESPONSE:
	REVISE NEW TYPICAL WALL SECTION ON SHEET A1:
	A) FOOTING SIZE DOESN'T MATCH SIZE SPECIFIED ON THE
	FOUNDATION PLAN. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.

	B)ROOFING COVER AND UNDERLAYMENT SPECIFIED IS NOT
	CLEAR. THESE SPECIFICATIONS ARE NOT FOR SHINGLES.
	COORDINATE WITH PRODUCT APPROVAL COMMENT ABOVE. SEC.
	107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.

	C)ROOF SHEATHING NAILING SPECIFICATIONS ARE NOT CLEAR.
	COORDINATE WITH ITEM #7 ABOVE. NOTE: SEE TABLE
	R803.2.3.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL FOR MINIMUM ROOF SHEATHING
	ATTACHMENT.

	NEW COMMENTS:
	16- FOUNDATION PLAN ON SHEET S1:
	A)MISSING THE FOOTING FOR THE FRONT AND REAR PORCHES.
	SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.

	B)FOUNDATION PLANS DOESN'T SHOW THE FOOTINGS SHOWN ON
	THE FOOTING SCHEDULE. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.

	C) PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
	CONSTRUCTION OF FRONT AND REAR STAIRWAYS SHOWING
	COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R311.7 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	17- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
	CONSTRUCTION OF THE FRONT AND BACK GUARDRAILS SHOWING
	COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R312.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE
	ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF
	THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR
	SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL
	HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR
	ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.

	PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
	QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
	JULIO GOMEZ
	COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	BUILDING DIVISION
	(561)805-6712
	[email protected]

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	2021-08-17			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2021-08-17	Time	13:09	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2021-08-17	Time	10:40	Sent To

Notes

2021-08-17 13:10:40	NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) SECOND BUILDING REVIEW
	COMMENTS
	CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS.
	PERMIT #20121077

	NOTE:
	ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS
	FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B):
	ARCHITECTS WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN
	PROFESSIONALS DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT
	NECESSARY, IN ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT
	DESIGN DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE
	TIMES FOR FAILURE TO CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION
	SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY NOTED IN EACH REJECTION,
	INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION,
	STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING,
	VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS
	SYSTEMS, OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF
	THE FLORIDA BUILDING COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
	CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH
	TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED
	FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT
	OF THE PROPORTION OF THE PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS
	REVIEW



	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	1-ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED:
	A) THE BUILDING'S OWNER, THE OWNER'S ARCHITECT, OR
	OTHER AUTHORIZED AGENT LEGALLY DESIGNATED BY THE OWNER
	SHALL CERTIFY THAT THE BUILDING IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH
	THE CODE, AS PER SECTION 553.907, FLORIDA STATUTES,
	PRIOR TO RECEIVING THE PERMIT TO BEGIN CONSTRUCTION OR
	RENOVATION AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R103.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY
	CONSERVATION.

	RESPONSE:
	REPEAT COMMENT.

	B) PROVIDE THE NAME OF THE PERSON DOING THE
	CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R405.4.2.1 FBC-ENERGY
	CONSERVATION.

	RESPONSE:
	REPEAT COMMENT.

	C)PROVIDE CORRECT AND COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF
	FORM. CORRECT ADDRESS IS 839 4TH STREET NOT 837 4TH
	STREET. PROVIDE OWNER'S NAME. PROVIDE BUILDER'S NAME.
	PERMITTING OFFICE IS WEST PALM BEACH NOT PALM BEACH.
	REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY
	CONSERVATION.

	RESPONSE:
	REPEAT COMMENT.

	D)ITEM #8(A) ON PAGE 1 OF 4 SPECIFIES R-5 SLAB-ON-GRADE
	EDGE INSULATION. PLANS DON'T SPECIFY ANY SLAB EDGE
	INSULATION. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH.
	SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION.

	RESPONSE:
	REPEAT COMMENT.

	E)ITEM #9(A) ON PAGE 1 OF 4 SPECIFIES R-4.5 EXTERIOR
	INSULATION ON CONCRETE BLOCK. PLANS DON'T SPECIFY
	EXTERIOR INSULATION ON THE CONCRETE BLOCK. THE
	INSULATION IS ON THE INTERIOR SIDE. SEE PLANS AND
	REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH, INCLUDING R-VALUE
	SPECIFIED.
	SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION.

	RESPONSE:
	REPEAT COMMENT.

	F)ITEM #10(A) ON PAGE 1 OF 4 SPECIFIES R-19 UNDER ATTIC
	INSULATION. THIS DOESN'T MATCH PLANS. SEE PLANS AND
	REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH, INCLUDING.
	SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION.

	RESPONSE:
	REPEAT COMMENT.

	G)ROOF MATERIAL SPECIFIED ON PAGE 2 OF 4 NEEDS TO BE
	COORDINATED WITH PLANS. PLANS ARE NOT CLEAR ON WHAT
	ROOFING MATERIAL IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED BUT IT
	DOESN'T SPECIFY FLAT TILE OR SLATE. COORDINATE WITH
	ENGINEER PLANS AND REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH.
	SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION.

	RESPONSE:
	REPEAT COMMENT.

	H)REVISE THE ATTIC VENT RATIO ON PAGE 2 OF 4. PLANS
	DON'T SHOW ANY 1/300 VENT RATIO. TYPICALLY, THE RATIO
	IS 1/150 NOT 1/300. SEC. R806.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. OR
	PERSON PREPARING THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS TO PROVIDE
	COMPLETE DETAILS/SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH
	THE 1/300 RATIO AS REQUIRED BY THE EXCEPTION ON SEC.
	R806.2. NOTE: ENGINEER OF RECORD NEEDS TO
	REVIEW/APPROVE THEM PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL.

	RESPONSE:
	REPEAT COMMENT.

	I)DOOR TYPE INFORMATION SPECIFIED ON PAGE 3 OF 4 IS
	INCORRECT. ACCORDING TO PLANS AND PRODUCT APPROVALS
	SUBMITTED THE ENTRY DOOR AND THE BEDROOM #3 DOORS ARE
	ALUMINUM DOORS WITH GLAZING. GLASS IN THESE DOORS NEED
	TO BE INCLUDED ON THE GLASS CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY
	SEC. R405.5.3.1 AND SEC. R405.5.3.3 FBC-ENERGY
	CONSERVATION. REVISE AS REQUIRED.

	RESPONSE:
	REPEAT COMMENT.

	J)WINDOWS INFORMATION SPECIFIED ON 3 OF 4 DOESN'T MATCH
	PLANS. REVISE THE WINDOW AREA AND WINDOW OVERHANG DEPTH
	AND SEPARATION TO MATCH PLANS.
	SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION.

	RESPONSE:
	REPEAT COMMENT.

	NEW COMMENT:
	K)FLOOR PLAN WAS REVISED. NEW ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED
	TO BE DONE BASED ON THE NEW FLOOR PLAN. COORDINATE ALL
	THE INFORMATION ACCORDINGLY.

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	2-PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE
	FOLLOWING:
	R401.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
	SEC. 107.2.5 CITY AMENDMENTS.
	SEC. 110.9 CITY AMENDMENTS.

	RESPONSE:
	REPEAT COMMENT.

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	3-SPECIFY ATTIC ACCESS SIZE AND LOCATION SHOWING
	COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R807 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	RESPONSE:
	REPEAT COMMENT.

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	4-PLANS SUBMITTED DON'T SPECIFY WHAT IS THE ROOFING
	MATERIAL. IS IT SHINGLES?, TILE?. IF USING SHINGLES ,
	THEN A ROOF PITCH OF 2:12 TO LESS THAN 4:12 REQUIRES
	TWO LAYERS OF UNDERLAYMENT AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R905.2.2
	FBC-RESIDENTIAL. PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS ON PLANS FOR
	THE TWO LAYERS OF UNDERLAYMENT. ALSO, PROVIDE
	SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE FLAT ROOF.

	RESPONSE:
	PLANS SUBMITTED STILL DON'T SPECIFY THE ROOF PITCH.
	SPECIFY THE ROOF SLOPE ON ALL ROOF AREAS SHOWN ON THE
	REVISED PLANS.


	5- OK. NO FLAT ROOFS ON REVISED PLANS.

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	6- BEAM SCHEDULE ON SHEET S-2 ONLY SPECIFIES B-1 BEAM.
	IT DOESN'T SPECIFY THE RAKE BEAM SHOWN ON SHEET S-4.
	REVISE AS REQUIRED TO CLARIFY. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY
	AMENDMENTS.

	RESPONSE:
	ARCHITECTURAL PLANS WERE REVISED. NEW FLOOR
	PLANS/ELEVATIONS WERE SUBMITTED BUT NONE OF THE
	STRUCTURAL PLANS WERE REVISED. REVISE ALL STRUCTURAL
	PLANS AND COORDINATE ACCORDINGLY.

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	7- PLANS DON'T PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE ROOF
	SHEATHING. SPECIFY TYPE, THICKNESS AND ROOF SHEATHING
	FASTENING AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R803.2.3.1
	FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	RESPONSE:
	REPEAT COMMENT.

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	8- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
	STEEL COLUMNS SHOWN ON THE FRONT PORCH. SPECIFY TOP AND
	BOTTOM CONNECTORS AND FURRING DETAILS.
	SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	RESPONSE:
	REPEAT COMMENT.

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	9- PROVIDE DOORS AND WINDOWS STRUCTURAL BUCK DETAIL.
	NOTE: STRUCTURAL BUCK NEEDS TO PROVIDE FULL SUPPORT TO
	THE DOOR FRAME AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R609.7.2.1
	FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	RESPONSE:
	REPEAT COMMENT.

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	10- REVISE THE ADDRESS INFORMATION ON ALL DRAWINGS,
	CALCULATIONS, ENERGY CALCULATIONS, ETC. SUBMITTED TO
	AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. THERE ARE TWO STRUCTURES IN
	THIS LOT. 839 4TH STREET IS THE ADDRESS FOR THE REAR
	STRUCTURE. THIS PERMIT APPLICATION IS FOR THE REAR
	STRUCTURE ONLY. 837 4TH STREET IS THE MAIN HOUSE. THIS
	WILL FACILITATE INSPECTIONS AND RECORDS KEEPING.
	SEC. 107.2.1.3 CITY AMENDMENTS.

	RESPONSE:
	REPEAT COMMENT.

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	11- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC
	61G20-3.001 FOR

	A)ROOF MATERIAL FOR PITCHED ROOF AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS.

	RESPONSE:
	NOA 19-0313.03 SUBMITTED IS FOR FLAT ROOFS OVER
	LIGHTWEIGHT CONCRETE DECKS. THIS IS INCORRECT. PROVIDE
	CORRECT SHINGLES PRODUCT APPROVAL.

	B)OK. REVISED PLANS DON'T SHOW FLAT ROOFS NOW.

	C)SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS A SPECIFIED ON REVISED PLANS.

	D)HARDIEBOARD SIDING. INFORMATION SUBMITTED IS NOT A
	PRODUCT APPROVAL. NEED MIAMI DADE NOA OR COMPLETE
	FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL.

	NOTE: CLARIFY WHY SUBMITTING PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR
	HORIZONTAL SLIDER WINDOWS IF THEY ARE NOT SPECIFIED ON
	THE REVISED PLANS?

	12- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING
	(NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ABOVE PRODUCT APPROVALS
	(INCLUDING THE HARDIEBOARD SIDING) AS REQUIRED BY SEC.
	107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.

	NEW COMMENTS BASED ON REVISED PLANS.
	13- SINGLE HUNG WINDOW SIZE SPECIFIED FOR BEDROOM #3
	DOESN'T COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM CLEAR OPENING HEIGHT
	REQUIRED BY SEC. R310.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. REVISE AS
	REQUIRED.

	14- PROVIDE COMPLETE WALL SECTION FROM FOUNDATION
	THROUGH ROOF AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.5.3 CITY
	AMENDMENTS.

	15- REVISED ELEVATIONS SHOW WHAT LOOKS LIKE CRAWL SPACE
	VENTILATION. PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND
	SPECIFICATIONS. NOTE: STRUCTURAL PLANS WERE NOT
	REVISED. IT IS NOT KNOW IF THE FLOOR IS GOING TO BE
	WOOD OR CONCRETE SLAB.
	CRAWL SPACE VENTILATION WITH FLOOR JOISTS NEED TO
	COMPLY WITH SEC. R409 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE
	ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF
	THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR
	SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL
	HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR
	ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.

	PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
	QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
	JULIO GOMEZ
	COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	BUILDING DIVISION
	(561)805-6712
	[email protected]

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	2021-02-17			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2021-02-17	Time	13:20	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2021-02-17	Time	13:20	Sent To

Notes

2021-02-17 13:22:11	NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) BUILDING REVIEW
	COMMENTS
	CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS.
	PERMIT #20121077

	1-ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED:
	A) THE BUILDING'S OWNER, THE OWNER'S ARCHITECT, OR
	OTHER AUTHORIZED AGENT LEGALLY DESIGNATED BY THE OWNER
	SHALL CERTIFY THAT THE BUILDING IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH
	THE CODE, AS PER SECTION 553.907, FLORIDA STATUTES,
	PRIOR TO RECEIVING THE PERMIT TO BEGIN CONSTRUCTION OR
	RENOVATION AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R103.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY
	CONSERVATION.

	B) PROVIDE THE NAME OF THE PERSON DOING THE
	CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R405.4.2.1 FBC-ENERGY
	CONSERVATION.

	C)PROVIDE CORRECT AND COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF
	FORM. CORRECT ADDRESS IS 839 4TH STREET NOT 837 4TH
	STREET. PROVIDE OWNER'S NAME. PROVIDE BUILDER'S NAME.
	PERMITTING OFFICE IS WEST PALM BEACH NOT PALM BEACH.
	REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY
	CONSERVATION.

	D)ITEM #8(A) ON PAGE 1 OF 4 SPECIFIES R-5 SLAB-ON-GRADE
	EDGE INSULATION. PLANS DON'T SPECIFY ANY SLAB EDGE
	INSULATION. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH.
	SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION.

	E)ITEM #9(A) ON PAGE 1 OF 4 SPECIFIES R-4.5 EXTERIOR
	INSULATION ON CONCRETE BLOCK. PLANS DON'T SPECIFY
	EXTERIOR INSULATION ON THE CONCRETE BLOCK. THE
	INSULATION IS ON THE INTERIOR SIDE. SEE PLANS AND
	REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH, INCLUDING R-VALUE
	SPECIFIED.
	SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION.

	F)ITEM #10(A) ON PAGE 1 OF 4 SPECIFIES R-19 UNDER ATTIC
	INSULATION. THIS DOESN'T MATCH PLANS. SEE PLANS AND
	REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH, INCLUDING.
	SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION.

	G)ROOF MATERIAL SPECIFIED ON PAGE 2 OF 4 NEEDS TO BE
	COORDINATED WITH PLANS. PLANS ARE NOT CLEAR ON WHAT
	ROOFING MATERIAL IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED BUT IT
	DOESN'T SPECIFY FLAT TILE OR SLATE. COORDINATE WITH
	ENGINEER PLANS AND REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH.
	SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION.

	H)REVISE THE ATTIC VENT RATIO ON PAGE 2 OF 4. PLANS
	DON'T SHOW ANY 1/300 VENT RATIO. TYPICALLY, THE RATIO
	IS 1/150 NOT 1/300. SEC. R806.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. OR
	PERSON PREPARING THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS TO PROVIDE
	COMPLETE DETAILS/SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH
	THE 1/300 RATIO AS REQUIRED BY THE EXCEPTION ON SEC.
	R806.2. NOTE: ENGINEER OF RECORD NEEDS TO
	REVIEW/APPROVE THEM PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL.

	I)DOOR TYPE INFORMATION SPECIFIED ON PAGE 3 OF 4 IS
	INCORRECT. ACCORDING TO PLANS AND PRODUCT APPROVALS
	SUBMITTED THE ENTRY DOOR AND THE BEDROOM #3 DOORS ARE
	ALUMINUM DOORS WITH GLAZING. GLASS IN THESE DOORS NEED
	TO BE INCLUDED ON THE GLASS CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY
	SEC. R405.5.3.1 AND SEC. R405.5.3.3 FBC-ENERGY
	CONSERVATION. REVISE AS REQUIRED.

	J)WINDOWS INFORMATION SPECIFIED ON 3 OF 4 DOESN'T MATCH
	PLANS. REVISE THE WINDOW AREA AND WINDOW OVERHANG DEPTH
	AND SEPARATION TO MATCH PLANS.
	SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION.

	2-PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE
	FOLLOWING:
	R401.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
	SEC. 107.2.5 CITY AMENDMENTS.
	SEC. 110.9 CITY AMENDMENTS.

	3-SPECIFY ATTIC ACCESS SIZE AND LOCATION SHOWING
	COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R807 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	4-PLANS SUBMITTED DON'T SPECIFY WHAT IS THE ROOFING
	MATERIAL. IS IT SHINGLES?, TILE?. IF USING SHINGLES ,
	THEN A ROOF PITCH OF 2:12 TO LESS THAN 4:12 REQUIRES
	TWO LAYERS OF UNDERLAYMENT AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R905.2.2
	FBC-RESIDENTIAL. PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS ON PLANS FOR
	THE TWO LAYERS OF UNDERLAYMENT. ALSO, PROVIDE
	SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE FLAT ROOF.

	5- SPECIFY ROOF PITCH OF THE FLAT ROOF ON THE FRONT
	PORCH. SEE SEC. R905.9.1 OR 905.11.1 FBC RESIDENTIAL.

	6- BEAM SCHEDULE ON SHEET S-2 ONLY SPECIFIES B-1 BEAM.
	IT DOESN'T SPECIFY THE RAKE BEAM SHOWN ON SHEET S-4.
	REVISE AS REQUIRED TO CLARIFY. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY
	AMENDMENTS.

	7- PLANS DON'T PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE ROOF
	SHEATHING. SPECIFY TYPE, THICKNESS AND ROOF SHEATHING
	FASTENING AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R803.2.3.1
	FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	8- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
	STEEL COLUMNS SHOWN ON THE FRONT PORCH. SPECIFY TOP AND
	BOTTOM CONNECTORS AND FURRING DETAILS.
	SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	9- PROVIDE DOORS AND WINDOWS STRUCTURAL BUCK DETAIL.
	NOTE: STRUCTURAL BUCK NEEDS TO PROVIDE FULL SUPPORT TO
	THE DOOR FRAME AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R609.7.2.1
	FBC-RESIDENTIAL.

	10- REVISE THE ADDRESS INFORMATION ON ALL DRAWINGS,
	CALCULATIONS, ENERGY CALCULATIONS, ETC. SUBMITTED TO
	AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. THERE ARE TWO STRUCTURES IN
	THIS LOT. 839 4TH STREET IS THE ADDRESS FOR THE REAR
	STRUCTURE. THIS PERMIT APPLICATION IS FOR THE REAR
	STRUCTURE ONLY. 837 4TH STREET IS THE MAIN HOUSE. THIS
	WILL FACILITATE INSPECTIONS AND RECORDS KEEPING.
	SEC. 107.2.1.3 CITY AMENDMENTS.

	11- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC
	61G20-3.001 FOR
	(NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS A DEFERRED
	SUBMITTAL. PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION PRIOR TO
	INSTALLATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. ALL PRODUCT
	APPROVALS NEED TO BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY DESIGNER OF
	RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL):

	A)ROOF MATERIAL FOR PITCHED ROOF AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS.

	B) FLAT ROOF. AND, CLEARLY MARK WHICH APPROVED ASSEMBLY
	IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE
	DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
	NOTE: IF THE SELECTED ASSEMBLY DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN
	PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF ZONES, THEN SIGNED AND SEALED
	RAS 117 CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED.


	12- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING
	(NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ABOVE PRODUCT APPROVALS AS
	REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.

	13-VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS LOW.
	VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, CONTRACTOR'S
	OVERHEAD AND PROFIT AND DESIGN PROFESSIONAL FEES AS
	REQUIRED BY SEC. 109.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. VALUATION WAS
	UPDATED TO $120,957. THE PERMIT FEE BALANCE IS
	$2456.00.

	14- ENGINEER TO FOLLOW UP WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING
	CODE TRAINING REQUIREMENT. SEE BELOW:

	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE TRAINING FOR ENGINEERS(471.0195
	F.S.)

	471.0195 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE TRAINING FOR ENGINEERS.
	ALL LICENSEES ACTIVELY PARTICIPATING IN THE DESIGN OF
	ENGINEERING WORKS OR SYSTEMS IN CONNECTION WITH
	BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, OR FACILITIES AND SYSTEMS
	COVERED BY THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL TAKE
	CONTINUING EDUCATION COURSES AND SUBMIT PROOF TO THE
	BOARD, AT SUCH TIMES AND IN SUCH MANNER AS ESTABLISHED
	BY THE BOARD BY RULE, THAT THE LICENSEE HAS COMPLETED
	ANY SPECIALIZED OR ADVANCED COURSES ON ANY PORTION OF
	THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE APPLICABLE TO THE LICENSEE'S
	AREA OF PRACTICE. THE BOARD SHALL RECORD REPORTED
	CONTINUING EDUCATION COURSES ON A SYSTEM EASILY
	ACCESSED BY CODE ENFORCEMENT JURISDICTIONS FOR
	EVALUATION WHEN DETERMINING LICENSE STATUS FOR PURPOSES
	OF PROCESSING DESIGN DOCUMENTS. LOCAL JURISDICTIONS
	SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR NOTIFYING THE BOARD WHEN
	DESIGN DOCUMENTS ARE SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING
	CONSTRUCTION PERMITS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOT IN
	COMPLIANCE WITH THIS SECTION. THE BOARD SHALL TAKE
	APPROPRIATE ACTION AS PROVIDED BY ITS RULES WHEN SUCH
	NONCOMPLIANCE IS DETERMINED TO EXIST.


	WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE
	ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF
	THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR
	SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL
	HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR
	ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.

	PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
	QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
	JULIO GOMEZ
	COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	BUILDING DIVISION
	(561)805-6712
	[email protected]

Review Stop	E			ELECTRICAL
Rev No	3	Status	P	Date	2021-10-26			Cont ID
Sent By	jleahy			Date	2021-10-26	Time	14:03	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jleahy			Date	2021-10-26	Time	13:57	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	E			ELECTRICAL
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	2021-08-06			Cont ID
Sent By	jleahy			Date	2021-08-06	Time	08:11	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jleahy			Date	2021-08-06	Time	07:47	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	E			ELECTRICAL
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	2021-02-01			Cont ID
Sent By	equinone			Date	2021-02-01	Time	16:03	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	equinone			Date	2021-02-01	Time	14:06	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	HIST			HISTORICAL
Rev No	5	Status	P	Date	2022-12-28			Cont ID
Sent By	fmittner			Date	2022-12-28	Time	12:11	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	fmittner			Date	2022-12-28	Time	12:11	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	HIST			HISTORICAL
Rev No	4	Status	P	Date	2022-06-06			Cont ID
Sent By	amhamilt			Date	2022-06-06	Time	16:32	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	amhamilt			Date	2022-06-06	Time	16:32	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	HIST			HISTORICAL
Rev No	3	Status	P	Date	2021-10-21			Cont ID
Sent By	amhamilt			Date	2021-10-21	Time	08:42	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	amhamilt			Date	2021-10-21	Time	08:42	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	HIST			HISTORICAL
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	2021-09-02			Cont ID
Sent By	fmittner			Date	2021-09-02	Time	12:02	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	fmittner			Date	2021-09-02	Time	12:02	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	HIST			HISTORICAL
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	2021-01-28			Cont ID
Sent By	aborngra			Date	2021-01-28	Time	12:37	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	aborngra			Date	2021-01-27	Time	16:54	Sent To

Notes

2021-01-28 12:37:21	THIS PROJECT HAS TWO AVENUES TO PROCEED:
	OPTION A:
	1. A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS (COA) APPLICATION
	IS REQUIRED FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE NORTHWEST
	HISTORIC DISTRICT. PLEASE EMAIL STAFF AT
	[email protected] TO REQUEST A COPY OF THE
	APPLICATION. INCLUDE ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS REQUIRED
	UNDER ?NEW CONSTRUCTION?. THE NEXT APPLICATION DEADLINE
	IS FEBRUARY 17, 2021 FOR THE MARCH 23, 2021 HISTORIC
	PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING.

	THE APPLICATION FEE IS $350.00 + $0.01 PER SQUARE FOOT.
	STAFF RECOMMENDS ADDRESSING THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS
	BEFORE SUBMITTING A COA APPLICATION. ADDITIONAL
	COMMENTS DURING STAFF?S REPORT OR BY THE HISTORIC
	PRESERVATION MAY NEED TO BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO A PERMIT
	BEING ISSUED.

	1. THE TOTAL FLOOR AREA OF ALL ROOFED ACCESSORY
	BUILDINGS ON A PROPERTY SHALL NOT EXCEED 75 PERCENT OF
	THE GROSS FLOOR AREA OF THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE WITH A
	MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA OF 1,000 SQUARE FEET. (SEC.
	94-304(B)(1)). SEE SEC. 94-86 FOR HISTORIC RESIDENTIAL
	DISTRICT DEFINITIONS FOR HOW TO CALCULATE LOT COVERAGE.
	2. REVISE ALL WINDOWS TO BE A SASH WINDOW WITH
	TRADITIONAL WINDOW OPENINGS.
	3. REVISE ALL DOOR OPENINGS TO BE A TRADITIONAL SINGLE
	OR PAIRED FRENCH DOOR.
	4. REVISE RAILINGS TO BE VERTICAL TO EMPHASIZE A
	TRADITIONAL RAILING.
	5. REVISE STUCCO EXTERIOR TO HAVE SIDING. THE SIDING
	MAY BE WOOD, BORAL TRUEXTERIOR, OR HARDIEBOARD SMOOTH
	IN A CHANNEL BEVEL PROFILE TO MATCH THE PREVIOUS
	CONTRIBUTING ACCESSORY STRUCTURE.
	6. REVISE ALL WINDOW FRAMES TO HAVE WHITE FRAMES AND
	CLEAR GLASS OR CLEAR GLASS WITH LOW-E COATING.
	7. REVISE THE FRONT PORCH POST TO BE WOOD OR WOOD
	ALTERNATE PRODUCT SUCH AS TREX.
	8. REVISE THE REAR PORCH TO HAVE A WOOD LIKE MASSING
	FOR THE COLUMNS.
	9. INDICATE ROOFING MATERIAL.

	OPTION B:

	STAFF RECOMMENDS THIS OPTION.

	REVISE THE PLANS TO BUILD A MODIFIED RECONSTRUCTION OF
	THE STRUCTURE THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY CONTRIBUTING. A
	MODIFIED RECONSTRUCTION MAY BE BUILT WITH CMU BLOCKS
	AND HAVE SIDING WITH BORAL TRUEXTERIOR OR HARDIEBOARD
	SMOOTH. THE ENTIRE FRONT PORCH MAY BE A WOOD ALTERNATE
	PRODUCT SUCH AS TREX.

	IF THIS APPROACH IS SELECTED, STAFF WILL SUPPORT AN AD
	VALOREM TAX EXEMPTION. THE AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTION
	PROGRAM:
	THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AND PALM BEACH COUNTY HAVE
	PASSED PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENT EXEMPTION ORDINANCES,
	WHICH AUTHORIZE GRANTING AN EXEMPTION FROM INCREASES TO
	AD VALOREM TAXES FOR QUALIFIED IMPROVEMENTS TO
	PROPERTIES LISTED IN THE WEST PALM BEACH REGISTER OF
	HISTORIC PLACES. THIS EXEMPTION DOES NOT APPLY TO
	ASSESSED LAND VALUE, ONLY TO THE VALUE OF THE
	IMPROVEMENTS.

	THE CITY AND THE COUNTY WILL PROCESS THE APPLICATION
	FOLLOWING MUTUALLY ESTABLISHED PROCEDURES THROUGH BOTH
	THE CITY AND COUNTY COMMISSIONS. ONCE THE HISTORIC
	PRESERVATION BOARD HAS APPROVED THE WORK, THE OWNER HAS
	TWO (2) YEARS TO COMPLETE THE IMPROVEMENTS.

	THIS PROGRAM PROVIDES AN ABATEMENT OF TAX INCREASES ON
	THE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE PROPERTY FOR A TEN (10) YEAR
	PERIOD. THE ABATEMENT IS CONVEYED THROUGH A COVENANT
	THAT ACCOMPANIES THE DEED OF THE PROPERTY AND MAY BE
	TRANSFERRED TO FUTURE OWNERS DURING THE ABATEMENT TIME
	PERIOD.

	A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS (COA) APPLICATION WILL
	BE REQUIRED IN ADDITION TO AN AD VALOREM
	PRECONSTRUCTION APPLICATION. ALL MATERIALS REQUIRED
	UNDER THE ?AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTION? WILL BE REQUIRED
	IN ADDITION TO ROOF PLAN, SECTIONS, PROJECT DATA TABLE,
	AND NOTIFICATION. THE APPLICATION FEE IS $250.00. THE
	NEXT APPLICATION DEADLINE IS FEBRUARY 17, 2021 FOR THE
	MARCH 23, 2021 HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING.

	AN AD VALOREM APPLICATION CAN BE COMBINED FOR ONE (1)
	APPLICATION FOR BOTH STRUCTURES ON THE PROPERTY ONLY IF
	DOING THE MODIFIED RECONSTRUCTION OPTION. IF NOT, A
	SEPARATE APPLICATION WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE NEW
	CONSTRUCTION ACCESSORY STRUCTURE AND THE AD VALOREM TAX
	EXEMPTION ON THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE.

	AARON BORNGRABER
	HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLANNER \| DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
	PLANNING DIVISION
	[email protected] \| OFFICE: 561.822.1428 \| TTY:
	800.955.8771
	401 CLEMATIS STREET \| P.O BOX 3147 \| WEST PALM BEACH,
	FL 33402

Review Stop	I			INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No	7	Status	N	Date	2023-07-21			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2023-07-21	Time	18:13	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2023-06-28	Time	09:06	Sent To	I

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	I			INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No	6	Status	N	Date	2023-03-03			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2023-03-03	Time	14:09	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2023-02-16	Time	16:24	Sent To	I

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	I			INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No	5	Status	N	Date	2022-12-29			Cont ID
Sent By	aoliver			Date	2022-12-29	Time	09:07	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	aoliver			Date	2022-11-22	Time	08:35	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	I			INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No	4	Status	N	Date	2022-07-12			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2022-07-12	Time	17:40	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2022-05-25	Time	08:37	Sent To	I

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	I			INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No	3	Status	N	Date	2021-10-26			Cont ID
Sent By	jleahy			Date	2021-10-26	Time	14:03	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jleahy			Date	2021-10-01	Time	06:51	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	I			INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No	2	Status	N	Date	2021-09-02			Cont ID
Sent By	lmarchan			Date	2021-09-02	Time	16:54	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	lmarchan			Date	2021-07-28	Time	10:09	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	I			INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No	1	Status	N	Date	2021-02-17			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2021-02-17	Time	13:26	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2021-01-20	Time	12:05	Sent To	I

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	IMPACT			COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No	4	Status	F	Date	2023-07-21			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2023-07-21	Time	17:17	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2023-07-21	Time	17:17	Sent To

Notes

2023-07-21 17:17:38	PLANS NEED TO BE REVIEWED BY PALM BEACH COUNTY FOR
	IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT.
	PLANS WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE PBC IMPACT FEE OFFICE
	DIGITALLY VIA PROJECTDOX UPON NOTIFICATION BY THIS
	OFFICE. NOTIFICATION MAY OCCUR WHEN PLANS ARE NEAREST
	FINAL FORM. YOU MAY COORDINATE WITH THE IMPACT FEE
	OFFICE AT (561) 233-5025 OR SIMPLY UPLOAD THE MUNICIPAL
	IMPACT FEE QUESTIONNAIRE FORM TO YOUR PROJECT AND NAME
	THE FILE MUNICIPAL IMPACT FEE QUESTIONNAIRE. THE FORM
	CAN BE FOUND AT: HTTP://DISCOVER.PBCGOV.ORG/PZB/ADMINIS
	TRATION/PDF/IMPACTFEES/FORMS/QUESTIONNAIRE.PDF UPON
	APPROVAL AND FEE PAYMENT, PLEASE UPLOAD THE RECEIPT TO
	YOUR PROJECT OR EMAIL IT TO [email protected] .

Review Stop	IMPACT			COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	2023-03-03			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2023-03-03	Time	14:14	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2023-03-03	Time	14:14	Sent To

Notes

2023-03-03 14:15:03	PLANS NEED TO BE REVIEWED BY PALM BEACH COUNTY FOR
	IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT.
	PLANS WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE PBC IMPACT FEE OFFICE
	DIGITALLY VIA PROJECTDOX UPON NOTIFICATION BY THIS
	OFFICE. NOTIFICATION MAY OCCUR WHEN PLANS ARE NEAREST
	FINAL FORM. YOU MAY COORDINATE WITH THE IMPACT FEE
	OFFICE AT (561) 233-5025 OR SIMPLY UPLOAD THE MUNICIPAL
	IMPACT FEE QUESTIONNAIRE FORM TO YOUR PROJECT AND NAME
	THE FILE MUNICIPAL IMPACT FEE QUESTIONNAIRE. THE FORM
	CAN BE FOUND AT: HTTP://DISCOVER.PBCGOV.ORG/PZB/ADMINIS
	TRATION/PDF/IMPACTFEES/FORMS/QUESTIONNAIRE.PDF UPON
	APPROVAL AND FEE PAYMENT, PLEASE UPLOAD THE RECEIPT TO
	YOUR PROJECT OR EMAIL IT TO [email protected] .

Review Stop	IMPACT			COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	2022-12-27			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2022-12-27	Time	16:49	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2022-12-27	Time	16:49	Sent To

Notes

2022-12-27 16:49:52	PLANS NEED TO BE REVIEWED BY PALM BEACH COUNTY FOR
	IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT.
	PLANS WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE PBC IMPACT FEE OFFICE
	DIGITALLY VIA PROJECTDOX UPON NOTIFICATION BY THIS
	OFFICE. NOTIFICATION MAY OCCUR WHEN PLANS ARE NEAREST
	FINAL FORM. YOU MAY COORDINATE WITH THE IMPACT FEE
	OFFICE AT (561) 233-5025 OR SIMPLY UPLOAD THE MUNICIPAL
	IMPACT FEE QUESTIONNAIRE FORM TO YOUR PROJECT AND NAME
	THE FILE MUNICIPAL IMPACT FEE QUESTIONNAIRE. THE FORM
	CAN BE FOUND AT: HTTP://DISCOVER.PBCGOV.ORG/PZB/ADMINIS
	TRATION/PDF/IMPACTFEES/FORMS/QUESTIONNAIRE.PDF UPON
	APPROVAL AND FEE PAYMENT, PLEASE UPLOAD THE RECEIPT TO
	YOUR PROJECT OR EMAIL IT TO [email protected] .

Review Stop	IMPACT			COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	2021-02-17			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2021-02-17	Time	10:49	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2021-02-17	Time	10:48	Sent To

Notes

2021-02-17 10:50:09	PLANS NEED TO BE REVIEWED BY PALM BEACH COUNTY FOR
	IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT.
	PLANS WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE PBC IMPACT FEE OFFICE
	DIGITALLY VIA PROJECTDOX UPON NOTIFICATION BY THIS
	OFFICE. NOTIFICATION MAY OCCUR WHEN PLANS ARE NEAREST
	FINAL FORM. YOU MAY COORDINATE WITH THE IMPACT FEE
	OFFICE AT (561) 233-5025 OR SIMPLY UPLOAD THE MUNICIPAL
	IMPACT FEE QUESTIONNAIRE FORM TO YOUR PROJECT AND NAME
	THE FILE MUNICIPAL IMPACT FEE QUESTIONNAIRE. THE FORM
	CAN BE FOUND AT: HTTP://DISCOVER.PBCGOV.ORG/PZB/ADMINIS
	TRATION/PDF/IMPACTFEES/FORMS/QUESTIONNAIRE.PDF UPON
	APPROVAL AND FEE PAYMENT, PLEASE UPLOAD THE RECEIPT TO
	YOUR PROJECT OR EMAIL IT TO [email protected] .

Review Stop	M			MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No	3	Status	P	Date	2021-10-04			Cont ID
Sent By	medwards			Date	2021-10-04	Time	10:00	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	medwards			Date	2021-10-04	Time	10:00	Sent To

Notes

2021-10-04 10:01:04	APPROVED WITH PRIVISO:
	THE DRYER EXHAUST MUST MEET FBC RES M1502

	MICHAEL EDWARDS
	MECHANICAL EXAMINER
	401 CLEMATIS STREET
	WEST PALM BEACH FL. 33401
	561-805-6728
	[email protected]

Review Stop	M			MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	2021-08-04			Cont ID
Sent By	hmoser			Date	2021-08-04	Time	14:57	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	hmoser			Date	2021-08-04	Time	13:59	Sent To

Notes

2021-08-04 14:57:27	PLAN DENIED
	REFER TO SECTION M1401.3 EQUIPMENT AND APPLIANCE
	SIZING.

Review Stop	M			MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	2021-01-27			Cont ID
Sent By	hmoser			Date	2021-01-27	Time	10:18	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	hmoser			Date	2021-01-27	Time	10:18	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	P			PLUMBING
Rev No	3	Status	P	Date	2021-10-18			Cont ID
Sent By	abelisle			Date	2021-10-18	Time	06:05	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	abelisle			Date	2021-10-18	Time	05:00	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	P			PLUMBING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	2021-08-03			Cont ID
Sent By	lcrespo			Date	2021-08-03	Time	18:20	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	lcrespo			Date	2021-08-03	Time	18:20	Sent To

Notes

2021-08-03 18:21:11	08/03/21 2ND REQUEST PLUMBING REVIEWDENIED WITH
	COMMENTS

	NOTE - A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW COULD NOT BE DONE AT THIS
	TIME, AND ADDITIONAL PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS MAY BE
	GENERATED UPON THE RE-REVIEW OF SUBMITTED CORRECTIONS.

	1. PLEASE PROVIDE A PLUMBING ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM
	PER THE WPB AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC SEC. 107.3.5.3 (12)
	RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING.

	2. THIS IS A MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING, AND WATER USERS
	WILL BE REQUIRED TO INSTALL A BACKFLOW PREVENTION
	ASSEMBLY AT THE POINT OF DELIVERY. THE TYPE OF BACKFLOW
	ASSEMBLY REQUIRED WILL BE DEPENDENT UPON THE DEGREE OF
	HAZARD POSED BY THE WATER USER. A REDUCED PRESSURE ZONE
	BACKFLOW DEVICE WILL BE NEEDED FOR THE WATER METER PER
	THE CITY OF WEST PALM CROSS UTILITIES DEPARTMENT AND
	THEIR CONNECTION CONTROL PROGRAM.

	3. ON SHEET P-1 THE DRAIN ON THE STACK LOOKS LIKE A
	COMBINATION FITTING, AND IT IS NOT ALLOWED ON A
	HORIZONTAL DRAIN. YOU CAN PUT A NOT OR CHANGE THE
	FITTING TO REFLECT A SANITARY FITTING PER THE WPB
	AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC SEC. 107.3.5.3 (12) RESIDENTIAL
	PLUMBING.


	WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS, PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION &
	REMOVE ANY VOIDED SHEETS & REPLACE ANY NECESSARY PAGES.
	A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW
	COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION
	MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE
	THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR
	PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.

	HTTPS://CODES.ICCSAFE.ORG/CODES/FLORIDA

	LUIS A. CRESPO
	PLUMBING PLAN EXAMINER / INSPECTOR
	EMAIL: [email protected] OFFICE: 561 805-6720

Review Stop	P			PLUMBING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	2021-01-21			Cont ID
Sent By	lcrespo			Date	2021-01-21	Time	17:40	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	lcrespo			Date	2021-01-21	Time	17:40	Sent To

Notes

2021-01-21 17:40:45	01/21/21 PLUMBING REVIEWDENIED WITH COMMENTS

	NOTE - A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW COULD NOT BE DONE AT THIS
	TIME, AND ADDITIONAL PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS MAY BE
	GENERATED UPON THE RE-REVIEW OF SUBMITTED CORRECTIONS.

	1. PLEASE PROVIDE A PLUMBING ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM
	PER THE WPB AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC SEC. 107.3.5.3 (12)
	RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING.

	2. THIS IS A MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING, AND WATER USERS
	WILL BE REQUIRED TO INSTALL A BACKFLOW PREVENTION
	ASSEMBLY AT THE POINT OF DELIVERY. THE TYPE OF BACKFLOW
	ASSEMBLY REQUIRED WILL BE DEPENDENT UPON THE DEGREE OF
	HAZARD POSED BY THE WATER USER. A REDUCED PRESSURE ZONE
	BACKFLOW DEVICE WILL BE NEEDED FOR THE WATER METER PER
	THE CITY OF WEST PALM CROSS UTILITIES DEPARTMENT AND
	THEIR CONNECTION CONTROL PROGRAM.

	3. ON SHEET P-1 THE DRAIN ON THE STACK LOOKS LIKE A
	COMBINATION FITTING, AND IT IS NOT ALLOWED ON A
	HORIZONTAL DRAIN. YOU CAN PUT A NOT OR CHANGE THE
	FITTING TO REFLECT A SANITARY FITTING PER THE WPB
	AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC SEC. 107.3.5.3 (12) RESIDENTIAL
	PLUMBING.


	WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS, PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION &
	REMOVE ANY VOIDED SHEETS & REPLACE ANY NECESSARY PAGES.
	A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW
	COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION
	MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE
	THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR
	PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.

	HTTPS://CODES.ICCSAFE.ORG/CODES/FLORIDA

	LUIS A. CRESPO
	PLUMBING PLAN EXAMINER / INSPECTOR
	EMAIL: [email protected] OFFICE: 561 805-6720

Review Stop	R			ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No	5	Status	P	Date	2022-12-27			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2022-12-27	Time	16:53	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2022-12-27	Time	16:51	Sent To

Notes

2022-12-27 16:54:04	1-ROOF SHINGLES FL31588-R2.

	2- SHINGLES UNDERLAYMENT NOA 21-1130.01

Review Stop	R			ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No	4	Status	F	Date	2022-07-12			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2022-07-12	Time	17:37	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2022-07-12	Time	17:35	Sent To

Notes

2022-07-12 17:37:29	ROOFING REVIEW:

	1 PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC
	61G20-3.001 FOR

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	A)OK. ROOF SHINGLES FL31588-R2.

	B) PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR SHINGLES UNDERLAYMENT
	SPECIFIED ON TYPICAL WALL SECTION ON SHEET A-1.

	2- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING
	(NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ABOVE PRODUCT APPROVALS
	(INCLUDING THE HARDIEBOARD SIDING) AS REQUIRED BY SEC.
	107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.

	PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
	QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
	JULIO GOMEZ
	COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	BUILDING DIVISION
	(561)805-6712
	[email protected]

Review Stop	R			ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	2021-10-21			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2021-10-21	Time	15:29	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2021-10-21	Time	15:29	Sent To

Notes

2021-10-21 15:30:10	ROOFING REVIEW:

	1 PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC
	61G20-3.001 FOR

	ORIGINAL COMMENT:
	A)ROOF MATERIAL FOR PITCHED ROOF AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS.

	RESPONSE:
	NOA 19-0617.05 SUBMITTED NOW IS NOT FOR SHINGLES. WRONG
	NOA AGAIN.

	2- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING
	(NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ABOVE PRODUCT APPROVALS
	(INCLUDING THE HARDIEBOARD SIDING) AS REQUIRED BY SEC.
	107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.

	PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
	QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
	JULIO GOMEZ
	COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	BUILDING DIVISION
	(561)805-6712
	[email protected]

Review Stop	R			ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	2021-08-17			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2021-08-17	Time	13:24	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2021-08-17	Time	13:24	Sent To

Notes

2021-08-17 13:24:31	ROOFING SECOND REVIEW:


	1- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC
	61G20-3.001 FOR
	(NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS A DEFERRED
	SUBMITTAL. PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION PRIOR TO
	INSTALLATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. ALL PRODUCT
	APPROVALS NEED TO BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY DESIGNER OF
	RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL):

	A)ROOF MATERIAL FOR PITCHED ROOF AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS.

	RESPONSE:
	NOA 19-0313.03 SUBMITTED IS FOR FLAT ROOFS OVER
	LIGHTWEIGHT CONCRETE DECKS. THIS IS INCORRECT. PROVIDE
	CORRECT SHINGLES PRODUCT APPROVAL.


	2- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING
	(NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ABOVE PRODUCT APPROVALS AS
	REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.

	PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
	QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
	JULIO GOMEZ
	COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	BUILDING DIVISION
	(561)805-6712
	[email protected]

Review Stop	R			ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	2021-02-17			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2021-02-17	Time	13:22	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2021-02-17	Time	13:22	Sent To

Notes

2021-02-17 13:23:30	1- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC
	61G20-3.001 FOR
	(NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS A DEFERRED
	SUBMITTAL. PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION PRIOR TO
	INSTALLATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. ALL PRODUCT
	APPROVALS NEED TO BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY DESIGNER OF
	RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL):

	A)ROOF MATERIAL FOR PITCHED ROOF AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS.

	B) FLAT ROOF. AND, CLEARLY MARK WHICH APPROVED ASSEMBLY
	IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE
	DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
	NOTE: IF THE SELECTED ASSEMBLY DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN
	PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF ZONES, THEN SIGNED AND SEALED
	RAS 117 CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED.


	2- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING
	(NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ABOVE PRODUCT APPROVALS AS
	REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.

	PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
	QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
	JULIO GOMEZ
	COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	BUILDING DIVISION
	(561)805-6712
	[email protected]

Review Stop	SIGNATURE			ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No	7	Status	P	Date	2023-07-21			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2023-07-21	Time	18:12	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2023-07-21	Time	18:12	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	SIGNATURE			ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No	6	Status	F	Date	2023-03-03			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2023-03-03	Time	10:33	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2023-03-03	Time	10:27	Sent To

Notes

2023-03-03 10:28:12	ENGINEER'S SELF CERTIFIED DIGITAL SIGNATURE
	1- DRAWINGS A1, S1, S2, S3 AND S5 HAVE ENGINEER'S
	SELF-CERTIFIED SIGNATURE. A THIRD PARTY CERTIFICATION
	IS REQUIRED.
	FAC 61G15-23.004.

Review Stop	SIGNATURE			ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No	5	Status	P	Date	2022-12-27			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2022-12-27	Time	16:51	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2022-12-27	Time	16:51	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	SIGNATURE			ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No	4	Status	P	Date	2022-07-12			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2022-07-12	Time	17:40	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2022-07-12	Time	17:39	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	SIGNATURE			ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No	3	Status	P	Date	2021-10-21			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2021-10-21	Time	15:37	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2021-10-21	Time	15:32	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	SIGNATURE			ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	2021-08-17			Cont ID
Sent By	jgomez			Date	2021-08-17	Time	13:47	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2021-08-17	Time	13:26	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	SIGNATURE			ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	2021-02-17			Cont ID
Sent By	elevesqu			Date	2021-02-17	Time	13:24	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jgomez			Date	2021-02-17	Time	13:23	Sent To

Notes

2021-02-01 16:47:27	PLEASE SEE HISTORIC COMMENTS REGARDING ARCHITECTURE AND
	NECESSARY ACTIONS FOR APPROVAL

	LOT COVERAGE FOR THIS LOT IS MAXIMUM 30 PERCENT. PLEASE
	CLARIFY THE LOT COVERAGE BASED ON HISTORIC CALCULATIONS
	BELOW AND INCLUDE A TABLE BREAKING DOWN WHAT IS BEING
	COUNTED:

	BUILDING FOOTPRINT CALCULATED USING THE ASSIGNED LOT
	COVERAGE INCLUDES 100 PERCENT OF THE GROUND FLOOR AREA
	OF THE FOLLOWING STRUCTURES AND BUILDING ELEMENTS:

	ACCESSORY STRUCTURES SUCH AS SHEDS, GUEST HOUSES AND
	SECOND UNITS THAT ARE ROOFED AND ENCLOSED ON MORE THAN
	TWO SIDES WHETHER OR NOT THEY INCLUDE HABITABLE SPACE;
	ATTACHED AND DETACHED GARAGES;
	STAIRWAYS: THE GROUND FLOOR OF INTERIOR AND ROOFED
	EXTERIOR STAIRWAYS, ELEVATORS, ESCALATORS AND SIMILAR
	FEATURES. THE GROUND FLOOR AREA OF USABLE SPACES HAVING
	A 5' MINIMUM HEIGHT UNDER A RUN OF STAIRS SHALL BE
	COUNTED;
	UTILITY AREAS: THE GROUND FLOOR AREA OF LAUNDRY ROOMS,
	MECHANICAL ROOMS, CLOSETS, STORAGE ROOMS AND BUILT-IN
	CABINETS.
	BUILDING FOOTPRINT CALCULATED USING THE ASSIGNED LOT
	COVERAGE INCLUDES 50 PERCENT OF THE GROUND FLOOR AREA
	OF THE FOLLOWING STRUCTURES AND BUILDING ELEMENTS:

	ROOFED BUT OPEN CARPORTS THAT ARE ATTACHED TO A
	PRINCIPAL OR ACCESSORY STRUCTURE BUT NOT ENCLOSED BY
	SOLID WALLS ON MORE THAN TWO SIDES;
	ROOFED BUT OPEN PORCHES THAT ARE ATTACHED TO A
	PRINCIPAL OR ACCESSORY STRUCTURE BUT NOT ENCLOSED BY
	SOLID WALLS ON MORE THAN TWO SIDES;
	ROOFED BUT OPEN BREEZEWAYS THAT ARE ATTACHED TO A
	PRINCIPAL OR ACCESSORY STRUCTURE BUT NOT ENCLOSED BY
	SOLID WALLS ON MORE THAN TWO SIDES.
	BUILDING FOOTPRINT CALCULATED USING THE ASSIGNED LOT
	COVERAGE DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY OF THE GROUND FLOOR AREA
	OF THE FOLLOWING STRUCTURES AND BUILDING ELEMENTS:

	FREE-STANDING PATIOS, DECKS AND GAZEBOS THAT ARE ROOFED
	BUT NOT ENCLOSED BY SOLID WALLS ON MORE THAN ONE SIDE
	AND NOT ATTACHED TO A PRINCIPAL OR ACCESSORY STRUCTURE.

	PLEASE SUBMIT A SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT MEETING
	REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-113

	LIZ LEVESQUE, URBAN DESIGN PLANNER
	561 822 1426
	[email protected]

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	6	Status	P	Date	2023-07-14			Cont ID
Sent By	cibaven			Date	2023-07-14	Time	16:42	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cibaven			Date	2023-07-14	Time	16:42	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	5	Status	P	Date	2022-12-28			Cont ID
Sent By	fmittner			Date	2022-12-28	Time	12:13	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	fmittner			Date	2022-12-28	Time	12:13	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	4	Status	P	Date	2022-06-06			Cont ID
Sent By	ckimmerl			Date	2022-06-06	Time	16:30	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	amhamilt			Date	2022-06-06	Time	16:30	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	2021-10-12			Cont ID
Sent By	ckimmerl			Date	2021-10-12	Time	15:37	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	ckimmerl			Date	2021-10-12	Time	15:37	Sent To

Notes

2021-10-12 15:37:16	REPEAT COMMENTS:

	1. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF A CURRENT SURVEY FOR THE
	PROPERTY.

	2. PLEASE SUBMIT A SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT MEETING
	THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-113.

	- THE VALUE OF THE CONSTRUCTION ($120,957) EXCEEDS 50%
	OF THE STRUCTURE'S VALUE ($40,990) ACCORDING TO THE
	P.B.C. PROPERTY APPRAISER'S OFFICE; THEREFORE, PURSUANT
	TO SECTION 94-441(B) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
	REGULATIONS (ZLDR), THE LANDSCAPE ON THE SITE SHALL BE
	IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE REGULATIONS FOUND IN
	ARTICLE XIV OF THE ZLDR. IF THE SITE CONFORMS TO
	ARTICLE XIV, THEN TWO (2) COPIES OF A LANDSCAPE PLAN
	DEMONSTRATING COMPLIANCE SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE
	PERMIT RE-SUBMITTAL. IF THE SITE DOES NOT CONFORM TO
	ARTICLE XIV, THEN PRIOR TO THE ZONING APPROVAL OF THIS
	PERMIT A SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT AND IRRIGATION
	PERMIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED SHOWING MATERIAL TO BRING THE
	SITE INTO CONFORMITY.

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	2021-08-05			Cont ID
Sent By	ckimmerl			Date	2021-08-05	Time	14:42	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	ckimmerl			Date	2021-08-05	Time	14:41	Sent To

Notes

2021-08-05 14:42:15	PLEASE PROVIDE TWO (2) COPIES OF A CURRENT SURVEY,
	WHICH INCLUDES THE PROPERTY'S ADDRESS AND LEGAL
	DESCRIPTION.

	PLEASE SUBMIT A SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT MEETING THE
	REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-113.
	- THE VALUE OF THE CONSTRUCTION ($120,957) EXCEEDS 50%
	OF THE STRUCTURE'S VALUE ($40,990) ACCORDING TO THE
	P.B.C. PROPERTY APPRAISER'S OFFICE; THEREFORE, PURSUANT
	TO SECTION 94-441(B) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
	REGULATIONS (ZLDR), THE LANDSCAPE ON THE SITE SHALL BE
	IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE REGULATIONS FOUND IN
	ARTICLE XIV OF THE ZLDR. IF THE SITE CONFORMS TO
	ARTICLE XIV, THEN TWO (2) COPIES OF A LANDSCAPE PLAN
	DEMONSTRATING COMPLIANCE SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE
	PERMIT RE-SUBMITTAL. IF THE SITE DOES NOT CONFORM TO
	ARTICLE XIV, THEN PRIOR TO THE ZONING APPROVAL OF THIS
	PERMIT A SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT AND IRRIGATION
	PERMIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED SHOWING MATERIAL TO BRING THE
	SITE INTO CONFORMITY.

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	2021-02-01			Cont ID
Sent By	elevesqu			Date	2021-02-01	Time	16:47	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	elevesqu			Date	2021-02-01	Time	16:47	Sent To

Notes

2021-02-01 16:47:51	PLEASE SEE HISTORIC COMMENTS REGARDING ARCHITECTURE AND
	NECESSARY ACTIONS FOR APPROVAL

	LOT COVERAGE FOR THIS LOT IS MAXIMUM 30 PERCENT. PLEASE
	CLARIFY THE LOT COVERAGE BASED ON HISTORIC CALCULATIONS
	BELOW AND INCLUDE A TABLE BREAKING DOWN WHAT IS BEING
	COUNTED:

	BUILDING FOOTPRINT CALCULATED USING THE ASSIGNED LOT
	COVERAGE INCLUDES 100 PERCENT OF THE GROUND FLOOR AREA
	OF THE FOLLOWING STRUCTURES AND BUILDING ELEMENTS:

	ACCESSORY STRUCTURES SUCH AS SHEDS, GUEST HOUSES AND
	SECOND UNITS THAT ARE ROOFED AND ENCLOSED ON MORE THAN
	TWO SIDES WHETHER OR NOT THEY INCLUDE HABITABLE SPACE;
	ATTACHED AND DETACHED GARAGES;
	STAIRWAYS: THE GROUND FLOOR OF INTERIOR AND ROOFED
	EXTERIOR STAIRWAYS, ELEVATORS, ESCALATORS AND SIMILAR
	FEATURES. THE GROUND FLOOR AREA OF USABLE SPACES HAVING
	A 5' MINIMUM HEIGHT UNDER A RUN OF STAIRS SHALL BE
	COUNTED;
	UTILITY AREAS: THE GROUND FLOOR AREA OF LAUNDRY ROOMS,
	MECHANICAL ROOMS, CLOSETS, STORAGE ROOMS AND BUILT-IN
	CABINETS.
	BUILDING FOOTPRINT CALCULATED USING THE ASSIGNED LOT
	COVERAGE INCLUDES 50 PERCENT OF THE GROUND FLOOR AREA
	OF THE FOLLOWING STRUCTURES AND BUILDING ELEMENTS:

	ROOFED BUT OPEN CARPORTS THAT ARE ATTACHED TO A
	PRINCIPAL OR ACCESSORY STRUCTURE BUT NOT ENCLOSED BY
	SOLID WALLS ON MORE THAN TWO SIDES;
	ROOFED BUT OPEN PORCHES THAT ARE ATTACHED TO A
	PRINCIPAL OR ACCESSORY STRUCTURE BUT NOT ENCLOSED BY
	SOLID WALLS ON MORE THAN TWO SIDES;
	ROOFED BUT OPEN BREEZEWAYS THAT ARE ATTACHED TO A
	PRINCIPAL OR ACCESSORY STRUCTURE BUT NOT ENCLOSED BY
	SOLID WALLS ON MORE THAN TWO SIDES.
	BUILDING FOOTPRINT CALCULATED USING THE ASSIGNED LOT
	COVERAGE DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY OF THE GROUND FLOOR AREA
	OF THE FOLLOWING STRUCTURES AND BUILDING ELEMENTS:

	FREE-STANDING PATIOS, DECKS AND GAZEBOS THAT ARE ROOFED
	BUT NOT ENCLOSED BY SOLID WALLS ON MORE THAN ONE SIDE
	AND NOT ATTACHED TO A PRINCIPAL OR ACCESSORY STRUCTURE.

	PLEASE SUBMIT A SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT MEETING
	REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-113

	LIZ LEVESQUE, URBAN DESIGN PLANNER
	561 822 1426
	[email protected]