Plan Review Details - Permit 20090998
Plan Review Stops For Permit 20090998
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 5 Status P Date 2020-11-12 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2020-11-12 Time 09:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2020-11-12 Time 09:44 Sent To  
Notes
2020-11-12 09:47:31BUILDING REVIEW APPROVED WITH PROVISO:
 1- SHEET A4.2:
 A)DETAIL #16 RAMP AND STAIR DETAILS: NEED TO SHOW
 HANDRAIL ON BOTH SIDES OF STAIRS AND RAMPS. SEC. 505.2
 FBC-ACCESSIBILITY.
 B)DETAIL #16 RAMP AND STAIR DETAILS: NEED TO SHOW THE
 TOP AND BOTTOM EXTENSION AT RAMP. AND PROVIDE DETAILS.
 SEC. 505.10.1 FBC-ACCESSIBILITY.
 C)DETAIL #14 AND DETAIL #17: THE BOTTOM EXTENSION AT
 STAIRS NEED TO EXTEND AT THE SLOPE OF THE STAIR FLIGHT
 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 505.10.3 FBC-ACCESSIBILITY.
  
 2- SHEET A4.3:
 A) PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
 SIGNAGE WALL AND THE LOW WALL ALONG THE RAMPS. PROVIDE
 COMPLETE SPECS FOR FOOTINGS, INCLUDING SIZES
 REINFORCEMENT, ETC. AND WALL VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT.
 SEC. 1603.1 FBC-BUILDING.
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2020-11-10 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2020-11-10 Time 17:40 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2020-11-10 Time 17:38 Sent To  
Notes
2020-11-10 17:44:39BUILDING REVIEW APPROVED WITH PROVISO:
 1- SHEET A4.2:
 A)DETAIL #16 RAMP AND STAIR DETAILS: NEED TO SHOW
 HANDRAIL ON BOTH SIDES OF STAIRS AND RAMPS. SEC. 505.2
 FBC-ACCESSIBILITY.
 B)DETAIL #16 RAMP AND STAIR DETAILS: NEED TO SHOW THE
 TOP AND BOTTOM EXTENSION AT RAMP. AND PROVIDE DETAILS.
 SEC. 505.10.1 FBC-ACCESSIBILITY.
 C)DETAIL #14 AND DETAIL #17: THE BOTTOM EXTENSION AT
 STAIRS NEED TO EXTEND AT THE SLOPE OF THE STAIR FLIGHT
 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 505.10.3 FBC-ACCESSIBILITY.
  
 2- SHEET A4.3:
 A) PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
 SIGNAGE WALL AND THE LOW WALL ALONG THE RAMPS. PROVIDE
 COMPLETE SPECS FOR FOOTINGS, INCLUDING SIZES
 REINFORCEMENT, ETC. AND WALL VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT.
 SEC. 1603.1 FBC-BUILDING.
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2020-11-06 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2020-11-06 Time 13:41 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2020-11-06 Time 13:33 Sent To  
Notes
2020-11-06 13:44:28THIRD BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS
 CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 ******COMMENTS WERE NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL.
 NO RESPONSE ON THE RESUBMITTAL.
  
  
  
 NOTE:
 BUILDING REVIEW MAY BE APPROVED WITH PROVISO. PROVISO
 MEANS CONTRACTOR WILL SUBMIT REQUIRED REVISED
 INFORMATION AFTER THE PERMIT IS ISSUED BUT BEFORE
 INSPECTIONS TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. REVISION FEES
 APPLY. CONTRACTOR TO ADVICE IF PROVISO OPTION IS
 PREFERRED AT THIS TIME OR IF RE-SUBMITTING REQUIRED
 INFORMATION BEFORE PERMIT ISSUANCE.
  
  
  
 NOTE: SEC. 801.3 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. ALL NEW
 CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, SYSTEMS, AND SPACES
 SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE.
  
 1- STOREFRONT IS NOT PART OF THIS PERMIT.
  
 2- OK
  
 3- SHEET A4.2:
 A)DETAIL #16 RAMP AND STAIR DETAILS: NEED TO SHOW
 HANDRAIL ON BOTH SIDES OF STAIRS AND RAMPS. SEC. 505.2
 FBC-ACCESSIBILITY. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 RESPONSE:
 DETAIL #16 WAS REVISED BUT STILL SHOWS NO HANDRAILS ON
 BOTH SIDES OF THE RAMP. IT SHOWS ONLY ONE SIDE WITH
 HANDRAIL. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 B) OK.
  
 C)DETAIL #16 RAMP AND STAIR DETAILS: NEED TO SHOW THE
 TOP AND BOTTOM EXTENSION AT RAMP. AND PROVIDE DETAILS.
 SEC. 505.10.1 FBC-ACCESSIBILITY. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 RESPONSE:
 NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 D) DETAIL #14 AND DETAIL #17: THE BOTTOM EXTENSION AT
 STAIRS NEED TO EXTEND AT THE SLOPE OF THE STAIR FLIGHT
 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 505.10.3 FBC-ACCESSIBILITY. REVISE
 AS REQUIRED.
  
 RESPONSE:
 NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 4- SHEET A4.3:
 A) OK
  
 B) OK
  
 C)PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
 SIGNAGE WALL AND THE LOW WALL ALONG THE RAMPS. PROVIDE
 COMPLETE SPECS FOR FOOTINGS, INCLUDING SIZES
 REINFORCEMENT, ETC. AND WALL VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT.
 SEC. 1603.1 FBC-BUILDING.
  
 RESPONSE:
 NOT ADDRESSED. THERE ARE NOT DETAILS/SPECS FOR FOOTINGS
 SIZES, REINFORCEMENT FOR SIGNAGE WALL.
  
 D) OK
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE
 ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF
 THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR
 SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL
 HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR
 ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2020-11-03 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2020-11-03 Time 09:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2020-11-02 Time 09:09 Sent To  
Notes
2020-11-03 09:54:32SECOND BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS
 CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 NOTE:
 BUILDING REVIEW MAY BE APPROVED WITH PROVISO. PROVISO
 MEANS CONTRACTOR WILL SUBMIT REQUIRED REVISED
 INFORMATION AFTER THE PERMIT IS ISSUED BUT BEFORE
 INSPECTIONS TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. REVISION FEES
 APPLY. CONTRACTOR TO ADVICE IF PROVISO OPTION IS
 PREFERRED AT THIS TIME OR IF RE-SUBMITTING REQUIRED
 INFORMATION BEFORE PERMIT ISSUANCE.
  
  
  
 NOTE: SEC. 801.3 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. ALL NEW
 CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, SYSTEMS, AND SPACES
 SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE.
  
 1- STOREFRONT IS NOT PART OF THIS PERMIT.
  
 2- OK
  
 3- SHEET A4.2:
 A)DETAIL #16 RAMP AND STAIR DETAILS: NEED TO SHOW
 HANDRAIL ON BOTH SIDES OF STAIRS AND RAMPS. SEC. 505.2
 FBC-ACCESSIBILITY. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 RESPONSE:
 DETAIL #16 WAS REVISED BUT STILL SHOWS NO HANDRAILS ON
 BOTH SIDES OF THE RAMP. IT SHOWS ONLY ONE SIDE WITH
 HANDRAIL. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 B) OK.
  
 C)DETAIL #16 RAMP AND STAIR DETAILS: NEED TO SHOW THE
 TOP AND BOTTOM EXTENSION AT RAMP. AND PROVIDE DETAILS.
 SEC. 505.10.1 FBC-ACCESSIBILITY. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 RESPONSE:
 NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 D) DETAIL #14 AND DETAIL #17: THE BOTTOM EXTENSION AT
 STAIRS NEED TO EXTEND AT THE SLOPE OF THE STAIR FLIGHT
 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 505.10.3 FBC-ACCESSIBILITY. REVISE
 AS REQUIRED.
  
 RESPONSE:
 NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 4- SHEET A4.3:
 A) OK
  
 B) OK
  
 C)PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
 SIGNAGE WALL AND THE LOW WALL ALONG THE RAMPS. PROVIDE
 COMPLETE SPECS FOR FOOTINGS, INCLUDING SIZES
 REINFORCEMENT, ETC. AND WALL VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT.
 SEC. 1603.1 FBC-BUILDING.
  
 RESPONSE:
 NOT ADDRESSED. THERE ARE NOT DETAILS/SPECS FOR FOOTINGS
 SIZES, REINFORCEMENT FOR SIGNAGE WALL.
  
 D) OK
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE
 ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF
 THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR
 SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL
 HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR
 ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2020-10-23 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2020-10-23 Time 10:31 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2020-10-22 Time 12:49 Sent To  
Notes
2020-10-23 10:32:42BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS
 CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 NOTE: SEC. 801.3 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. ALL NEW
 CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, SYSTEMS, AND SPACES
 SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE.
  
 1- SCOPE OF WORK IS NOT CLEAR. THE PERMIT APPLICATION
 DESCRIBES "INSTALLATION OF PAVER, STOREFRONT, STAIRS
 AND MONUMENT PER ATTACHED DRAWINGS".
 ON THE OTHER HAND, THE DESCRIPTION OF WORK ON-THE
 ARCHITECTURAL PLANS IS "EXTERIOR COURTYARD WORK,
 COMPOSED OF NEW STAIRS, NEW RAMPS & SIGNAGE TO CREATE
 ADDITIONAL OPEN AIR AREAS AT EXISTING PALM BEACH
 ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY STUDENT CENTER DINING".
 ARCHITECTURAL PLANS DON'T INCLUDE THE STOREFRONTS. I
 FOUND THAT THERE IS A SEPARATE PERMIT APPLICATION
 SUBMITTED FOR STOREFRONT REPLACEMENT (PERMIT
 #20090997). ARE THESE THE SAME STOREFRONTS. IF SO,
 PLEASE REVISE THE SCOPE ON THE PERMIT APPLICATION AND
 STATE THAT STOREFRONT UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT #20090997.
 THIS WILL HELP AVOID CONFUSION/CONFLICTS/DELAYS.
 SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 2-SITE PLAN ON SHEET A1.0 SHOWS TWO NEW TRELLIS
 STRUCTURES ON THE NORTH WEST COURT YARD. PROVIDE
 COMPLETE DESIGN CRITERIA AND COMPLETE FRAMING PLANS,
 DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF
 THOSE STRUCTURES AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 1603.1.1 4 AND
 SEC. 1603.1FBC-BUILDING RESPECTIVELY.
  
 3- SHEET A4.2:
 A)DETAIL #16 RAMP AND STAIR DETAILS: NEED TO SHOW
 HANDRAIL ON BOTH SIDES OF STAIRS AND RAMPS. SEC. 505.2
 FBC-ACCESSIBILITY. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 B)DETAIL #13 EXTERIOR STAIR DETAIL: NEED TO SHOW
 HANDRAIL ON BOTH SIDES. SEC. 505.2 FBC-ACCESSIBILITY.
 REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 C)DETAIL #16 RAMP AND STAIR DETAILS: NEED TO SHOW THE
 TOP AND BOTTOM EXTENSION AT RAMP. AND PROVIDE DETAILS.
 SEC. 505.10.1 FBC-ACCESSIBILITY. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 D) DETAIL #14 AND DETAIL #17: THE BOTTOM EXTENSION AT
 STAIRS NEED TO EXTEND AT THE SLOPE OF THE STAIR FLIGHT
 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 505.10.3 FBC-ACCESSIBILITY. REVISE
 AS REQUIRED.
  
 4- SHEET A4.3:
 A)DETAIL #22 EXTERIOR STAIR & PLANTER SECTION: HANDRAIL
 HEIGHT OF 2'-8" DOESN'T COMPLY WITH SEC. 505.4
 FBC-ACCESSIBILITY. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 B)DETAIL #21 EXTERIOR STAIR & PLANTER: NEED TO SHOW
 HANDRAIL ON BOTH SIDES OF STAIRS. SEC. 505.2
 FBC-ACCESSIBILITY. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 C)PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
 SIGNAGE WALL AND THE LOW WALL ALONG THE RAMPS. PROVIDE
 COMPLETE SPECS FOR FOOTINGS, INCLUDING SIZES
 REINFORCEMENT, ETC. AND WALL VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT.
 SEC. 1603.1 FBC-BUILDING.
  
 D)DETAIL #24 EXTERIOR RAMP SECTION DETAIL: THIS DETAIL
 DOESN'T MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON PLAN DETAIL #23 EXTERIOR
 RAMP DETAIL. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. ALSO, SHOW
 THE HANDRAIL BOTTOM EXTENSION. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY
 AMENDMENTS.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE
 ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF
 THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR
 SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL
 HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR
 ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2020-10-20 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 2020-10-20 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 2020-10-20 Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2020-11-03 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 2020-11-03 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 2020-11-03 Time 14:48 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2020-10-26 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 2020-10-26 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 2020-10-23 Time 10:08 Sent To  
Notes
2020-10-26 10:24:26THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE
 MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
  
  
 1) SHEETS A11, A21, A 42, A43, DO NOT APPEAR TO
 INDICATE HANDRAILS ON BOTH SIDES OF THE STAIRS.
  
 PER NFPA 101, CH 7 MEANS OF EGRESS
  
 7.2.2.4 GUARDS AND HANDRAILS.
 7.2.2.4.1 HANDRAILS.
 7.2.2.4.1.1 STAIRS AND RAMPS SHALL HAVE HANDRAILS ON
 BOTH SIDES,
 UNLESS OTHERWISE PERMITTED IN 7.2.2.4.1.5 OR
 7.2.2.4.1.6.
  
 PLEASE REVIEW AND CORRECT.
  
  
 2) SHEET A21 - THE STAIRS BY THE DOUBLE DOORS DOES NOT
 APPEAR TO INDICATE RAILINGS ON BOTH SIDES BUT ALSO NO
 CENTER RAILING.
  
 PER NFPA 101, CH 7 MEANS OF EGRESS
  
 7.2.2.4 GUARDS AND HANDRAILS.
 7.2.2.4.1 HANDRAILS.
 7.2.2.4.1.1 STAIRS AND RAMPS SHALL HAVE HANDRAILS ON
 BOTH SIDES,
 UNLESS OTHERWISE PERMITTED IN 7.2.2.4.1.5 OR
 7.2.2.4.1.6.
 7.2.2.4.1.2 IN ADDITION TO THE HANDRAILS REQUIRED AT
 THE SIDES OF
 STAIRS BY 7.2.2.4.1.1, BOTH OF THE FOLLOWING PROVISIONS
 SHALL APPLY:
 (1) FOR NEW STAIRS, HANDRAILS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITHIN
 30 IN. (760
 MM) OF ALL PORTIONS OF THE REQUIRED EGRESS WIDTH.
  
 PLEASE REVIEW AND CORRECT.
  
  
  
 3) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET
 REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE
 ABOVE.
  
  
 4) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE
 RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE.
  
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 5 Status N Date 2020-11-12 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2020-11-12 Time 10:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2020-11-12 Time 09:44 Sent To I
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2020-11-10 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2020-11-10 Time 18:00 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2020-11-10 Time 17:39 Sent To I
Notes
2020-11-10 17:39:58MR. GOMEZ,
  
 PER OUR PHONE CONVERSATION I AM EMAILING YOU TO RELEASE
 PERMIT 20090998 PROVISO. WE WILL COMPLETE THE REVISIONS
 AS THEY RELATE TO ALL OF THE COMMENTS
 AND WILL GET A SIGNATURE ON SP1 AS REQUESTED. THE
 ARCHITECT AND THE DESIGN PLANNER HAVE BOTH BEEN COPIED
 ON THIS EMAIL AS WELL.
 ADDITIONALLY, WE UNDERSTAND THAT NO INSPECTIONS WILL BE
 COMPLETED PRIOR TO ALL COMMENTS BEING ADDRESSED.
  
 THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR GUIDANCE AND ASSISTANCE
 IN THIS MATTER.
  
 BEST REGARDS
  
 BOB BLACK
 SUPERINTENDENT
 HEDRICK BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION
  
 C 561-602-7364
 E [email protected]
 2200 CENTREPARK WEST DRIVE
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33409 | CGC013137
  
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2020-11-10 Cont ID  
Sent By lmarchan Date 2020-11-10 Time 11:23 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmarchan Date 2020-11-05 Time 15:08 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2020-11-03 Cont ID  
Sent By lmarchan Date 2020-11-03 Time 15:23 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmarchan Date 2020-10-27 Time 15:04 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2020-10-27 Cont ID  
Sent By cpuell Date 2020-10-27 Time 09:39 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cpuell Date 2020-10-05 Time 16:19 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 5 Status P Date 2020-11-12 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2020-11-12 Time 10:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2020-11-12 Time 09:21 Sent To  
Notes
2020-11-12 10:15:10SIGNATURE REVIEW PROVISO:
  
 1- SITE PLAN DRAWING SP-1 FROM URBAN DESIGN STUDIO WAS
 UPLOADED WITH COPY OF DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SEAL AND
 SIGNATURE. PROVIDE DRAWING WITH ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AS
 REQUIRED BY F.S. WHEN SUBMITTING PLANS/DOCUMENTS FOR
 PUBLIC RECORDS.
  
 2- SITE ENGINEERING PLAN SHEET C1.0 OF THE ENGINEER'S
 SIGNATURE. PROVIDE DRAWING WITH ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AS
 REQUIRED BY F.S. WHEN SUBMITTING PLANS/DOCUMENTS FOR
 PUBLIC RECORDS.
  
 NOTE: PLANS MAY BE SUBMITTED WITH A DIGITAL SIGNATURE
 OR HARD COPIES WITH LICENSED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SEAL
 AND SIGNATURE MAY BE DROPPED (OR MAILED) TO CITY HALL
 FOR RECORDS RETENTION.
  
  
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2020-11-10 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2020-11-10 Time 17:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2020-11-10 Time 17:53 Sent To  
Notes
2020-11-10 17:59:54SIGNATURE REVIEW COMMENTS
  
 1- SITE PLAN DRAWING SP-1 FROM URBAN DESIGN STUDIO
 DOESN'T HAVE ANY SEAL AND SIGNATURE. NEEDS TO BE SIGNED
 AND SEALED BY THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD WHEN
 SUBMITTING PLANS/DOCUMENTS FOR PUBLIC RECORDS.
  
  
 2- SITE ENGINEERING PLAN SHEET C1.0 SUBMITTED DON'T
 HAVE THE ENGINEER'S ORIGINAL SIGNATURE. PLANS SUBMITTED
 HAVE A COPY OF THE ENGINEER'S SIGNATURE. PLANS NEED TO
 HAVE THE ORIGINAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE OF THE ENGINEER OF
 RECORD AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 61G15-23.001 FAC AND CHAPTER
 471 F.S. WHEN SUBMITTING PLANS/DOCUMENTS FOR PUBLIC
 RECORDS.
  
 NOTE: PLANS MAY BE SUBMITTED WITH A DIGITAL SIGNATURE
 OR HARD COPIES WITH LICENSED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SEAL
 AND SIGNATURE MAY BE DROPPED IN CITY HALL FOR RECORDS
 RETENTION.
  
  
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2020-11-06 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2020-11-06 Time 13:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2020-11-06 Time 13:44 Sent To  
Notes
2020-11-06 13:46:42SIGNATURE REVIEW COMMENTS NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 1- ALL THE LANDSCAPE AND HARDSCAPE PLANS FROM URBAN
 DESIGN STUDIO NEED TO BE PROPERLY SIGNED AND SEALED BY
 THE LICENSED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. PLANS MAY BE
 SUBMITTED WITH A DIGITAL SIGNATURE OR HARD COPIES WITH
 LICENSED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE MAY BE
 DROPPED IN CITY HALL FOR RECORDS RETENTION.
  
 NOTE: ACCORDING TO ZONING THESE PLANS ARE TO BE
 SUBMITTED UNDER THE SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT. SEE
 ZONING COMMENTS.
  
 2- SITE ENGINEERING PLAN SHEET C1.0 SUBMITTED DON'T
 HAVE THE ENGINEER'S ORIGINAL SIGNATURE. PLANS SUBMITTED
 HAVE A COPY OF THE ENGINEER'S SIGNATURE. PLANS NEED TO
 HAVE THE ORIGINAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE OF THE ENGINEER OF
 RECORD AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 61G15-23.001 FAC AND CHAPTER
 471 F.S. WHEN SUBMITTING PLANS/DOCUMENTS FOR PUBLIC
 RECORDS.
 NOTE: PLANS MAY BE SUBMITTED WITH A DIGITAL SIGNATURE
 OR HARD COPIES WITH LICENSED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SEAL
 AND SIGNATURE MAY BE DROPPED IN CITY HALL FOR RECORDS
 RETENTION.
  
  
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2020-11-03 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2020-11-03 Time 12:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2020-11-03 Time 12:47 Sent To  
Notes
2020-11-03 12:48:36SIGNATURE REVIEW COMMENTS NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 1- ALL THE LANDSCAPE AND HARDSCAPE PLANS FROM URBAN
 DESIGN STUDIO NEED TO BE PROPERLY SIGNED AND SEALED BY
 THE LICENSED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. PLANS MAY BE
 SUBMITTED WITH A DIGITAL SIGNATURE OR HARD COPIES WITH
 LICENSED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE MAY BE
 DROPPED IN CITY HALL FOR RECORDS RETENTION.
  
 NOTE: ACCORDING TO ZONING THESE PLANS ARE TO BE
 SUBMITTED UNDER THE SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT. SEE
 ZONING COMMENTS.
  
 2- SITE ENGINEERING PLAN SHEET C1.0 SUBMITTED DON'T
 HAVE THE ENGINEER'S ORIGINAL SIGNATURE. PLANS SUBMITTED
 HAVE A COPY OF THE ENGINEER'S SIGNATURE. PLANS NEED TO
 HAVE THE ORIGINAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE OF THE ENGINEER OF
 RECORD AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 61G15-23.001 FAC AND CHAPTER
 471 F.S. WHEN SUBMITTING PLANS/DOCUMENTS FOR PUBLIC
 RECORDS.
 NOTE: PLANS MAY BE SUBMITTED WITH A DIGITAL SIGNATURE
 OR HARD COPIES WITH LICENSED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SEAL
 AND SIGNATURE MAY BE DROPPED IN CITY HALL FOR RECORDS
 RETENTION.
  
  
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2020-10-23 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2020-10-23 Time 10:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2020-10-23 Time 10:33 Sent To  
Notes
2020-10-23 10:47:241- ALL THE LANDSCAPE AND HARDSCAPE PLANS FROM URBAN
 DESIGN STUDIO NEED TO BE PROPERLY SIGNED AND SEALED BY
 THE LICENSED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. PLANS MAY BE
 SUBMITTED WITH A DIGITAL SIGNATURE OR HARD COPIES WITH
 LICENSED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE MAY BE
 DROPPED IN CITY HALL FOR RECORDS RETENTION.
  
 NOTE: ACCORDING TO ZONING THESE PLANS ARE TO BE
 SUBMITTED UNDER THE SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT. SEE
 ZONING COMMENTS.
  
 2- SITE ENGINEERING PLAN SHEET C1.0 SUBMITTED DON'T
 HAVE THE ENGINEER'S ORIGINAL SIGNATURE. PLANS SUBMITTED
 HAVE A COPY OF THE ENGINEER'S SIGNATURE. PLANS NEED TO
 HAVE THE ORIGINAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE OF THE ENGINEER OF
 RECORD AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 61G15-23.001 FAC AND CHAPTER
 471 F.S. WHEN SUBMITTING PLANS/DOCUMENTS FOR PUBLIC
 RECORDS.
 NOTE: PLANS MAY BE SUBMITTED WITH A DIGITAL SIGNATURE
 OR HARD COPIES WITH LICENSED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SEAL
 AND SIGNATURE MAY BE DROPPED IN CITY HALL FOR RECORDS
 RETENTION.
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2020-11-10 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 2020-11-10 Time 11:00 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 2020-11-10 Time 09:53 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2020-11-03 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 2020-11-03 Time 14:43 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 2020-11-03 Time 14:43 Sent To  
Notes
2020-11-03 15:01:46ZONING PLAN REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 11.03.2020
 PERMIT NO.: 20090998
 ________________________________________
  
 REVIEW STATUS: FAILED
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING PLAN
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - LANDSCAPE PLANS NEED TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE MAIN BUILDING PERMIT AND SUBMITTED AS
 A SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT.
  
 1.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - PLEASE PROVIDE THE PERMIT # FOR
 THE LANDSCAPE PERMIT...I WAS UNABLE TO FIND WHERE SUCH
 PERMIT HAD BEEN APPLIED FOR.
  
 2. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - SITE PLAN (SHEET SP-1) IS
 LACKING A LOT OF DETAIL.
  
 2.1. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - WHAT ARE THE DASHED
 LINES WITH WHAT APPEARS TO BE FOUR (4) POSTS IN THE NEW
 COURTYARD? IS THIS A TRELLIS (AS INDICATED ON THE
 HARDSCAPE AND LANDSCAPE PLAN)? DETAILS NEED TO BE
 PROVIDED.
  
 2.1.1. [ NEW COMMENT ] - THERE ARE TWO (2) VERSIONS OF
 THE SITE PLAN IN THE SYSTEM. IT APPEARS THAT VERSIONING
 OF THE PLANS WAS NOT DONE PROPERLY WHEN UPLOADING THE
 PLANS. PLEASE REMOVE THE OLD SITE PLAN. THE NEW SITE
 PLAN HAS SATISFIED THE COMMENT.
  
 2.2. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - FENCING NEEDS TO BE
 LABELED.
  
 2.2.1. [ NEW COMMENT ] - [ NEW COMMENT ] - THERE ARE
 TWO (2) VERSIONS OF THE SITE PLAN IN THE SYSTEM. IT
 APPEARS THAT VERSIONING OF THE PLANS WAS NOT DONE
 PROPERLY WHEN UPLOADING THE PLANS. PLEASE REMOVE THE
 OLD SITE PLAN. THE NEW SITE PLAN HAS SATISFIED THE
 COMMENT.
  
 2.3. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - DETAILS NEED TO BE
 PROVIDED FOR THE PROPOSED FENCING.
  
 2.3.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - THERE ARE TWO (2) VERSIONS OF
 THE SITE PLAN IN THE SYSTEM. IT APPEARS THAT VERSIONING
 OF THE PLANS WAS NOT DONE PROPERLY WHEN UPLOADING THE
 PLANS. PLEASE REMOVE THE OLD SITE PLAN. THE NEW SITE
 PLAN HAS SATISFIED THE COMMENT.
  
 2.4. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - VISIBILITY TRIANGLE
 NEEDS TO BE SHOWN AND ENSURE THAT THERE ARE NO
 IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE THAT ARE
 BETWEEN 18? AND 8? IN HEIGHT.
  
 2.4.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - THERE ARE TWO (2) VERSIONS OF
 THE SITE PLAN IN THE SYSTEM. IT APPEARS THAT VERSIONING
 OF THE PLANS WAS NOT DONE PROPERLY WHEN UPLOADING THE
 PLANS. PLEASE REMOVE THE OLD SITE PLAN. THE NEW SITE
 PLAN HAS SATISFIED THE COMMENT.
  
 3. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - WHY WAS THE HARDSCAPE PLAN FOR
 THE EAST PLAZA (HS-1) INCLUDED IN THIS PERMIT? THERE
 WERE EVEN THREE (3) COPIES OF SHEET HS-1 SUBMITTED.
 THIS AREA WAS PERMITTED SEPARATELY AND SHOULD BE
 REMOVED FROM THIS PLAN SET (PAGE #S MAY NEED TO BE
 ADJUSTED).
  
 4. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - SURVEY DOES NOT ACCURATELY
 REFLECT THE CURRENT CONDITIONS OF THE SITE. PLEASE
 PROVIDE THE MOST RECENT SURVEY.
  
 5. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - PURSUANT TO SEC.
 94-408.F.2.E. OF THE CITY'S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS, FREESTANDING SIGNS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF
 FIVE (5) FEET FROM THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 5.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - THERE ARE TWO (2) VERSIONS OF THE
 SITE PLAN IN THE SYSTEM. IT APPEARS THAT VERSIONING OF
 THE PLANS WAS NOT DONE PROPERLY WHEN UPLOADING THE
 PLANS. PLEASE REMOVE THE OLD SITE PLAN. THE NEW SITE
 PLAN HAS SATISFIED THE COMMENT.
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED
 MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2020-10-09 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 2020-10-09 Time 11:31 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 2020-10-09 Time 11:20 Sent To  
Notes
2020-10-09 11:31:38ZONING PLAN REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 10.09.2020
 PERMIT NO.: 20090998
 ________________________________________
  
 REVIEW STATUS: FAILED
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING PLAN
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. LANDSCAPE PLANS NEED TO BE REMOVED FROM THE MAIN
 BUILDING PERMIT AND SUBMITTED AS A SEPARATE LANDSCAPE
 PERMIT.
  
 2. SITE PLAN (SHEET SP-1) IS LACKING A LOT OF DETAIL.
  
 2.1. WHAT ARE THE DASHED LINES WITH WHAT APPEARS TO BE
 FOUR (4) POSTS IN THE NEW COURTYARD? IS THIS A TRELLIS
 (AS INDICATED ON THE HARDSCAPE AND LANDSCAPE PLAN)?
 DETAILS NEED TO BE PROVIDED.
  
 2.2. FENCING NEEDS TO BE LABELED.
  
 2.3. DETAILS NEED TO BE PROVIDED FOR THE PROPOSED
 FENCING.
  
 2.4. VISIBILITY TRIANGLE NEEDS TO BE SHOWN AND ENSURE
 THAT THERE ARE NO IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE VISIBILITY
 TRIANGLE THAT ARE BETWEEN 18? AND 8? IN HEIGHT.
  
 3. WHY WAS THE HARDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE EAST PLAZA (HS-1)
 INCLUDED IN THIS PERMIT? THERE WERE EVEN THREE (3)
 COPIES OF SHEET HS-1 SUBMITTED. THIS AREA WAS PERMITTED
 SEPARATELY AND SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM THIS PLAN SET
 (PAGE #S MAY NEED TO BE ADJUSTED).
  
 4. SURVEY DOES NOT ACCURATELY REFLECT THE CURRENT
 CONDITIONS OF THE SITE. PLEASE PROVIDE THE MOST RECENT
 SURVEY.
  
 5. PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-408.F.2.E. OF THE CITY?S ZONING
 AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, FREESTANDING SIGNS
 SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF FIVE (5) FEET FROM THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED
 MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved