Plan Review Stops For Permit 20080891 |
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2021-02-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mcphers |
Date |
2021-02-18 |
Time |
12:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2021-02-18 |
Time |
12:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-01-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2021-01-13 |
Time |
10:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2021-01-13 |
Time |
10:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2021-01-13 10:28:12 | SIGN | | REVIEWED BY ROGER MCPHERSON | | 561-805-6716 | | [email protected]. | | CODE USED FOR REVIEW - 2017 FBC WITH WPB CHAPTER 1 | | AMENDMENTS | | | | CORRECTIONS NEEDED - FBC WPB AMENDMENTS 107 | | 1) SIGN DESIGN HAS BEEN CHANGED FROM A WALL MOUNTED | | SIGN TO A CEILING MOUNTED SIGN. SIGN IS SUBJECT TO WIND | | LOADS PLEASE PROVIDE THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS AND | | ATTACHMENT DETAILS FOR THE SIGN OR PROVIDE SIGNED AND | | SEALED ATTACHMENT DETAILS FOR THE "NEW SIGN DESIGN" | | FROM AN ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER. SHOW THE WIND DESIGN | | CRITERIA USED FOR DESIGN ON THE DRAWINGS FBC 1609 | | 2) BE SURE TO HAVE THE NEW DESIGN MARKED APPROVED BY | | CITY PLACE. | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2020-12-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2020-12-11 |
Time |
15:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2020-12-11 |
Time |
15:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2020-12-11 15:27:17 | SIGN | | REVIEWED BY ROGER MCPHERSON | | 561-805-6716 | | [email protected]. | | CODE USED FOR REVIEW - 2017 FBC WITH WPB CHAPTER 1 | | AMENDMENTS | | | | CORRECTIONS NEEDED - FBC WPB AMENDMENTS 107 | | 1) PLEASE PROVIDE SIGNED AND SEALED ATTACHMENT DETAILS | | FOR THE "NEW SIGN DESIGN" FROM AN ARCHITECT OR | | ENGINEER. SHOW THE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA USED FOR DESIGN | | ON THE DRAWINGS FBC 1609 | | 2) BE SURE TO HAVE THE NEW DESIGN MARKED APPROVED BY | | CITY PLACE. | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-10-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2020-10-22 |
Time |
07:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2020-10-22 |
Time |
07:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-09-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2020-09-15 |
Time |
17:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2020-09-15 |
Time |
17:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-10-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
equinone |
Date |
2020-10-26 |
Time |
16:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
equinone |
Date |
2020-10-26 |
Time |
16:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2020-09-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
fgiaquin |
Date |
2020-09-05 |
Time |
23:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
fgiaquin |
Date |
2020-09-05 |
Time |
22:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2020-09-05 23:00:39 | ELECTRICAL REVIEW STATUS: DENIED, SEE COMMENTS BELOW. | | | | 1. NO ELECTRICAL DRAWING SUBMITTED??? | | | | END OF COMMENTS. | | | | PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED | | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. WHEN | | RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE | | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY | | RESUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, INSERT CORRECTED PAGES | | INTO THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE OR VOID THE | | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS. | | CODES IN EFFECT: | | | | IF THE RESUBMITTAL IS NOT PREPARED BY A DESIGN | | PROFESSIONAL (ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER), AND THE PAGES ARE | | 11X17 OR SMALLER, YOU MAY RESUBMIT, ALONG WITH A | | COMPLETED RESUBMITTAL FORM, VIA EMAIL TO | | [email protected]. THE EMAIL SHOULD INCLUDE THE PERMIT | | NUMBER AND "RESUBMITTAL" IN THE SUBJECT LINE. THE | | RESUBMITTAL FORM CAN BE FOUND AT THIS WEBSITE: | | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/DEVELOPMENT-SERVICES/FORMS/B | | UILDING-PERMIT-FORMS | | | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2017 6TH EDITION | | WPB FBC = WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA | | BUILDING CODE 2017 6TH ED. | | FBC EB = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE EXISTING BUILDING 2017 | | 6TH EDITION | | FBC EC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION 2017 | | 6TH EDITION | | FBC RE = FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE 2017 6TH EDITION | | NEC = NFPA 70 2014 EDITION, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE | | FS = FLORIDA STATUTES | | | | V/R, | | | | FRANK GIAQUINTO III | | ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | [email protected] | | CELL: 561-657-1653 | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2021-02-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2021-02-18 |
Time |
12:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2021-02-01 |
Time |
19:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2021-01-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2021-01-13 |
Time |
10:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2020-12-30 |
Time |
15:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2020-12-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2020-12-15 |
Time |
14:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2020-12-01 |
Time |
16:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2020-10-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
cpuell |
Date |
2020-10-29 |
Time |
17:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
cpuell |
Date |
2020-10-13 |
Time |
14:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2020-10-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2020-10-06 |
Time |
07:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2020-08-20 |
Time |
07:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2021-02-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2021-02-18 |
Time |
12:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2021-02-18 |
Time |
12:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2021-01-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2021-01-13 |
Time |
10:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2021-01-13 |
Time |
10:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2020-12-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2020-12-11 |
Time |
15:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2020-12-11 |
Time |
15:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2020-12-11 15:27:58 | SIGNED AND SEALED DRAWINGS IN PROJECTDOX NEED TO BE | | DIGITALLY/ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED BY THE ENGINEER OR | | ARCHITECT TO BE USED IN ELECTRONIC PLAN REVIEW. | | DRAWINGS DO NOT SHOW IN "ADOBE READER" AS | | DIGITALLY/ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED. - OR - IF YOUR | | ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER DOES NOT HAVE AN ELECTRONIC OR | | DIGITAL SIGNATURE ? YOU CAN DROP OFF THE ORIGINAL | | SIGNED AND SEALED DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS TO THE FRONT DESK | | IN THE BUILDING DEPT. AT THE CITY HALL |
|
|
Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-10-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2020-10-22 |
Time |
07:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2020-10-22 |
Time |
07:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-09-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2020-09-15 |
Time |
17:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2020-09-15 |
Time |
17:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2020-08-20 07:51:50 | DIGITALLY SIGNED FILE IN 'SIGNATURES' FOLDER |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2021-01-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2021-01-11 |
Time |
12:13 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2021-01-11 |
Time |
10:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2020-12-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2020-12-15 |
Time |
11:56 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2020-12-15 |
Time |
10:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2020-12-15 11:58:47 | FAILED | | | | CEILING MOUNTED BLADE SIGN | | | | 1) PROVIDE AN UPDATED CITYPLACE RETAIL APPROVAL OF THIS | | NEW SIGN DESIGN. | | | | 2) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA PERMIT | | CEILING MOUNTED BLADE SIGNS TO USE EITHER PUSH THOUGH | | WHITE ACRYLIC LETTERS OR PAINTED METAL PANELS. | | CITYPLACE RETAIL IS AUTHORIZED TO GRANT A WAIVER I TO | | PERMIT THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE MATERIALS FROM THOSE | | SPECIFIC IN THE MASTER PLAN. CITYPLACE RETAIL NEEDS TO | | WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE WAIVER I TO ALLOW THE USE OF | | THE ACRYLIC AND VINYL COPY INSTEAD OF PAINTED COPY. | | | | 3) WHILE IT APPEARS ON THE ELEVATION DRAWING THAT THE | | CEILING MOUNTED BLADE SIGN IS CENTERED IN THE ARCADE | | CEILING, PLEASE INCLUDE A NOTATION ON THE PLANS TO | | VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THIS REQUIREMENT OF THE ROSEMARY | | SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA. | | | | WINDOW GRAPHICS NOT PART OF THIS PERMIT REVIEW. | | | | THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS A ZONING RESUBMITTAL REVIEW AS | | THE REVISED SIGN DESIGN ADDRESSED THE PREVIOUS REPEAT | | COMMENTS. THESE COMMENTS ARE NEW COMMENTS. | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2020-10-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2020-10-29 |
Time |
16:06 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2020-10-23 |
Time |
15:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2020-10-29 16:07:24 | BLADE SIGN | | | | 1) REPEAT COMMENT: THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN | | CRITERIA REQUIRE THAT THE SIGN COPY AREA SHALL MAINTAIN | | A MARGIN AT LEAST THREE (3) INCHES FROM ANY EDGE OF THE | | PERCEIVED SIGN AREA. PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE SIGN FACE | | THAT VERIFIES THIS REQUIREMENT. THE COMMENT NOTE ON THE | | PLANS STATES THAT THE BLADE SIGN DESIGN IS THE BRAND | | LOGO, WHICH DOES NOT EXEMPT IT FROM MEETING THE | | REQUIREMENT. A POSSIBLE SOLUTION IS TO HAVE THE CIRCLE | | MOUNTED ON A PANEL THAT WOULD PROVIDE THE THREE (3) | | INCH MARGIN FOR THE SIGN COPY (IT WOULD APPEAR SIMILAR | | TO THE NIGHT VIEW DEPENDING ON THE PANEL COLOR). | | | | WINDOW GRAPHICS NOT PART OF THIS PERMIT REVIEW. | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2020-10-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2020-10-02 |
Time |
17:19 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2020-10-02 |
Time |
17:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2020-10-02 17:19:18 | BLADE SIGN | | | | 1) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA REQUIRE | | THAT THE SIGN COPY AREA SHALL MAINTAIN A MARGIN AT | | LEAST THREE (3) INCHES FROM ANY EDGE OF THE PERCEIVED | | SIGN AREA. PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE SIGN FACE THAT | | VERIFIES THIS REQUIREMENT. | | | | 2) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA REQUIRE THE | | STUD MOUNTS TO BE SERIES 316 STAINLESS STEEL ANCHOR | | BOLTS. PROVIDE VERIFICATION OF THIS REQUIREMENT ON THE | | PLANS. THIS IS NOT SPECIFIED ON THE PLANS. | | | | 3) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA ONLY PERMIT | | WHITE, NOT CLEAR, ACRYLIC FOR PUSH THROUGH | | APPLICATIONS. THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE MATERIALS IS ONLY | | PERMITTED AS A WAIVER I. A WAIVER I REQUIRES WRITTEN | | APPROVAL FROM CITYPLACE RETAIL. | | | | 4) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA REQUIRE | | THAT BLADE SIGNS UTILIZING HALO ILLUMINATION MAY ONLY | | BE RECTANGULAR IN SHAPE. THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE DESIGN | | IS ONLY PERMITTED AS A WAIVER I. A WAIVER I REQUIRES | | WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM CITYPLACE RETAIL. | | | | 5) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA REQUIRE | | THAT RIVETS, SCREWS AND OTHER FASTENERS THAT EXTEND TO | | VISIBLE SURFACES SHALL BE FLUSH, FILLED AND FINISHED SO | | AS TO BE UNNOTICEABLE. VERIFY THAT THE MOUNTING SCREWS | | MEET THIS REQUIREMENT. | | | | 6) NO ELECTRICAL DETAILS PROVIDED. REMEMBER: THE | | ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA REQUIRES THAT ALL | | CONDUIT, CROSSOVERS, WIRING NECESSARY FOR THE SIGN'S | | ELECTRICAL CONNECTION TO BE CONCEALED AND NOT VISIBLE | | TO THE PUBLIC. THE PLANS STATE THAT ALL WIRING WILL BE | | CONCEALED. THE CONDUIT THAT THE WIRING IS IN ALSO NEEDS | | TO BE CONCEALED. PROVIDE HOW THIS WILL OCCUR. | | | | | | WINDOW GRAPHICS NOT PART OF THIS PERMIT REVIEW. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|