|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 20071412
| Plan Review Stops For Permit 20071412 |
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2021-04-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cthroop |
Date |
2021-04-13 |
Time |
10:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cthroop |
Date |
2021-02-17 |
Time |
05:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2021-01-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleahy |
Date |
2021-01-22 |
Time |
14:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleahy |
Date |
2020-12-23 |
Time |
13:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2020-11-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ccarvaja |
Date |
2020-11-16 |
Time |
13:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ccarvaja |
Date |
2020-11-06 |
Time |
15:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2020-08-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ahansen |
Date |
2020-08-25 |
Time |
16:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ahansen |
Date |
2020-08-03 |
Time |
11:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ahansen |
Date |
2021-04-12 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ahansen |
Date |
2021-04-20 |
Time |
09:24 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ahansen |
Date |
2021-01-12 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ahansen |
Date |
2021-01-12 |
Time |
16:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-01-12 16:22:46 | THE REVISED PERMIT SUBMITTAL STILL DOES NOT SHOW THE | | | ENTIRE AREA WHERE THE FENCE WAS BUILT. THIS FENCE WAS | | | ALREADY BUILT AND COVERS THE ENTIRE DEPTH (EAST-WEST) | | | OF THE PROPERTY. THE LOCATION DRAWING PROVIDED IN THE | | | PERMIT APPLICATION DOES NOT COINCIDE WITH THE ACTUAL | | | LOCATION OF THE FENCE. A REVISED LOCATION DRAWING THAT | | | ACCURATELY REFLECTS THE ACTUAL LOCATION OF THE FENCE | | | NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED. IN ADDTION, THE REVISED SUBMITTAL | | | NEEDS TO REFLECT THE COST OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE | | | ENTIRE FENCE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2020-08-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ahansen |
Date |
2020-08-25 |
Time |
16:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ahansen |
Date |
2020-08-25 |
Time |
16:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-08-25 16:16:56 | 1. THIS FENCE WAS ALREADY BUILT AND IT COVERS THE | | | ENTIRE DEPTH (EAST-WEST) OF THE PROPERTY. THE LOCATION | | | DRAWING PROVIDED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION DOES NOT | | | COINCIDE WITH THE ACTUAL LOCATION OF THE FENCE. A | | | REVISED LOCATION DRAWING THAT ACCURATELY REFLECTS THE | | | ACTUAL LOCATION OF THE FENCE NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED. | | | | | | 2. SECTION 94-302.C. OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS STATES THAT "IN NONRESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, | | | NO FENCE, HEDGE OR WALL SHALL EXCEED EIGHT FEET IN | | | HEIGHT WITHIN THE REQUIRED SIDE AND REAR SETBACKS. | | | FENCES AND WALL SHALL NOT EXCEED 48 INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITHIN THE REQUIRED FRONT SETBACK.". THE PROPOSED FENCE | | | IS 72 INCHES IN HEIGHT AND THE REQUIRED FRONT SETBACK | | | FOR THIS PROPERTY IS 25 FEET (CS ZONING). AS A RESULT, | | | WITHIN THE FRONT 25 FEET EITHER THE FENCE NEEDS TO BE | | | LOWERED TO NOT EXCEED 48 INCHES IN HEIGHT OR THE | | | APPLICANT HAS TO REQUEST A VARIANCE TO ALLOW A HIGHER | | | FENCE. | | | |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |
|
