Plan Review Details - Permit 20070017
Plan Review Stops For Permit 20070017
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2020-08-11 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 2020-08-11 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 2020-08-11 Time 11:30 Sent To  
Notes
2020-08-11 11:35:30THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 PLEASE CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING AS PROVISO:
  
 THESE PROVISO COMMENTS WILL BE VERIFIED AND CONFIRMED
 AT THE TIME OF FIRE INSPECTION. FAILURE TO FOLLOW THESE
 PROVISO COMMENTS WILL RESULT IN A FAILED FIRE
 INSPECTION.
  
 1) RELOCATED DROPS MAY NOT BE ABLE TO BE ISOLATED;
 HOWEVER, THE FLOOR AREA MAY AND BE TESTED AT 200PSI FOR
 2HRS.
  
 IF NOT OR LESS THAN 20 HEADS:
  
 2) TEST AT WORKING PRESSURE FOR 2 HOURS PER NFPA 13.
  
 3) USE FIRE PUMP TEST PRESSURE FOR WORKING PRESSURE
 CALCULATIONS MINUS 5 PSI PER FLOOR FOR ELEVATION
 PRESSURE LOSS.
  
 PER NFPA 13
  
 3.3.23 SYSTEM WORKING PRESSURE. THE MAXIMUM ANTICIPATED
 STATIC (NONFLOWING) OR FLOWING PRESSURE APPLIED TO
 SPRINKLER SYSTEM COMPONENTS EXCLUSIVE OF SURGE
 PRESSURES AND EXCLUSIVE OF PRESSURE FROM THE FIRE
 DEPARTMENT CONNECTION.
  
 25.2 ACCEPTANCE REQUIREMENTS.
  
 25.2.1* HYDROSTATIC TESTS.
 25.2.1.1 UNLESS PERMITTED BY 25.2.1.2 THROUGH 25.2.1.8,
 ALL PIPING AND ATTACHED APPURTENANCES SUBJECTED TO
 SYSTEM WORKING PRESSURE SHALL BE HYDROSTATICALLY TESTED
 AT 200 PSI (13.8 BAR) AND SHALL MAINTAIN THAT PRESSURE
 WITHOUT LOSS FOR 2 HOURS.
 25.2.1.2 PORTIONS OF SYSTEMS NORMALLY SUBJECTED TO
 SYSTEM WORKING PRESSURES IN EXCESS OF 150 PSI (10.4
 BAR) SHALL BE TESTED AS DESCRIBED IN 25.2.1.1, AT A
 PRESSURE OF 50 PSI (3.5 BAR) IN EXCESS OF SYSTEM
 WORKING PRESSURE.
 25.2.1.3 WHERE COLD WEATHER WILL NOT PERMIT TESTING
 WITH WATER, AN INTERIM AIR TEST SHALL BE PERMITTED TO
 BE CONDUCTED AS DESCRIBED IN 25.2.2. THIS PROVISION
 SHALL NOT REMOVE OR REPLACE THE REQUIREMENT FOR
 CONDUCTING THE HYDROSTATIC TEST AS DESCRIBED IN
 25.2.1.1.
 25.2.1.4 MODIFICATIONS AFFECTING 20 OR FEWER SPRINKLERS
 SHALL NOT REQUIRE TESTING IN EXCESS OF SYSTEM WORKING
 PRESSURE.
 25.2.1.5 WHERE ADDITION OR MODIFICATION IS MADE TO AN
 EXISTING SYSTEM AFFECTING MORE THAN 20 SPRINKLERS, THE
 NEW PORTION SHALL BE ISOLATED AND TESTED AT NOT LESS
 THAN 200 PSI (13.8 BAR) FOR 2 HOURS.
 25.2.1.6 MODIFICATIONS THAT CANNOT BE ISOLATED, SUCH AS
 RELOCATED DROPS, SHALL NOT REQUIRE TESTING IN EXCESS OF
 SYSTEM WORKING PRESSURE.
 25.2.1.7 LOSS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY A DROP IN GAUGE
 PRESSURE OR VISUAL LEAKAGE.
 25.2.1.8* THE TEST PRESSURE SHALL BE READ FROM A GAUGE
 LOCATED AT THE LOW ELEVATION POINT OF THE SYSTEM OR
 PORTION BEING TESTED. THE PRESSURES IN PIPING AT HIGHER
 ELEVATIONS SHALL BE PERMITTED TO BE LESS THAN 200 PSI
 (13.8 BAR) WHEN ACCOUNTING FOR ELEVATION LOSSES.
 SYSTEMS OR PORTIONS OF SYSTEMS THAT CAN BE ISOLATED
 SHALL BE PERMITTED TO BE TESTED SEPARATELY.
  
  
 4) PLEASE ENSURE THAT A MECHANICAL INSPECTION # 603 -
 FIRE SPRINKLER PIPE IS CALLED IN WITH FIRE SPRINKLER
 #310 ? FIRE SPRINKLER HEAD AND # 311 - PRESSURE TEST
 INSPECTIONS.
  
 5) FIRE SPRINKLER PIPE INSPECTION MECHANICAL INSPECTION
 # 603 ALSO REQUIRED.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2020-07-22 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 2020-07-22 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 2020-07-22 Time 11:34 Sent To  
Notes
2020-07-22 13:08:48THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE
 MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1) I CANNOT DETERMINE WHAT, IF ANYTHING, WAS REVISED ON
 THE RESUBMITTAL PLAN SHEET.
  
 THE PREVIOUS COMMENTS REMAIN AND PROVIDED BELOW:
  
 PLEASE ENSURE YOU PROVIDE SEPCIFIC DETAILS TO EACH
 COMMENT AND CLOUD THE AREA ON THE PLAN SHEET.
  
 *******************************************************
 ********
  
 1) THE PROPOSED PROJECT INDICATES THE USE OF FLEX DROP
 PIPING. THE EXISTING SYSTEM APPEARS TO A TYPICAL ARM
 OVER.
  
 THERE IS NO HYDRAULIC CALCULATION SUBMITTED THAT SHOWS
 THAT THE NEW FLEX DROPS WILL BE SUPPORTED BY THE
 EXISTING SYSTEM DESIGN.
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS DETAILS OR PROVIDE A
 STATEMENT THAT THE SYSTEM DESIGN SHALL NOT BE AFFECTED
 BY THE ADDITION OF FLEX HEADS ANF THE ENTIRE SYSTEM
 SHALL FUNCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 13 AND OTHER
 APPLICABLE CODES.
  
  
  
 2) THE SPEC SHEETS NOR PLAN SHEETS INDICATE WHICH TYPE
 AND/OR SIZE OF THE FLEX DROP SPRINKLERS ARE BEING USED.
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE SHEETS THAT MATCH THE NEW HYDRAULIC
 CALCULATIONS.
  
  
  
 3) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET
 REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE
 ABOVE.
  
  
 4) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE
 RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE.
  
  
  
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2020-07-14 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 2020-07-14 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 2020-07-14 Time 12:02 Sent To  
Notes
2020-07-14 12:09:53THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE
 MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
  
 1) THE PROPOSED PROJECT INDICATES THE USE OF FLEX DROP
 PIPING. THE EXISTING SYSTEM APPEARS TO A TYPICAL ARM
 OVER.
  
 THERE IS NO HYDRAULIC CALCULATION SUBMITTED THAT SHOWS
 THAT THE NEW FLEX DROPS WILL BE SUPPORTED BY THE
 EXISTING SYSTEM DESIGN.
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS DETAILS OR PROVIDE A
 STATEMENT THAT THE SYSTEM DESIGN SHALL NOT BE AFFECTED
 BY THE ADDITION OF FLEX HEADS ANF THE ENTIRE SYSTEM
 SHALL FUNCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 13 AND OTHER
 APPLICABLE CODES.
  
  
  
 2) THE SPEC SHEETS NOR PLAN SHEETS INDICATE WHICH TYPE
 AND/OR SIZE OF THE FLEX DROP SPRINKLERS ARE BEING USED.
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE SHEETS THAT MATCH THE NEW HYDRAULIC
 CALCULATIONS.
  
  
 3) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET
 REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE
 ABOVE.
  
  
 4) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE
 RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE.
  
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2020-08-11 Cont ID  
Sent By cpuell Date 2020-08-11 Time 12:30 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cpuell Date 2020-08-07 Time 15:17 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2020-07-22 Cont ID  
Sent By ccarvaja Date 2020-07-22 Time 17:30 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ccarvaja Date 2020-07-20 Time 14:33 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2020-07-20 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2020-07-20 Time 09:27 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2020-07-13 Time 13:58 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved