| Plan Review Stops For Permit 20060037 |
| Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-07-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cpuell |
Date |
2020-07-01 |
Time |
09:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cpuell |
Date |
2020-07-01 |
Time |
09:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-07-01 09:14:50 | UNITS A AND B CHANGED TO A=3416 AND B=3414 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2020-06-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cpuell |
Date |
2020-06-10 |
Time |
15:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cpuell |
Date |
2020-06-10 |
Time |
15:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-06-10 15:36:22 | I HAVE BEEN UNABLE TO FIND IN EITHER THE COUNTY?S OR | | | CITY?S DATABASES AND ADDRESS DESIGNATION AS A & B. IS | | | THIS SOMETHING RECENT? AS LETTER DESIGNATIONS ARE NO | | | LONGER ALLOWED IN THE CITY, THE SECOND SUITE WILL NEED | | | TO BE GIVEN IT?S OWN ADDRESS. PLEASE CONTACT ME SO THAT | | | WE CAN SEE WHAT THE DESIGNATION CAN BE. PLEASE EMAIL | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2020-06-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cpuell |
Date |
2020-06-01 |
Time |
16:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cpuell |
Date |
2020-06-01 |
Time |
16:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-06-01 16:52:40 | PLEASE PROVIDE A SITE PLAN SHOWING THE SEPARATION OF | | | THE DIFFERENT UNITS, PLEAQSE INDICATE WHERE THE | | | ENTRANCES ARE FOR THE UNITS. PLEASE EMAIL THIS | | | INFORMATION TO [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ASBESTOS |
CONFIRM RPT SENT TO PBC HEALTH |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2020-06-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2020-06-17 |
Time |
09:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2020-06-17 |
Time |
09:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-06-17 09:41:18 | NO DEMO |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-07-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2020-07-27 |
Time |
15:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2020-07-27 |
Time |
15:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2020-06-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2020-06-17 |
Time |
09:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2020-06-17 |
Time |
09:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-06-17 09:34:49 | BUILD OUT | | | REVIEWED BY ROGER MCPHERSON | | | 561-805-6716 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | CORRECTIONS NEEDED - FBC WPB AMENDMENTS 107 | | | 1) PLEASE SHOW THE EXISTING OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION | | | PER FBC CHAPTER 3 | | | 2) PLEASE SHOW THE ADJACENT OCCUPANCY USE PER FBC | | | CHAPTER 3 | | | 3) DRAWINGS NEED TO BE DIGITALLY/ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED | | | AND SEALED TO BE USED IN ELECTRONIC PLAN REVIEW. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-07-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleahy |
Date |
2020-07-29 |
Time |
12:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleahy |
Date |
2020-07-29 |
Time |
12:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-06-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleahy |
Date |
2020-06-18 |
Time |
16:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleahy |
Date |
2020-06-18 |
Time |
16:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-07-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2020-07-17 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2020-07-17 |
Time |
10:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-07-17 10:22:42 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | PLEASE CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING AS PROVISO: | | | | | | THESE PROVISO COMMENTS WILL BE VERIFIED AND CONFIRMED | | | AT THE TIME OF FIRE INSPECTION. FAILURE TO FOLLOW THESE | | | PROVISO COMMENTS WILL RESULT IN A FAILED FIRE | | | INSPECTION. | | | | | | | | | 1) THERE ARE EXIT DOORS INDICATED, HOWEVER, THERE ARE | | | NO LOCKS NOR HARDWARE INDICATED. | | | | | | PER NFPA 101, CH 7 MEANS OF EGRESS | | | | | | 7.2 MEANS OF EGRESS COMPONENTS. | | | 7.2.1 DOOR OPENINGS. | | | 7.2.1.1 GENERAL. | | | 7.2.1.1.1 A DOOR ASSEMBLY IN A MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL | | | CONFORM TO | | | THE GENERAL REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 7.1 AND TO THE | | | SPECIAL | | | REQUIREMENTS OF 7.2.1. | | | | | | 7.2.1.5 LOCKS, LATCHES, AND ALARM DEVICES. | | | 7.2.1.5.1 DOOR LEAVES SHALL BE ARRANGED TO BE OPENED | | | READILY FROM | | | THE EGRESS SIDE WHENEVER THE BUILDING IS OCCUPIED. | | | 7.2.1.5.2* THE REQUIREMENT OF 7.2.1.5.1 SHALL NOT APPLY | | | TO DOOR | | | LEAVES OF LISTED FIRE DOOR ASSEMBLIES AFTER EXPOSURE TO | | | ELEVATED | | | TEMPERATURE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LISTING, BASED ON | | | LABORATORY | | | FIRE TEST PROCEDURES. | | | 7.2.1.5.3 LOCKS, IF PROVIDED, SHALL NOT REQUIRE THE USE | | | OF A KEY, A | | | TOOL, OR SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE OR EFFORT FOR OPERATION FROM | | | THE EGRESS | | | SIDE. | | | 7.2.1.5.4 THE REQUIREMENTS OF 7.2.1.5.1 AND 7.2.1.5.3 | | | SHALL NOT | | | APPLY WHERE OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN CHAPTERS 18 THROUGH | | | 23. | | | 7.2.1.5.5 KEY-OPERATED LOCKS. | | | 7.2.1.5.5.1* EXTERIOR DOOR ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE | | | PERMITTED TO HAVE | | | KEY-OPERATED LOCKS FROM THE EGRESS SIDE, PROVIDED THAT | | | ALL OF THE | | | FOLLOWING CRITERIA ARE MET: | | | (1) THIS ALTERNATIVE IS PERMITTED IN CHAPTERS 11 | | | THROUGH 43 FOR | | | THE SPECIFIC OCCUPANCY. | | | (2) A READILY VISIBLE, DURABLE SIGN IN LETTERS NOT LESS | | | THAN 1 IN. | | | (25 MM) HIGH ON A CONTRASTING BACKGROUND THAT READS AS | | | FOLLOWS IS LOCATED ON OR ADJACENT TO THE DOOR LEAF: | | | THIS | | | DOOR TO REMAIN UNLOCKED WHEN THE | | | BUILDING IS OCCUPIED. | | | (3) THE LOCKING DEVICE IS OF A TYPE THAT IS READILY | | | DISTINGUISHABLE | | | AS LOCKED. | | | (4) A KEY IS IMMEDIATELY AVAILABLE TO ANY OCCUPANT | | | INSIDE THE | | | BUILDING WHEN IT IS LOCKED. | | | | | | 7.2.1.5.10* A LATCH OR OTHER FASTENING DEVICE ON A DOOR | | | LEAF SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED WITH A RELEASING DEVICE THAT HAS AN OBVIOUS | | | METHOD OF | | | OPERATION AND THAT IS READILY OPERATED UNDER ALL | | | LIGHTING CONDITIONS. | | | 7.2.1.5.10.1 THE RELEASING MECHANISM FOR ANY LATCH | | | SHALL BE | | | LOCATED AS FOLLOWS: | | | (1) NOT LESS THAN 34 IN. (865 MM) ABOVE THE FINISHED | | | FLOOR FOR | | | OTHER THAN EXISTING INSTALLATIONS | | | (2) NOT MORE THAN 48 IN. (1220 MM) ABOVE THE FINISHED | | | FLOOR | | | 7.2.1.5.10.2 THE RELEASING MECHANISM SHALL OPEN THE | | | DOOR LEAF | | | WITH NOT MORE THAN ONE RELEASING OPERATION, UNLESS | | | OTHERWISE | | | SPECIFIED IN 7.2.1.5.10.3, 7.2.1.5.10.4, OR | | | 7.2.1.5.10.6. | | | | | | PLEASSE ENSURE COMPLIANCE AS THE FIRE INSPECTOR WILL | | | VERIFY AND CONFIRM INSTALLATION. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-06-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2020-06-04 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2020-06-03 |
Time |
14:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-06-04 10:51:38 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | PLEASE CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING AS PROVISO: | | | | | | THESE PROVISO COMMENTS WILL BE VERIFIED AND CONFIRMED | | | AT THE TIME OF FIRE INSPECTION. FAILURE TO FOLLOW THESE | | | PROVISO COMMENTS WILL RESULT IN A FAILED FIRE | | | INSPECTION. | | | | | | | | | 1) THERE ARE EXIT DOORS INDICATED, HOWEVER, THERE ARE | | | NO LOCKS NOR HARDWARE INDICATED. | | | | | | PER NFPA 101, CH 7 MEANS OF EGRESS | | | | | | 7.2 MEANS OF EGRESS COMPONENTS. | | | 7.2.1 DOOR OPENINGS. | | | 7.2.1.1 GENERAL. | | | 7.2.1.1.1 A DOOR ASSEMBLY IN A MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL | | | CONFORM TO | | | THE GENERAL REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 7.1 AND TO THE | | | SPECIAL | | | REQUIREMENTS OF 7.2.1. | | | | | | 7.2.1.5 LOCKS, LATCHES, AND ALARM DEVICES. | | | 7.2.1.5.1 DOOR LEAVES SHALL BE ARRANGED TO BE OPENED | | | READILY FROM | | | THE EGRESS SIDE WHENEVER THE BUILDING IS OCCUPIED. | | | 7.2.1.5.2* THE REQUIREMENT OF 7.2.1.5.1 SHALL NOT APPLY | | | TO DOOR | | | LEAVES OF LISTED FIRE DOOR ASSEMBLIES AFTER EXPOSURE TO | | | ELEVATED | | | TEMPERATURE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LISTING, BASED ON | | | LABORATORY | | | FIRE TEST PROCEDURES. | | | 7.2.1.5.3 LOCKS, IF PROVIDED, SHALL NOT REQUIRE THE USE | | | OF A KEY, A | | | TOOL, OR SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE OR EFFORT FOR OPERATION FROM | | | THE EGRESS | | | SIDE. | | | 7.2.1.5.4 THE REQUIREMENTS OF 7.2.1.5.1 AND 7.2.1.5.3 | | | SHALL NOT | | | APPLY WHERE OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN CHAPTERS 18 THROUGH | | | 23. | | | 7.2.1.5.5 KEY-OPERATED LOCKS. | | | 7.2.1.5.5.1* EXTERIOR DOOR ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE | | | PERMITTED TO HAVE | | | KEY-OPERATED LOCKS FROM THE EGRESS SIDE, PROVIDED THAT | | | ALL OF THE | | | FOLLOWING CRITERIA ARE MET: | | | (1) THIS ALTERNATIVE IS PERMITTED IN CHAPTERS 11 | | | THROUGH 43 FOR | | | THE SPECIFIC OCCUPANCY. | | | (2) A READILY VISIBLE, DURABLE SIGN IN LETTERS NOT LESS | | | THAN 1 IN. | | | (25 MM) HIGH ON A CONTRASTING BACKGROUND THAT READS AS | | | FOLLOWS IS LOCATED ON OR ADJACENT TO THE DOOR LEAF: | | | THIS | | | DOOR TO REMAIN UNLOCKED WHEN THE | | | BUILDING IS OCCUPIED. | | | (3) THE LOCKING DEVICE IS OF A TYPE THAT IS READILY | | | DISTINGUISHABLE | | | AS LOCKED. | | | (4) A KEY IS IMMEDIATELY AVAILABLE TO ANY OCCUPANT | | | INSIDE THE | | | BUILDING WHEN IT IS LOCKED. | | | | | | 7.2.1.5.10* A LATCH OR OTHER FASTENING DEVICE ON A DOOR | | | LEAF SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED WITH A RELEASING DEVICE THAT HAS AN OBVIOUS | | | METHOD OF | | | OPERATION AND THAT IS READILY OPERATED UNDER ALL | | | LIGHTING CONDITIONS. | | | 7.2.1.5.10.1 THE RELEASING MECHANISM FOR ANY LATCH | | | SHALL BE | | | LOCATED AS FOLLOWS: | | | (1) NOT LESS THAN 34 IN. (865 MM) ABOVE THE FINISHED | | | FLOOR FOR | | | OTHER THAN EXISTING INSTALLATIONS | | | (2) NOT MORE THAN 48 IN. (1220 MM) ABOVE THE FINISHED | | | FLOOR | | | 7.2.1.5.10.2 THE RELEASING MECHANISM SHALL OPEN THE | | | DOOR LEAF | | | WITH NOT MORE THAN ONE RELEASING OPERATION, UNLESS | | | OTHERWISE | | | SPECIFIED IN 7.2.1.5.10.3, 7.2.1.5.10.4, OR | | | 7.2.1.5.10.6. | | | | | | PLEASSE ENSURE COMPLIANCE AS THE FIRE INSPECTOR WILL | | | VERIFY AND CONFIRM INSTALLATION. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2020-07-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleahy |
Date |
2020-07-29 |
Time |
12:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleahy |
Date |
2020-07-15 |
Time |
10:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2020-07-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2020-07-13 |
Time |
15:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2020-07-07 |
Time |
13:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2020-06-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jleahy |
Date |
2020-06-18 |
Time |
16:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jleahy |
Date |
2020-06-02 |
Time |
08:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-08-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2020-08-04 |
Time |
15:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2020-07-30 |
Time |
15:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-08-04 15:08:10 | NO FEES DUE PER IMPACT FEE OFFICE. LEM | | 2020-07-30 15:18:59 | 7/30/20 NOTIFIED IMPACT FEE OFFICE FOR REVIEW. LEM |
|
|
| Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2020-07-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2020-07-27 |
Time |
15:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2020-07-27 |
Time |
15:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-07-27 15:28:11 | PLANS WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE PBC IMPACT FEE OFFICE | | | DIGITALLY VIA PROJECTDOX UPON NOTIFICATION BY THIS | | | OFFICE. NOTIFICATION MAY OCCUR WHEN PLANS ARE NEAREST | | | FINAL FORM. YOU MAY COORDINATE WITH THE IMPACT FEE | | | OFFICE AT (561) 233-5025 OR SIMPLY UPLOAD THE MUNICIPAL | | | IMPACT FEE QUESTIONNAIRE FORM TO YOUR PROJECT AND NAME | | | THE FILE MUNICIPAL IMPACT FEE QUESTIONNAIRE. THE FORM | | | CAN BE FOUND AT: HTTP://DISCOVER.PBCGOV.ORG/PZB/ADMINIS | | | TRATION/PDF/IMPACTFEES/FORMS/QUESTIONNAIRE.PDF | | | | | | UPON APPROVAL AND FEE PAYMENT, PLEASE UPLOAD THE | | | RECEIPT TO YOUR PROJECT OR EMAIL IT TO | | | [email protected] . | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-07-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2020-07-16 |
Time |
15:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2020-07-16 |
Time |
15:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2020-07-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2020-07-13 |
Time |
15:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2020-07-13 |
Time |
15:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-07-13 15:20:42 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | 1. THIS IS A PROJECTDOX PROJECT (DIGITAL). SOMEONE | | | DROPPED OFF PAPER PLANS FOR REVIEW. PLEASE SUBMIT VIA | | | PROJECTDOX. IF YOU NEED THE INSTRUCTIONS SENT TO YOU | | | AGAIN, EMAIL [email protected]. | | | | | | PLEASE HAVE ARCHITECT CONTACT ME; THE SIGNATURE REVIEW | | | AT THE END OF THE REVIEW PROCESS CAN BE AVOIDED IF HE | | | CAN EITHER UPLOAD DIGITALLY SIGNED DOCUMENTS OR CAN | | | SEND ME A DIGITALLY SIGNED PDF AFTER ALL REVIEWS HAVE | | | PASSED. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2020-06-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2020-06-17 |
Time |
09:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2020-06-17 |
Time |
09:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-06-17 09:37:20 | SEE BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
|
|
