Plan Review Details - Permit 20020121
Plan Review Stops For Permit 20020121
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2020-09-26 Cont ID  
Sent By cthroop Date 2020-09-26 Time 06:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cthroop Date 2020-09-26 Time 06:42 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2020-07-08 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2020-07-08 Time 14:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date 2020-07-08 Time 14:02 Sent To  
Notes
2020-07-08 14:28:01WILL STAMP THE ENGINEERING SHEET ONCE THE SIGNATURE CAN
 BE VERIFIED. J. WITMER
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2020-02-25 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2020-02-25 Time 14:49 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date 2020-02-25 Time 14:19 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2020-07-08 Cont ID  
Sent By jleahy Date 2020-07-08 Time 16:18 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jleahy Date 2020-07-08 Time 16:18 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2020-03-16 Cont ID  
Sent By jleahy Date 2020-03-16 Time 15:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jleahy Date 2020-03-16 Time 15:10 Sent To Z
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2020-10-06 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2020-10-06 Time 07:14 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2020-09-21 Time 11:33 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2020-07-23 Cont ID  
Sent By lmarchan Date 2020-07-23 Time 08:01 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmarchan Date 2020-07-01 Time 14:52 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2020-03-18 Cont ID  
Sent By lmarchan Date 2020-03-18 Time 16:12 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmarchan Date 2020-02-05 Time 16:10 Sent To  
Notes
2020-02-14 14:49:04ROUTED TO BLDG MISC 2 - ZONING TO GO LAST
2020-02-06 16:11:05ROUTED TO ZONING INBOX
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2020-09-30 Cont ID  
Sent By cthroop Date 2020-09-30 Time 06:23 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cthroop Date 2020-09-30 Time 06:17 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2020-09-26 Cont ID  
Sent By cthroop Date 2020-09-26 Time 06:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cthroop Date 2020-09-26 Time 06:42 Sent To  
Notes
2020-09-26 06:48:59PLAN REVIEW / SIGNATURES
  
 CHRISTOPHER S. THROOP, C.B.O.
 PLANS EXAMINER BUILDING - PX3169
 PLANS EXAMINER 1&2 FAMILY - SFP306
 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DIVISION
 TEL: 561-805-6726
 FAX: 561-805-6676
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
 CODES IN EFFECT:
 2017 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 6TH EDITION W/2017 WEST
 PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE,
 CHAPTER 1 ADMINISTRATION
  
 2ND REVIEW
  
 RESULTS: DENIED
 ADDRESS THE ATTACHED COMMENTS AND RE-SUBMIT
  
 DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER AND
 SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED,
 DATED ORIGINALS. A SCAN OF A WET / DIGITAL SIGNATURE IS
 NOT CONSIDERED A DIGITAL SIGNATURE.
  
 EITHER UPLOAD A DIGITALLY SIGNED DOCUMENT OR DROP OFF
 (OR MAIL) ONE PAPER ORIGINAL WITH A WET SEAL AND
 SIGNATURE TO:
  
 BUILDING DIVISION, FIRST FLOOR
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 401 CLEMATIS ST
 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401
  
  
Review Stop SIGNATURE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2020-07-08 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2020-07-08 Time 14:30 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-07-08 14:26:35THE H & M ENGINEERING SHEET THAT HAS THE CITY PLACE
 STAMP OF APPROVAL APARTENTLY WAS DOWN LOADED, PRINTED
 TO OBTAIN THE CITY PLACE STAMP OF APPROVAL. ONCE A
 DIGITAL DOCUMENT IS DOWNLOADED THEN UPLOADED AGAIN THE
 ENGINEERING SHEET CAN NOT VERIFY THE SIGNATURE ANYMORE.
  
 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 61G15-23.005 (3)(C) A
 SCANNED, FACSIMILE, DIGITALLY CREATED OR COPIED IMAGE
 OF THE LICENSEE?S SIGNATURE SHALL NOT BE USED ON
 DIGITALLY SIGNED AND SEALED ENGINEERING PLANS,
 SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS.
  
 61G15-23.005 PROCEDURES FOR SIGNING AND SEALING
 ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMITTED PLANS (DIGITAL SIGNATURES),
 SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS.
  
 JAMES A. WITMER BN, PX, SFP, CBO
 SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 BUILDING DIVISION / DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 401 CLEMATIS ST. WEST PALM BEACH. FL 33402
 TEL: 561-805-6717
 FAX: 561-805-6676
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2020-10-05 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2020-10-05 Time 17:16 Rev Time 0.25
Received By eschneid Date 2020-10-05 Time 17:03 Sent To  
Notes
2020-10-05 17:16:28THE SIGN IS AN ARCADE IDENTIFY SIGN TYPE 1D AND IS
 DESIGNATED H&M SIGN #3.
  
 SIGN SF
  
 PERMITTED: 140 SF
 SIGN #1 (PERMIT 20020115): 14.56 SF
 SIGN #2 (PERMIT 20020119): 14.56 SF
 SIGN #3 (PERMIT 20020121): 14.56 SF
  
  
 TOTAL PROPOSED: 43.68 SF
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2020-07-22 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2020-07-22 Time 11:46 Rev Time 0.25
Received By eschneid Date 2020-07-22 Time 11:46 Sent To  
Notes
2020-07-22 11:47:07FAILED
  
 PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS.
  
 THE SIGN IS AN ARCADE IDENTIFY SIGN TYPE 1D AND IS
 DESIGNATED H&M SIGN #3.
  
 1) THE PROPOSED SIGN DESIGN DOES NOT MATCH THE CURRENT
 ARCADE IDENTITY SIGN OPTION 2A SUSPENDED LETTERS ON A
 RACEWAY THAT IS DEPICTED IN THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT
 SIGN CRITERIA. NOTE: THE CITY IS PROCESSING AN
 AMENDMENT TO THE SIGN CRITERIA THAT WOULD PERMIT THIS
 SIGN STYLE; HOWEVER, UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT THE CHANGE IS
 APPROVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION (PUBLIC HEARING IN
 SEPTEMBER) ZONING CANNOT REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE
 NEW REQUIREMENTS.
  
 2) ALL 6 EXISTING H&M WALL MOUNTED SIGNS MUST BE
 REMOVED.
  
 SIGN SF
  
 PERMITTED: 140 SF
 SIGN #1 (PERMIT 20020115): 4.74 SF
 SIGN #2 (PERMIT 20020119): 4.74 SF
 SIGN #2 (PERMIT 20020121): 4.74 SF
  
 TOTAL PROPOSED: 14.22 SF
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2020-03-18 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2020-03-18 Time 15:20 Rev Time 0.50
Received By eschneid Date 2020-03-18 Time 15:07 Sent To PC
Notes
2020-03-18 15:22:03FAILED
  
 PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS.
  
 1) THIS SIGN IS BEING CLASSIFIED AS SIGN #3 FOR H&M.
 NOTE: THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA ONLY
 PERMIT ONE ARCADE IDENTITY SIGN PER FRONTAGE, SO THIS
 SIGN IS NOT PERMITTED UNDER THE CURRENT REGULATIONS.
  
 2) THE PROPOSED SIGN DOES NOT MATCH ONE OF THE ARCADE
 IDENTITY SIGN TYPES INCLUDED IN THE ROSEMARY SQUARE
 TENANT SIGN CRITERIA. THE PERMISSIBLE MOUNTING OPTIONS
 THAT ARE SIMILAR TO THE PROPOSED SIGN ARE SUSPENDED
 LETTERS ON A RACEWAY (WHICH WOULD BE THE FRONT OF THE
 SUPPORT FRAME, WITH NO BACK PANEL) OR TENANT NAME
 MOUNTED TO A SUSPENDED PANEL (WHICH WOULD REQUIRE THE
 SUPPORT FRAME TO CONNECT TO THE TOP OF THE BACK PANEL).
  
 3) H&M CURRENTLY HAS 6 WALL MOUNTED SIGNS. PROVIDE THE
 DEMOLITION PERMIT FOR THESE 6 SIGNS AS THEY ARE NOT
 PERMITTED TO REMAIN ONCE THE SIGN(S) COMPLYING WITH THE
 NEW ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA ARE INSTALLED.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS DEAL WITH SPECIFIC DESIGN
 ELEMENTS; HOWEVER THEY MAY CHANGE BASED ON ADDRESSING
 COMMENT #2 ABOVE.
  
 4) THE EAST ELEVATION SHEET LISTS THE DISTANCE OF THE
 SIGN ABOVE GRADE AS 10 FEET; HOWEVER THE SIGN DETAILS
 LIST THE SIGNS AS BEING 9.5 FEET ABOVE GRADE. ALL PLANS
 NEED TO SHOW THE SAME CONDITIONS. NOTE: 9 FEET IS THE
 MINIMUM REQUIRED CLEARANCE, SO EITHER HEIGHT MEETS THE
 ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA.
  
 5) THE ELEVATION TYPICAL SHEET NEEDS TO SHOW THE
 OPENING IN WHICH THE PROPOSED SIGN IS TO BE LOCATED,
 NOT A GENERIC OPENING OR THE OPENING FOR A DIFFERENT
 SIGN (IN THIS CASE THE ONE UNDER PERMIT 20020115). THE
 OPENING WIDTH NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED SO STAFF CAN VERIFY
 THAT THE SIGN MEETS THE MAXIMUM WIDTH REQUIREMENT.
 ADDITIONALLY, THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA
 LIMIT THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF ARCADE SIGNS AT 12 FEET
 FROM THE FINISHED FLOOR. THE "ELEVATION TYPICAL" SHEET
 NEEDS TO INCLUDE THE DIMENSION TO THE TOP OF THE BACK
 PLATE TO VERIFY THAT IT DOES NOT EXCEED THE 12 FOOT
 HEIGHT LIMIT.
  
 6) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA REQUIRE THE
 BACK PLATE TO BE COUNTED WITHIN THE SIGN SQUARE
 FOOTAGE. BASED ON THE DIMENSIONS PROVIDED, THE SIGN IS
 4.74 SF IN AREA.
  
 7) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA REQUIRE
 THAT THE SIGN COPY AREA SHALL MAINTAIN A MARGIN AT
 LEAST SIX INCHES FROM ANY EDGE OF THE PERCEIVED SIGN
 AREA. THE FRAME ELEMENTS THAT HANG THE SIGN TO THE ARCH
 ARE THE PERCEIVED SIGN AREA. PROVIDE VERIFICATION
 DIMENSIONS TO SHOW THAT THE FURTHEST PROJECTION OF THE
 SIGN (WHICH INCLUDES THE BACK PLATE) IS A MINIMUM OF 6
 INCHES FROM THE SUPPORT TUBES.
  
 8) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA REQUIRE
 THAT THE LOCATION OF ALL OPENINGS FOR CONDUIT SLEEVES
 AND SUPPORT IN SIGN PANELS AND BUILDING WALLS BE
 INDICATED BY THE SIGN CONTRACTOR IN THE SHOP DRAWINGS.
 STAFF NEEDS TO SEE THESE AS PART OF THE PERMIT TO
 VERIFY THAT THE SIGN'S ELECTRICAL CONNECTIONS ARE NOT
 VISIBLE TO THE PUBLIC.
  
 SIGN SF
  
 PERMITTED: 140 SF
 SIGN #1 (PERMIT 20020115): 4.74 SF
 SIGN #2 (PERMIT 20020119): 4.74 SF (CURRENTLY NOT
 PERMITTED)
 SIGN #2 (PERMIT 20020121): 4.74 SF (CURRENTLY NOT
 PERMITTED)
  
 TOTAL PROPOSED: 14.22 SF
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved