Plan Review Stops For Permit 20020113 |
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-04-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2020-04-23 |
Time |
07:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2020-04-23 |
Time |
07:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2020-04-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jbrooks |
Date |
2020-04-02 |
Time |
08:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jbrooks |
Date |
2020-04-02 |
Time |
08:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2020-04-02 08:47:01 | JONATHAN BROOKS JR. | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | WORK HOURS TUESDAY & THURSDAY 7:00 AM TO 3:00 PM | | (561) 805-6716 ALTERNATE: CONTACT SAMANTHA HILL (561) | | 805-6724 | | [email protected] | | | | 1ST REVIEW: FBC 2017 6TH EDITION | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 6TH EDITION (2017) | | FBC B = FBC BUILDING | | FBC R = FBC RESIDENTIAL | | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING | | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY | | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION | | WPB A = CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENMENTS TO THE FBC | | RESULTS: DENIED | | ADDRESS THE ATTACHED COMMENTS AND RE-SUBMIT | | IF THE RESUBMITTAL IS NOT PREPARED BY A DESIGN | | PROFESSIONAL (ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER), AND THE PAGES ARE | | 11X17 OR SMALLER, YOU MAY RESUBMIT ALONG WITH A | | COMPLETED RESUBMITTAL FORM, VIA EMAIL TO | | [email protected]. THE EMAIL SHOULD INCLUDE THE PERMIT | | NUMBER AND "RESUBMITTAL" IN THE SUBJECT LINE. THE | | RESUBMITTAL FORM CAN BE FOUND AT THIS WEBSITE: | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/DEVELOPMENT-SERVICES/FORMS/B | | UILDING-PERMIT-FORMS | | | | 1. PLEASE ADDRESS ZONING COMMENTS. | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-02-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2020-02-25 |
Time |
13:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2020-02-25 |
Time |
13:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-04-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jpearson |
Date |
2020-04-22 |
Time |
08:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jpearson |
Date |
2020-04-22 |
Time |
08:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2020-04-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jbrooks |
Date |
2020-04-02 |
Time |
08:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jbrooks |
Date |
2020-04-02 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-03-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jleahy |
Date |
2020-03-10 |
Time |
14:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jleahy |
Date |
2020-03-10 |
Time |
14:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2020-05-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2020-05-11 |
Time |
09:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2020-04-17 |
Time |
14:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2020-04-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
ccarvaja |
Date |
2020-04-02 |
Time |
18:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
ccarvaja |
Date |
2020-03-12 |
Time |
11:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2020-04-01 11:13:56 | ROUTED TO BLDG MISC 2 | 2020-03-13 11:09:10 | RESUB ROUTED TO ZONING INBOX |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2020-03-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jleahy |
Date |
2020-03-10 |
Time |
14:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jleahy |
Date |
2020-02-05 |
Time |
16:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2020-02-14 14:49:46 | ROUTED TO BLDG MISC 2 | 2020-02-06 16:14:06 | ROUTED TO ZONING INBOX |
|
|
Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-04-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2020-04-21 |
Time |
16:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2020-04-21 |
Time |
16:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2020-04-21 16:06:00 | CONVERTED TO DIGITAL. | | DRAWINGS/CALCULATIONS WITH ENGINEER'S ORIGINAL | | SEAL/SIGNATURE ON CITY'S FILE. JG | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-05-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2020-05-11 |
Time |
09:20 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2020-05-11 |
Time |
08:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2020-05-11 09:48:29 | PERMITTED: 62 SF | | PROPOSED: 14.1 SF | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2020-04-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2020-04-01 |
Time |
10:08 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2020-03-31 |
Time |
17:04 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2020-04-01 10:08:47 | FAILED | | | | 1) UPDATED COMMENT: THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN | | CRITERIA STOREFRONT TYPE 2 ONLY PERMITS ONE SIGN FOR | | THE BUSINESS (THE ARCADE IDENTITY SIGN PROPOSED BY THIS | | PERMIT IS THE ONE SIGN). THANK YOU FOR SPECIFICALLY | | STATING THAT THE EXISTING SIGN ON THE EXTERIOR WALKWAY | | RAILING WILL BE REMOVED AS PART OF THE NEW SIGN | | INSTALLATION; HOWEVER, NO VERIFICATION WAS PROVIDED | | THAT THE EXISTING WALL SIGN ON THE FACADE OF THE | | BUILDING AND THE. NOTE: WINDOW GRAPHICS AND PEDESTRIAN | | BLADE SIGNS ARE PERMITTED AS ALTERNATIVES TO THE | | EXISTING WALL SIGN AND MAY BE INCLUDED ON THIS PERMIT | | APPLICATION PROVIDED THAT ALL INFORMATION TO INCLUDE | | THE INCREASE IN PERMIT VALUE IS INCLUDED. | | | | 2) NEW COMMENT: THE REVISED PLANS SHOW THE LOWEST POINT | | OF THE SIGN AT 8 FEET 10 INCHES. THE ROSEMARY SQUARE | | TENANT SIGN CRITERIA REQUIRE A MINIMUM CLEARANCE FROM | | THE FINISHED FLOOR OF 9 FEET FOR ARCADE IDENTITY SIGNS. | | PLEASE REMEMBER, THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT FOR AN ARCADE | | IDENTITY SIGN IS 12 FEET. NOTE: THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL | | MET THESE STANDARDS. | | | | PERMITTED: 68 SF | | PROPOSED: 14.1 SF | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2020-02-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2020-02-14 |
Time |
13:43 |
Rev Time |
0.75 |
Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2020-02-14 |
Time |
13:43 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2020-02-14 13:44:56 | FAILED | | | | 1) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA STOREFRONT | | TYPE 2 REQUIRES THAT THE ARCADE IDENTITY SIGN IS | | CENTERED ON THE FACADE IN FRONT OF THE TENANT'S ENTRY. | | PLEASE PROVIDE A BETTER GRAPHIC (FLOOR PLAN) SHOWING | | THE SIGN LOCATION AND THE ENTRY. USING GOOGLE STREET | | VIEW, IT APPEARS THAT THE SIGN IS OFF-SET FROM THE | | ENTRY, WHICH APPEARS TO BE BETWEEN THE COLUMNS TO THE | | LEFT OF THE PROPOSED SIGN. | | | | 2) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA STOREFRONT | | TYPE 2 ONLY PERMITS ONE SIGN FOR THE BUSINESS (THE | | ARCADE IDENTITY SIGN PROPOSED BY THIS PERMIT IS THE ONE | | SIGN). PLEASE PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE EXISTING | | WALL SIGN ON THE FACADE OF THE BUILDING AND THE | | EXISTING SIGN ON THE EXTERIOR WALKWAY RAILING WILL BE | | REMOVED AS PART OF THE NEW SIGN INSTALLATION. NOTE: | | WINDOW GRAPHICS AND PEDESTRIAN BLADE SIGNS ARE | | PERMITTED AS ALTERNATIVES TO THE EXISTING WALL SIGN AND | | MAY BE INCLUDED ON THIS PERMIT APPLICATION PROVIDED | | THAT ALL INFORMATION TO INCLUDE THE INCREASE IN PERMIT | | VALUE IS INCLUDED. | | | | 3) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA REQUIRES | | THAT ALL CONDUIT, CROSSOVERS, WIRING NECESSARY FOR THE | | SIGN?S ELECTRICAL CONNECTION TO BE CONCEALED AND NOT | | VISIBLE TO THE PUBLIC. THE WIRING FROM THE TUBE | | STRINGERS TO THE LETTERS NEEDS TO BE CONCEALED AND NOT | | VISIBLE TO THE PUBLIC. ADDITIONALLY, YOU MUST PROVIDE | | DETAILS TO VERIFY THAT THE ELECTRICAL PRIMARY TO THE | | SIGN THAT IS PROPOSED ON THE BACK OF THE COLUMN MEETS | | THIS STANDARD. NOTE: EXPOSED CONDUIT ATTACHED TO THE | | COLUMN DOES NOT MATCH THIS REQUIREMENT. | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | [email protected] |
|
|