Plan Review Stops For Permit 19121125 |
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-09-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2020-09-17 |
Time |
09:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2020-09-17 |
Time |
09:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-07-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2020-07-09 |
Time |
15:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2020-07-09 |
Time |
15:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-01-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2020-01-28 |
Time |
15:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2020-01-28 |
Time |
15:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-09-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jleahy |
Date |
2020-09-17 |
Time |
11:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jleahy |
Date |
2020-09-17 |
Time |
11:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-07-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jleahy |
Date |
2020-07-15 |
Time |
16:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jleahy |
Date |
2020-07-15 |
Time |
16:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2020-01-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jpearson |
Date |
2020-01-26 |
Time |
12:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jpearson |
Date |
2020-01-26 |
Time |
12:49 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2020-01-26 12:45:52 | CODES IN EFFECT: | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2017 6TH EDITION | | WPB FBC = WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC 2017 | | 6TH ED, CHAPTER 1. | | FBC EC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION 2017 | | 6TH EDITION | | FBC EX = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE EXISTING BUILDING 2017 | | 6TH EDITION | | FBC RE = FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE 2017 6TH EDITION | | NEC = NFPA 70 2014 EDITION, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE | | FS = FLORIDA STATUTES | | FAC = FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | | ELECTRICAL REVIEW STATUS: DENIED, SEE COMMENTS BELOW. | | | | 1. VALUE FOR WORK STATED ON PERMIT APPLICATION APPEARS | | LOW. PROVIDE COPY OF SIGNED CONTRACT WITH SCOPE AND | | VALUE OF WORK, TO INCLUDE ALL MATERIALS AND LABOR. THIS | | IS FOR TOTAL PROJECT, NOT JUST ELECTRICAL. WPB FBC | | 109.3 | | 2. PROVIDE ELECTRICAL PLAN FOR NEW ELECTRIC TO SIGN. | | INCLUDE PANEL SCHEDULE INDICATING ANY NEW OR ALTERED | | CIRCUITS, THE WIRE AND BREAKER SIZE FOR THESE CIRCUITS, | | AND AFCI OR GFCI PROTECTION WHERE APPLICABLE TO COMPLY | | WITH CODE. NEC 210.8, 210.12, 210.19, 210.20, 215.5, | | 408.4; WPB FBC 107.2.1 | | 3. PROVIDE EXTERIOR LIGHTING CONTROLS AS SPECIFIED IN | | THE FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION. FBC EC C405.2.5 | | 4. PROVIDE EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTOR TO SIGN. NEC | | 600.7 | | | | END OF COMMENTS. | | | | PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED | | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. WHEN | | RESUBMITTING, PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH | | ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY RESUBMITTAL FORM. | | ADDITIONALLY, INSERT CORRECTED PAGES INTO THE ORIGINAL | | SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS. | | ONE COPY OF THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS SHOULD | | REMAIN IN PACKAGE AND BE MARKED OLD SHEETS. | | | | SINCERELY, | | | | JOHN PEARSON | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | 561-805-6746 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2020-09-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2020-09-22 |
Time |
17:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2020-09-16 |
Time |
11:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2020-07-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
ccarvaja |
Date |
2020-07-30 |
Time |
18:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
ccarvaja |
Date |
2020-07-01 |
Time |
14:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2020-01-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2020-01-28 |
Time |
15:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2019-12-31 |
Time |
15:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2020-01-02 15:11:29 | ROUTED TO ZONING INBOX |
|
|
Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-09-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2020-09-17 |
Time |
09:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2020-09-17 |
Time |
09:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2020-09-17 09:28:47 | EMERGENCY RULE APPLIED 61G15ER20-4 |
|
|
Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-09-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2020-09-14 |
Time |
15:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2020-09-14 |
Time |
15:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2020-07-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2020-07-09 |
Time |
15:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcphers |
Date |
2020-07-09 |
Time |
15:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2020-07-09 15:23:21 | SIGNED AND SEALED DRAWINGS IN PROJECTDOX NEED TO BE | | DIGITALLY/ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED BY THE ENGINEER OR | | ARCHITECT TO BE USED IN ELECTRONIC PLAN REVIEW. | | DRAWINGS DO NOT SHOW IN "ADOBE READER" AS | | DIGITALLY/ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED. - OR - IF YOUR | | ENGINEER DOES NOT HAVE AN ELECTRONIC OR DIGITAL | | SIGNATURE - PLEASE DROP OFF (CITY HALL DROP BOX) THE | | ORIGINAL SIGNED AND SEALED DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS ALONG | | WITH A "PLAN REVIEW REQUEST FORM" EXPLAINING THE REASON | | FOR SUBMITTING THE DOCUMENT OR DRAWINGS. PLAN REVIEW | | REQUEST FORM CAN BE OBTAINED BY E MAILING [email protected] | | AND ASKING FOR THE FORM. |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2020-09-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2020-09-22 |
Time |
15:22 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2020-09-22 |
Time |
11:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2020-09-22 15:32:00 | PERMITTED: 125 SF | | PROPOSED: 22.34 SF | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2020-07-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2020-07-30 |
Time |
16:43 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2020-07-30 |
Time |
16:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2020-07-30 16:43:41 | FAILED | | | | 1) REPEAT COMMENT: THE EXISTING LA FITNESS SIGN ON THE | | SOUTHERN FACE OF THE BUILDING UTILIZES THE ENTIRE | | SQUARE FOOTAGE PERMITTED FOR THIS FRONTAGE. IS THE | | EXISTING SIGN BEING REMOVED? IF SO, THEN THE COMMENTS | | BELOW APPLY. | | | | 2) UPDATED COMMENT: THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN | | CRITERIA PERMIT A MAXIMUM LETTER HEIGHT OF 18 INCHES | | FOR A FASCIA SIGN UNLESS THE PLANNING DIVISION APPROVES | | WAIVER II (MINOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT). THE | | WAIVER II MAY INCREASE THE SIGN DIMENSION BY UP TO 25 | | PERCENT, SO THE PROPOSED LETTER HEIGHT (INCLUDING THE | | VERTICAL BAR) OF 22.5 INCHES WOULD BE PERMITTED. | | | | 3) REPEAT COMMENT THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN | | CRITERIA REQUIRE THE STUD MOUNTS TO BE SERIES 316 | | STAINLESS STEEL ANCHOR BOLTS. PROVIDE VERIFICATION OF | | THIS REQUIREMENT ON THE PLANS. | | | | 4) THE SIGN IS REQUIRED TO BE CENTERED ON THE TOWER. | | | | PERMITTED: 125 SF | | EXISTING SIGN: VERIFY REMOVAL | | PROPOSED: 22.34 SF | | | | TOTAL SOUTH FRONTAGE: ?? SF | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2020-01-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2020-01-14 |
Time |
15:32 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2020-01-14 |
Time |
15:32 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2020-01-14 15:34:10 | FAILED | | | | 1) THE EXISTING LA FITNESS SIGN ON THE SOUTHERN FACE OF | | THE BUILDING UTILIZES THE ENTIRE SQUARE FOOTAGE | | PERMITTED FOR THIS FRONTAGE. IS THE EXISTING SIGN BEING | | REMOVED? IF SO, THEN THE COMMENTS BELOW APPLY. | | | | 2) THE FULL DIMENSION OF THE SIGN IS NOT PROVIDED ON | | THE PLANS. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ROSEMARY SQUARE | | TENANT SIGN CRITERIA REQUIRES THAT THE SIGN AREA IS | | CALCULATED USING THE MAXIMUM EXTENT OF THE SIGN. | | PROVIDE THE DIMENSION OF THE VERTICAL BAR BETWEEN LA | | AND FITNESS. | | | | 3) THE SIGN SQUARE FOOTAGE ALLOWANCE IS BASED ON THE | | LINEAR FRONTAGE OF THE TENANT SPACE. PROVIDE THE | | FRONTAGE DIMENSION OF THE ENTIRE LA FITNESS SPACE. | | | | 4) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA PERMIT A | | MAXIMUM LETTER HEIGHT OF 18 INCHES FOR A FASCIA SIGN | | UNLESS CITYPLACE RETAIL GRANTS A WAIVER II (MINOR | | PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT). THE WAIVER II MAY | | INCREASE THE SIGNS DIMENSION BY UP TO 25 PERCENT, SO | | THE LETTER HEIGHT (INCLUDING THE VERTICAL BAR) COULD BE | | UP TO 22.5 INCHES. | | | | 5) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA REQUIRE | | THAT REVERSE CHANNEL LETTERS ARE FABRICATED OUT OF | | ALUMINUM WITH A MINIMUM METAL THICKNESS OF .060 INCHES. | | THE SIGN DETAIL DOES NOT SPECIFY THE UNIT OF | | MEASUREMENT FOR THE ALUMINUM LETTERS. | | | | 6) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA REQUIRE THE | | STUD MOUNTS TO BE SERIES 316 STAINLESS STEEL ANCHOR | | BOLTS. PROVIDE VERIFICATION OF THIS REQUIREMENT ON THE | | PLANS. NOTE: IT APPEARS THAT ALUMINUM STUDS ARE BEING | | USED INSTEAD OF THE STAINLESS STEEL. | | | | 7) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA STOREFRONT | | TYPE 7 REQUIRES CITYPLACE RETAIL TO PROVIDE WRITTEN | | APPROVAL FOR THE PLACEMENT OF THE SIGN ON THE SECOND | | FLOOR. | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|