2019-12-18 14:24:45 | INSUFFICIENT |
| |
| PERMIT 19100095 SPRINT MI90XSR05-F 112 S CLEMATIS ST |
| 2ND REVIEW |
| |
| PLEASE SEE THE LIST BELOW FOR AN ANALYSIS OF THE |
| DEFICIENCIES IN INFORMATION REQUIRED BY SECTION 78-401 |
| OF THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE AS PART OF THE |
| COMMUNICATION FACILITIES PLACEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION. |
| THE DEFICIENT INFORMATION MUST BE PROVIDED FOR STAFF TO |
| REVIEW THE PERMIT APPLICATION. PLEASE NOTE THAT STAFF |
| HAS ALSO INCLUDED SOME SUBSTANTIVE REVIEW COMMENTS, |
| THAT WHILE NOT RESULTING IN A DEFICIENT APPLICATION, |
| NEED TO BE ADDRESSED OR THE PERMIT WILL NOT BE |
| APPROVED. |
| |
| 1) REPEAT COMMENT: ENGINEERING PLAN |
| |
| A. THE 100 BLOCK OF CLEMATIS STREET IS CURRENTLY BEING |
| RECONSTRUCTED. THE ENGINEERING PLAN THAT YOU SUBMITTED |
| DOES NOT SHOW THE FINAL RECONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS AND |
| THUS DOES NOT ACCURATELY SHOW THE PLACEMENT LOCATION |
| FOR THE PROPOSED FACILITIES. PROVIDE ACCURATE PLANS |
| BASED ON THE FINAL RECONSTRUCTION OF THE CLEMATIS |
| STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY. NOTE: EVEN THOUGH YOUR SURVEY |
| EXHIBIT SHEET DOES NOT QUALIFY AS A SURVEY, IT SHOWS |
| THE PROPOSED POLE LOCATION IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION FROM |
| THE ENGINEERING PLANS. |
| |
| B. THE SIZE OF THE PROPOSED POLE BASE WITHIN THE |
| RIGHT-OF-WAY MUST BE SHOWN ON THE ENGINEERING PLAN. |
| |
| C. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE NEW POLE IS TO BE LOCATED SO AS |
| TO ALIGN WITH FUTURE STREET LIGHT POLES AND TREES IN |
| THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. |
| |
| 2) REPEAT COMMENT: SURVEY OF UNDERGROUND FACILITIES - |
| THE BASE OF THE POLE IS BEING INSTALLED UNDERGROUND SO |
| THIS IS REQUIRED. |
| |
| A. AS PREVIOUSLY STATED, CLEMATIS STREET IS BEING |
| RECONSTRUCTED, INCLUDING UNDERGROUND UTILITY WORK AS |
| WELL AS THE USE OF A SUSPENDED PAVEMENT SYSTEM TO |
| PERMIT AND EXPANDED TREE ROOT GROWTH. ONCE THE |
| RECONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, PROVIDE A SURVEY, PREPARED |
| BY A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR, SHOWING ALL UNDERGROUND |
| UTILITIES AND FEATURES, SUCH AS THE SUSPENDED PAVEMENT |
| SYSTEM. SHEET SE-1 IS NOT A SURVEY PREPARED BY A |
| FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR, NOR DOES IT SHOW THE FINAL |
| CLEMATIS STREET RECONSTRUCTION. |
| |
| B. THE ENGINEERING PLAN MUST BE BASED OFF OF THIS |
| SURVEY INFORMATION. |
| |
| 3) REPEAT COMMENT: SURVEY OF ABOVEGROUND FACILITIES - A |
| NEW POLE IS BEING INSTALLED ABOVEGROUND SO THIS IS |
| REQUIRED. |
| |
| A. AS PREVIOUSLY STATED, CLEMATIS STREET IS BEING |
| RECONSTRUCTED. ONCE THE RECONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, |
| PROVIDE A SURVEY, PREPARED BY A FLORIDA LICENSED |
| SURVEYOR, SHOWING ALL ABOVEGROUND FEATURES, INCLUDING |
| LANDSCAPE WITH THE PROPOSED POLE NOT INTERFERING WITH |
| ABOVE GROUND FACULTIES, INCLUDING LANDSCAPE. SHEET SE-1 |
| IS NOT A SURVEY PREPARED BY A FLORIDA LICENSED |
| SURVEYOR, NOR DOES IT SHOW THE FINAL CLEMATIS STREET |
| RECONSTRUCTION. |
| |
| B. IDENTIFY ALL ABOVEGROUND COMMUNICATION FACILITIES IN |
| THE AREA TO INCLUDE AN INVENTORY OF THE REGISTRANT'S |
| EXISTING FACILITIES - NO INFORMATION ON EXISTING |
| FACILITIES WAS PROVIDED. SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON THE |
| PLANS AND PROVIDE A NARRATIVE. IF THERE ARE NO |
| FACILITIES, THIS SHALL BE NOTED ON THE SURVEY. |
| |
| C. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE INFORMATION REGARDING |
| EXISTING UTILITY POLES (INCLUDING LIGHT POLES) WITHIN |
| 50 FEET OF YOUR PROPOSED POLE. THE POLE HEIGHT AND BASE |
| DIAMETER SHALL BE INCLUDED. PLEASE NOTE: THE SUPPORT |
| POLE INCLUDED WITH THIS APPLICATION IS 35 FEET ABOVE |
| GRADE IN HEIGHT, WHICH DOES NOT APPEAR TO COMPLY WITH |
| THE HEIGHT STANDARDS LISTED IN SECTION 78-411(G)(1) OF |
| THE CITY CODE. |
| |
| D. THE ENGINEERING PLAN MUST BE BASED OFF OF THIS |
| SURVEY INFORMATION. |
| |
| 4) REPEAT COMMENT: CONCEALMENT METHODS DESCRIPTIONS - |
| NO CONCEALMENT INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED. PLEASE NOTE |
| THAT THE PROPOSED SUPPORT POLE, INCLUDING THE ANTENNA, |
| EQUIPMENT AND METER ATTACHMENTS, DOES NOT MEET THE CITY |
| CONCEALMENT STANDARDS OUTLINED IN SECTION 78-411 OF THE |
| CITY CODE. THE POLE ELEVATION MUST INCLUDE ALL THE |
| DIMENSIONS. NOTE: THE POLE AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION |
| EQUIPMENT MAY NOT BE TWO INSTALLATIONS, BUT MUST RATHER |
| BE ONE INTEGRATED INSTALLATION. YOU ARE NOT ATTACHING |
| EQUIPMENT TO AN EXISTING POLE AS STATED IN THE RESPONSE |
| SINCE THERE IS NO EXISTING POLE. YOU MUST SUBMIT A |
| CONCEALED DESIGN. |
| |
| 5) REPEAT COMMENT: CONSTRUCTION TIMETABLE - YOU MUST |
| PROVIDE AN ESTIMATED TIMETABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE |
| PROJECT. |
| |
| 6) REPEAT COMMENT: RESTORATION ESTIMATE - YOU MUST |
| PROVIDE A RESTORATION ESTIMATE, WHICH IS THE COST FOR |
| THE RESTORATION THAT YOU LIST ON SHEET R-1. THE NOTES |
| ON SHEET R-1 MUST BE UPDATED TO NOT REFERENCE THE CITY |
| OF FORT LAUDERDALE REQUIREMENTS. |
| |
| 7) REPEAT COMMENT: EVIDENCE OF INSURANCE COVERAGE - YOU |
| ARE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT VERIFICATION OF INSURANCE IN |
| ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 78-406 OF THE |
| CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES. |
| |
| 8) REPEAT COMMENT: START OF OPERATION - AN ATTESTATION |
| FROM THE COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES SERVICE PROVIDER |
| THAT COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES FACILITIES WILL BE |
| INSTALLED AND OPERATIONAL ON THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE NO |
| LATER THAN NINE MONTHS AFTER THE DATE THE APPLICATION |
| IS APPROVED IS REQUIRED. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED |
| ATTESTATION. |
| |
| 9) REPEAT COMMENT: PUBLIC UTILITY LETTERS, TELEPHONE, |
| NATURAL GAS, ELECTRIC SERVICE, AND TELEVISION CABLE - |
| THE PUBLIC UTILITY LETTERS WERE NOT PROVIDED. PROVIDE |
| COPIES OF THE PUBLIC UTILITY LETTERS. |
| |
| 10) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDER CLARIFICATION - ON THE |
| COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES PLACEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION, |
| YOU MARKED THAT THIS IS A PASS THROUGH PROVIDER, YET |
| YOU HAVE ALSO MARKED THAT YOU ARE A COMMUNICATION |
| SERVICES PROVIDER THAT REMITS TAXES TO THE CITY. BY |
| CITY DEFINITION, YOU CANNOT BE BOTH. IF YOU ARE A PASS |
| THROUGH PROVIDER, YOU ARE REQUIRED TO PAY AN |
| APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY. |
| |
| CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| [email protected] |
| |
| |