| Plan Review Stops For Permit 18090957 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2019-02-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pvalenti |
Date |
2019-02-19 |
Time |
14:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pvalenti |
Date |
2019-02-19 |
Time |
14:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2019-01-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pvalenti |
Date |
2019-01-23 |
Time |
10:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pvalenti |
Date |
2019-01-23 |
Time |
10:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2019-01-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2019-01-04 |
Time |
17:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2019-01-04 |
Time |
06:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-01-04 18:03:29 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | ****REVISED 1/12/19*** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 6TH EDITION (2017) | | | FBC B = FBC BUILDING | | | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING | | | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY | | | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION | | | FBC R = FBC RESIDENTIAL | | | | | | 1. RAS 117 CALCULATIONS WERE SUBMITTED, BUT ARE | | | DESIGNED TO THE WRONG WIND SPEED, SEE MASTER PERMIT | | | (170 RATHER THAN 180). A ROOF SUB PERMIT WAS SUBMITTED; | | | CAN THIS DOCUMENT BE DELETED? | | | | | | 2. COMMENT FROM FIRST REVIEW: FBC 107, AN INDEX PAGE IS | | | SUGGESTED. NOTE THAT, WITHOUT AN INDEX, IT IS VERY | | | DIFFICULT TO FIND INFORMATION. FOR INSTANCE, LS001 | | | WHICH INCLUDES INFORMATION NEEDED FOR REVIEW OF ALL | | | OTHER SHEETS, IS AT THE END OF THE FILE DUE TO THE WAY | | | THAT IT WAS NAMED; THIS IS TYPICALLY IN THE BEGINNING | | | OR RIGHT AFTER CIVILS. | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW - DOCUMENT "101 - GI1000, 102 - GI1001", | | | ETC. WERE UPLOADED. AS THE OTHER DOCUMENTS ARE A ZERO | | | SERIES (001, 052, 060, ETC.) THE INDEX APPEARS AT THE | | | END OF THE DOCUMENT. SINCE THE PURPOSE WAS TO MAKE THE | | | PLAN EASIER TO REVIEW AND TO FIND INFORMATION, PLEASE | | | RENAME SO IT APPEARS BEFORE THE OTHER SHEETS RATHER | | | THAN AT THE END. | | | | | | 3-4. OK | | | | | | 4. COMMENT FROM FIRST REVIEW: DA121, FBC B 1017, SECOND | | | TIER LEVEL, EXITING FOR THE STORAGE AREAS IS NOT CLEAR. | | | REVISE PLAN TO SHOW EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE. | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW, LS003A & DA131, 209'4" AND 212' ARE NOTED | | | AS THE TRAVEL DISTANCE BUT THE LOCATION OF THE EXIT IS | | | NOT CLEAR. THE PATH OF EGRESS SHOWN ON THE PLAN APPEARS | | | TO END IN THE MIDDLE OF AN OPEN STAIR. CLARIFY EXIT | | | LOCATION AND TRAVEL DISTANCE. LS003A DOES NOT APPEAR TO | | | SHOW THE EXIT. IF THIS IS COVERED UNDER AN EXCEPTION, | | | PLEASE REVISE PLAN TO INCLUDE. | | | | | | 5. COMMENT FROM FIRST REVIEW: DA131, FBC B 1017, THIRD | | | TIER LEVEL, EXITING FOR THE STORAGE AREAS IS NOT CLEAR. | | | REVISE PLAN TO SHOW EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE. | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW, LS003A, DA131, 209'4" AND 212' ARE NOTED AS | | | THE TRAVEL DISTANCES. THIS IS THE SAME AS 2ND FLOOR BUT | | | BOTH APPEAR TO TRAVEL THROUGH AN UNPROTECTED STAIR, NOT | | | CLEAR WHERE 209'4" ENDS FOR EACH STAIR. IF 209'4" IS | | | THE DISTANCE FROM 2ND FLOOR STORAGE ROOM TO AN EXIT, | | | AND 3RD FLOOR USES THE SAME TRAVEL PATH BUT IS ONE | | | FLOOR HIGHER, IT APPEARS THAT THE 3RD FLOOR NUMBER | | | SHOULD BE A LARGER NUMBER. | | | | | | 6-7. OK | | | | | | 8. PRECAST ENGINEERING IN SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS, | | | DELEGATED ENGINEERING IS TO BE REVIEWED BY SEOR, | | | FAC61G15. | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW, RESPONSE LETTER STATES TO REFER TO REVIEW | | | LETTER; UNABLE TO LOCATE. PLEASE PROVIDE OR ADVISE AS | | | TO FILE NAME. | | | | | | 9. OK | | | | | | NEW COMMENT: | | | | | | 10. PER OUR DISCUSSION - SUBMIT THE DELEGATED | | | ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERED SHOP DRAWINGS AS A | | | SUBMITTAL. SUBMIT THE MISSING PAGE DS502 AS A REVISION | | | TO 18060764. IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THIS IS IN | | | PROGRESS (PENDING CITY STAFF GENERATING A PROJECTDOX | | | SUBMITTAL AND INVIDATION TO UPLOAD). | | | | | | 11. THIS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH THE FOLLOWING | | | PROVISOS: | | | | | | A. A SEPARATE ROOF PERMIT IS REQUIRED. PRIOR TO | | | INSTALLATION, SUBMIT ROOF PERMIT APPLICATION WITH | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD AND | | | ENGINEERING FOR ENHANCED FASTENING IF APPLICABLE. | | | | | | B. COMPONENT & CLADDING PRODUCT APPROVALS REVIEWED BY | | | DESIGNER OF RECORD ARE TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING | | | DIVISION, REVIEWED AND ISSUED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-11-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2018-11-02 |
Time |
16:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2018-11-02 |
Time |
06:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-11-02 16:34:04 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 6TH EDITION (2017) | | | FBC B = FBC BUILDING | | | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING | | | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY | | | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION | | | FBC R = FBC RESIDENTIAL | | | | | | 1. ROOF PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS SUBMITTED; FBC 107 PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD | | | PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THE CITY. NOTE THAT THE ASSEMBLY | | | DOES NOT MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR ZONES 2 & 3, SO | | | RAS 117 CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED. | | | | | | THIS CAN BE ADDRESSED AT THIS TIME OR WILL BE A PROVISO | | | ITEM, SUBMIT WITH ROOF PERMIT APPLICATION, REVIEW | | | REQUIRED AT THAT TIME. | | | | | | 2. FBC 107, AN INDEX PAGE IS SUGGESTED. NOTE THAT, | | | WITHOUT AN INDEX, IT IS VERY DIFFICULT TO FIND | | | INFORMATION. FOR INSTANCE, LS001 WHICH INCLUDES | | | INFORMATION NEEDED FOR REVIEW OF ALL OTHER SHEETS, IS | | | AT THE END OF THE FILE DUE TO THE WAY THAT IT WAS | | | NAMED; THIS IS TYPICALLY IN THE BEGINNING OR RIGHT | | | AFTER CIVILS. | | | | | | 3. LS001, LS002, A TEMPORARY LIFE SAFETY PLAN WAS | | | PROVIDED FOR TWO LEVELS. PROVIDE A LIFE SAFETY PLAN FOR | | | FINISHED CONSTRUCTION, FBC B CHAPTER 10. THIS SHOULD | | | INCLUDE THE NEW OCCUPANT LOAD FBC B 1004. | | | | | | 4. LS001, NOTES FOR 508, 508.4 ARE NOT CLEAR AS TO | | | DESIGN INTENT AND WHICH NOTE IS APPLICABLE TO THE | | | STORAGE AREAS. I COULD NOT FIND OCCUPANCY | | | CLASSIFICATION FOR THE STORAGE AREAS; REVISE TO | | | INCLUDE. IT APPEARS THAT THE STORAGE MAY BE S2, WHICH | | | PER THE NOTE 508.4, SEPARATION IS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 4. DA121, FBC B 1017, SECOND TIER LEVEL, EXITING FOR | | | THE STORAGE AREAS IS NOT CLEAR. REVISE PLAN TO SHOW | | | EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE. | | | | | | 5. DA131, FBC B 1017, THIRD TIER LEVEL, EXITING FOR THE | | | STORAGE AREAS IS NOT CLEAR. REVISE PLAN TO SHOW EXIT | | | ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE. | | | | | | 6. LS001, REVISE DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO INCLUDE THE 2ND | | | AND 3RD TIER STORAGE AREAS, FBC 107. | | | | | | 7. DA121, FBC B 713, 2 HR FIRE RATED CHASE IS SHOWN; | | | REVISE PLAN TO INDICATE WHICH ASSEMBLY IS PROPOSED. | | | | | | 8. PRECAST ENGINEERING IN SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS, | | | DELEGATED ENGINEERING IS TO BE REVIEWED BY SEOR, | | | FAC61G15. | | | | | | 9. PROVIDE A SITE PLAN SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH FBC B | | | TABLES 602, 705.8. | | | | | | 10. THIS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH THE FOLLOWING | | | PROVISOS: | | | | | | A. A SEPARATE ROOF PERMIT IS REQUIRED. PRIOR TO | | | INSTALLATION, SUBMIT ROOF PERMIT APPLICATION WITH | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD AND | | | ENGINEERING FOR ENHANCED FASTENING IF APPLICABLE. | | | | | | B. COMPONENT & CLADDING PRODUCT APPROVALS REVIEWED BY | | | DESIGNER OF RECORD ARE TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING | | | DIVISION, REVIEWED AND ISSUED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2018-12-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jpearson |
Date |
2018-12-23 |
Time |
11:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jpearson |
Date |
2018-12-23 |
Time |
11:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-10-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jpearson |
Date |
2018-10-15 |
Time |
10:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jpearson |
Date |
2018-10-15 |
Time |
10:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-10-15 10:23:27 | CODES IN EFFECT: | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2017 6TH EDITION | | | WPB FBC = WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC 2017 | | | 6TH ED, CHAPTER 1. | | | FBC EC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION 2017 | | | 6TH EDITION | | | FBC EX = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE EXISTING BUILDING 2017 | | | 6TH EDITION | | | FBC RE = FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE 2017 6TH EDITION | | | NEC = NFPA 70 2014 EDITION, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE | | | FS = FLORIDA STATUTES | | | | | | ELECTRICAL REVIEW STATUS: DENIED, SEE COMMENTS BELOW. | | | | | | 1. PROVIDE COMPLETED LIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULE. WPB FBC | | | 107.2.1 | | | 2. IT APPEARS LOAD IS BEING ADDED TO PANEL SEBB AND | | | SWBB FOR THE NEW PANELS. PROVIDE LOAD CALCULATION FOR | | | THESE PANELS, INCLUDE EXISTING AND NEW LOADS TO CONFIRM | | | CAPACITY IS ADEQUATE. NEC 215.2, 220, 408.30 | | | 3. BE ADVISED THAT FIRE ALARM, LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEMS, | | | DAS, LIGHTNING PROTECTION, GENERATORS, COMMERCIAL HOOD | | | SYSTEMS, WALK IN COOLERS, SIGNS, SITE LIGHTING, AND | | | SWIMMING POOLS (WHERE APPLICABLE) ARE NOT INCLUDED IN | | | THE SCOPE OF THIS PLAN REVIEW. PROVIDE A BLOCK NOTE | | | INDICATING THE REQUIRED SEPARATE PERMITS AND PLAN | | | SUBMITTALS FOR ANY OF THESE SYSTEMS PRESENT. WPB FBC | | | 105.1, 107.2.1 | | | | | | END OF COMMENTS. | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED | | | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. WHEN | | | RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY | | | RESUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, INSERT CORRECTED PAGES | | | INTO THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE THE PREVIOUSLY | | | REVIEWED SHEETS. ONE COPY OF THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED | | | SHEETS SHOULD REMAIN IN PACKAGE AND BE MARKED OLD | | | SHEETS. | | | | | | SINCERELY, | | | | | | JOHN PEARSON | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6746 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2018-11-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
2018-11-05 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
2018-11-05 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2018-11-05 09:10:08 | PASSED PER MANNY GONZALEZ. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2019-01-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2019-01-04 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2018-12-17 |
Time |
14:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-01-04 09:55:13 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | PLEASE CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING AS PROVISO: | | | | | | THESE PROVISO COMMENTS WILL BE VERIFIED AND CONFIRMED | | | AT THE TIME OF FIRE INSPECTION. FAILURE TO FOLLOW THESE | | | PROVISO COMMENTS WILL RESULT IN A FAILED FIRE | | | INSPECTION. | | | | | | | | | 1) THE SUBMITTED PLANS SHALL REQUIRE THE APPLICABLE | | | REVISIONS TO REFLECT THE PERFORMANCE BASED DESIGN AS | | | OUTLINED IN THE REVISED THORTON TOMASETTI ENGINEERS | | | REPORT SUBMITTED BY EMAIL ON 12/11/18. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2018-10-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2018-10-15 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2018-10-10 |
Time |
09:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2019-02-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2019-02-21 |
Time |
15:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2019-02-14 |
Time |
08:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2019-01-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2019-01-31 |
Time |
15:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2019-01-22 |
Time |
17:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2019-01-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2019-01-04 |
Time |
18:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2018-12-12 |
Time |
08:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2018-12-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cpuell |
Date |
2018-12-02 |
Time |
11:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cpuell |
Date |
2018-09-26 |
Time |
08:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2018-11-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2018-11-02 |
Time |
06:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2018-11-02 |
Time |
06:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-11-02 06:12:41 | REVIEWED UNDER FOUNDATION PERMIT 18060764 | | | | | | MU-2018-24860 | | | $1,376.91 PAID | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2018-12-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ccole |
Date |
2018-12-28 |
Time |
13:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ccole |
Date |
2018-12-28 |
Time |
07:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-10-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ccole |
Date |
2018-10-29 |
Time |
10:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ccole |
Date |
2018-10-18 |
Time |
11:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-10-29 11:13:27 | 1ST REVIEW FBC-2017 MECHANICAL | | | PERMIT #18090957 | | | 10/29/18 | | | | | | CODES IN EFFECT: | | | | | | FBC B- FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SIXTH EDITION 2017 | | | FBC M- FLORIDA MECHANICAL CODE SIXTH EDITION 2017 | | | FBC EC- FLORIDA ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE SIXTH EDITION | | | 2017 | | | FBC EX- FLORIDA EXISTING BUILDING CODE SIXTH EDITION | | | 2017 | | | FS- FLORIDA STATUTES | | | FAC- FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | WPB- WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC SIXTH | | | EDITION 2017 | | | | | | PLAN REVIEW RESULTS: DENIED. | | | | | | 1) SHEET DM201: REFER TO SECTION 1101.1 FBC-17 EXISTING | | | BUILDING CODE AND PROVIDE MINIMUM VENTILATION | | | CALCULATIONS FOR ALL ROOMS AND SPACES PER TABLE | | | 403.3.1.1 FBC-17 MECHANICAL. PROVIDE A SCHEDULE THAT | | | INDICATES THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED CFMS OF OUTDOOR | | | AIR. | | | | | | 2) DM202: A) SEE NOTES M09 AND M11 AND CLARIFY THE TYPE | | | OF EXHAUST THAT IS BEING EXTENDED TO THE NEW | | | TERMINATION LOCATION. B) SUBMIT MANUFACTURER'S | | | SPECIFICATIONS AND THE MIAMI-DADE NOA FOR THE EXHAUST | | | AND OUTSIDE AIR LOUVERS. C) DUCT SMOKE DETECTORS ARE | | | REQUIRED FOR THE NEW FAN COIL UNITS IF THESE UNITS ARE | | | SHARING THE COMMON OUTDOOR AIR SUPPLY OR COMMON PLENUM- | | | SECTION 606.2.2 FBC M. C) PLACE A NOTE TO INDICATING | | | THAT NO MORE THAN 10% OF AIR SUPPLIED INTO THE TOILET | | | ROOMS WILL BE RECIRCULATED VIA RETURNS INTO THE PLENUM | | | OR TO ADJACENT SPACES- TABLE 403.3.1.1 FOOTNOTE G. D) | | | PROVIDE NOTES INDICATING THE LOCATION OF THE RISERS | | | INTO THE UPPER LEVELS. | | | | | | 3) DM204, 206, 208, 210, 212: THE PLANS SHOW NUMEROUS | | | DUCT RISERS PENETRATING FLOORS AND ALSO WHAT APPEARS TO | | | BE CHASES OR SHAFT. PLEASE SHOW THE REQUIRED FIRE | | | DAMPERS AT THESE LOCATIONS- SECTIONS 607.5.2, 607.5.5, | | | & 607.6 FBC M. | | | | | | 4) DM302: PROVIDE A DUCT PENETRATION FIRESTOPPING | | | DETAIL- SECTION 714.1.1 FBC B. | | | | | | 5) DM401: PROVIDE A SEQUENCE OF OPERATION FOR FAN SHUT | | | DOWN RELATING TO ACTIVATION OF AN AREA OR DUCT SMOKE | | | DETECTOR- SECTIONS 606.4 AND 606.4.1 FBC M. | | | | | | 6) DM212: CLARIFY IF THE STAIRWELL WALL THAT THE DUCT | | | IS PENETRATING IS A WALL THAT IS ENCLOSING AN INTERIOR | | | EXIT STAIRWAY- SEESECTION 1023.5 FBC B. | | | | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY | | | RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE INSERT | | | CORRECTED PLAN SHEETS INTO THE SETS, REMOVE THE | | | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS AND MARK VOID ON THEM, AND | | | KEEP THEM WITH THE SUBMITTALS | | | | | | CHRISTOPHER L. COLE | | | MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET | | | WEST PALM BEACH FL 33401 | | | 561-805-6719 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2019-01-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2019-01-04 |
Time |
16:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2019-01-04 |
Time |
15:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-10-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2018-10-31 |
Time |
11:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2018-10-30 |
Time |
10:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-10-31 12:02:33 | 1ST REVIEW: | | | 2017 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 6TH EDITION | | | 2017 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE - PLUMBING, SIXTH EDITION | | | 2017 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE - ACCESSIBILITY, SIXTH | | | EDITION | | | 2017 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE - FUEL GAS, SIXTH EDITION | | | 2017 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE - RESIDENTIAL, SIXTH EDITION | | | 2017 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE - EXISTING BUILDING, SIXTH | | | EDITION | | | 2017 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE - ENERGY CONSERVATION, SIXTH | | | EDITION | | | | | | PLUMBING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THE NEW BATHROOM FIXTURE COUNT SHALL COMPLY WITH FBC | | | PL 403.1.3 POTTY PARITY. IN ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCIES, | | | RESTROOMS WHICH ARE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC MUST HAVE A | | | RATIO OF 3:2 WATER CLOSETS PROVIDED FOR WOMEN AS THE | | | COMBINED TOTAL OF WATER CLOSETS AND URINALS PROVIDED | | | FOR MEN, UNLESS THESE ARE TWO OR FEWER SUCH FIXTURES | | | FOR MEN, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ?553.86, FLORIDA STATUTES. | | | | | | 2. THE GRAB BARS SHALL SHOWN TO BE MEASURED TO THE TOP | | | OF THE GRIPPING SURFACE FROM FINISHED FLOOR . PER FBC | | | ACC 609.4 | | | | | | 3. PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE OF THE AMBULATORY STALL PER | | | FBC ACC 604.8.2.1 SIZE. | | | AMBULATORY ACCESSIBLE COMPARTMENTS SHALL HAVE A DEPTH | | | OF 60 INCHES (1525 MM) MINIMUM AND A WIDTH OF 35 INCHES | | | (890 MM) MINIMUM AND 37 INCHES (940 MM) MAXIMUM. | | | 604.8.2.2 DOORS. TOILET COMPARTMENT DOORS, INCLUDING | | | DOOR HARDWARE, SHALL COMPLY WITH 404, EXCEPT THAT IF | | | THE APPROACH IS TO THE LATCH SIDE OF THE COMPARTMENT | | | DOOR, CLEARANCE BETWEEN THE DOOR SIDE OF THE | | | COMPARTMENT AND ANY OBSTRUCTION SHALL BE 42 INCHES | | | (1065 MM) MINIMUM. THE DOOR SHALL BE SELF-CLOSING. A | | | DOOR PULL COMPLYING WITH 404.2.7 SHALL BE PLACED ON | | | BOTH SIDES OF THE DOOR NEAR THE LATCH. TOILET | | | COMPARTMENT DOORS SHALL NOT SWING INTO THE MINIMUM | | | REQUIRED COMPARTMENT AREA. | | | 604.8.2.3 GRAB BARS. GRAB BARS SHALL COMPLY WITH 609. A | | | SIDE-WALL GRAB BAR COMPLYING WITH 604.5.1 SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED ON BOTH SIDES OF THE COMPARTMENT. | | | | | | 4.PLEASE ENLARGE THE ISOMETRIC DRAWING FOR THE WATER | | | SANITARY AND STORM DRAIN THEY ARE TO CONGESTED TO | | | DETERMINE CODE COMPLIANCE. PER WPB AMEND TO FBC | | | 107.2.1.3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED | | | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY | | | RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. PLEASE, ADDITIONALLY, INSERT | | | CORRECTED PAGES INTO TO SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE OR VOID | | | THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS. | | | | | | GEORGE JOHNSON | | | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6711 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2019-01-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2019-01-12 |
Time |
11:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2019-01-12 |
Time |
11:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-01-12 11:25:30 | GAF MODIFIED NOA 15-1008.01 SUBMITTED, APPROVED BY | | | DESIGNER OF RECORD | | | RAS117 CALCULATIONS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH ROOF | | | PERMIT APPLICATION | | | | | | NOTE THAT NOA IS NOW EXPIRED, BUT FOUNDATION PERMIT | | | 18060764 WAS APPLIED FOR ON 6/15/2018 (NOA NOT EXPIRED | | | AT THAT TIME) | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2019-01-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pvalenti |
Date |
2019-01-23 |
Time |
10:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pvalenti |
Date |
2019-01-23 |
Time |
10:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-12-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jpearson |
Date |
2018-12-23 |
Time |
11:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jpearson |
Date |
2018-12-23 |
Time |
11:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-12-23 11:43:49 | SHEET DA-102 AND LS-003 ARE MISSING THE THIRD PARTY | | | VERIFICATION REQUIRED FOR DIGITAL SIGNATURES. ALL OTHER | | | SHEETS OK. PROVIDE CORRECTION. WPB FBC 107.1; FS | | | 471/481 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-10-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jpearson |
Date |
2018-10-15 |
Time |
09:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jpearson |
Date |
2018-10-15 |
Time |
09:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-10-15 09:57:07 | SHEET DA-102 HAS A CORRUPTED SIGNATURE. ALL OTHER | | | SHEETS OK. PLAN IS REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY | | | THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN. A DIGITAL PLAN | | | REQUIRES A DIGITAL SIGNATURE. PROVIDE CORRECTION. WPB | | | FBC 107.1; FS 471/481 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
THRESHOLD |
THRESHOLD INSPECTOR DOCUMENTS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2018-11-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2018-11-02 |
Time |
06:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2018-11-02 |
Time |
06:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-11-02 06:29:36 | **THRESHOLD** ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY >5000 SF, >500 | | | OCCUPANTS | | | | | | SI AGREEMENT AND PRIVATE PROVIDER DOCUMENTS REVIEWED | | | UNDER FOUNDATION PERMIT 18091159 | | | | | | ADDITION OF ANOTHER INSPECTOR IS RECOMMENDED (MAY BE | | | ADDED AFTER PERMIT ISSUANCE) - PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU | | | WISH TO DISCUSS | | | | | | THRESHOLD STATEMENT FOR ARCHITECT ON MOST PAGES | | | (WILLIAM A HANSER, AR7110) | | | THRESHOLD STATEMENT FOR ENGINEER ON EACH PAGE (DEREK A | | | WASSINK, PE 55303, THORNTON THOMASETTI) | | | | | | THRESHOLD INSPECTION PLAN ON SHEET DS004 & DS005 | | | | | | PRIVATE PROVIDER (MEP STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND | | | INSPECTIONS) IS ALSO SI FOR THE PROJECT | | | | | | SI AGREEMENT SIGNED BY: | | | | | | OTTO J LETZELTER, PE, SI 54716 | | | MEP STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND INSPECTIONS | | | GARY HENNINGS, CGC1509819 | | | KRAVIS REP | | | JACK BOTHE, BN5957 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2019-02-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2019-02-21 |
Time |
14:23 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2019-02-21 |
Time |
13:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-02-21 14:24:34 | PASSED W/PROVISOS | | | | | | 1) IN ACCORDANCE WITH RES. NO. 68-18: PRIOR TO THE | | | ISSUANCE OF THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (PASS FINAL | | | BUILDING INSPECTION) FOR THE EXPANDED DREYFOOS HALL | | | LOBBY THE KRAVIS CENTER MUST: | | | | | | A. RECORD AN ACCESS AND MAINTENANCE EASEMENT FOR ANY | | | PUBLIC SIDEWALKS OR UTILITIES ON THE SITE. THE EASEMENT | | | LANGUAGE SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY?S | | | OFFICE. | | | B. PROVIDE THE CITY WITH ALL THE DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED | | | BY THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) TO | | | PERMIT THE OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD RIGHT-OF-WAY | | | IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING CURBING, APRONS, STREET TREES, | | | TREE GRATES, LANDSCAPING, IRRIGATION AND LIGHTING. | | | C. COMPLETE AND PASS INSPECTIONS FOR ALL THE OKEECHOBEE | | | BOULEVARD RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENTS. | | | D. EXECUTE TO A RIGHT-OF-WAY MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH | | | THE CITY FOR ALL THE OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD RIGHT-OF-WAY | | | IMPROVEMENTS. | | | E. DO ALL ITEMS NECESSARY WITH PALM BEACH COUNTY TO | | | RELOCATE THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE AT THE CORNER OF | | | SAPODILLA AVENUE AND OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD TO INCLUDE | | | BEARING ALL COSTS FOR THE RELOCATION, TO INCLUDE | | | PERMITTING. | | | | | | 2) THE PLANS HAVE CHANGED SINCE THE ONES APPROVED BY | | | THE CITY COMMISSION, SO A MINOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT | | | AMENDMENT SHOWING ALL CHANGES MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR | | | TO THE FINAL INSPECTION FOR THE BUILDING. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2019-01-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2019-01-31 |
Time |
15:48 |
Rev Time |
2.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2019-01-31 |
Time |
13:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-01-31 15:49:07 | FAILED | | | | | | PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS. | | | | | | 1) THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE ROOFING MATERIAL | | | EXTENDING DOWN THE FACADE OF THE BUILDING TO THE ROOF. | | | HOWEVER, AT THE MEETING BETWEEN DESIGN PROFESSIONALS | | | AND STAFF AGREEMENT WAS REACHED TO HAVE THE COPPER ROOF | | | MATERIAL EXTEND DOWN TO COVER ALL THE NEW HORIZONTAL | | | AREAS THAT REPLACED THE SLOPED ROOF ON THE CITY | | | COMMISSION APPROVED PLANS. THE DESIGN TEAM STATED THAT | | | THE HORIZONTAL AREAS AT THE ALUMINUM LOUVER SYSTEM | | | WOULD NOT BE VISIBLE, BUT HAVE PROVIDED NO PROOF TO | | | THIS STATEMENT, SO THIS AREA (THE BUILT UP FRAMED CURB) | | | MUST INCLUDE THE COOPER ROOF MATERIAL. SEE STAFF | | | MARK-UP OF THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS. | | | | | | 2) DETAIL 4 ON SHEET DA311 DOES NOT CORRESPOND TO THE | | | DETAIL TAG ON SHEET DA310. IT IS SUPPOSED TO BE THE | | | AREA ABOVE THE LOUVER, BUT IS INSTEAD THE ACCESS | | | LADDER. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-12-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2018-12-31 |
Time |
16:27 |
Rev Time |
2.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2018-12-31 |
Time |
12:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-12-31 16:27:52 | FAILED | | | | | | 1) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE A SITE PLAN OR SURVEY | | | SHOWING THE BUILDING SETBACKS. --- CONTRARY TO THE | | | COMMENT RESPONSES, NOT SITE PLAN OR SURVEY SHOWING | | | BUILDING SETBACKS WAS PROVIDED WITH THE RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 2) REVISED COMMENT: THE ROOF DOES NOT MATCH THE PLANS | | | APPROVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION. THE LOWEST LEVEL OF | | | ROOF HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE PERMIT PLANS. --- AT THE | | | MEETING BETWEEN DESIGN PROFESSIONALS AND STAFF | | | AGREEMENT WAS REACHED TO HAVE THE COPPER ROOF MATERIAL | | | EXTEND DOWN TO COVER ALL THE NEW HORIZONTAL AREAS THAT | | | REPLACED THE SLOPED ROOF ON THE CITY COMMISSION | | | APPROVED PLANS. NO NEW ELEVATION DRAWINGS WERE | | | SUBMITTED TO VERIFY THIS (SHEETS DA201 THROUGH DA203). | | | | | | 3) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PLANS ARE UNCLEAR TO THE DEPTH | | | OF THE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL MULLIONS. THE APPROVED | | | PLANS WERE TO EXPAND THE LOBBY WITH THE SAME DEPTH OF | | | THE MULLIONS. SHEET DA303 SEEMS TO INDICATE HORIZONTAL | | | MULLION DEPTH, BUT DOES NOT GIVE DETAILS ON THE DEPTH, | | | NOR HOW IT COMPARES TO THE EXISTING MULLION DEPTH. | | | PROVIDE INFORMATION TO VERIFY THAT THE HORIZONTAL AND | | | VERTICAL MULLIONS ARE THE SAME AS EXISTING. ------ THE | | | COMMENT RESPONSES REFERENCE DETAILS 8 AND 9 ON SHEET | | | DA603 AS WELL AS AN ATTACHED PHOTO TO ADDRESS THIS | | | COMMENT. NEITHER SHEET DA603 NOR THE PHOTO WAS INCLUDED | | | IN THE RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-11-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2018-11-05 |
Time |
17:14 |
Rev Time |
3.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2018-11-05 |
Time |
17:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-11-05 17:26:04 | FAILED | | | | | | 1) PROVIDE A SITE PLAN OR SURVEY SHOWING THE BUILDING | | | SETBACKS. | | | | | | 2) THE ROOF DOES NOT MATCH THE PLANS APPROVED BY THE | | | CITY COMMISSION. THE LOWEST LEVEL OF ROOF HAS BEEN | | | REMOVED FROM THE PERMIT PLANS. IN ORDER TO REMOVE THIS | | | FEATURE, THE CITY COMMISSION IS REQUIRED TO APPROVE AS | | | PART OF A REVISED LEVEL III SITE PLAN REVIEW. | | | | | | 3) THE PLANS ARE UNCLEAR TO THE DEPTH OF THE HORIZONTAL | | | AND VERTICAL MULLIONS. THE APPROVED PLANS WERE TO | | | EXPAND THE LOBBY WITH THE SAME DEPTH OF THE MULLIONS. | | | SHEET DA303 SEEMS TO INDICATE HORIZONTAL MULLION DEPTH, | | | BUT DOES NOT GIVE DETAILS ON THE DEPTH, NOR HOW IT | | | COMPARES TO THE EXISTING MULLION DEPTH. PROVIDE | | | INFORMATION TO VERIFY THAT THE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL | | | MULLIONS ARE THE SAME AS EXISTING. | | | | | | 4) THE MECHANICAL PLANS SHOW NEW ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT. IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITYPLACE DRI, PLEASE PROVIDE | | | VERIFICATION THAT ALL ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, | | | INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SUCH ITEMS AS PUBLIC AND | | | PRIVATE UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTIONS; HEATING, | | | VENTILATING, AND AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEMS; | | | COMMUNICATIONS DEVICES; AND RELATED EQUIPMENT, SHALL BE | | | SCREENED FROM PUBLIC VIEW THROUGH ANY COMBINATION OF | | | LANDSCAPING, WALLS AND EQUIPMENT LOCATION. PLEASE | | | PROVIDE PLANS OR OTHER EVIDENCE THAT THE NEW ROOFTOP | | | MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED FROM PUBLIC VIEW. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
