 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 18021046
Plan Review Stops For Permit 18021046 |
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2018-11-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2018-11-01 |
Time |
15:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2018-11-01 |
Time |
15:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2018-11-01 16:04:58 | THE HORIZONTAL FLOOR ASSEMBLY IS TO BE MAINTAIN TO | | PROVIDE THE EXISTING DEGREE OF FIRE SEPARATION. IF THE | | FLOORING IS TO BE COVERED WITH ADDITIONAL FLOORING, | | PROVIDE A SOUND INSULATION SUBMITTAL. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-10-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-10-18 |
Time |
17:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-10-18 |
Time |
14:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2018-10-04 16:59:26 | RESIDENTIAL (R2) ALTERATION, FOURTH BUILDING REVIEW | | CHECKLIST. | | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017). | | | | 1) THE OWNER OR OWNER'S LEGALLY AUTHORIZED AGENT NEED | | TO CERTIFY AT THE BOTTOM OF THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS | | PRIOR TO RECEIVING THE PERMIT AS REQUIRED BY SEC. | | R103.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. | | | | 2) PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE | | FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLY FOR TENANT SEPARATION WITH THE | | APT ON THE SECOND FLOOR. NOTE: TENANT SEPARATION WALL | | DETAIL "F" ON SHEET S1A DOESN'T PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS | | FOR APPROVED HORIZONTAL ASSEMBLY. IT ONLY SPECIFIES THE | | WALL ASSEMBLY UL-U311. PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND | | SPECIFICATIONS FOR APPROVED HORIZONTAL FIRE RATED | | ASSEMBLY AS REQUIRED . SEC. 420.3 FBC. | | | | RESPONSE: | | NEW DETAIL "G" ON SHEET S1A: | | A) THE TIME ASSIGNED FOR WOOD JOISTS IS 10 MINUTES NOT | | 20 MINUTES. SEE TABLE 722.6.2(2). REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | NOTE: KEEP IN MIND THAT NEED TO GET 1 HOUR FIRE RATED | | HORIZONTAL ASSEMBLY. NEED TO REVISE ASSEMBLY TO MEET | | THE ONE HOUR FIRE RATING. | | | | B) PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE FLOOR | | ASSEMBLY SUB FLOORING AND FINISH FLOOR AS REQUIRED BY | | SEC. 722.6.2.4. FBC. | | | | C) PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE ADDITIONAL | | PROTECTION OF THE FLOOR ASSEMBLY AS REQUIRED BY SEC. | | 722.6.2.4. FBC. | | | | D) PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE FASTENING OF | | THE FLOOR ASSEMBLY FRAMING MEMBERS AND MEMBRANES | | (PLYWOOD, GYPSUM BOARD ETC) AS REQUIRED BY SEC. | | 722.6.2.6 FBC. | | | | E) THERE IS A FIRE NOTE ABOVE NEW DETAIL "G" THAT | | SPECIFIES 2 LAYERS OF 1/2" TYPE X GYPSUM BOARD. | | COORDINATE THIS INFORMATION WITH DETAIL G AND ALL WALL | | SECTIONS TO AVOID CONFUSION/DISCREPANCIES. SEC. 107.2.1 | | CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | 3) INFORMATION ON DRAWINGS NEED TO BE COORDINATED. | | INFORMATION ON TENANT SEPARATION HORIZONTAL ASSEMBLY | | DETAIL "G" NEEDS TO BE COORDINATED WITH CEILING | | INFORMATION ON ALL WALL SECTION DETAILS SHOWN ON SHEET | | S1 AND SHEET S1A. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. | | 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | 4) CEILING INFORMATION UNDER THE EXISTING STAIRS DETAIL | | ON SHEET S1 WAS REVISED. PREVIOUS DETAIL SPECIFIED 2 | | LAYERS OF 5/8" FIRE RATED GYPSUM BOARD. NEW DETAIL | | SPECIFIES ONLY ONE LAYER. CLARIFY/REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | NEED TO PROVIDE ONE HOUR FIRE RATED TENANT SEPARATION | | ASSEMBLY WITH THE ABOVE UNIT. SEC. 420.3 FBC. | | COORDINATE WITH ITEM #2 ABOVE. | | | | 5) ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, SYSTEMS, | | AND SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING AS REQUIRED BY SEC. | | 801.3 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE | | SOUND TRANSMISSION FOR FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLY. | | FLOORING UNDERLAYMENT | | SOUND INSULATION MATERIAL: | | A) PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF THE FLAME SPREAD INDEX AND SMOKE | | DEVELOPED INDEX TEST DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 84 | | OR UL 723 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 720.1 OF FBC 6TH EDITION | | (2017). | | | | B) PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF THE SOUND TRANSMISSION CLASS | | (STC) TEST DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 90 AS | | REQUIRED BY SEC. 1207.2 OF FBC 6TH EDITION (2017). | | | | C) PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF THE IMPACT INSULATION CLASS | | (IIC) TEST DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 492 AS | | REQUIRED BY SEC. 1207.3 OF FBC 6TH EDITION (2017). | | | | RESPONSE: | | ICC EVALUATION REPORT ESR-2540 SUBMITTED IS FOR 2X10 | | WOOD JOIST FLOOR ASSEMBLIES. THIS DOESN'T MATCH | | EXISTING FLOOR FRAMING. PROVIDE COMPLIANCE WITH THE | | ABOVE A, B AND C SOUND INSULATION REQUIREMENTS. | | NOTE: COORDINATE WITH HORIZONTAL TENANT ASSEMBLY DETAIL | | G TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. | | | | | | 6) PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY | | FAC 61G20-3.001 FOR: | | NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS DEFERRED | | SUBMITTAL, BUT BEFORE INSTALLATION (NO FEES). | | | | A) FLAT ROOF. AND, CLEARLY MARK WHICH APPROVED ASSEMBLY | | IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE | | DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. 1609 FBC. NOTE: IF THE | | SELECTED ASSEMBLY DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR | | ALL ROOF ZONES, THEN SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 | | CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED. | | | | RESPONSE: | | NO PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS SUBMITTED. NEED PRODUCT | | APPROVAL AND SPECIFIC ASSEMBLY TO BE INSTALLED. | | | | B) ROOF TILE ADHESIVE REFERENCED IN ROOF TILE NOA | | 15-0915.09 SUBMITTED. ROOF TILE ADHESIVE RTA-1 | | SUBMITTED IS NOT THE ONE REFERENCED IN THE NOA FOR CLAY | | TILE. AND, CLEARLY MARK PADDY SIZE. | | | | 7- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING | | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ABOVE PRODUCT APPROVALS AS | | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | 8) PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR THE FIRE RATING | | ASSEMBLY BELOW THE STAIRS AND BY THE PANTRY CLOSET ON | | FIRST FLOOR KITCHEN. SEC. 420.2 AND 420.3 FBC. | | | | RESPONSE: | | SPECIFIED ASSEMBLY DOESN'T PROVIDE 1 HOUR FIRE RATED | | ASSEMBLY. COORDINATE WITH ITEM #4 ABOVE. | | | | | | ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS | | FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B): | | WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS? | | DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT NECESSARY, IN | | ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING | | CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT DESIGN DOCUMENTS | | REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE TIMES FOR FAILURE TO | | CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY | | NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, | | EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, | | ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, | | MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS SYSTEMS, OR OTHER | | REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING | | COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL | | GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH | | REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, | | A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT OF THE PROPORTION OF THE | | PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS REVIEW | | | | NOTE: | | ENGINEER OF RECORD TO PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER | | ADDRESSING EACH COMMENT TO AVOID PLAN REVIEW FEES AS | | REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B). | | | | ****PLEASE INSERT ANY REVISED DRAWING AND REMOVE OLD | | DRAWING. SUBMIT OLD DRAWINGS FOR REFERENCE OF ALREADY | | REVIEWED DRAWINGS. DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS TO PLANS. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT | | JULIO GOMEZ | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | BUILDING DIVISION | | (561)805-6712 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-07-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-07-16 |
Time |
18:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-07-13 |
Time |
17:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2018-07-17 09:30:38 | RESIDENTIAL (R2) ALTERATION, THIRD BUILDING REVIEW | | CHECKLIST. | | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017). | | | | 1 REVISE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED FOR APT. #1, | | APT. #2 AND APT. #3 (NOTE: COORDINATE INFORMATION ON | | ALL 3 APARTMENTS TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS): | | A) PROVIDE COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION ON TOP OF | | FORM. NEED OWNER'S NAME. NEED CORRECT BUILDER'S NAME. | | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. | | | | RESPONSE: | | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT PROPERLY ADDRESSED. NEED CORRECT | | NAME OF THE OWNER AND THE BUILDER. | | | | B)APT #1 AND APT #2: REVISE ATTIC INFORMATION SHOWN ON | | PAGE 2 OF 4. THERE IS NO ATTIC ABOVE THIS APARTMENT. | | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. | | | | RESPONSE: | | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT PROPERLY ADDRESSED. THERE IS NOT | | ATTIC ABOVE THIS APARTMENT. CONSEQUENTLY THERE IS NOT | | VENTED ATTIC EITHER. THERE IS AN APARTMENT ON THE | | SECOND FLOOR. REVISE AS REQUIRED. NOTE: COORDINATE AND | | REVISE INFORMATION ON ITEM #10 ON PAGE 1 OF 4. WHY ONE | | APARTMENT HAS INSULATION AND THE OTHER DOESN'T?. | | CLARIFY WHY INFORMATION ON APT. # 2 SAYS "NO ATTIC" AND | | INFORMATION ON APT #1 SAYS "FULL ATTIC". COORDINATE ALL | | INFORMATION TO AVOID UNNECESSARY CONFLICTS/DELAYS. | | | | C)CRAWLSPACE IN APT #1 AND APT #2: : CLARIFY WHY ONE | | APARTMENT HAS INSULATION AND THE OTHER DOESN'T?. SEC. | | R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. | | | | D)APT #1 AND APT #2: : CLARIFY WHY THE WINDOW U-FACTOR | | AND SHGC FACTOR IS DIFFERENT ON EACH APARTMENT. | | TYPICALLY CONTRACTOR USES SAME WINDOWS WHEN REPLACING | | THEM. IF DIFFERENT WINDOWS ARE USED, THEN CLEARLY | | IDENTIFY EACH WINDOW. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY | | CONSERVATION. | | | | E) APT #3: CLARIFY WHY THERE IS NO INSULATION ON ITEM | | #8 ON PAGE 1 OF 4. COORDINATE WITH INFORMATION GIVEN ON | | APT #1 AND APT #2. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY | | CONSERVATION. | | | | F)APT #3: REVISE ROOF INFORMATION SHOWN ON PAGE 1 OF 4 | | AND PAGE 2 OF 4. ACCORDING TO PLANS THE CEILING JOISTS | | ARE 2X6. THEREFORE, R-30 BATT INSULATION DOESN'T FIT. | | R-30 BATT INSULATION IS ABOUT 9-1/2" THICK. REVISE AS | | REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. | | | | G)APT #3: REVISE ROOF INFORMATION SHOWN ON PAGE 2 OF 4. | | THERE IS ON GABLE AREA ON A FLAT ROOF. REVISE AS | | REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. | | | | H)BUILDER TO COMPLETE THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE LEVEL | | (EPL) DISPLAY CARD FOR ALL APARTMENTS. SEC. R405.4.3 | | FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. | | | | NOTE: | | LABEL FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS SHOWING THE U-FACTOR AND | | SHGC FACTOR IS REQUIRED WHEN THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS | | ARE NOT USING THE DEFAULT FACTOR. THIS WILL BE DONE AT | | TIME OF INSPECTIONS. | | | | 2- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVISE INSULATION INFORMATION | | SHOWN ON PLANS. R-30 BATT INSULATION IS 9-1/2" +/- | | THICK. IT DOESN'T FIT ON ROOF JOIST AND FLOOR JOISTS | | SIZES SHOWN ON PLANS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. NOTE: | | COORDINATE WITH ENERGY CALCULATIONS TO AVOID | | CONFLICTS/DELAYS. SEC. R103.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. | | | | 3- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE | | FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLY FOR TENANT SEPARATION WITH THE | | APT ON THE SECOND FLOOR. REPEAT COMMENT. NOTE: TENANT | | SEPARATION WALL DETAIL "F" ON SHEET S1A DOESN'T PROVIDE | | SPECIFICATIONS FOR APPROVED HORIZONTAL ASSEMBLY. IT | | ONLY SPECIFIES THE WALL ASSEMBLY UL-U311. PROVIDE | | COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR APPROVED | | HORIZONTAL FIRE RATED ASSEMBLY AS REQUIRED . SEC. 420.3 | | FBC. | | | | 4-SECOND FLOOR WINDOWS NEED TO COMPLY WITH THE WINDOW | | OPENING CONTROL DEVICES REQUIRED BY SEC. 702.4 | | FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. | | NOTE: PROVIDE INFORMATION SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH ASTM | | F2090. | | | | 5- ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, SYSTEMS, | | AND SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING AS REQUIRED BY SEC. | | 801.3 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE | | SOUND TRANSMISSION FOR FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLY. | | FLOORING UNDERLAYMENT | | SOUND INSULATION MATERIAL: | | A) PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF THE FLAME SPREAD INDEX AND SMOKE | | DEVELOPED INDEX TEST DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 84 | | OR UL 723 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 720.1 OF FBC 6TH EDITION | | (2017). | | | | B) PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF THE SOUND TRANSMISSION CLASS | | (STC) TEST DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 90 AS | | REQUIRED BY SEC. 1207.2 OF FBC 6TH EDITION (2017). | | | | C) PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF THE IMPACT INSULATION CLASS | | (IIC) TEST DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 492 AS | | REQUIRED BY SEC. 1207.3 OF FBC 6TH EDITION (2017). | | | | 6-DESIGNER OF RECORD TO SPECIFY ROOF TILE FASTENING AS | | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS. IF | | SPECIFYING SCREWS, THEN SPECIFY SIZE AND NUMBER OF | | SCREWS. IF SPECIFYING ROOF TILE ADHESIVE, THEN SPECIFY | | PADDY SIZE AND PRODUCT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. REPEAT | | COMMENT. ENGINEER TO SPECIFY FASTENING. THIS IS NOT BY | | OTHERS. | | | | 7- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY | | FAC 61G20-3.001 FOR: | | NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS DEFERRED | | SUBMITTAL, BUT BEFORE INSTALLATION (NO FEES). | | | | A) FLAT ROOF. AND, CLEARLY MARK WHICH APPROVED ASSEMBLY | | IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE | | DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. 1609 FBC. NOTE: IF THE | | SELECTED ASSEMBLY DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR | | ALL ROOF ZONES, THEN SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 | | CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED. | | | | B) ROOF TILE. | | | | C) ROOF TILE ADHESIVE IF SPECIFIED BY THE DESIGNER OF | | RECORD. AND SPECIFY PADDY SIZE. SEE ROOF TILE PRODUCT | | APPROVAL FOR LISTED ADHESIVES. | | | | 8- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING | | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ABOVE PRODUCT APPROVALS AS | | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | 9- BASED ON THE MECHANICAL PLANS SUBMITTED, PROVIDE | | DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING HOW THE A/C DUCTWORK | | IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED. REMEMBER THAT THERE IS A FIRE | | RATED FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLY SEPARATING THE APT ABOVE. | | SEC. 711 FBC-BUILDING. | | NEED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF | | THE SOFFITS FOR A/C WORK. | | | | 10- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS ANS SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE | | REPLACEMENT OF EXTERIOR WOOD STUDS. SPECIFY ALL | | CONNECTORS. SEC. 1609.1 FBC. | | | | 11-ROOF FRAMING PLAN ON SHEET S1A: | | A) PROVIDE COMPLETE SECTION/DETAIL AT CANOPY ENTRY FOR | | APT #2 AND APT #3. IT'S NOT CLEAR HOW THE ROOF IS | | SUPPORTED. FRONT ELEVATION CALLS FOR COLUMNS, BUT ROOF | | FRAMING DETAIL DOESN'T SPECIFY ANY. SEC. 1609.1 FBC. | | | | B) LEDGER INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE ROOF FRAMING PLAN | | DOESN'T MATCH LEDGER INFORMATION SHOWN ON SECTION 1 ON | | SAME SHEET. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY | | AMENDMENTS. | | | | 12- PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR THE FIRE RATING | | ASSEMBLY BELOW THE STAIRS AND BY THE PANTRY CLOSET ON | | FIRST FLOOR KITCHEN. SEC. 420.2 AND 420.3 FBC. | | | | | | ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS | | FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B): | | WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS? | | DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT NECESSARY, IN | | ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING | | CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT DESIGN DOCUMENTS | | REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE TIMES FOR FAILURE TO | | CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY | | NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, | | EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, | | ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, | | MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS SYSTEMS, OR OTHER | | REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING | | COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL | | GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH | | REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, | | A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT OF THE PROPORTION OF THE | | PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS REVIEW | | | | NOTE: | | ENGINEER OF RECORD TO PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER | | ADDRESSING EACH COMMENT TO AVOID PLAN REVIEW FEES AS | | REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B). | | | | ****PLEASE INSERT ANY REVISED DRAWING AND REMOVE OLD | | DRAWING. SUBMIT OLD DRAWINGS FOR REFERENCE OF ALREADY | | REVIEWED DRAWINGS. DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS TO PLANS. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT | | JULIO GOMEZ | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | BUILDING DIVISION | | (561)805-6712 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-05-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-05-02 |
Time |
18:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-05-01 |
Time |
15:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2018-05-01 17:28:50 | RESIDENTIAL (R2) ALTERATION, SECOND BUILDING REVIEW | | CHECKLIST. | | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017). | | | | | | 1(A)REVISE ALL ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED. | | A)PROVIDE COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION ON TOP OF | | FORM. NEED OWNER'S NAME. NEED CORRECT BUILDER'S NAME. | | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. | | | | B) THIS IS NOT NEW CONSTRUCTION. REVISE ITEM #1. SEC. | | R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. | | | | C) WALL INSULATION R-VALUE SHOWN ON ITEM #9A DOESN'T | | MATCH PLANS. SEE WALL TYPE LEGEND ON SHEET CVR FOR | | EXTERIOR WALL SPECIFICATIONS AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. | | | | D) CLARIFY WHY THE FLOOR INFORMATION SHOWN ON PAGE 2 OF | | 4 DOESN'T SHOW THE R-VALUE SPECIFIED FOR THE RAISED | | FLOOR ON PAGE 1 OF 4. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY | | CONSERVATION. | | | | E) REVISE ROOF INFORMATION SHOWN ON PAGE 2 OF 4. THERE | | IS NO ROOF ABOVE THIS APARTMENT. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- | | ENERGY CONSERVATION. | | | | F) REVISE ATTIC INFORMATION SHOWN ON PAGE 2 OF 4. THERE | | IS NO ATTIC ABOVE THIS APARTMENT. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 | | FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. | | | | G) REVISE WALLS INFORMATION SHOWN ON PAGE 2 OF 4. | | ORIENTATION OF WALLS DON'T MATCH ACTUAL ORIENTATION OF | | BUILDING. SEE PLANS AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. | | R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. | | | | H) REVISE WINDOWS INFORMATION SHOWN ON PAGE 3 OF 4. | | ORIENTATION DOESN'T MATCH ACTUAL ORIENTATION OF | | BUILDING. ALSO, REVISE AREA AND OVERHANG DEPTH AND | | SEPARATION TO MATCH PLANS. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- | | ENERGY CONSERVATION. | | | | I) PROVIDE THE NAME OF PERSON PERFORMING THE ANALYSIS | | AND GENERATING THE REPORT AS REQUIRED BY SEC. | | R405.4.2.1 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. | | | | J)BUILDER TO COMPLETE THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE LEVEL | | (EPL) DISPLAY CARD. SEC. R405.4.3 FBC- ENERGY | | CONSERVATION. | | | | IMPORTANT NOTES: | | (1) BASED ON THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED, THIS | | PROJECT REQUIRES AN ENVELOPE LEAKAGE TEST REPORT WITH | | ENVELOPE LEAKAGE NO GREATER THAN 4.00 ACH50 | | (R402.4.1.2) | | | | (2)LABEL FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS SHOWING THE U-FACTOR AND | | SHGC FACTOR IS REQUIRED WHEN THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS | | ARE NOT USING THE DEFAULT FACTOR. | | | | 1(B) ENGINEER OF RECORD TO COORDINATE WITH ENERGY | | CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED. PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE | | INSULATION ON THE RAISED FLOOR AS SPECIFIED ON ITEM 8A | | OF THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS. SEC. R103.2 FBC- ENERGY | | CONSERVATION. | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | PROVIDE ENERGY CALCULATIONS (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY | | SEC. 908 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. | | | | 2- SHEET CVR: | | A)THIS IS NOT "MULTI-FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENCE(R2)". | | THIS DOESN'T MAKE SENSE. IF THEY WERE DETACHED, THEN | | THEY WOULD BE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES. THE BUILDING | | CODE IN EFFECT IS THE 2017 NOT 2014. ALTERATION LEVEL 3 | | NEEDS TO COMPLY WITH CHAPTER 9. REVISE INFORMATION | | SHOWN ON "SCOPE OF WORK" AS REQUIRED. | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | THIS IS NOT A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE. THIS IS | | MULTIFAMILY BUILDING (R2). REVISE ALL THE INFORMATION | | SHOWN ON THIS SHEET THAT REFERENCE THE SINGLE FAMILY | | RESIDENCE AND ALL CODE SECTIONS REFERENCED. NEED TO | | REFERENCE SECTIONS FROM THE FBC-BUILDING. | | SEC. 310.4 FBC-BUILDING | | | | B) ALL FIRE RATED PARTITIONS NEED TO PROVIDE CONTINUITY | | AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 708.4 FBC-BUILDING. REVISE ALL FIRE | | RATED WALLS ASSEMBLIES AS REQUIRED TO MATCH PROPOSED | | INSTALLATION. DETAIL "F" ON SHEET S1A IS UNFEASIBLE TO | | BUILD THE WAY IS SHOWN. INTERIOR GYPSUM BOARD CAN NOT | | GO THRU THE FLOOR ASSEMBLY. ALSO, BOTTOM AND TOP | | STRUCTURAL CONNECTIONS NEED MORE INFORMATION. CLEARLY | | SPECIFY ALL CONNECTORS SHOWING THE LOAD PATH (FOR | | EXAMPLE: TOP AND BOTTOM PLATES TO THE EXISTING | | STRUCTURAL FRAMING MEMBERS). NOTE: COORDINATE ALL WALL | | DETAILS WITH FIRE RATED BEARING WALLS AND NON BEARING | | WALLS TO MATCH PROPOSED INSTALLATION. | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | WALL TYPE LEGEND: FIRE RATED WALL "F" DOESN'T MATCH | | FIRE RATED WALL ON SHEET S2. REVISE AS REQUIRED. AND, | | PROVIDE COMPLETE AND CLEAR WALL SECTION THAT MATCHES | | PROPOSED INSTALLATION. | | NOTE: NEED TO PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECS FOR | | ALL WALLS FOR TENANT SEPARATION BETWEEN APT #1 AND APT | | #2. INCLUDING THE BEARING WALLS. SEC. 703.1 | | FBC-BUILDING. INCLUDING THE FOYER AREA THAT WAS DIVIDED | | TO ALLOW SEPARATE ENTRANCE TO APT ABOVE. COORDINATE | | WITH UL ASSEMBLY U305 SPECIFIED ON SHEET S2. | | | | C) COMPLIED. EXISTENT RAILING TO REMAIN. | | | | 3- BEARING WALL DETAIL "G" ON SHEET S1 DOESN'T SEEM TO | | COMPLY WITH A BEARING WALL. IT IS BEARING ON PLYWOOD | | INSTEAD OF A SUPPORTING STRUCTURAL MEMBER. MISMATCHING | | METAL AND WOOD CONNECTORS?. THERE IS NO COORDINATION | | WITH FIRE RATED PARTITIONS SHOWN ON SHEET S1A. ALSO | | NEED TO COORDINATE WITH ITEM #2B ABOVE. CONNECTIONS AT | | TOP AND BOTTOM DON'T SEEM TO WORK THE WAY THEY ARE | | SPECIFIED. FIRST FLOOR DEMOLITION PLAN CALLS FOR | | EXISTING GIRDER BEAM BY THE STAIRWAY AREA. ACCORDING TO | | CITY RECORDS, THERE WAS A CONTINUOUS WALL IN THIS AREA | | NOT A BEAM. ENGINEER NEEDS TO CLEARLY IDENTIFY ALL | | BEARING WALLS AND CLEARLY PROVIDE DETAILS AND | | SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING REINFORCEMENT AT THE ENDS OF | | PROPOSED OPENINGS. | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | INFORMATION ON BEARING WALLS IS NOT CLEAR AND IS | | INCOMPLETE. CLEARLY IDENTIFY ALL BEARING AND NON | | BEARING WALLS. BEARING WALL TO BE REMOVED AND HOW ARE | | THEY REINFORCED. COORDINATE DEMOLITION PLANS WITH | | PROPOSED PLANS. SEC. 907 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. | | NOTE: CLARIFY WHY THE 18"X18" COLUMN DOESN'T ALIGN WITH | | COLUMN ABOVE? | | | | 4- TYPICAL WINDOW OPENING FRAMING DETAIL SUBMITTED | | DOESN'T PROVIDE ANY INFORMATION FOR CONNECTORS AT THE | | TOP OF THE WALL AND WINDOW HEADER. IT DOESN'T PROVIDE | | THE LOAD PATH. ALSO, IT DOESN'T SHOW ANY FULL LENGTH | | STUDS AT THE ENDS OF THE OPENING. | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | CLEARLY IDENTIFY ALL EXTERIOR STRUCTURAL WALLS THAT ARE | | DAMAGED AND PROVIDE COMPLETE STRUCTURAL DETAILS | | IDENTIFYING THE STRUCTURAL FRAMING MEMBERS AND ALL | | CONNECTORS. TYPICAL STRAPPING PLAN ON SHEET S1 IS | | INSUFFICIENT. SEC. 907 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. | | | | 5- NO INFORMATION SUBMITTED FOR NEW COLUMNS SHOWN ON | | THE PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION. | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR NEW | | COLUMNS SHOWN ON SHEET S2. SPECIFY ALL FRAMING MEMBERS | | AND CONNECTORS. SEC. 1609 FBC-BUILDING. | | | | 6- MISSING INFORMATION ABOUT ROOF SHEATHING SPECS AND | | FASTENING. BEAM CONNECTIONS, ETC. | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | PROVIDE COMPLETE FRAMING DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR | | NEW ROOF SHOWN ON SHEET S2 ON PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION. | | SPECIFY ALL FRAMING MEMBERS, PLYWOOD, CONNECTORS, ETC. | | SEC. 1609 FBC-BUILDING. | | | | 7- SAME NOTE APPEARS ON PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION. | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING HOW | | EXISTING 4X4 POST CAN BE REPAIR/FIX AS SPECIFIED ON | | PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION ON SHEET S2. SEC. 1609 | | FBC-BUILDING. | | | | 8- SHEET S1: | | A) REPEAT COMMENT. DETAIL F ON SHEET S1A REFERENCE ON | | THE RESPONSE LETTER DOESN'T PROVIDE THE COMPLETE | | SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE FLOOR/CEILING FIRE RATED | | ASSEMBLY AND THE DETAIL F NEEDS TO BE REVISED. | | COORDINATE WITH ITEM #2B ABOVE. | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE | | FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLY FOR TENANT SEPARATION WITH THE | | APT ON THE SECOND FLOOR. SEC. 901.2 FBC-EXISTING | | BUILDING. | | | | B)WINDOW "C" DOESN'T COMPLY. | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | PROPOSED BEDROOM WINDOWS DON'T COMPLY WITH THE | | EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE SEC. 1030 FBC-BUILDING | | (SEC. 702.5 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING). | | | | C) NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | SECOND FLOOR WINDOWS NEED TO COMPLY WITH THE WINDOW | | CONTROL DEVICES REQUIRED BY SEC. 702.4 FBC-EXISTING | | BUILDING. | | | | D) NEED TO COORDINATE WITH ITEM #2B ABOVE. ALSO, NEED | | TO PROVIDE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING HOW THE | | NEW WALL WILL PROVIDE CONTINUOUS FIRE RATING ON BOTH | | SIDES OF THE WALL CONSIDERING THE EXISTING STAIRS. HOW | | THE EXISTING STAIRS WILL BE SUPPORTED. ALSO, NEED TO | | PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR FIRE | | SEPARATION OF KITCHEN AREA ON APT #1 AND APT ABOVE. | | INCLUDE BOTTOM OF STAIRS AND PANTRY AREA OF FIRST FLOOR | | KITCHEN. | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | PROVIDE COMPLETE WALL SECTION FOR NEW WALL AT FOYER | | AREA SEPARATING APT #1 FROM APT ABOVE. SEC. 903.1 | | FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. | | | | E)NOT ADDRESSED. RESPONSE LETTER REFERENCES DETAIL WALL | | G. THIS DETAIL DOESN'T APPLY TO THE REQUESTED ITEM. | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | PROVIDE COMPLETE OPENING FRAMING DETAIL AND | | SPECIFICATIONS FOR NEW DOOR AT APT ABOVE. SPECIFY ALL | | FRAMING MEMBERS AND CONNECTORS. SEC. 907 FBC-EXISTING | | BUILDING. | | | | F) STILL NOT CLEAR. SHOWING BOTH. | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | TYPICAL INTERIOR PARTITION DETAIL IS NOT CLEAR. IS IT A | | WOOD FRAMED WALL OR METAL FRAMED WALL. SEC. 107.2.1 | | CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | G)COMPLIED. | | | | 9- SHEET S2: | | A) COMPLIED. | | | | B) REVISE SPECIFICATIONS: SPECIFY TWO LAYERS OF | | WATER-RESISTIVE BARRIER AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 2510.6 | | FBC-BUILDING. AND, SPECIFY NO LESS THAN THREE COATS OF | | STUCCO AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 2512.1 FBC-BUILDING. | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE | | APPLICATION OF NEW STUCCO FINISH OVER EXISTING STUCCO | | FINISH AS SPECIFIED ON PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION. SEC. | | 2510 FBC-BUILDING. | | | | 10- COMPLIED. | | | | 11- RESPONSE LETTER STATES R-13 INSULATION ON WALLS, | | R-30 INSULATION ON 1ST FLOOR CEILING. THERMAL | | INSULATION AND SOUND INSULATION ARE TWO DIFFERENT | | THINGS. NEED TO COMPLY WITH THE SOUND AND IMPACT | | INSULATION AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 1207. PROVIDE | | SPECIFICATIONS ON PLANS. NOTE: COPIES OF THE REQUIRED | | TESTING FOR SPECIFIC PRODUCTS TO BE INSTALLED MAY BE | | SUBMITTED LATER AS DEFERRED SUBMITTAL, BUT BEFORE | | INSTALLATION. | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, SYSTEMS, AND | | SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING AS REQUIRED BY SEC. | | 801.3 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE | | SOUND TRANSMISSION FOR FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLY AND | | TENANT SEPARATION WALLS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 1207 | | FBC-BUILDING. | | | | 12- THE MINIMUM ATTACHMENT RESISTANCE (26.1 FT-LBF) OF | | ADHESIVE SELECTED ON PAGE 5 OF 6 OF NOA 16-0112.08 | | SUBMITTED DOESN'T MEET THE MINIMUM ATTACHMENT | | RESISTANCE OF TABLE 2A OF FRSA 5TH EDITION (REVISED). | | REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | DESIGNER OF RECORD TO SPECIFY ROOF TILE FASTENING AS | | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS. IF | | SPECIFYING SCREWS, THEN SPECIFY SIZE AND NUMBER OF | | SCREWS. IF SPECIFYING ROOF TILE ADHESIVE, THEN SPECIFY | | PADDY SIZE AND PRODUCT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. | | | | 13- SELECTED ASSEMBLY ON PAGE 28-29 OF NOA 14-1030.02 | | SUBMITTED DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR ALL | | ROOF ZONES. NEED SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 | | CALCULATIONS. SEE GENERAL LIMITATION #7 ON LAST PAGE OF | | NOA. | | NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS DEFERRED | | SUBMITTAL, BUT BEFORE INSTALLATION. | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | FLAT ROOF NOA 15-1020.01 SUBMITTED: CLEARLY MARK WHICH | | APPROVED ASSEMBLY IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED TO VERIFY | | COMPLIANCE WITH THE DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. 1609 | | FBC-BUILDING. IF THE SELECTED ASSEMBLY DOESN'T MEET THE | | DESIGN PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF ZONES, THEN SIGNED AND | | SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED. RAS 117 | | CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE THE FLORIDA | | ENGINEER'S SEAL AND ORIGINAL HANDWRITTEN SIGNATURE, | | COPIES OR OTHER FACSIMILES ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. FAC | | 61G15 - 23.002 DIGITAL SIGNATURES ARE ONLY ACCEPTABLE | | FOR ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMITTED PLANS AND DOCUMENTS. | | | | 14- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY | | FAC 61G20-3.001 FOR: | | NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS DEFERRED | | SUBMITTAL, BUT BEFORE INSTALLATION. | | | | A)SHEET S1 DOESN'T SHOW WINDOW MULLION DETAIL AS | | REFERENCED ON HE RESPONSE LETTER. CLEARLY IDENTIFY | | MULLION SIZE ON PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | WINDOW MULLIONS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. AND, CLEARLY MARK | | MULLION SIZE TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALCULATED | | DESIGN PRESSURES. | | | | B) NO SUBMITTED. PROVIDE ACTUAL PRODUCT APPROVAL LISTED | | ON THE NOA FOR ROOF TILE. | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | ROOF TILE ADHESIVE IF SPECIFIED BY THE DESIGNER OF | | RECORD ON ITEM #12 ABOVE. AND SPECIFY PADDY SIZE. SEE | | ROOF TILE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR LISTED ADHESIVES. | | | | C)NEED PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR ALL CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON | | ALL PLANS AND DETAILS NOT JUST THE ONES SHOWN ON THE | | ROOF FRAMING PLAN. | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | ALL SIMPSON STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON PLANS | | AND DETAILS. PROVIDE ONLY THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL | | COVER PAGE AND PAGE SHOWING THE SPECIFIED CONNECTOR OR | | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL TO LIST THE FLORIDA PRODUCT | | APPROVAL NUMBER NEXT TO EACH SPECIFIED CONNECTOR. | | | | 15- THERE ARE SOME PRODUCT APPROVALS THAT ARE NOT | | REVIEWED (ENTRY DOOR). | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | 15- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING | | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS | | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | 16-NEW COMMENT: | | BASED ON THE MECHANICAL PLANS SUBMITTED, PROVIDE | | DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING HOW THE A/C DUCTWORK | | IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED. REMEMBER THAT THERE IS A FIRE | | RATED FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLY SEPARATING THE APT ABOVE. | | SEC. 711 FBC-BUILDING. | | | | | | | | NOTE: | | ENGINEER OF RECORD TO PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER | | ADDRESSING EACH COMMENT TO AVOID PLAN REVIEW FEES AS | | REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B). | | | | ****PLEASE INSERT ANY REVISED DRAWING AND REMOVE OLD | | DRAWING. SUBMIT OLD DRAWINGS FOR REFERENCE OF ALREADY | | REVIEWED DRAWINGS. DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS TO PLANS. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT | | JULIO GOMEZ | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | BUILDING DIVISION | | (561)805-6712 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-03-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-03-15 |
Time |
18:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-03-15 |
Time |
12:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2018-03-15 13:52:22 | RESIDENTIAL (R2) ALTERATION, BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS | | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017). | | | | 1- PROVIDE ENERGY CALCULATIONS (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED | | BY SEC. 908 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. | | | | 2- SHEET CVR: | | A) THIS IS NOT A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE. THIS IS | | MULTIFAMILY BUILDING (R2). REVISE ALL THE INFORMATION | | SHOWN ON THIS SHEET THAT REFERENCE THE SINGLE FAMILY | | RESIDENCE AND ALL CODE SECTIONS REFERENCED. NEED TO | | REFERENCE SECTIONS FROM THE FBC-BUILDING. | | SEC. 310.4 FBC-BUILDING | | | | B) WALL TYPE LEGEND: FIRE RATED WALL "F" DOESN'T MATCH | | FIRE RATED WALL ON SHEET S2. REVISE AS REQUIRED. AND, | | PROVIDE COMPLETE AND CLEAR WALL SECTION THAT MATCHES | | PROPOSED INSTALLATION. | | NOTE: NEED TO PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECS FOR | | ALL WALLS FOR TENANT SEPARATION BETWEEN APT #1 AND APT | | #2. INCLUDING THE BEARING WALL. SEC. 703.1 | | FBC-BUILDING. INCLUDING THE FOYER AREA THAT WAS DIVIDED | | TO ALLOW SEPARATE ENTRANCE TO APT ABOVE. COORDINATE | | WITH UL ASSEMBLY U305 SPECIFIED ON SHEET S2. | | | | C) IT IS NOT CLEAR IF THE SECOND FLOOR BALCONY RAILING | | IS GOING TO BE REPLACED OR NOT. SEE 2ND FLOOR | | DEMOLITION PLAN AND 2ND FLOOR PROPOSED PLAN. SEC. | | 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. NOTE: IF RAILING IS GOING TO | | BE REPLACE, THEN PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND | | SPECIFICATIONS. | | | | 3- INFORMATION ON BEARING WALLS IS NOT CLEAR AND IS | | INCOMPLETE. CLEARLY IDENTIFY ALL BEARING AND NON | | BEARING WALLS. BEARING WALL TO BE REMOVED AND HOW ARE | | THEY REINFORCED. COORDINATE DEMOLITION PLANS WITH | | PROPOSED PLANS. SEC. 907 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. | | NOTE: CLARIFY WHY THE 18"X18" COLUMN DOESN'T ALIGN WITH | | COLUMN ABOVE? | | | | 4- CLEARLY IDENTIFY ALL EXTERIOR STRUCTURAL WALLS THAT | | ARE DAMAGED AND PROVIDE COMPLETE STRUCTURAL DETAILS | | IDENTIFYING THE STRUCTURAL FRAMING MEMBERS AND ALL | | CONNECTORS. TYPICAL STRAPPING PLAN ON SHEET S1 IS | | INSUFFICIENT. SEC. 907 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. | | | | 5- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR NEW | | COLUMNS SHOWN ON SHEET S2. SPECIFY ALL FRAMING MEMBERS | | AND CONNECTORS. SEC. 1609 FBC-BUILDING. | | | | 6- PROVIDE COMPLETE FRAMING DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS | | FOR NEW ROOF SHOWN ON SHEET S2 ON PROPOSED SOUTH | | ELEVATION. SPECIFY ALL FRAMING MEMBERS, PLYWOOD, | | CONNECTORS, ETC. SEC. 1609 FBC-BUILDING. | | | | 7- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING | | HOW EXISTING 4X4 POST CAN BE REPAIR/FIX AS SPECIFIED ON | | PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION ON SHEET S2. SEC. 1609 | | FBC-BUILDING. | | | | 8- SHEET S1: | | A) PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE | | FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLY FOR TENANT SEPARATION WITH THE | | APT ON THE SECOND FLOOR. SEC. 901.2 FBC-EXISTING | | BUILDING. | | | | B) PROPOSED BEDROOM WINDOWS DON'T COMPLY WITH THE | | EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE SEC. 1030 FBC-BUILDING | | (SEC. 702.5 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING). | | | | C) SECOND FLOOR WINDOWS NEED TO COMPLY WITH THE WINDOW | | CONTROL DEVICES REQUIRED BY SEC. 702.4 FBC-EXISTING | | BUILDING. | | | | D) PROVIDE COMPLETE WALL SECTION FOR NEW WALL AT FOYER | | AREA SEPARATING APT #1 FROM APT ABOVE. SEC. 903.1 | | FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. | | | | E) PROVIDE COMPLETE OPENING FRAMING DETAIL AND | | SPECIFICATIONS FOR NEW DOOR AT APT ABOVE. SPECIFY ALL | | FRAMING MEMBERS AND CONNECTORS. SEC. 907 FBC-EXISTING | | BUILDING. | | | | F) TYPICAL INTERIOR PARTITION DETAIL IS NOT CLEAR. IS | | IT A WOOD FRAMED WALL OR METAL FRAMED WALL. SEC. | | 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | G) PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS, | | INCLUDING LOCATION FOR THE STAIRWAY HANDRAILS. SEC. | | 805.9 FBC-EXISTING-BUILDING. | | | | 9- SHEET S2: | | A) REVISE THE DESIGN DATA FOR WIND LOADS. | | (1)RESIDENTIAL CODE DOESN'T APPLY TO R2 GROUPS. SEC. | | 310.4 FBC-BUILDING. (2) REVISE THE DESIGN PRESSURES TO | | CORRESPOND TO THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT OF THIS BUILDING. | | SEC. 1609 FBC-BUILDING. | | | | B) PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE | | APPLICATION OF NEW STUCCO FINISH OVER EXISTING STUCCO | | FINISH AS SPECIFIED ON PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION. SEC. | | 2510 FBC-BUILDING. | | | | 10- FIRE ALARM IS REQUIRED BY SEC. 804.4.1.7 | | FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECIFICATIONS. | | | | 11- ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, SYSTEMS, | | AND SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING AS REQUIRED BY SEC. | | 801.3 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE | | SOUND TRANSMISSION FOR FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLY AND | | TENANT SEPARATION WALLS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 1207 | | FBC-BUILDING. | | | | 12- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO SPECIFY ROOF TILE FASTENING | | AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS. IF | | SPECIFYING SCREWS, THEN SPECIFY SIZE AND NUMBER OF | | SCREWS. IF SPECIFYING ROOF TILE ADHESIVE, THEN SPECIFY | | PADDY SIZE AND PRODUCT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. | | | | 13- FLAT ROOF NOA 15-1020.01 SUBMITTED: CLEARLY MARK | | WHICH APPROVED ASSEMBLY IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED TO | | VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. | | 1609 FBC-BUILDING. IF THE SELECTED ASSEMBLY DOESN'T | | MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF ZONES, THEN | | SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED. | | RAS 117 CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE THE FLORIDA | | ENGINEER'S SEAL AND ORIGINAL HANDWRITTEN SIGNATURE, | | COPIES OR OTHER FACSIMILES ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. FAC | | 61G15 - 23.002 DIGITAL SIGNATURES ARE ONLY ACCEPTABLE | | FOR ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMITTED PLANS AND DOCUMENTS. | | | | 14- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY | | FAC 61G20-3.001 FOR: | | A) WINDOW MULLIONS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. AND, CLEARLY MARK | | MULLION SIZE TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALCULATED | | DESIGN PRESSURES. | | | | B) ROOF TILE ADHESIVE IF SPECIFIED BY THE DESIGNER OF | | RECORD ON ITEM #12 ABOVE. AND SPECIFY PADDY SIZE. SEE | | ROOF TILE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR LISTED ADHESIVES. | | | | C) ALL SIMPSON STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON PLANS | | AND DETAILS. PROVIDE ONLY THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL | | COVER PAGE AND PAGE SHOWING THE SPECIFIED CONNECTOR OR | | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL TO LIST THE FLORIDA PRODUCT | | APPROVAL NUMBER NEXT TO EACH SPECIFIED CONNECTOR. | | | | 15- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING | | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS | | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | NOTE: | | ENGINEER OF RECORD TO PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER | | ADDRESSING EACH COMMENT TO AVOID PLAN REVIEW FEES AS | | REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B). | | | | ****PLEASE INSERT ANY REVISED DRAWING AND REMOVE OLD | | DRAWING. SUBMIT OLD DRAWINGS FOR REFERENCE OF ALREADY | | REVIEWED DRAWINGS. DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS TO PLANS. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT | | JULIO GOMEZ | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | BUILDING DIVISION | | (561)805-6712 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2018-09-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jpearson |
Date |
2018-09-22 |
Time |
14:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jpearson |
Date |
2018-09-22 |
Time |
14:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-07-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jpearson |
Date |
2018-07-17 |
Time |
08:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jpearson |
Date |
2018-07-17 |
Time |
05:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2018-07-17 07:45:28 | CODES IN EFFECT: | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2017 6TH EDITION | | FBC EC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION 2017 | | 6TH EDITION | | FBC RE = FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE 2017 6TH EDITION | | NEC = NFPA 70 2014 EDITION, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE | | FS = FLORIDA STATUTES | | | | ELECTRICAL REVIEW STATUS: DENIED, SEE COMMENTS BELOW. | | | | PREVIOUS COMMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED | | SATISFACTORILY ARE MARKED AS CORRECTED. PREVIOUS | | COMMENTS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRESSED SATISFACTORILY | | HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS IN PARENTHESES. ANY NEW | | COMMENTS WILL BE LISTED AFTER PREVIOUS COMMENTS. | | | | 1. PROVIDE ACCURATE LOAD CALCULATION INCLUDING ALL | | LOADS. ALL LOADS SUPPLIED ARE THE SAME FOR EACH PANEL | | EVEN THOUGH THERE ARE DIFFERENCES IN EACH UNIT. ALSO, | | THE PANEL SCHEDULE SHOWS 10 KW HEAT FOR THE AHU, BUT | | YOU HAVE INCLUDED 3.25 KW IN LOAD CALCULATION. THERE | | SHOULD BE ONE LOAD CALCULATION FOR ENTIRE SERVICE, AND | | THEN A LOAD CALCULATION FOR EACH SUB-PANEL ALSO. NEC | | 220 (LOAD CALCULATION PROVIDED IS NOT CODE COMPLIANT. | | DEMAND FACTORS HAVE BEEN APPLIED TO EACH PANEL, AND | | THEN AGAIN BASED ON 220.84. THAT CODE SECTION EXPLAINS | | THAT THE LOADS ARE ALL ADDED TOGETHER AND THEN A DEMAND | | FACTOR IS APPLIED ONE TIME. PROVIDE ACCURATE LOAD | | CALCULATION.) | | 2. PROVIDE ACCURATE RISER DIAGRAM, SHOWING ALL DETAILS | | OF SERVICE EQUIPMENT, UNDERGROUND OR OVERHEAD SERVICE, | | WIRE AND BREAKER SIZES FOR SERVICE AND FEED TO ANY | | SUB-PANEL(S). SHOW GEC SIZE AND SYSTEM, SHOW | | INTERSYSTEM BONDING TERMINATION POINT. PLAN CURRENTLY | | SHOWS DISCONNECT A FEEDING NOTHING, DISCONNECT B | | FEEDING PANEL A, AND DISCONNECT C FEEDING PANEL B. ALSO | | NEED TO SHOW WIRE SIZE FOR SERVICE LATERAL. PROVIDE | | CORRECTIONS. NEC 215.5, 230, 250.50, 250.94, 408.30 | | (THIS IS MOSTLY CORRECTED, BUT SHOWS A 130 AMP BREAKER | | FEEDING APARTMENT 3. THIS IS NOT A STANDARD FUSE SIZE | | PER 240.6. PROVIDE CORRECTION.) | | 3. CORRECTED. | | 4. PLAN SHOWS AFCI COVERAGE FOR SOME RECEPTACLE OUTLETS | | BUT NOT LIGHTING. THIS COVERAGE IS NOT TO CODE AND NOT | | COMPLETE. CODE REQUIRES: "BRANCH CIRCUITS THAT SUPPLY | | 120-VOLT, SINGLE-PHASE, 15- AND 20-AMPERE OUTLETS | | INSTALLED IN KITCHENS, FAMILY ROOMS, DINING ROOMS, | | LIVING ROOMS, PARLORS, LIBRARIES, DENS, BEDROOMS, | | SUN-ROOMS, RECREATIONS ROOMS, CLOSETS, HALLWAYS, | | LAUNDRY AREAS AND SIMILAR ROOMS OR AREAS SHALL BE AFCI | | PROTECTED." PROVIDE CORRECTION. NEC 210.12 (NOTE | | PROVIDED FOR THIS IS IN CONFLICT WITH THE ABOVE | | STATEMENT. SOME AREAS WILL REQUIRE BOTH AFCI AND GFCI | | PROTECTION. THIS SHOULD ALSO BE REFLECTED IN PANEL | | SCHEDULE.) | | 5. CORRECTED. | | 6. PROVIDE ACCURATE PANEL SCHEDULES, THE WIRE AND | | BREAKER SIZE FOR THESE CIRCUITS, AND AFCI OR GFCI | | PROTECTION WHERE APPLICABLE TO COMPLY WITH CODE. ALL | | PANEL SCHEDULES PROVIDED ARE IDENTICAL EVEN THOUGH THE | | UNITS ARE DIFFERENT. CIRCUITS SHOULD HAVE UNIQUE | | IDENTIFICATION. NEC 210.8, 210.12, 215.5, 408.4 (AFCI | | PROTECTION NOT LISTED COMPLETELY.) | | 7. CORRECTED. | | 8. CORRECTED. | | 9. CORRECTED. | | | | NEW COMMENT: | | | | 10. BE ADVISED THAT SOME OF THESE COMMENTS HAVE NOT | | BEEN ADDRESSED FOR TWO REVIEWS. IF UPON THE THIRD | | REVIEW, IF IT IS NECESSARY TO REJECT THE SUBMITTED PLAN | | A THIRD TIME FOR THE SAME REASONS, AN ADDITIONAL PLAN | | REVIEW IS REQUIRED. FLORIDA STATUTES STATE: WITH | | RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS | | DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT NECESSARY, IN | | ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING | | CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT DESIGN DOCUMENTS | | REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE TIMES FOR FAILURE TO | | CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY | | NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, | | EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, | | ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, | | MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS SYSTEMS, OR OTHER | | REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING | | COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL | | GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH | | REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, | | A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT OF THE PROPORTION OF THE | | PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS REVIEW. FS 553.80(2)(B)? | | (PLAN REVIEW FEE ADDED.) | | | | END OF COMMENTS. | | | | PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED | | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. WHEN | | RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE | | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY | | RESUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, INSERT CORRECTED PAGES | | INTO THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE OR VOID THE | | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS. | | | | SINCERELY, | | | | JOHN PEARSON | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | 561-805-6746 | | [email protected] | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-04-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jpearson |
Date |
2018-04-30 |
Time |
17:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jpearson |
Date |
2018-04-30 |
Time |
16:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2018-04-30 17:10:54 | CODES IN EFFECT: | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2017 6TH EDITION | | FBC EC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION 2017 | | 6TH EDITION | | FBC RE = FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE 2017 6TH EDITION | | NEC = NFPA 70 2014 EDITION, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE | | FS = FLORIDA STATUTES | | | | ELECTRICAL REVIEW STATUS: DENIED, SEE COMMENTS BELOW. | | | | PREVIOUS COMMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED | | SATISFACTORILY ARE MARKED AS CORRECTED. PREVIOUS | | COMMENTS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRESSED SATISFACTORILY | | HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS IN PARENTHESES. ANY NEW | | COMMENTS WILL BE LISTED AFTER PREVIOUS COMMENTS. | | | | 1. PROVIDE ACCURATE LOAD CALCULATION INCLUDING ALL | | LOADS. ALL LOADS SUPPLIED ARE THE SAME FOR EACH PANEL | | EVEN THOUGH THERE ARE DIFFERENCES IN EACH UNIT. ALSO, | | THE PANEL SCHEDULE SHOWS 10 KW HEAT FOR THE AHU, BUT | | YOU HAVE INCLUDED 3.25 KW IN LOAD CALCULATION. THERE | | SHOULD BE ONE LOAD CALCULATION FOR ENTIRE SERVICE, AND | | THEN A LOAD CALCULATION FOR EACH SUB-PANEL ALSO. NEC | | 220 (NOT PROVIDED AS REQUESTED) | | 2. PROVIDE ACCURATE RISER DIAGRAM, SHOWING ALL DETAILS | | OF SERVICE EQUIPMENT, UNDERGROUND OR OVERHEAD SERVICE, | | WIRE AND BREAKER SIZES FOR SERVICE AND FEED TO ANY | | SUB-PANEL(S). SHOW GEC SIZE AND SYSTEM, SHOW | | INTERSYSTEM BONDING TERMINATION POINT. PLAN CURRENTLY | | SHOWS DISCONNECT A FEEDING NOTHING, DISCONNECT B | | FEEDING PANEL A, AND DISCONNECT C FEEDING PANEL B. ALSO | | NEED TO SHOW WIRE SIZE FOR SERVICE LATERAL. PROVIDE | | CORRECTIONS. NEC 215.5, 230, 250.50, 250.94, 408.30 | | (NOT PROVIDED) | | 3. PANEL C IS SHOWN IN 2 LOCATIONS, PROVIDE CORRECTION. | | FBC 107.2.1 (NOT CORRECTED) | | 4. PLAN SHOWS AFCI COVERAGE FOR SOME RECEPTACLE OUTLETS | | BUT NOT LIGHTING. THIS COVERAGE IS NOT TO CODE AND NOT | | COMPLETE. CODE REQUIRES: "BRANCH CIRCUITS THAT SUPPLY | | 120-VOLT, SINGLE-PHASE, 15- AND 20-AMPERE OUTLETS | | INSTALLED IN KITCHENS, FAMILY ROOMS, DINING ROOMS, | | LIVING ROOMS, PARLORS, LIBRARIES, DENS, BEDROOMS, | | SUN-ROOMS, RECREATIONS ROOMS, CLOSETS, HALLWAYS, | | LAUNDRY AREAS AND SIMILAR ROOMS OR AREAS SHALL BE AFCI | | PROTECTED." PROVIDE CORRECTION. NEC 210.12 (NOT | | PROVIDED) | | 5. CORRECTED. | | 6. PROVIDE ACCURATE PANEL SCHEDULES, THE WIRE AND | | BREAKER SIZE FOR THESE CIRCUITS, AND AFCI OR GFCI | | PROTECTION WHERE APPLICABLE TO COMPLY WITH CODE. ALL | | PANEL SCHEDULES PROVIDED ARE IDENTICAL EVEN THOUGH THE | | UNITS ARE DIFFERENT. CIRCUITS SHOULD HAVE UNIQUE | | IDENTIFICATION. NEC 210.8, 210.12, 215.5, 408.4 (NOT | | PROVIDED) | | 7. PROVIDE GFCI PROTECTION FOR DISHWASHER. NEC 210.8(D) | | (NOT PROVIDED) | | 8. CORRECTED. | | 9. BE ADVISED THAT FIRE ALARM, LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEMS, | | DAS, LIGHTNING PROTECTION, GENERATORS, COMMERCIAL HOOD | | SYSTEMS, WALK IN COOLERS, SIGNS, SITE LIGHTING, AND | | SWIMMING POOLS (WHERE APPLICABLE) ARE NOT INCLUDED IN | | THE SCOPE OF THIS PLAN REVIEW. PROVIDE A BLOCK NOTE | | INDICATING THE REQUIRED SEPARATE PERMITS AND DATA | | SPECIFICATION SHEET SUBMITTALS FOR ANY OF THESE SYSTEMS | | PRESENT. FBC 105.1, 107.2.1 (NOT PROVIDED) | | | | NEW COMMENT: | | | | 10. BE ADVISED THAT SOME OF THESE COMMENTS HAVE NOT | | BEEN ADDRESSED FOR TWO REVIEWS. IF UPON THE THIRD | | REVIEW, IF IT IS NECESSARY TO REJECT THE SUBMITTED PLAN | | A THIRD TIME FOR THE SAME REASONS, AN ADDITIONAL PLAN | | REVIEW IS REQUIRED. FLORIDA STATUTES STATE: ?WITH | | RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS? | | DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT NECESSARY, IN | | ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING | | CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT DESIGN DOCUMENTS | | REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE TIMES FOR FAILURE TO | | CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY | | NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, | | EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, | | ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, | | MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS SYSTEMS, OR OTHER | | REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING | | COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL | | GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH | | REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, | | A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT OF THE PROPORTION OF THE | | PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS REVIEW. FS 553.80(2)(B)? | | | | END OF COMMENTS. | | | | PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED | | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. WHEN | | RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE | | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY | | RESUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, INSERT CORRECTED PAGES | | INTO THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE OR VOID THE | | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS. | | | | SINCERELY, | | | | JOHN PEARSON | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | 561-805-6746 | | [email protected] | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-03-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jpearson |
Date |
2018-03-06 |
Time |
07:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jpearson |
Date |
2018-03-05 |
Time |
16:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2018-03-06 07:26:22 | CODES IN EFFECT: | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2017 6TH EDITION | | FBC EC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION 2017 | | 6TH EDITION | | FBC RE = FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE 2017 6TH EDITION | | NEC = NFPA 70 2014 EDITION, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE | | FS = FLORIDA STATUTES | | | | ELECTRICAL REVIEW STATUS: DENIED, SEE COMMENTS BELOW. | | | | 1. PROVIDE ACCURATE LOAD CALCULATION INCLUDING ALL | | LOADS. ALL LOADS SUPPLIED ARE THE SAME FOR EACH PANEL | | EVEN THOUGH THERE ARE DIFFERENCES IN EACH UNIT. ALSO, | | THE PANEL SCHEDULE SHOWS 10 KW HEAT FOR THE AHU, BUT | | YOU HAVE INCLUDED 3.25 KW IN LOAD CALCULATION. THERE | | SHOULD BE ONE LOAD CALCULATION FOR ENTIRE SERVICE, AND | | THEN A LOAD CALCULATION FOR EACH SUB-PANEL ALSO. NEC | | 220 | | 2. PROVIDE ACCURATE RISER DIAGRAM, SHOWING ALL DETAILS | | OF SERVICE EQUIPMENT, UNDERGROUND OR OVERHEAD SERVICE, | | WIRE AND BREAKER SIZES FOR SERVICE AND FEED TO ANY | | SUB-PANEL(S). SHOW GEC SIZE AND SYSTEM, SHOW | | INTERSYSTEM BONDING TERMINATION POINT. PLAN CURRENTLY | | SHOWS DISCONNECT A FEEDING NOTHING, DISCONNECT B | | FEEDING PANEL A, AND DISCONNECT C FEEDING PANEL B. ALSO | | NEED TO SHOW WIRE SIZE FOR SERVICE LATERAL. PROVIDE | | CORRECTIONS. NEC 215.5, 230, 250.50, 250.94, 408.30 | | 3. PANEL C IS SHOWN IN 2 LOCATIONS, PROVIDE CORRECTION. | | FBC 107.2.1 | | 4. PLAN SHOWS AFCI COVERAGE FOR SOME RECEPTACLE OUTLETS | | BUT NOT LIGHTING. THIS COVERAGE IS NOT TO CODE AND NOT | | COMPLETE. CODE REQUIRES: ?BRANCH CIRCUITS THAT SUPPLY | | 120-VOLT, SINGLE-PHASE, 15- AND 20-AMPERE OUTLETS | | INSTALLED IN KITCHENS, FAMILY ROOMS, DINING ROOMS, | | LIVING ROOMS, PARLORS, LIBRARIES, DENS, BEDROOMS, | | SUN-ROOMS, RECREATIONS ROOMS, CLOSETS, HALLWAYS, | | LAUNDRY AREAS AND SIMILAR ROOMS OR AREAS SHALL BE AFCI | | PROTECTED.? PROVIDE CORRECTION. NEC 210.12 | | 5. BREAKER FOR WATER HEATER IS STATED AS 30 AMP, WHICH | | IS TOO LARGE FOR THIS LOAD. BREAKER SHOULD BE SIZED AT | | 125% OF THE LOAD, WHICH WOULD REQUIRE A 25 AMP BREAKER. | | PROVIDE CORRECTION. NEC 422.13 | | 6. PROVIDE ACCURATE PANEL SCHEDULES, THE WIRE AND | | BREAKER SIZE FOR THESE CIRCUITS, AND AFCI OR GFCI | | PROTECTION WHERE APPLICABLE TO COMPLY WITH CODE. ALL | | PANEL SCHEDULES PROVIDED ARE IDENTICAL EVEN THOUGH THE | | UNITS ARE DIFFERENT. CIRCUITS SHOULD HAVE UNIQUE | | IDENTIFICATION. NEC 210.8, 210.12, 215.5, 408.4 | | 7. PROVIDE GFCI PROTECTION FOR DISHWASHER. NEC 210.8(D) | | 8. SMOKE ALARMS MUST BE INSTALLED AT LEAST 3 FEET FROM | | BATHROOM DOOR, 3 FEET FROM CEILING FANS, AND 3 FEET | | FROM ANY MECHANICAL DUCT. PROVIDE CORRECTIONS. FBC RE | | R314.3(4), NFPA 72:29.8.3.4 | | 9. BE ADVISED THAT FIRE ALARM, LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEMS, | | DAS, LIGHTNING PROTECTION, GENERATORS, COMMERCIAL HOOD | | SYSTEMS, WALK IN COOLERS, SIGNS, SITE LIGHTING, AND | | SWIMMING POOLS (WHERE APPLICABLE) ARE NOT INCLUDED IN | | THE SCOPE OF THIS PLAN REVIEW. PROVIDE A BLOCK NOTE | | INDICATING THE REQUIRED SEPARATE PERMITS AND DATA | | SPECIFICATION SHEET SUBMITTALS FOR ANY OF THESE SYSTEMS | | PRESENT. FBC 105.1, 107.2.1 | | | | END OF COMMENTS. | | | | PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED | | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. WHEN | | RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE | | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY | | RESUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, INSERT CORRECTED PAGES | | INTO THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE OR VOID THE | | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS. | | | | SINCERELY, | | | | JOHN PEARSON | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | 561-805-6746 | | [email protected] | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2018-09-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2018-09-21 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2018-09-20 |
Time |
15:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2018-07-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2018-07-03 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2018-07-03 |
Time |
13:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2018-04-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2018-04-25 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2018-04-24 |
Time |
17:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2018-04-25 13:15:50 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PETER LEDUC, | | FIRE MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | PLEASE CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING AS PROVISO: | | | | THESE PROVISO COMMENTS WILL BE VERIFIED AND CONFIRMED | | AT THE TIME OF FIRE INSPECTION. FAILURE TO FOLLOW THESE | | PROVISO COMMENTS WILL RESULT IN A FAILED FIRE | | INSPECTION. | | | | | | 1) SHEET S 1A - CALL-OUT DRAWING INDICATED AS DIAMOND G | | DOES NOT SHOW TYPE X DRYWALL ON THE CEILING. ALL | | CEILING AREAS SHALL BE TYPE X AS INDICATED IN CALL-OUT | | DRAWING DIAMOND F. | | | | PLEASE ENSURE ALL CEILING AREAS HAVE 1 HOUR FIRE RATED | | CONSTRUCTION FEATURES. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | FIRE MARSHAL | | 561-804-4709 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-03-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2018-03-20 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2018-03-19 |
Time |
11:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2018-03-20 09:15:17 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE | | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1) SHEET CVR - THE PROPOSED PROJECT CHANGES A DUPLEX | | INTO A TRIPLEX CREATING A NEW APARTMENT BUILDING. | | | | PER NFPA 101, CHAPTER 3, DEFINITIONS | | | | 3.3.36.3* APARTMENT BUILDING. A BUILDING OR PORTION | | THEREOF | | CONTAINING THREE OR MORE DWELLING UNITS WITH | | INDEPENDENT | | COOKING AND BATHROOM FACILITIES. (SAF-RES) | | | | PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | | | 2) SHEET CVR - THERE IS NO APPLICABLE REFERNECED FIRE | | CODE. | | | | THE PROPOSED PROJECT SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE | | 6TH EDITION OF FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE INCLUDING | | THE 2015 EDITION OF NFPA 1 AND NFPA 101 AND ALL OTHER | | APPLICABLE CODES OR STANDARDS. | | FIRE SPRINKLER WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS | | OF NFPA 13, 2013 EDITION. | | FIRE ALARM WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF | | NFPA 72, 2013 EDITION. | | CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF | | NFPA 241, 2013 EDITION. | | FIRE EXTINGUISHERS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS | | OF NFPA 10, 2013 EDITION. | | ELECTRIC WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 70, 2014 EDITION. | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A NOTE OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND COMPLIANCE | | | | | | 3) SHEET S 1 - A FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS REQUIRED. | | | | PER NFPA 101, CHAPTER 30, NEW APARTMENT BUILDINGS. | | | | 30.3.5 EXTINGUISHMENT REQUIREMENTS. | | 30.3.5.1 ALL BUILDINGS SHALL BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT BY | | AN APPROVED, | | SUPERVISED AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM INSTALLED IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH | | 30.3.5.2. | | 30.3.5.2 WHERE AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS | | INSTALLED, EITHER FOR | | TOTAL OR PARTIAL BUILDING COVERAGE, THE SYSTEM SHALL BE | | INSTALLED IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.7, AS MODIFIED BY 30.3.5.3 | | AND 30.3.5.4. IN | | BUILDINGS FOUR OR FEWER STORIES ABOVE GRADE PLANE, | | SYSTEMS IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 13R, STANDARD FOR THE INSTALLATION | | OF | | SPRINKLER SYSTEMS IN LOW-RISE RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCIES, | | SHALL BE | | PERMITTED. | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE FOR THE REQUIREMENT AS WELL AS 61G | | DOCUMENTS PER FLORIDA STATUTE WITH THIS MASTER PERMIT. | | | | | | | | 4) THE FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS REQUIRED TO BE | | SUPERVISED AND MONITORED. | | | | PER NFPA 101, CHAPTER 9, FIRE PREOTECTIONS SYSTEMS. | | | | 9.7.2 SUPERVISION. | | 9.7.2.1* SUPERVISORY SIGNALS. | | 9.7.2.1.1 WHERE SUPERVISED AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS | | ARE REQUIRED BY | | ANOTHER SECTION OF THIS CODE, SUPERVISORY ATTACHMENTS | | SHALL BE INSTALLED | | AND MONITORED FOR INTEGRITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 72, | | NATIONAL FIRE | | ALARM AND SIGNALING CODE, AND A DISTINCTIVE SUPERVISORY | | SIGNAL SHALL BE | | PROVIDED TO INDICATE A CONDITION THAT WOULD IMPAIR THE | | SATISFACTORY | | OPERATION OF THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM. | | 9.7.2.1.2 SUPERVISORY SIGNALS SHALL SOUND AND SHALL BE | | DISPLAYED EITHER AT | | A LOCATION WITHIN THE PROTECTED BUILDING THAT IS | | CONSTANTLY ATTENDED BY | | QUALIFIED PERSONNEL OR AT AN APPROVED, REMOTELY LOCATED | | RECEIVING | | FACILITY. | | 9.7.2.2 ALARM SIGNAL TRANSMISSION. | | 9.7.2.2.1 WHERE SUPERVISION OF AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER | | SYSTEMS IS REQUIRED | | BY ANOTHER SECTION OF THIS CODE, WATERFLOW ALARMS SHALL | | BE TRANSMITTED | | TO AN APPROVED, PROPRIETARY ALARM-RECEIVING FACILITY, A | | REMOTE STATION, A | | CENTRAL STATION, OR THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A NOTE OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND COMPLIANCE | | AS WELL AS SHOP DRAWING SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | | | 5) SHEET S 1 - THERE ARE MULTIPLE DIAMOND SHAPED | | REFERNCES THAT DO NOT COINCIDE WITH ANY DRAWINGS OR | | SHEETS. | | | | PLEASE REVIEW AND PROVIDE THEIR DRAWING REFERENCES. | | | | | | | | 6) SHEET S 1 - THERE APPEARS TO BE 1 HOUR RATED WALLS | | THAT INTERSECT WITH BEARING WALLS. THE BEARING WALLS DO | | NOT HAVE ANY RATING INDICATED. | | | | 30.3.7 SUBDIVISIONS OF BUILDING SPACES. BUILDINGS SHALL | | BE | | SUBDIVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 30.3.7.1 OR 30.3.7.2. | | 30.3.7.1 IN BUILDINGS NOT MEETING THE REQUIREMENT OF | | 30.3.7.2, | | DWELLING UNITS SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM EACH OTHER BY | | WALLS AND | | FLOORS CONSTRUCTED AS FIRE BARRIERS HAVING A MINIMUM | | 1-HOUR FIRE | | RESISTANCE RATING. | | | | 30.3.7.2 IN BUILDINGS PROTECTED THROUGHOUT BY AN | | APPROVED, | | SUPERVISED AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM, DWELLING UNITS | | SHALL BE | | SEPARATED FROM EACH OTHER BY WALLS AND FLOORS | | CONSTRUCTED AS FIRE | | BARRIERS HAVING A MINIMUM ?-HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE | | RATING. | | | | PLEASE REVIEW AND CORRECT WITH APPLICABLE RATED | | CONSTRUCTION AND LISTING. | | | | | | | | 7) SHEET S 1 - THERE IS NO INDICATION OF ANY RATING OF | | THE STAIRWELL EXIT ACCESS. | | | | 30.3.6 CORRIDORS. | | 30.3.6.1 WALLS. EXIT ACCESS CORRIDOR WALLS SHALL COMPLY | | WITH | | 30.3.6.1.1 OR 30.3.6.1.2. | | 30.3.6.1.1 IN BUILDINGS NOT COMPLYING WITH 30.3.6.1.2, | | EXIT ACCESS | | CORRIDOR WALLS SHALL CONSIST OF FIRE BARRIERS IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH | | SECTION 8.3 THAT HAVE NOT LESS THAN A 1-HOUR FIRE | | RESISTANCE RATING. | | 30.3.6.1.2 IN BUILDINGS PROTECTED THROUGHOUT BY AN | | APPROVED, | | SUPERVISED AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE | | WITH | | 30.3.5.2, CORRIDOR WALLS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM ?-HOUR | | FIRE | | RESISTANCE RATING. | | | | PLEASE REVIEW AND CORRECT. | | | | | | | | 8) SHEET S 1 - THERE ARE NO REFERNECES TO ANY RATING | | FOR THE CEILING/FLOOR ASSEMBLY. | | | | 30.3.7 SUBDIVISIONS OF BUILDING SPACES. BUILDINGS SHALL | | BE | | SUBDIVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 30.3.7.1 OR 30.3.7.2. | | 30.3.7.1 IN BUILDINGS NOT MEETING THE REQUIREMENT OF | | 30.3.7.2, | | DWELLING UNITS SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM EACH OTHER BY | | WALLS AND | | FLOORS CONSTRUCTED AS FIRE BARRIERS HAVING A MINIMUM | | 1-HOUR FIRE | | RESISTANCE RATING. | | | | 30.3.7.2 IN BUILDINGS PROTECTED THROUGHOUT BY AN | | APPROVED, | | SUPERVISED AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM, DWELLING UNITS | | SHALL BE | | SEPARATED FROM EACH OTHER BY WALLS AND FLOORS | | CONSTRUCTED AS FIRE | | BARRIERS HAVING A MINIMUM ?-HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE | | RATING. | | | | PLEASE REVIEW AND CORRECT. | | | | | | 7) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET | | REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE | | ABOVE. | | | | | | | | 8) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE | | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | FIRE MARSHAL | | 561-804-4709 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2018-10-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-10-18 |
Time |
17:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-09-11 |
Time |
11:05 |
Sent To |
I |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2018-08-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2018-08-02 |
Time |
18:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2018-06-28 |
Time |
14:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2018-05-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2018-05-14 |
Time |
16:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2018-04-20 |
Time |
14:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2018-04-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2018-04-06 |
Time |
15:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2018-02-26 |
Time |
13:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2018-11-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2018-11-01 |
Time |
10:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2018-11-01 |
Time |
10:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-10-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
hmoser |
Date |
2018-10-12 |
Time |
10:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
hmoser |
Date |
2018-10-12 |
Time |
09:48 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2018-10-12 10:41:29 | PLAN DENIED | | REFER TO SECTION 61G15-23.002 FLORIDA STATUE. IF THE | | PLAN IS DRAWN ON | | ENGINEER PAPER IT MUST BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE | | ENGINEER. | | | | PLAN REVIEW BY HAROLD MOSER | | [email protected] | | OFFICE 561-805-6732 | | FAX 561-805-6676 |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-07-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
cmontell |
Date |
2018-07-17 |
Time |
13:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
cmontell |
Date |
2018-07-17 |
Time |
13:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2018-07-17 13:55:42 | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW FAIL | | | | 1 - NEED TO SUBMIT 2 COPYS OF MECHANICAL PLANS (ONLY 1 | | COPY SUBMITTED) | | 2 - ANY DUCTS THROUGH PARTY WALLS NEED FIRE DAMPERS | | | | CHRIS MONTELLO | | 561-805-6733 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-05-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
cmontell |
Date |
2018-04-30 |
Time |
12:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
cmontell |
Date |
2018-05-03 |
Time |
15:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2018-05-03 15:38:15 | NEED FIRE DAMPERS IN ALL DUCT PENETRATIONS |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-03-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
cmontell |
Date |
2018-03-05 |
Time |
15:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
cmontell |
Date |
2018-03-05 |
Time |
15:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2018-03-05 15:07:54 | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW FAIL | | | | 1 - 2017 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 107.1 GENERAL. ( NEED | | MCHANICAL PLANS ) |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2018-11-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2018-11-01 |
Time |
15:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2018-11-01 |
Time |
15:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-09-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jesmith |
Date |
2018-09-27 |
Time |
14:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jesmith |
Date |
2018-09-27 |
Time |
14:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2018-09-27 14:52:24 | CODES IN EFFECT: | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2017 6TH EDITION | | WPB FBC = WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC 2017 | | 6TH ED, CHAPTER 1. | | FBC EC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION 2017 | | 6TH EDITION | | FBC RES = FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE 2017 6TH EDITION | | FBC ACC = FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE 2017 6TH EDITION | | FBC PL = FLORIDA PLUMBING CODE 2017 6TH EDITION | | FAC= FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | FS = FLORIDA STATUTES | | | | 4TH REVIEW: | | PLUMBING COMMENTS: DENIED | | | | 1. PLAN SHEET P-1 SHOWING WATER DISTRIBUTION IS MISSING | | FROM NEW SUBMITTAL. HAVING REVIEWED VOIDED P-1 SHEET | | REV 1, PLEASE NOTE THAT THE WATER DISTRIBUTION PLAN | | SHALL SHOW AN INDIVIDUAL COLD WATER SUPPLY WITH | | ACCESSIBLE VALVE PER FPC PL 606.1 (6) FOR EACH UNIT. | | THE DIAGRAM SHALL SHOW HOT AND COLD WATER DISTRIBUTION | | FOR EACH UNIT PER WPB FBC 702.1. | | A. PLEASE REVIEW RED LINED NOTES MADE ON VOIDED SHEET | | P-1 REV 1 FOR CLARIFICATION. | | 2. ALL NEW SANITARY BRANCHES AND STACK(S) TO CONNECT, | | IN METHODS COMPLIANT WITH FBC PL 704.1 AND SECTION 706, | | TO THE EXISTING BUILDING DRAIN UPSTREAM OF THE EXTERIOR | | FOOTER AND NOTED AS SUCH ON THE SANITARY PLAN VIEW AND | | THE SANITARY ISOMETRIC PER WPB FBC 107.2.1. | | 3. THE KITCHEN SINK IN APT #1 REQUIRES A VENT WHICH MAY | | BE AN AIR ADMITTANCE VALVE, RE-VENT OR THROUGH THE | | ROOF. | | | | | | | | JERALD SMITH | | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | EMAIL [email protected] | | PHONE 561-805-6715 | | | | | | | | JERALD SMITH | | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | EMAIL [email protected] | | PHONE 561-805-6715 |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-08-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2018-08-02 |
Time |
18:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2018-08-02 |
Time |
18:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2018-08-02 18:46:30 | 2ND REVIEW: | | 2017 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 6TH EDITION | | 2017 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE - PLUMBING, SIXTH EDITION | | 2017 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE - ACCESSIBILITY, SIXTH | | EDITION | | 2017 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE - FUEL GAS, SIXTH EDITION | | 2017 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE - RESIDENTIAL, SIXTH EDITION | | 2017 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE - EXISTING BUILDING, SIXTH | | EDITION | | 2017 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE - ENERGY CONSERVATION, SIXTH | | EDITION | | | | PLUMBING COMMENTS: | | | | 1. THE 2" LINE CONNECTING THE KITCHEN ON THE FIRST | | FLOOR SHALL BE VENTED BY A VENT THAT RUN THROUGH THE | | ROOF OR BE CONNECTED TO THE BUILDING DRAIN BEFORE | | EXITING BUILDING. PER FBC PL 904.1 AND MANUFACTURE | | SPECIFICATION. | | | | 2. SHOW A COMPLETE BUILDING DRAIN ON THE FIRST FLOOR | | ISOMETRIC INCLUDING THE SOIL STACKS FROM SECOND FLOOR. | | PER WPB AMEND TO FBC 107.2.1. | | | | 3. THE HORIZONTAL BRANCH DRAIN FOR THE WASHING MACHINE | | SHALL BE 3" IF USING AN AIR ADMITTANCE VALVE. PER | | MANUFACTURE INSTALLATION GUIDE. | | | | 4. THE 3" SOIL STACKS THAT ARE RUNNING DOWN THROUGH THE | | EXTERIOR WALL MAR INTERFERE WITH THE WIDTH OF A 2 X 4 | | WALL THE 3" FITTING ARE LARGER THAN THE INSIDE SPACE OF | | THE WALL ALSO WILL THE PIPE BE RUNNING DOWN THROUGH TH | | FOOTER PLEASE CLARIFY. PER WPB AMEND TO FBC 107.2.1 | | | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED | | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. | | WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE | | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY | | RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. PLEASE, ADDITIONALLY, INSERT | | CORRECTED PAGES INTO TO SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE OR VOID | | THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS. | | | | GEORGE JOHNSON | | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6711 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-04-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2018-04-27 |
Time |
15:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2018-04-26 |
Time |
16:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2018-04-27 15:31:00 | 2ND REVIEW: FBC 2017 6TH EDITION | | | | PLUMBING COMMENTS: | | | | 2ND REQUEST 1. PROVIDE WATER ISOMETRIC FOR NEW BATHROOM | | ON 2ND FLOOR. WPB AMEND TO FBC 107.3.5.1.3(3)(13) | | | | 2. THE SANITARY ISOMETRIC IS ONLY SHOWING THE WASHING | | MACHINE AND NEW BATHROOM ON 2ND FLOOR IS THIS THE ONLY | | NEW PIPING BEING DONE. WPB AMEND TO FBC 107.2.1 | | | | 3. ARE THE WATER HEATERS EXISTING TO REMAIN OR ARE THEY | | NEW PLEASE PLACE NOTE ON PLAN. WPB AMEND TO FBC 107.2.1 | | | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED | | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. | | WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE | | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY | | RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. PLEASE, ADDITIONALLY, INSERT | | CORRECTED PAGES INTO TO SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE OR VOID | | THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS. | | | | GEORGE JOHNSON | | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6711 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-03-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2018-03-14 |
Time |
08:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2018-03-14 |
Time |
07:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2018-03-14 08:45:19 | 1ST REVIEW: FBC 2017 6TH EDITION | | | | PLUMBING COMMENTS: | | | | 1. PROVIDE WATER ISOMETRIC SHOW EXISTING AND NEW. PER | | WPB AMEND TO FBC 107.3.5.1.3(13) | | | | 2. THE SOIL STACK FOR 2ND FLOOR IS NOT SHOWN ON 1ST | | FLOOR ISOMETRIC, THE LAUNDRY IS NOT SHOWN ON 2ND FLOOR | | ISOMETRIC SHOW ALL NEW AND EXISTING PIPING AND MARK IT | | AS EXISTING OR NEW. PER WPB AMEND TO FBC | | 107.3.5.1.3(13) | | | | 3. BACKFLOW REQUIRED ON WATER SERVICE SHOW ON WATER | | ISOMETRIC NEW OR EXISTING. PER WPB UTILITIES DEPARTMENT | | CROSS CONNECTION MANUAL | | | | 4. THE COVER SHEET UNDER SCOPE OF WORK LISTED AS A | | SINGLE FAMILY HOME THIS DRELLING IS AN R2 OCCUPANCY PER | | FBC 310.4 PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED | | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. | | WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE | | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY | | RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. PLEASE, ADDITIONALLY, INSERT | | CORRECTED PAGES INTO TO SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE OR VOID | | THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS. | | | | GEORGE JOHNSON | | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6711 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2018-11-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2018-11-01 |
Time |
10:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2018-11-01 |
Time |
10:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2018-11-01 10:47:28 | ROOFING WILL BE BY DEFERRED SUBMITTAL. |
|
|
Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-10-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-10-18 |
Time |
17:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-10-18 |
Time |
17:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2018-10-18 17:44:27 | 1) PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY | | FAC 61G20-3.001 FOR: | | NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS DEFERRED | | SUBMITTAL, BUT BEFORE INSTALLATION (NO FEES). | | | | A) FLAT ROOF. AND, CLEARLY MARK WHICH APPROVED ASSEMBLY | | IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE | | DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. 1609 FBC. NOTE: IF THE | | SELECTED ASSEMBLY DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR | | ALL ROOF ZONES, THEN SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 | | CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED. | | | | RESPONSE: | | NO PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS SUBMITTED. NEED PRODUCT | | APPROVAL AND SPECIFIC ASSEMBLY TO BE INSTALLED. | | | | B) ROOF TILE ADHESIVE REFERENCED IN ROOF TILE NOA | | 15-0915.09 SUBMITTED. ROOF TILE ADHESIVE RTA-1 | | SUBMITTED IS NOT THE ONE REFERENCED IN THE NOA FOR CLAY | | TILE. AND, CLEARLY MARK PADDY SIZE. | | | | 2) DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING | | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ABOVE PRODUCT APPROVALS AS | | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | APPROVED: | | CLAY TILE NOA 15-0915.09 |
|
|
Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-07-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-07-17 |
Time |
09:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-07-17 |
Time |
09:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2018-07-17 09:40:18 | 1-- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY | | FAC 61G20-3.001 FOR: | | NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS DEFERRED | | SUBMITTAL, BUT BEFORE INSTALLATION (NO FEES). | | | | A) FLAT ROOF. AND, CLEARLY MARK WHICH APPROVED ASSEMBLY | | IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE | | DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. 1609 FBC. NOTE: IF THE | | SELECTED ASSEMBLY DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR | | ALL ROOF ZONES, THEN SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 | | CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED. | | | | B) ROOF TILE. | | | | C) ROOF TILE ADHESIVE IF SPECIFIED BY THE DESIGNER OF | | RECORD. AND SPECIFY PADDY SIZE. SEE ROOF TILE PRODUCT | | APPROVAL FOR LISTED ADHESIVES. | | | | 2-- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING | | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ABOVE PRODUCT APPROVALS AS | | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
|
|
Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-05-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-05-02 |
Time |
18:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-05-02 |
Time |
18:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2018-05-02 18:24:20 | 1- THE MINIMUM ATTACHMENT RESISTANCE (26.1 FT-LBF) OF | | ADHESIVE SELECTED ON PAGE 5 OF 6 OF NOA 16-0112.08 | | SUBMITTED DOESN'T MEET THE MINIMUM ATTACHMENT | | RESISTANCE OF TABLE 2A OF FRSA 5TH EDITION (REVISED). | | REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | DESIGNER OF RECORD TO SPECIFY ROOF TILE FASTENING AS | | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS. IF | | SPECIFYING SCREWS, THEN SPECIFY SIZE AND NUMBER OF | | SCREWS. IF SPECIFYING ROOF TILE ADHESIVE, THEN SPECIFY | | PADDY SIZE AND PRODUCT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. | | | | 2- SELECTED ASSEMBLY ON PAGE 28-29 OF NOA 14-1030.02 | | SUBMITTED DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR ALL | | ROOF ZONES. NEED SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 | | CALCULATIONS. SEE GENERAL LIMITATION #7 ON LAST PAGE OF | | NOA. | | NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS DEFERRED | | SUBMITTAL, BUT BEFORE INSTALLATION. | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | FLAT ROOF NOA 15-1020.01 SUBMITTED: CLEARLY MARK WHICH | | APPROVED ASSEMBLY IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED TO VERIFY | | COMPLIANCE WITH THE DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. 1609 | | FBC-BUILDING. IF THE SELECTED ASSEMBLY DOESN'T MEET THE | | DESIGN PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF ZONES, THEN SIGNED AND | | SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED. RAS 117 | | CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE THE FLORIDA | | ENGINEER'S SEAL AND ORIGINAL HANDWRITTEN SIGNATURE, | | COPIES OR OTHER FACSIMILES ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. FAC | | 61G15 - 23.002 DIGITAL SIGNATURES ARE ONLY ACCEPTABLE | | FOR ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMITTED PLANS AND DOCUMENTS. | | | | 3- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY | | FAC 61G20-3.001 FOR: | | NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS DEFERRED | | SUBMITTAL, BUT BEFORE INSTALLATION. | | | | A) NO SUBMITTED. PROVIDE ACTUAL PRODUCT APPROVAL LISTED | | ON THE NOA FOR ROOF TILE. | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | ROOF TILE ADHESIVE IF SPECIFIED BY THE DESIGNER OF | | RECORD ON ITEM #12 ABOVE. AND SPECIFY PADDY SIZE. SEE | | ROOF TILE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR LISTED ADHESIVES. | | | | | | ROOF TILE NOA 16-0112.08 | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-03-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-03-16 |
Time |
11:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-03-16 |
Time |
11:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2018-03-16 11:40:13 | 1- FLAT ROOF NOA 15-1020.01 SUBMITTED: CLEARLY MARK | | WHICH APPROVED ASSEMBLY IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED TO | | VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. | | 1609 FBC-BUILDING. IF THE SELECTED ASSEMBLY DOESN'T | | MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF ZONES, THEN | | SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED. | | RAS 117 CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE THE FLORIDA | | ENGINEER'S SEAL AND ORIGINAL HANDWRITTEN SIGNATURE, | | COPIES OR OTHER FACSIMILES ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. FAC | | 61G15 - 23.002 DIGITAL SIGNATURES ARE ONLY ACCEPTABLE | | FOR ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMITTED PLANS AND DOCUMENTS. | | | | 2- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY | | FAC 61G20-3.001 FOR: | | A) ROOF TILE ADHESIVE IF SPECIFIED BY THE DESIGNER OF | | RECORD. AND SPECIFY PADDY SIZE. SEE ROOF TILE PRODUCT | | APPROVAL FOR LISTED ADHESIVES. | | | | | | APPROVED: | | 1) ENTEGRA ROOF TILE NOA 16-0112.08 | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
|
Date |
2018-10-04 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
pgreilic |
Date |
2018-10-02 |
Time |
16:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2018-10-04 15:50:35 | 1.) LANDSCAPE PERMIT REQUIRED | | | | PAUL GREILICH, SENIOR PLANNER | | 561-822-1443 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
|
Date |
2018-07-10 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
pgreilic |
Date |
2018-07-06 |
Time |
14:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2018-07-10 09:29:37 | 1.) PROVIDE DEMENSIONS FOR ALL PROPOSED ROOMS | | | | PAUL GREILICH, SENIOR PLANNER | | 561-822-1443 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
|
Date |
2018-05-04 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
pgreilic |
Date |
2018-05-04 |
Time |
16:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2018-05-04 16:43:13 | PLEASE INDICATE ON SITE PLAN/SURVEY IS BUILDING IS | | BEING EXPANDED. IF SO, PLEASE LABEL PROPOSED FRONT, | | REAR AND SIDE SETBACKS | | | | PAUL GREILICH, SENIOR PLANNER | | 561-822-1443 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
PG |
Date |
2018-04-06 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
pgreilic |
Date |
2018-04-05 |
Time |
14:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2018-04-06 10:42:01 | 1.) LABEL PROPOSED HEIGHT OF ALL ELEVATIONS | | 2.) IS BUILDING FOOTPRINT BEING ALTERED? INDICATE ON | | PLAN IF SO | | | | PAUL GREILICH, SENIOR PLANNER | | 561-822-1443 | | [email protected] |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |