 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 18020006
Plan Review Stops For Permit 18020006 |
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2018-08-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
cthroop |
Date |
2018-08-15 |
Time |
16:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
cthroop |
Date |
2018-08-15 |
Time |
15:21 |
Sent To |
I |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-07-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2018-07-03 |
Time |
17:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2018-07-03 |
Time |
17:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2018-07-03 17:40:50 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | [email protected] | | 561-805-6724 | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014) | | FBC B = FBC BUILDING | | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING | | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY | | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION | | | | FBC B 1609 | | | | 1. THE ENGINEER'S LETTER STATES THAT THE "COMPOSITE | | PANELS" HAVE NO PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | | | THE LETTER SHOULD BE SPECIFIC AS TO PRODUCT, AND THAT | | THE PRODUCT DOES HAVE AN NOA BUT FOR USE AS A WALL | | PANEL, NOT A ROOF PANEL. REVISE TO REFERENCE. | | | | 2. THE LETTER STATES THAT THE PANELS ARE ADJUDGED | | "STRUCTURALLY EQUAL" TO METL-SPAN CFR PANELS. THE TWO | | PRODUCTS ARE DIFFERENT (FOAM DENSITY, STEEL GAGE); | | INCLUDE THE DIFFERENCES IN THE LETTER. | | | | 3. THE LETTER STATES THAT THE PRODUCT WILL "SPAN 48"". | | IT IS NOT CLEAR WHERE THIS IS; THE ROOF PANEL NOA SPANS | | 60", WALL SPAN DOES NOT APPEAR RELEVANT; CLARIFY OR | | REMOVE. | | | | 4. THE LETTER SHOULD SPECIFICALLY STATE THAT THE WALL | | PANEL NOA IS ACCEPTABLE FOR USE AS A ROOF PANEL. | | | | 5. THE PLANS APPEAR TO SHOW THE ROOF PANELS SECURED TO | | THE WALL PANELS WITH "TRIM" AND NO OTHER SUPPORT AT | | EACH END. SEE THE ROOF PANEL NOA, PAGE 3, HIGH EAVE | | DETAIL AND EVE DETAIL. THE INSTALLATION SHOULD BE | | CONSISTENT WITH THE NOA OR A DETAIL WITH SIMILAR | | SUPPORT PROVIDED. | | | | 6. IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT A ROOF COVERING WAS | | INSTALLED; PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION - PRODUCT | | APPROVAL, METHOD OF INSTALLATION. REVISE PLAN TO | | INCLUDE THE ROOF COVERING. | | | | 7. PROVIDE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR THE ROOF. SEE SHEET 1 | | OF 3, ROOF PANEL NOA. REVISE PLAN TO PROPOSE PERLIN | | SUPPORT AS NEEDED FOR SPECIFIED DESIGN PRESSURES. | | | | 8. SHEET 1, THE EXPANSION BOLT IS SHOWN GRAPHICALLY TOO | | CLOSE TO THE EDGE OF THE CONCRETE. REVISE TO SHOW | | DISTANCE OF EACH BOLT TO EDGE, AND DISTANCE BETWEEN | | BOLTS. PROVIDE THE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE BOLTS SO | | REQUIRED SEPARATION AND EDGE DISTANCE CAN BE CONFIRMED. | | THE WAY THE DETAIL IS DRAWN, FAILURE OF THE CONCRETE AT | | THE TOP IS POSSIBLE. | | | | 9. THE NOA FOR THE ROOF PANELS, HIGH EAVE DETAIL AND | | EAVE DETAIL, SHOW FASTENERS FROM "EAVE STRUCTURE BY | | OTHERS" TO THE WALL PANEL, BUT DOES NOT SPECIFY | | SPACING. REVISE PLAN TO INCLUDE. | | | | 10. A MECHANICAL UNIT IS SHOWN ABOVE THE COOLER. HOW | | WILL THIS BE ACCESSED FOR SERVICE? FBC B TABLE 1607.1, | | IT APPEARS THAT THE ONLY ACCESS IS OVER THE TOP OF THE | | COOLER, BUT THE COOLER ROOF DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE | | DESIGNED FOR THE REQUIRED LOAD OF 300# PSF. | | | | 11. FBC B TABLE 1607.1, REVISE PLAN TO CLARIFY THAT THE | | ROOF MEETS THE LIVE LOAD REQUIREMENT OF 20# PSF. | | | | 12. AFTER PERMIT IS ISSUED AND INSTALLATION IS | | COMPLETE, AN ENGINEER'S INSPECTION AND LETTER/REPORT | | WILL BE REQUIRED DUE TO THE UNUSUAL NATURE OF THE | | CONSTRUCTION, FBC 110.3.9. | | | | 13. FOR THE WALL PANELS, ON THE PRODUCT APPROVAL | | INDICATE | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-05-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
cthroop |
Date |
2018-05-05 |
Time |
09:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
cthroop |
Date |
2018-05-05 |
Time |
07:38 |
Sent To |
M |
|
Notes |
2018-05-05 09:52:59 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | 2014 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 6TH EDITION W/2010 WEST | | PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, | | CHAPTER 1 ADMINISTRATION | | | | CHRISTOPHER S. THROOP, C.B.O. | | PLANS EXAMINER, PX3169 | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DIVISION | | TEL: 561-805-6726 | | FAX: 561-805-6676 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | 3RD REVIEW | | RESULTS: DENIED | | ADDRESS THE ATTACHED COMMENTS AND RE-SUBMIT | | | | 1. JOB ADDRESS LISTED ON PLAN REVIEW REQUEST FORM IS | | 538 NORTHWOOD RD. CORRECT ADDRESS FOR THIS PROJECTL IS | | 3815 S DIXIE HWY. PLEASE CLARIFY. | | 2. CONTRACTOR LISTED ON LATEST PLAN REVIEW REQUEST FORM | | IS EDRIK BANDEZ, GENERAL CONTRACTOR, CGC1522589. | | CONTRACTOR FOR MECHANICAL SUB-PERMIT IS EVID VALERO, | | CAC1817915. PLEASE CLARIFY. | | 3. RESPONSE FROM METRO DESIGN GROUP IN RESPONSE TO PLAN | | REVIEW COMMENT DENYING THE USE OF KINGSPAN INSULATED | | PANELS TO BE USED FOR THE ROOF OF THE WALK-IN COOLER | | STATES "THE ROOF HAS BEEN INSTALLED AND INSPECTED UNDER | | THE BUILDING MASTER ROOFING PERMIT". NO RECORD CAN BE | | FOUND OF A PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THESE COMPOSITE WALL | | PANELS BEING SUBMITTED AND/OR APPROVED FOR ANY PREVIOUS | | PERMIT. ALSO, THERE IS NO INSPECTION HISTORY THAT THESE | | INSULATED PANELS WRE INSPECTED AND APPROVED FOR THE | | APPLIED USE. | | PROVIDE SITE SPECIFIC ENGINEERING FOR THE KINGSPAN | | INSULATED PANELS TO BE USED AS A ROOF SYSTEM COMPONENT. | | DEMONSTRATE THAT THE PANELS, WHEN USED IN THIS | | APPLICATION, WILL MEET OR EXCEED THE ANTICIPATED WIND | | LOADS FOR THEIR LOCATION AND USE. | | | | PLANS THAT HAVE BEEN PREPARED BY AN ENGINEER AND | | SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD SHALL BEAR THE SIGNATURE, | | DATE AND SEAL OF THE ENGINEER PER FL ADMIN. CODE RULE | | 61G15-23.001. | | | | CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT CLARITY | | TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE AND EXTENT OF THE WORK | | PROPOSED AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT WILL CONFORM TO THE | | PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE AND RELEVANT LAWS, ORDINANCES, | | RULES AND REGULATIONS, AS DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING | | OFFICIAL. | | | | FBC 107.3.5.1.1(8) ? PROVIDE WIND DESIGN LOADS/DESIGN | | PRESSURES PURSUANT TO FBC-CHAPTER 16 | | | | 1603.1.4 WIND DESIGN DATA. | | THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION RELATED TO WIND LOADS SHALL | | BE SHOWN, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER WIND LOADS GOVERN THE | | DESIGN OF THE LATERAL FORCE-RESISTING SYSTEM OF THE | | STRUCTURE: | | 1. ULTIMATE DESIGN WIND SPEED, VULT, (3-SECOND GUST), | | MILES PER HOUR (KM/HR) AND NOMINAL DESIGN WIND SPEED, | | VASD, AS DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION | | 1609.3.1. | | 2. RISK CATEGORY. | | 3. WIND EXPOSURE. APPLICABLE WIND DIRECTION IF MORE | | THAN ONE WIND EXPOSURE IS UTILIZED. | | 4. APPLICABLE INTERNAL PRESSURE COEFFICIENT. | | 5. DESIGN WIND PRESSURES TO BE USED FOR EXTERIOR | | COMPONENT AND CLADDING MATERIALS NOT SPECIFICALLY | | DESIGNED BY THE REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN OF THE STRUCTURE, PSF (KN/ | | M2). | | | | F.S. 553.80 (2) (B) | | (B)?WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS? | | DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT NECESSARY, IN | | ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING | | CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT DESIGN DOCUMENTS | | REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE TIMES FOR FAILURE TO | | CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY | | NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, | | EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, | | ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, | | MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS SYSTEMS, OR OTHER | | REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING | | COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL | | GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH | | REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, | | A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT OF THE PROPORTION OF THE | | PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS REVIEW. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-03-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
cthroop |
Date |
2018-03-19 |
Time |
11:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
cthroop |
Date |
2018-03-19 |
Time |
10:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2018-03-19 11:36:46 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | 2017 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 6TH EDITION W/2017 WEST | | PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, | | CHAPTER 1 ADMINISTRATION | | | | CHRISTOPHER S. THROOP, C.B.O. | | PLANS EXAMINER, PX3169 | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DIVISION | | TEL: 561-805-6726 | | FAX: 561-805-6676 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | 2ND REVIEW | | RESULTS: DENIED | | ADDRESS THE ATTACHED COMMENTS AND RE-SUBMIT | | | | 1. COMPOSITE WALL PANEL SYSTEM PER NOA 16-0706.08 IS | | NOT DESIGNED FOR USE AS HORIZONTAL MEMBERS. THEY ARE | | BEING USED AS A ROOF SYSTEM COMPONENT FOR THE PROPOSED | | COOLER. | | 2. PER SECTION 5. OF THE NOA, THE WALL PANELS REQUIRE A | | STRUCTURAL SUPPORT SYSTEM. | | PLEASE CLARIFY. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-02-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
cthroop |
Date |
2018-02-12 |
Time |
07:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
cthroop |
Date |
2018-02-10 |
Time |
11:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2018-02-12 08:01:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | 2017 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 6TH EDITION W/2010 WEST | | PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, | | CHAPTER 1 ADMINISTRATION | | | | CHRISTOPHER S. THROOP, C.B.O. | | PLANS EXAMINER, PX3169 | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DIVISION | | TEL: 561-805-6726 | | FAX: 561-805-6676 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | 1ST REVIEW | | RESULTS: DENIED | | ADDRESS THE ATTACHED COMMENTS AND RE-SUBMIT | | | | 1. PLAN DESIGN IS BASED ON THE 2014 FBC 5TH ED. PROVIDE | | DESIGN BASED ON THE 2017 FBC 6TH ED. | | 2. PLAN PAGE #1 REFERENCES NOA 13-0909.11. THIS NOA IS | | VOID AND THERE IS NO DESCRIPTION OF IT'S PURPOSE. | | 3. PROVIDE NOA FOR COOLER DOORS. | | 4. PROVIDE DESIGN AND NOA FOR RAIN COVER (ROOF) OF | | COOLER. | | 5. PROVIDE DETAIL OR NOA FOR WALL BRACKET. | | 6. PROVIDE FOUNDATION DETAIL. | | | | ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, SYSTEMS AND | | SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE 2017 | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 6TH EDITION. | | | | FBC 107.3.4 - PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THOSE | | PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY FAC RULE 9N-3 REVIEWED | | AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. | | | | 107.2.1 INFORMATION ON CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. | | CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE | | DIMENSIONED AND DRAWN UPON SUITABLE MATERIAL. | | CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT CLARITY | | TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE AND EXTENT OF THE WORK | | PROPOSED AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT WILL CONFORM TO THE | | PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE AND RELEVANT LAWS, ORDINANCES, | | RULES AND REGULATIONS, AS DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING | | OFFICIAL. | | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED | | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. | | WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE | | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY | | RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. PLEASE, ADDITIONALLY, INSERT | | CORRECTED PAGES INTO SUBMITTAL AND LEAVE THE PREVIOUSLY | | REVIEWED SHEETS DETACHED AND MARK VOID. | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2018-08-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
cthroop |
Date |
2018-08-15 |
Time |
16:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
cthroop |
Date |
2018-07-31 |
Time |
14:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2018-08-01 14:43:25 | RESUB ROUTED TO CCOLE |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2018-07-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2018-07-03 |
Time |
09:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2018-06-22 |
Time |
13:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2018-06-25 13:15:47 | RESUB ROUTED TO CCOLE |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
|
Date |
2018-05-10 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2018-03-27 |
Time |
13:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2018-04-30 11:01:26 | 4/30 TO CT DESK | | | 2018-04-02 18:46:08 | 4/2 ON SH DESK | | | | | 2018-03-28 13:33:04 | RESUB ROUTED TO CCOLE |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2018-03-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
cthroop |
Date |
2018-03-19 |
Time |
11:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
cthroop |
Date |
2018-03-07 |
Time |
13:13 |
Sent To |
I |
|
Notes |
2018-03-08 13:13:49 | RESUB ROUTED TO CCOLE |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
|
Date |
2018-02-09 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2018-02-02 |
Time |
13:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2018-02-02 13:03:07 | ROUTED TO MECHANICAL INBOX |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2018-08-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
ccole |
Date |
2018-08-07 |
Time |
09:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
ccole |
Date |
2018-08-07 |
Time |
09:28 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2018-08-07 09:41:02 | PROVISO: | | MECHANICAL APPROVAL IS FOR THE WALK-IN COOLER | | REFRIGERATION SYSTEM ONLY. | | THE WALK-IN BOX HAS A BUILDING REVIEW PENDING. | | CCOLE- 8/7/18 | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-07-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
ccole |
Date |
2018-07-09 |
Time |
09:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
ccole |
Date |
2018-07-09 |
Time |
09:48 |
Sent To |
I |
|
Notes |
2018-07-09 09:55:42 | 4TH REVIEW FBC-2017 MECHANICAL | | PERMIT #18020006 | | 7/9/18 | | | | PLAN REVIEW RESULTS: DENIED. | | | | 1) PLEASE SEE THE BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS BY SAMANTHA | | HILL DATED 7/3/18 . MECHANICAL APPROVAL FOR THE WALKIN | | COOLER IS CONTINGENT ON ALL BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS | | ADDRESSED, AND THE RESUBMITTAL OF CORRECTED PLANS AND | | DOCUMENTS. | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE | | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY | | RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE INSERT | | CORRECTED PLAN SHEETS INTO THE SETS, REMOVE THE | | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS AND MARK VOID ON THEM, AND | | KEEP THEM WITH THE SUBMITTALS. | | | | CHRISTOPHER L. COLE | | MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET | | WEST PALM BEACH FL 33401 | | 561-805-6719 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-05-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
ccole |
Date |
2018-05-10 |
Time |
15:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
ccole |
Date |
2018-05-10 |
Time |
15:39 |
Sent To |
I |
|
Notes |
2018-05-10 16:30:42 | 3RD REVIEW FBC-2017 MECHANICAL | | PERMIT #18020006 | | 5/10/18 | | | | PLAN REVIEW RESULTS: DENIED. | | | | 1) THE USE OF THE KINGSPAN 300 INSULATED WALL PANELS TO | | FORM THE ROOF OF THE WALK-IN COOLER IS STILL IN | | QUESTION BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. AS PREVIOUSLY | | STATED IN THE1ST AND 2ND REVIEWS, THE ENGINEERING | | REPORT CONTAINED IN THE MIAMI-DADE NOA #16-0706.08 | | INDICATES THE PANELS HAVE BEEN EVALUATED AS NON BEARING | | EXTERIOR WALL PANELS. THEY HAVE NOT BEEN EVALUATED AS A | | ROOF | | | | PANEL. IN RESPONSE, THE PROJECT MANAGER HAS SUBMITTED A | | DOCUMENT FROM THE MANUFACTURER TITLED "UNIFORM WIND + | | THERMAL LOAD". THIS STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS APPEARS TO BE | | FOR AN INDIVIDUAL WALL PANEL, AND DOES NOT ADDRESS THE | | USE OF THE PANEL AS A ROOF PANEL. FURTHER, THE ANALYSIS | | IS NOT SITE SPECIFIC AND IS NOT SIGNED AND SEALED BY A | | FLORIDA REGISTERED ENGINEER AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA | | | | STAUTE 471, AND FAC 16G15-23.002. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE | | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY | | RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE INSERT | | CORRECTED PLAN SHEETS INTO THE SETS, REMOVE THE | | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS AND MARK VOID ON THEM, AND | | KEEP THEM WITH THE SUBMITTALS. | | | | CHRISTOPHER L. COLE | | MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET | | WEST PALM BEACH FL 33401 | | 561-805-6719 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-03-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
ccole |
Date |
2018-03-14 |
Time |
17:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
ccole |
Date |
2018-03-14 |
Time |
17:36 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2018-03-14 18:02:37 | 1ST REVIEW FBC-2014 MECHANICAL | | PERMIT #18020006 | | 3/14/18 | | | | PLAN REVIEW RESULTS: DENIED. | | | | 1) COMMENT #3 FROM THE 1ST REVIEW STILL EXISTS. I HAVE | | REPRINTED IT BELOW WITH SOME ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: | | | | NOA #16-0706.08 PROVIDES ENGINEERING CERTIFICATION FOR | | THE THERMALSPAN 300 INSULATED METAL WALL PANELS. THERE | | ARE NO DETAILS OR CERTIFICATIONS ON THE NOA FOR THE | | ROOF PANELS, AND NO TYPICAL DETAILS ARE PROVIDED FOR | | ATTACHMENT AND SUPPORT OF ROOF PANELS. | | | | PLEASE REFER TO THE ENGINEERING REPORT & DRAWINGS FOR | | THE THERMALSPAN 300 INSULATED METAL WALL PANELS | | ATTACHED WITH THE NOA. ON PAGE 2 OF THE DOCUMENT SEE | | ITEM 3.0 EVALUATED USES, AND 4.0 ASSEMBLY DESCRIPTION. | | THE ENGINEER IS CLEARLY STATING THAT THESE PANELS ARE | | NON-LOAD BEARING AND CAN ONLY BE INSTALLED VERTICALLY. | | THE DRAWING ON PLAN SHEET 2 IS DEPICTING AN | | | | INSTALLATION INCONSISTENT WITH THE ENGINEERING | | CERTIFICATION, AND BEYOND THE LIMITATIONS OF USE FOR | | THE PANEL. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE | | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY | | RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE INSERT | | CORRECTED PLAN SHEETS INTO THE SETS, REMOVE THE | | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS AND MARK VOID ON THEM, AND | | KEEP THEM WITH THE SUBMITTALS. | | | | CHRISTOPHER L. COLE | | MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET | | WEST PALM BEACH FL 33401 | | 561-805-6719 | | [email protected] | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-02-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
ccole |
Date |
2018-02-08 |
Time |
17:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
ccole |
Date |
2018-02-08 |
Time |
17:05 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2018-02-09 11:25:46 | 1ST REVIEW FBC-2014 MECHANICAL | | PERMIT #18020006 | | 2/9/18 | | | | PLAN REVIEW RESULTS: DENIED. | | | | 1) SHEET 1, DESIGN CRITERIA: THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | SIXTH EDITION-2017 WENT INTO EFFECT ON JAN.1, 2017. | | THIS PERMIT APPLICATION AND PLANS WERE SUBMITTED AFTER | | THAT DATE. PLEASE UPDATE THE DESIGN PARAMETERS FOR THE | | PROJECT, AND THE DESIGN CRITERIA LISTED ON SHEET A1 TO | | BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CURRENT CODES. | | | | 2) SHEET 1: THE NOA #13-0909.11 HAS BEEN SUPERSEDED BY | | #16-0706.08. PLEASE SUBMIT COPIES OF THE NOA WITH | | APPROVAL STAMPS BY THE EOR. | | | | 3) NOA #16-0706.08 PROVIDES ENGINEERING CERTIFICATION | | FOR NONBEARING EXTERIOR WALL PANELS. THERE ARE NO | | DETAILS OR CERTIFICATIONS ON THE NOA FOR THE ROOF | | PANELS, AND NO TYPICAL DETAILS ARE PROVIDED FOR | | ATTACHMENT ABND SUPPORT OF ROOF PANELS. PLEASE NOTE | | THAT THE NOA IS FOR THERMALSPAN 300 PANEL, BUT THE PLAN | | INDICATES ECO-FICIENT PANELS. | | | | 4) PROVIDE AN ATTACHMENT DETAIL ON THE PLAN FOR THE | | VINYL RAIN COVER, AND SUPPORT A PRODUCT DATA SHEET | | APPROVED BY THE EOR. | | | | 5) PROVIDE ENGINEERED DETAILS FOR THE WALL BRACKET. | | CLARIFY IF THE BRACKET IS TO BE SITE BUILT, OR IS THE | | BRACKET A MANUFACTURED PRODUCT THAT HAS A FL. PRODUCT | | APPROVAL OR A MIAMI-DADE NOA? | | | | 6) SPECS FOR THE FJAF-0108-TAC-052 CONDENSER AND THE | | LSCO78TFC EVAPORATOR NOT SUBMITTED. | | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY OCCUR PENDING | | RESUBMITTAL OF CORRECTED PLANS AND DOCUMENTS. | | WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE | | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY | | RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE INSERT | | CORRECTED PLAN SHEETS INTO THE SETS, REMOVE THE | | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS AND MARK VOID ON THEM, AND | | KEEP THEM WITH THE SUBMITTALS. | | | | CHRISTOPHER L. COLE | | MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET | | WEST PALM BEACH FL 33401 | | 561-805-6719 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |